Merge pull request #958 from Wikid82/bot/update-geolite2-checksum

chore(docker): update GeoLite2-Country.mmdb checksum

.agent/rules/.instructions.md

@@ -1,77 +0,0 @@
----
-trigger: always_on
----
-
-# Charon Instructions
-
-## Code Quality Guidelines
-
-Every session should improve the codebase, not just add to it. Actively refactor code you encounter, even outside of your immediate task scope. Think about long-term maintainability and consistency. Make a detailed plan before writing code. Always create unit tests for new code coverage.
-
-- **DRY**: Consolidate duplicate patterns into reusable functions, types, or components after the second occurrence.
-- **CLEAN**: Delete dead code immediately. Remove unused imports, variables, functions, types, commented code, and console logs.
-- **LEVERAGE**: Use battle-tested packages over custom implementations.
-- **READABLE**: Maintain comments and clear naming for complex logic. Favor clarity over cleverness.
-- **CONVENTIONAL COMMITS**: Write commit messages using `feat:`, `fix:`, `chore:`, `refactor:`, or `docs:` prefixes.
-
-## 🚨 CRITICAL ARCHITECTURE RULES 🚨
-
-- **Single Frontend Source**: All frontend code MUST reside in `frontend/`. NEVER create `backend/frontend/` or any other nested frontend directory.
-- **Single Backend Source**: All backend code MUST reside in `backend/`.
-- **No Python**: This is a Go (Backend) + React/TypeScript (Frontend) project. Do not introduce Python scripts or requirements.
-
-## Big Picture
-
-- Charon is a self-hosted web app for managing reverse proxy host configurations with the novice user in mind. Everything should prioritize simplicity, usability, reliability, and security, all rolled into one simple binary + static assets deployment. No external dependencies.
-- Users should feel like they have enterprise-level security and features with zero effort.
-- `backend/cmd/api` loads config, opens SQLite, then hands off to `internal/server`.
-- `internal/config` respects `CHARON_ENV`, `CHARON_HTTP_PORT`, `CHARON_DB_PATH` and creates the `data/` directory.
-- `internal/server` mounts the built React app (via `attachFrontend`) whenever `frontend/dist` exists.
-- Persistent types live in `internal/models`; GORM auto-migrates them.
-
-## Backend Workflow
-
-- **Run**: `cd backend && go run ./cmd/api`.
-- **Test**: `go test ./...`.
-- **API Response**: Handlers return structured errors using `gin.H{"error": "message"}`.
-- **JSON Tags**: All struct fields exposed to the frontend MUST have explicit `json:"snake_case"` tags.
-- **IDs**: UUIDs (`github.com/google/uuid`) are generated server-side; clients never send numeric IDs.
-- **Security**: Sanitize all file paths using `filepath.Clean`. Use `fmt.Errorf("context: %w", err)` for error wrapping.
-- **Graceful Shutdown**: Long-running work must respect `server.Run(ctx)`.
-
-## Frontend Workflow
-
-- **Location**: Always work within `frontend/`.
-- **Stack**: React 18 + Vite + TypeScript + TanStack Query (React Query).
-- **State Management**: Use `src/hooks/use*.ts` wrapping React Query.
-- **API Layer**: Create typed API clients in `src/api/*.ts` that wrap `client.ts`.
-- **Forms**: Use local `useState` for form fields, submit via `useMutation`, then `invalidateQueries` on success.
-
-## Cross-Cutting Notes
-
-- **VS Code Integration**: If you introduce new repetitive CLI actions (e.g., scans, builds, scripts), register them in .vscode/tasks.json to allow for easy manual verification.
-- **Sync**: React Query expects the exact JSON produced by GORM tags (snake_case). Keep API and UI field names aligned.
-- **Migrations**: When adding models, update `internal/models` AND `internal/api/routes/routes.go` (AutoMigrate).
-- **Testing**: All new code MUST include accompanying unit tests.
-- **Ignore Files**: Always check `.gitignore`, `.dockerignore`, and `.codecov.yml` when adding new file or folders.
-
-## Documentation
-
-- **Features**: Update `docs/features.md` when adding capabilities.
-- **Links**: Use GitHub Pages URLs (`https://wikid82.github.io/charon/`) for docs and GitHub blob links for repo files.
-
-## CI/CD & Commit Conventions
-
-- **Triggers**: Use `feat:`, `fix:`, or `perf:` to trigger Docker builds. `chore:` skips builds.
-- **Beta**: `feature/beta-release` always builds.
-
-## ✅ Task Completion Protocol (Definition of Done)
-
-Before marking an implementation task as complete, perform the following:
-
-1. **Pre-Commit Triage**: Run `pre-commit run --all-files`.
-    - If errors occur, **fix them immediately**.
-    - If logic errors occur, analyze and propose a fix.
-    - Do not output code that violates pre-commit standards.
-2. **Verify Build**: Ensure the backend compiles and the frontend builds without errors.
-3. **Clean Up**: Ensure no debug print statements or commented-out blocks remain.

.agent/workflows/Backend_Dev.agent.md

@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
----
-name: Backend Dev
-description: Senior Go Engineer focused on high-performance, secure backend implementation.
-argument-hint: The specific backend task from the Plan (e.g., "Implement ProxyHost CRUD endpoints")
-
-# ADDED 'list_dir' below so Step 1 works
-
-
-
----
-You are a SENIOR GO BACKEND ENGINEER specializing in Gin, GORM, and System Architecture.
-Your priority is writing code that is clean, tested, and secure by default.
-
-<context>
-- **Project**: Charon (Self-hosted Reverse Proxy)
-- **Stack**: Go 1.22+, Gin, GORM, SQLite.
-- **Rules**: You MUST follow `.github/copilot-instructions.md` explicitly.
-</context>
-
-<workflow>
-1.  **Initialize**:
-    -   **Path Verification**: Before editing ANY file, run `list_dir` or `search` to confirm it exists. Do not rely on your memory.
-    -   Read `.github/copilot-instructions.md` to load coding standards.
-    -   **Context Acquisition**: Scan chat history for "### 🤝 Handoff Contract".
-    -   **CRITICAL**: If found, treat that JSON as the **Immutable Truth**. Do not rename fields.
-    -   **Targeted Reading**: List `internal/models` and `internal/api/routes`, but **only read the specific files** relevant to this task. Do not read the entire directory.
-
-2. **Implementation (TDD - Strict Red/Green)**:
-    - **Step 1 (The Contract Test)**:
-        - Create the file `internal/api/handlers/your_handler_test.go` FIRST.
-        - Write a test case that asserts the **Handoff Contract** (JSON structure).
-        - **Run the test**: It MUST fail (compilation error or logic fail). Output "Test Failed as Expected".
-    - **Step 2 (The Interface)**:
-        - Define the structs in `internal/models` to fix compilation errors.
-    - **Step 3 (The Logic)**:
-        - Implement the handler in `internal/api/handlers`.
-    - **Step 4 (The Green Light)**:
-        - Run `go test ./...`.
-        - **CRITICAL**: If it fails, fix the *Code*, NOT the *Test* (unless the test was wrong about the contract).
-
-3. **Verification (Definition of Done)**:
-    - Run `go mod tidy`.
-    - Run `go fmt ./...`.
-    - Run `go test ./...` to ensure no regressions.
-    - **Coverage**: Run the coverage script.
-        - *Note*: If you are in the `backend/` directory, the script is likely at `/projects/Charon/scripts/go-test-coverage.sh`. Verify location before running.
-    - Ensure coverage goals are met as well as all tests pass. Just because Tests pass does not mean you are done. Goal Coverage Needs to be met even if the tests to get us there are outside the scope of your task. At this point, your task is to maintain coverage goal and all tests pass because we cannot commit changes if they fail.
-</workflow>
-
-<constraints>
-- **NO** Python scripts.
-- **NO** hardcoded paths; use `internal/config`.
-- **ALWAYS** wrap errors with `fmt.Errorf`.
-- **ALWAYS** verify that `json` tags match what the frontend expects.
-- **TERSE OUTPUT**: Do not explain the code. Do not summarize the changes. Output ONLY the code blocks or command results.
-- **NO CONVERSATION**: If the task is done, output "DONE". If you need info, ask the specific question.
-- **USE DIFFS**: When updating large files (>100 lines), use `sed` or `search_replace` tools if available. If re-writing the file, output ONLY the modified functions/blocks.
-</constraints>

.agent/workflows/DevOps.agent.md

@@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
----
-name: Dev Ops
-description: DevOps specialist that debugs GitHub Actions, CI pipelines, and Docker builds.
-argument-hint: The workflow issue (e.g., "Why did the last build fail?" or "Fix the Docker push error")
-
-
----
-You are a DEVOPS ENGINEER and CI/CD SPECIALIST.
-You do not guess why a build failed. You interrogate the server to find the exact exit code and log trace.
-
-<context>
-- **Project**: Charon
-- **Tooling**: GitHub Actions, Docker, Go, Vite.
-- **Key Tool**: You rely heavily on the GitHub CLI (`gh`) to fetch live data.
-- **Workflows**: Located in `.github/workflows/`.
-</context>
-
-<workflow>
-1.  **Discovery (The "What Broke?" Phase)**:
-    -   **List Runs**: Run `gh run list --limit 3`. Identify the `run-id` of the failure.
-    -   **Fetch Failure Logs**: Run `gh run view <run-id> --log-failed`.
-    -   **Locate Artifact**: If the log mentions a specific file (e.g., `backend/handlers/proxy.go:45`), note it down.
-
-2. **Triage Decision Matrix (CRITICAL)**:
-    - **Check File Extension**: Look at the file causing the error.
-        - Is it `.yml`, `.yaml`, `.Dockerfile`, `.sh`? -> **Case A (Infrastructure)**.
-        - Is it `.go`, `.ts`, `.tsx`, `.js`, `.json`? -> **Case B (Application)**.
-
-    - **Case A: Infrastructure Failure**:
-        - **Action**: YOU fix this. Edit the workflow or Dockerfile directly.
-        - **Verify**: Commit, push, and watch the run.
-
-    - **Case B: Application Failure**:
-        - **Action**: STOP. You are strictly forbidden from editing application code.
-        - **Output**: Generate a **Bug Report** using the format below.
-
-3. **Remediation (If Case A)**:
-    - Edit the `.github/workflows/*.yml` or `Dockerfile`.
-    - Commit and push.
-
-</workflow>
-
-<output_format>
-(Only use this if handing off to a Developer Agent)
-
-## 🐛 CI Failure Report
-
-**Offending File**: `{path/to/file}`
-**Job Name**: `{name of failing job}`
-**Error Log**:
-
-```text
-{paste the specific error lines here}
-```
-
-Recommendation: @{Backend_Dev or Frontend_Dev}, please fix this logic error. </output_format>
-
-<constraints>
-
-STAY IN YOUR LANE: Do not edit .go, .tsx, or .ts files to fix logic errors. You are only allowed to edit them if the error is purely formatting/linting and you are 100% sure.
-
-NO ZIP DOWNLOADS: Do not try to download artifacts or log zips. Use gh run view to stream text.
-
-LOG EFFICIENCY: Never ask to "read the whole log" if it is >50 lines. Use grep to filter.
-
-ROOT CAUSE FIRST: Do not suggest changing the CI config if the code is broken. Generate a report so the Developer can fix the code. </constraints>

.agent/workflows/Doc_Writer.agent.md

@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
----
-name: Docs Writer
-description: User Advocate and Writer focused on creating simple, layman-friendly documentation.
-argument-hint: The feature to document (e.g., "Write the guide for the new Real-Time Logs")
-
-
----
-You are a USER ADVOCATE and TECHNICAL WRITER for a self-hosted tool designed for beginners.
-Your goal is to translate "Engineer Speak" into simple, actionable instructions.
-
-<context>
-- **Project**: Charon
-- **Audience**: A novice home user who likely has never opened a terminal before.
-- **Source of Truth**: The technical plan located at `docs/plans/current_spec.md`.
-</context>
-
-<style_guide>
-
-- **The "Magic Button" Rule**: The user does not care *how* the code works; they only care *what* it does for them.
-  - *Bad*: "The backend establishes a WebSocket connection to stream logs asynchronously."
-  - *Good*: "Click the 'Connect' button to see your logs appear instantly."
-- **ELI5 (Explain Like I'm 5)**: Use simple words. If you must use a technical term, explain it immediately using a real-world analogy.
-- **Banish Jargon**: Avoid words like "latency," "payload," "handshake," or "schema" unless you explain them.
-- **Focus on Action**: Structure text as: "Do this -> Get that result."
-- **Pull Requests**: When opening PRs, the title needs to follow the naming convention outlined in `auto-versioning.md` to make sure new versions are generated correctly upon merge.
-- **History-Rewrite PRs**: If a PR touches files in `scripts/history-rewrite/` or `docs/plans/history_rewrite.md`, include the checklist from `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/history-rewrite.md` in the PR description.
-</style_guide>
-
-<workflow>
-1.  **Ingest (The Translation Phase)**:
-    -   **Read the Plan**: Read `docs/plans/current_spec.md` to understand the feature.
-    -   **Ignore the Code**: Do not read the `.go` or `.tsx` files. They contain "How it works" details that will pollute your simple explanation.
-
-2. **Drafting**:
-    - **Update Feature List**: Add the new capability to `docs/features.md`.
-    - **Tone Check**: Read your draft. Is it boring? Is it too long? If a non-technical relative couldn't understand it, rewrite it.
-
-3. **Review**:
-    - Ensure consistent capitalization of "Charon".
-    - Check that links are valid.
-</workflow>
-
-<constraints>
-- **TERSE OUTPUT**: Do not explain your drafting process. Output ONLY the file content or diffs.
-- **NO CONVERSATION**: If the task is done, output "DONE".
-- **USE DIFFS**: When updating `docs/features.md`, use the `changes` tool.
-- **NO IMPLEMENTATION DETAILS**: Never mention database columns, API endpoints, or specific code functions in user-facing docs.
-</constraints>

.agent/workflows/Frontend_Dev.agent.md

@@ -1,64 +0,0 @@
----
-name: Frontend Dev
-description: Senior React/UX Engineer focused on seamless user experiences and clean component architecture.
-argument-hint: The specific frontend task from the Plan (e.g., "Create Proxy Host Form")
-
-# ADDED 'list_dir' below so Step 1 works
-
-
-
----
-You are a SENIOR FRONTEND ENGINEER and UX SPECIALIST.
-You do not just "make it work"; you make it **feel** professional, responsive, and robust.
-
-<context>
-- **Project**: Charon (Frontend)
-- **Stack**: React 18, TypeScript, Vite, TanStack Query, Tailwind CSS.
-- **Philosophy**: UX First. The user should never guess what is happening (Loading, Success, Error).
-- **Rules**: You MUST follow `.github/copilot-instructions.md` explicitly.
-</context>
-
-<workflow>
-1.  **Initialize**:
-    -   **Path Verification**: Before editing ANY file, run `list_dir` or `search` to confirm it exists. Do not rely on your memory of standard frameworks (e.g., assuming `main.go` vs `cmd/api/main.go`).
-    -   Read `.github/copilot-instructions.md`.
-    -   **Context Acquisition**: Scan the immediate chat history for the text "### 🤝 Handoff Contract".
-    -   **CRITICAL**: If found, treat that JSON as the **Immutable Truth**. You are not allowed to change field names (e.g., do not change `user_id` to `userId`).
-    -   Review `src/api/client.ts` to see available backend endpoints.
-    -   Review `src/components` to identify reusable UI patterns (Buttons, Cards, Modals) to maintain consistency (DRY).
-
-2. **UX Design & Implementation (TDD)**:
-    - **Step 1 (The Spec)**:
-        - Create `src/components/YourComponent.test.tsx` FIRST.
-        - Write tests for the "Happy Path" (User sees data) and "Sad Path" (User sees error).
-        - *Note*: Use `screen.getByText` to assert what the user *should* see.
-    - **Step 2 (The Hook)**:
-        - Create the `useQuery` hook to fetch the data.
-    - **Step 3 (The UI)**:
-        - Build the component to satisfy the test.
-        - Run `npm run test:ci`.
-    - **Step 4 (Refine)**:
-        - Style with Tailwind. Ensure tests still pass.
-
-3. **Verification (Quality Gates)**:
-    - **Gate 1: Static Analysis (CRITICAL)**:
-        - Run `npm run type-check`.
-        - Run `npm run lint`.
-        - **STOP**: If *any* errors appear in these two commands, you **MUST** fix them immediately. Do not say "I'll leave this for later." **Fix the type errors, then re-run the check.**
-    - **Gate 2: Logic**:
-        - Run `npm run test:ci`.
-    - **Gate 3: Coverage**:
-        - Run `npm run check-coverage`.
-        - Ensure the script executes successfully and coverage goals are met.
-        - Ensure coverage goals are met as well as all tests pass. Just because Tests pass does not mean you are done. Goal Coverage Needs to be met even if the tests to get us there are outside the scope of your task. At this point, your task is to maintain coverage goal and all tests pass because we cannot commit changes if they fail.
-</workflow>
-
-<constraints>
-- **NO** direct `fetch` calls in components; strictly use `src/api` + React Query hooks.
-- **NO** generic error messages like "Error occurred". Parse the backend's `gin.H{"error": "..."}` response.
-- **ALWAYS** check for mobile responsiveness (Tailwind `sm:`, `md:` prefixes).
-- **TERSE OUTPUT**: Do not explain the code. Do not summarize the changes. Output ONLY the code blocks or command results.
-- **NO CONVERSATION**: If the task is done, output "DONE". If you need info, ask the specific question.
-- **NPM SCRIPTS ONLY**: Do not try to construct complex commands. Always look at `package.json` first and use `npm run <script-name>`.
-- **USE DIFFS**: When updating large files (>100 lines), output ONLY the modified functions/blocks, not the whole file, unless the file is small.
-</constraints>

.agent/workflows/Manegment.agent.md

@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
----
-name: Management
-description: Engineering Director. Delegates ALL research and execution. DO NOT ask it to debug code directly.
-argument-hint: The high-level goal (e.g., "Build the new Proxy Host Dashboard widget")
-
-
----
-You are the ENGINEERING DIRECTOR.
-**YOUR OPERATING MODEL: AGGRESSIVE DELEGATION.**
-You are "lazy" in the smartest way possible. You never do what a subordinate can do.
-
-<global_context>
-
-1. **Initialize**: ALWAYS read `.github/copilot-instructions.md` first to load global project rules.
-2. **Team Roster**:
-    - `Planning`: The Architect. (Delegate research & planning here).
-    - `Backend_Dev`: The Engineer. (Delegate Go implementation here).
-    - `Frontend_Dev`: The Designer. (Delegate React implementation here).
-    - `QA_Security`: The Auditor. (Delegate verification and testing here).
-    - `Docs_Writer`: The Scribe. (Delegate docs here).
-    - `DevOps`: The Packager. (Delegate CI/CD and infrastructure here).
-</global_context>
-
-<workflow>
-1.  **Phase 1: Assessment and Delegation**:
-    -   **Read Instructions**: Read `.github/copilot-instructions.md`.
-    -   **Identify Goal**: Understand the user's request.
-    -   **STOP**: Do not look at the code. Do not run `list_dir`. No code is to be changed or implemented until there is a fundamentally sound plan of action that has been approved by the user.
-    -   **Action**: Immediately call `Planning` subagent.
-        -   *Prompt*: "Research the necessary files for '{user_request}' and write a comprehensive plan detailing as many specifics as possible to `docs/plans/current_spec.md`. Be an artist with directions and discriptions. Include file names, function names, and component names wherever possible. Break the plan into phases based on the least amount of requests. Review and suggest updaetes to `.gitignore`, `codecove.yml`, `.dockerignore`, and `Dockerfile` if necessary. Return only when the plan is complete."
-    - **Task Specifics**:
-        - If the task is to just run tests or audits, there is no need for a plan. Directly call `QA_Security` to perform the tests and write the report. If issues are found, return to `Planning` for a remediation plan and delegate the fixes to the corresponding subagents.
-2.  **Phase 2: Approval Gate**:
-    -   **Read Plan**: Read `docs/plans/current_spec.md` (You are allowed to read Markdown).
-    -   **Present**: Summarize the plan to the user.
-    -   **Ask**: "Plan created. Shall I authorize the construction?"
-
-3. **Phase 3: Execution (Waterfall)**:
-    - **Backend**: Call `Backend_Dev` with the plan file.
-    - **Frontend**: Call `Frontend_Dev` with the plan file.
-
-4. **Phase 4: Audit**:
-    - **QA**: Call `QA_Security` to meticulously test current implementation as well as regression test. Run all linting, security tasks, and manual pre-commit checks. Write a report to `docs/reports/qa_report.md`. Start back at Phase 1 if issues are found.
-5. **Phase 5: Closure**:
-    - **Docs**: Call `Docs_Writer`.
-    - **Final Report**: Summarize the successful subagent runs.
-</workflow>
-
-## DEFENITION OF DONE ##
-
-- The Task is not complete until pre-commit, frontend coverage tests, all linting, CodeQL, and Trivy pass with zero issues. Leaving this unfinished prevents commit, push, and leaves users open to security concerns. All issues must be fixed regardless if they are unrelated to the original task and severity. This rule must never be skipped. It is non-negotiable anytime any bit of code is added or changed.
-
-<constraints>
-- **SOURCE CODE BAN**: You are FORBIDDEN from reading `.go`, `.tsx`, `.ts`, or `.css` files. You may ONLY read `.md` (Markdown) files.
-- **NO DIRECT RESEARCH**: If you need to know how the code works, you must ask the `Planning` agent to tell you.
-- **MANDATORY DELEGATION**: Your first thought should always be "Which agent handles this?", not "How do I solve this?"
-- **WAIT FOR APPROVAL**: Do not trigger Phase 3 without explicit user confirmation.
-</constraints>

.agent/workflows/Planning.agent.md

@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
----
-name: Planning
-description: Principal Architect that researches and outlines detailed technical plans for Charon
-argument-hint: Describe the feature, bug, or goal to plan
-
-
----
-You are a PRINCIPAL SOFTWARE ARCHITECT and TECHNICAL PRODUCT MANAGER.
-
-Your goal is to design the **User Experience** first, then engineer the **Backend** to support it. Plan out the UX first and work backwards to make sure the API meets the exact needs of the Frontend. When you need a subagent to perform a task, use the `#runSubagent` tool. Specify the exact name of the subagent you want to use within the instruction
-
-<workflow>
-1.  **Context Loading (CRITICAL)**:
-    -   Read `.github/copilot-instructions.md`.
-    -   **Smart Research**: Run `list_dir` on `internal/models` and `src/api`. ONLY read the specific files relevant to the request. Do not read the entire directory.
-    -   **Path Verification**: Verify file existence before referencing them.
-
-2. **UX-First Gap Analysis**:
-    - **Step 1**: Visualize the user interaction. What data does the user need to see?
-    - **Step 2**: Determine the API requirements (JSON Contract) to support that exact interaction.
-    - **Step 3**: Identify necessary Backend changes.
-
-3. **Draft & Persist**:
-    - Create a structured plan following the <output_format>.
-    - **Define the Handoff**: You MUST write out the JSON payload structure with **Example Data**.
-    - **SAVE THE PLAN**: Write the final plan to `docs/plans/current_spec.md` (Create the directory if needed). This allows Dev agents to read it later.
-
-4. **Review**:
-    - Ask the user for confirmation.
-
-</workflow>
-
-<output_format>
-
-## 📋 Plan: {Title}
-
-### 🧐 UX & Context Analysis
-
-{Describe the desired user flow. e.g., "User clicks 'Scan', sees a spinner, then a live list of results."}
-
-### 🤝 Handoff Contract (The Truth)
-
-*The Backend MUST implement this, and Frontend MUST consume this.*
-
-```json
-// POST /api/v1/resource
-{
-  "request_payload": { "example": "data" },
-  "response_success": {
-    "id": "uuid",
-    "status": "pending"
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### 🏗️ Phase 1: Backend Implementation (Go)
-
-  1. Models: {Changes to internal/models}
-  2. API: {Routes in internal/api/routes}
-  3. Logic: {Handlers in internal/api/handlers}
-
-### 🎨 Phase 2: Frontend Implementation (React)
-
-  1. Client: {Update src/api/client.ts}
-  2. UI: {Components in src/components}
-  3. Tests: {Unit tests to verify UX states}
-
-### 🕵️ Phase 3: QA & Security
-
-  1. Edge Cases: {List specific scenarios to test}
-  2. Security: Run CodeQL and Trivy scans. Triage and fix any new errors or warnings.
-
-### 📚 Phase 4: Documentation
-
-  1. Files: Update docs/features.md.
-
-</output_format>
-
-<constraints>
-
-- NO HALLUCINATIONS: Do not guess file paths. Verify them.
-
-- UX FIRST: Design the API based on what the Frontend needs, not what the Database has.
-
-- NO FLUFF: Be detailed in technical specs, but do not offer "friendly" conversational filler. Get straight to the plan.
-
-- JSON EXAMPLES: The Handoff Contract must include valid JSON examples, not just type definitions. </constraints>

.agent/workflows/QA_Security.agent.md

@@ -1,75 +0,0 @@
----
-name: QA and Security
-description: Security Engineer and QA specialist focused on breaking the implementation.
-argument-hint: The feature or endpoint to audit (e.g., "Audit the new Proxy Host creation flow")
-
-
----
-You are a SECURITY ENGINEER and QA SPECIALIST.
-Your job is to act as an ADVERSARY. The Developer says "it works"; your job is to prove them wrong before the user does.
-
-<context>
-- **Project**: Charon (Reverse Proxy)
-- **Priority**: Security, Input Validation, Error Handling.
-- **Tools**: `go test`, `trivy` (if available), pre-commit, manual edge-case analysis.
-- **Role**: You are the final gatekeeper before code reaches production. Your goal is to find flaws, vulnerabilities, and edge cases that the developers missed. You write tests to prove these issues exist. Do not trust developer claims of "it works" and do not fix issues yourself; instead, write tests that expose them. If code needs to be fixed, report back to the Management agent for rework or directly to the appropriate subagent (Backend_Dev or Frontend_Dev)
-</context>
-
-<workflow>
-1.  **Reconnaissance**:
-    -   **Load The Spec**: Read `docs/plans/current_spec.md` (if it exists) to understand the intended behavior and JSON Contract.
-    -   **Target Identification**: Run `list_dir` to find the new code. Read ONLY the specific files involved (Backend Handlers or Frontend Components). Do not read the entire codebase.
-
-2. **Attack Plan (Verification)**:
-    - **Input Validation**: Check for empty strings, huge payloads, SQL injection attempts, and path traversal.
-    - **Error States**: What happens if the DB is down? What if the network fails?
-    - **Contract Enforcement**: Does the code actually match the JSON Contract defined in the Spec?
-
-3. **Execute**:
-    - **Path Verification**: Run `list_dir internal/api` to verify where tests should go.
-    - **Creation**: Write a new test file (e.g., `internal/api/tests/audit_test.go`) to test the *flow*.
-    - **Run**: Execute `go test ./internal/api/tests/...` (or specific path). Run local CodeQL and Trivy scans (they are built as VS Code Tasks so they just need to be triggered to run), pre-commit all files, and triage any findings.
-        - When running golangci-lint, always run it in docker to ensure consistent linting.
-        - When creating tests, if there are folders that don't require testing make sure to update `codecove.yml` to exclude them from coverage reports or this throws off the difference betwoeen local and CI coverage.
-    - **Cleanup**: If the test was temporary, delete it. If it's valuable, keep it.
-</workflow>
-
-<trivy-cve-remediation>
-When Trivy reports CVEs in container dependencies (especially Caddy transitive deps):
-
-1. **Triage**: Determine if CVE is in OUR code or a DEPENDENCY.
-    - If ours: Fix immediately.
-    - If dependency (e.g., Caddy's transitive deps): Patch in Dockerfile.
-
-2. **Patch Caddy Dependencies**:
-    - Open `Dockerfile`, find the `caddy-builder` stage.
-    - Add a Renovate-trackable comment + `go get` line:
-
-        ```dockerfile
-        # renovate: datasource=go depName=github.com/OWNER/REPO
-        go get github.com/OWNER/REPO@vX.Y.Z || true; \
-        ```
-
-    - Run `go mod tidy` after all patches.
-    - The `XCADDY_SKIP_CLEANUP=1` pattern preserves the build env for patching.
-
-3. **Verify**:
-    - Rebuild: `docker build --no-cache -t charon:local-patched .`
-    - Re-scan: `docker run --rm -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock aquasec/trivy:latest image --severity CRITICAL,HIGH charon:local-patched`
-    - Expect 0 vulnerabilities for patched libs.
-
-4. **Renovate Tracking**:
-    - Ensure `.github/renovate.json` has a `customManagers` regex for `# renovate:` comments in Dockerfile.
-    - Renovate will auto-PR when newer versions release.
-</trivy-cve-remediation>
-
-## DEFENITION OF DONE ##
-
-- The Task is not complete until pre-commit, frontend coverage tests, all linting, CodeQL, and Trivy pass with zero issues. Leaving this unfinished prevents commit, push, and leaves users open to security concerns. All issues must be fixed regardless if they are unrelated to the original task and severity. This rule must never be skipped. It is non-negotiable anytime any bit of code is added or changed.
-
-<constraints>
-- **TERSE OUTPUT**: Do not explain the code. Output ONLY the code blocks or command results.
-- **NO CONVERSATION**: If the task is done, output "DONE".
-- **NO HALLUCINATIONS**: Do not guess file paths. Verify them with `list_dir`.
-- **USE DIFFS**: When updating large files, output ONLY the modified functions/blocks.
-</constraints>

.agent/workflows/SubagentUsage.md

@@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
-## Subagent Usage Templates and Orchestration
-
-This helper provides the Management agent with templates to create robust and repeatable `runSubagent` calls.
-
-1) Basic runSubagent Template
-
-```
-runSubagent({
-  prompt: "<Clear, short instruction for the subagent>",
-  description: "<Agent role name - e.g., Backend Dev>",
-  metadata: {
-    plan_file: "docs/plans/current_spec.md",
-    files_to_change: ["..."],
-    commands_to_run: ["..."],
-    tests_to_run: ["..."],
-    timeout_minutes: 60,
-    acceptance_criteria: ["All tests pass", "No lint warnings"]
-  }
-})
-```
-
-2) Orchestration Checklist (Management)
-
-- Validate: `plan_file` exists and contains a `Handoff Contract` JSON.
-- Kickoff: call `Planning` to create the plan if not present.
-- Run: execute `Backend Dev` then `Frontend Dev` sequentially.
-- Parallel: run `QA and Security`, `DevOps` and `Doc Writer` in parallel for CI / QA checks and documentation.
-- Return: a JSON summary with `subagent_results`, `overall_status`, and aggregated artifacts.
-
-3) Return Contract that all subagents must return
-
-```
-{
-  "changed_files": ["path/to/file1", "path/to/file2"],
-  "summary": "Short summary of changes",
-  "tests": {"passed": true, "output": "..."},
-  "artifacts": ["..."],
-  "errors": []
-}
-```
-
-4) Error Handling
-
-- On a subagent failure, the Management agent must capture `tests.output` and decide to retry (1 retry maximum), or request a revert/rollback.
-- Clearly mark the `status` as `failed`, and include `errors` and `failing_tests` in the `summary`.
-
-5) Example: Run a full Feature Implementation
-
-```
-// 1. Planning
-runSubagent({ description: "Planning", prompt: "<generate plan>", metadata: { plan_file: "docs/plans/current_spec.md" } })
-
-// 2. Backend
-runSubagent({ description: "Backend Dev", prompt: "Implement backend as per plan file", metadata: { plan_file: "docs/plans/current_spec.md", commands_to_run: ["cd backend && go test ./..."] } })
-
-// 3. Frontend
-runSubagent({ description: "Frontend Dev", prompt: "Implement frontend widget per plan file", metadata: { plan_file: "docs/plans/current_spec.md", commands_to_run: ["cd frontend && npm run build"] } })
-
-// 4. QA & Security, DevOps, Docs (Parallel)
-runSubagent({ description: "QA and Security", prompt: "Audit the implementation for input validation, security and contract conformance", metadata: { plan_file: "docs/plans/current_spec.md" } })
-runSubagent({ description: "DevOps", prompt: "Update docker CI pipeline and add staging step", metadata: { plan_file: "docs/plans/current_spec.md" } })
-runSubagent({ description: "Doc Writer", prompt: "Update the features doc and release notes.", metadata: { plan_file: "docs/plans/current_spec.md" } })
-```
-
-This file is a template; management should keep operations terse and the metadata explicit. Always capture and persist the return artifact's path and the `changed_files` list.

.docker/README.md

@@ -94,7 +94,12 @@ Configure the application via `docker-compose.yml`:
 | `CHARON_ENV` | `production` | Set to `development` for verbose logging (`CPM_ENV` supported for backward compatibility). |
 | `CHARON_HTTP_PORT` | `8080` | Port for the Web UI (`CPM_HTTP_PORT` supported for backward compatibility). |
 | `CHARON_DB_PATH` | `/app/data/charon.db` | Path to the SQLite database (`CPM_DB_PATH` supported for backward compatibility). |
-| `CHARON_CADDY_ADMIN_API` | `http://localhost:2019` | Internal URL for Caddy API (`CPM_CADDY_ADMIN_API` supported for backward compatibility). |
+| `CHARON_CADDY_ADMIN_API` | `http://localhost:2019` | Internal URL for Caddy API (`CPM_CADDY_ADMIN_API` supported for backward compatibility). Must resolve to an internal allowlisted host on port `2019`. |
+| `CHARON_CADDY_CONFIG_ROOT` | `/config` | Path to Caddy autosave configuration directory. |
+| `CHARON_CADDY_LOG_DIR` | `/var/log/caddy` | Directory for Caddy access logs. |
+| `CHARON_CROWDSEC_LOG_DIR` | `/var/log/crowdsec` | Directory for CrowdSec logs. |
+| `CHARON_PLUGINS_DIR` | `/app/plugins` | Directory for DNS provider plugins. |
+| `CHARON_SINGLE_CONTAINER_MODE` | `true` | Enables permission repair endpoints for single-container deployments. |
 
 ## NAS Deployment Guides
 
@@ -213,6 +218,8 @@ environment:
   - CPM_CADDY_ADMIN_API=http://your-caddy-host:2019
 ```
 
+If using a non-localhost internal hostname, add it to `CHARON_SSRF_INTERNAL_HOST_ALLOWLIST`.
+
 **Warning**: Charon will replace Caddy's entire configuration. Backup first!
 
 ## Performance Tuning

.docker/compose/docker-compose.dev.yml

@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
 
 services:
   app:
-    image: ghcr.io/wikid82/charon:dev
+    # Override for local testing:
+    # CHARON_DEV_IMAGE=ghcr.io/wikid82/charon:dev
+    image: wikid82/charon:dev
     # Development: expose Caddy admin API externally for debugging
     ports:
       - "80:80"
@@ -15,6 +17,8 @@ services:
       - CPM_ENV=development
       - CHARON_HTTP_PORT=8080
       - CPM_HTTP_PORT=80
+      # Generate with: openssl rand -base64 32
+      - CHARON_ENCRYPTION_KEY=your-32-byte-base64-key-here
       - CHARON_DB_PATH=/app/data/charon.db
       - CHARON_FRONTEND_DIR=/app/frontend/dist
       - CHARON_CADDY_ADMIN_API=http://localhost:2019
@@ -28,6 +32,8 @@ services:
       #- CPM_SECURITY_RATELIMIT_ENABLED=false
       #- CPM_SECURITY_ACL_ENABLED=false
       - FEATURE_CERBERUS_ENABLED=true
+    # Docker socket group access: copy docker-compose.override.example.yml
+    # to docker-compose.override.yml and set your host's docker GID.
     volumes:
       - /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock:ro # For local container discovery
       - crowdsec_data:/app/data/crowdsec

.docker/compose/docker-compose.e2e.cerberus-disabled.override.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+services:
+  charon-e2e:
+    environment:
+      - CHARON_SECURITY_CERBERUS_ENABLED=false

.docker/compose/docker-compose.local.yml

@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ services:
       - CHARON_ENV=development
       - CHARON_DEBUG=1
       - TZ=America/New_York
+      # Generate with: openssl rand -base64 32
+      - CHARON_ENCRYPTION_KEY=your-32-byte-base64-key-here
       - CHARON_HTTP_PORT=8080
       - CHARON_DB_PATH=/app/data/charon.db
       - CHARON_FRONTEND_DIR=/app/frontend/dist
@@ -23,6 +25,10 @@ services:
       - CHARON_IMPORT_DIR=/app/data/imports
       - CHARON_ACME_STAGING=false
       - FEATURE_CERBERUS_ENABLED=true
+      # Emergency "break-glass" token for security reset when ACL blocks access
+      - CHARON_EMERGENCY_TOKEN=03e4682c1164f0c1cb8e17c99bd1a2d9156b59824dde41af3bb67c513e5c5e92
+    # Docker socket group access: copy docker-compose.override.example.yml
+    # to docker-compose.override.yml and set your host's docker GID.
     extra_hosts:
       - "host.docker.internal:host-gateway"
     cap_add:
@@ -34,13 +40,14 @@ services:
       - caddy_data:/data
       - caddy_config:/config
       - crowdsec_data:/app/data/crowdsec
+      - plugins_data:/app/plugins # Read-write for development/hot-loading
       - /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock:ro # For local container discovery
       - ./backend:/app/backend:ro # Mount source for debugging
       # Mount your existing Caddyfile for automatic import (optional)
 #      - <PATH_TO_YOUR_CADDYFILE>:/import/Caddyfile:ro
 #      - <PATH_TO_YOUR_SITES_DIR>:/import/sites:ro # If your Caddyfile imports other files
     healthcheck:
-      test: ["CMD", "wget", "--no-verbose", "--tries=1", "--spider", "http://localhost:8080/api/v1/health"]
+      test: ["CMD-SHELL", "wget -qO /dev/null http://localhost:8080/api/v1/health || exit 1"]
       interval: 30s
       timeout: 10s
       retries: 3
@@ -55,3 +62,5 @@ volumes:
     driver: local
   crowdsec_data:
     driver: local
+  plugins_data:
+    driver: local

.docker/compose/docker-compose.override.example.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+# Docker Compose override — copy to docker-compose.override.yml to activate.
+#
+# Use case: grant the container access to the host Docker socket so that
+# Charon can discover running containers.
+#
+# 1. cp docker-compose.override.example.yml docker-compose.override.yml
+# 2. Uncomment the service that matches your compose file:
+#      - "charon" for docker-compose.local.yml
+#      - "app"    for docker-compose.dev.yml
+# 3. Replace <GID> with the output of:  stat -c '%g' /var/run/docker.sock
+# 4. docker compose up -d
+
+services:
+  # Uncomment for docker-compose.local.yml
+  charon:
+    group_add:
+      - "<GID>"   # e.g. "988" — run: stat -c '%g' /var/run/docker.sock
+    volumes:
+      - /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock:ro
+
+  # Uncomment for docker-compose.dev.yml
+  app:
+    group_add:
+      - "<GID>"   # e.g. "988" — run: stat -c '%g' /var/run/docker.sock
+    volumes:
+      - /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock:ro

.docker/compose/docker-compose.playwright-ci.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+# Playwright E2E Test Environment for CI/CD
+# ==========================================
+# This configuration is specifically designed for GitHub Actions CI/CD pipelines.
+# Environment variables are provided via GitHub Secrets and generated dynamically.
+#
+# DO NOT USE env_file - CI provides variables via $GITHUB_ENV:
+#   - CHARON_ENCRYPTION_KEY: Generated with openssl rand -base64 32 (ephemeral)
+#   - CHARON_EMERGENCY_TOKEN: From repository secrets (secure)
+#
+# Usage in CI:
+#   export CHARON_ENCRYPTION_KEY=$(openssl rand -base64 32)
+#   export CHARON_EMERGENCY_TOKEN="${{ secrets.CHARON_EMERGENCY_TOKEN }}"
+#   docker compose -f .docker/compose/docker-compose.playwright-ci.yml up -d
+#
+# Profiles:
+#   # Start with security testing services (CrowdSec)
+#   docker compose -f .docker/compose/docker-compose.playwright-ci.yml --profile security-tests up -d
+#
+#   # Start with notification testing services (MailHog)
+#   docker compose -f .docker/compose/docker-compose.playwright-ci.yml --profile notification-tests up -d
+#
+# The setup API will be available since no users exist in the fresh database.
+# The auth.setup.ts fixture will create a test admin user automatically.
+
+services:
+  # =============================================================================
+  # Charon Application - Core E2E Testing Service
+  # =============================================================================
+  charon-app:
+    # CI provides CHARON_E2E_IMAGE_TAG=charon:e2e-test (retagged from shared digest)
+    # Local development uses the default fallback value
+    image: ${CHARON_E2E_IMAGE_TAG:-charon:e2e-test}
+    container_name: charon-playwright
+    restart: "no"
+    # CI generates CHARON_ENCRYPTION_KEY dynamically in GitHub Actions workflow
+    # and passes CHARON_EMERGENCY_TOKEN from GitHub Secrets via $GITHUB_ENV.
+    # No .env file is used in CI as it's gitignored and not available.
+    ports:
+      - "8080:8080"            # Management UI (Charon)
+      - "127.0.0.1:2019:2019" # Caddy admin API (IPv4 loopback)
+      - "[::1]:2019:2019"     # Caddy admin API (IPv6 loopback)
+      - "2020:2020"           # Emergency tier-2 API (all interfaces for E2E tests)
+      - "80:80"               # Caddy proxy (all interfaces for E2E tests)
+      - "443:443"             # Caddy proxy HTTPS (all interfaces for E2E tests)
+    environment:
+      # Core configuration
+      - CHARON_ENV=test
+      - CHARON_DEBUG=0
+      - TZ=UTC
+      # E2E testing encryption key - 32 bytes base64 encoded (not for production!)
+      # Encryption key - MUST be provided via environment variable
+      # Generate with: export CHARON_ENCRYPTION_KEY=$(openssl rand -base64 32)
+      - CHARON_ENCRYPTION_KEY=${CHARON_ENCRYPTION_KEY:?CHARON_ENCRYPTION_KEY is required}
+      # Emergency reset token - for break-glass recovery when locked out by ACL
+      # Generate with: openssl rand -hex 32
+      - CHARON_EMERGENCY_TOKEN=${CHARON_EMERGENCY_TOKEN:-test-emergency-token-for-e2e-32chars}
+      - CHARON_EMERGENCY_SERVER_ENABLED=true
+      - CHARON_SECURITY_TESTS_ENABLED=${CHARON_SECURITY_TESTS_ENABLED:-true}
+      # Emergency server must bind to 0.0.0.0 for Docker port mapping to work
+      # Host binding via compose restricts external access (127.0.0.1:2020:2020)
+      - CHARON_EMERGENCY_BIND=0.0.0.0:2020
+      # Emergency server Basic Auth (required for E2E tests)
+      - CHARON_EMERGENCY_USERNAME=admin
+      - CHARON_EMERGENCY_PASSWORD=changeme
+      # Server settings
+      - CHARON_HTTP_PORT=8080
+      - CHARON_DB_PATH=/app/data/charon.db
+      - CHARON_FRONTEND_DIR=/app/frontend/dist
+      # Caddy settings
+      - CHARON_CADDY_ADMIN_API=http://localhost:2019
+      - CHARON_CADDY_CONFIG_DIR=/app/data/caddy
+      - CHARON_CADDY_BINARY=caddy
+      # ACME settings (staging for E2E tests)
+      - CHARON_ACME_STAGING=true
+      # Security features - disabled by default for faster tests
+      # Enable via profile: --profile security-tests
+      # FEATURE_CERBERUS_ENABLED deprecated - Cerberus enabled by default
+      - CHARON_SECURITY_CROWDSEC_MODE=disabled
+      # SMTP for notification tests (connects to MailHog when profile enabled)
+      - CHARON_SMTP_HOST=mailhog
+      - CHARON_SMTP_PORT=1025
+      - CHARON_SMTP_AUTH=false
+    volumes:
+      # Named volume for test data persistence during test runs
+      - playwright_data:/app/data
+      - playwright_caddy_data:/data
+      - playwright_caddy_config:/config
+      - /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock:ro # For container discovery in tests
+    healthcheck:
+      test: ["CMD-SHELL", "wget -qO /dev/null http://localhost:8080/api/v1/health || exit 1"]
+      interval: 5s
+      timeout: 3s
+      retries: 12
+      start_period: 10s
+    networks:
+      - playwright-network
+
+  # =============================================================================
+  # CrowdSec - Security Testing Service (Optional Profile)
+  # =============================================================================
+  crowdsec:
+    image: crowdsecurity/crowdsec:latest@sha256:63b595fef92de1778573b375897a45dd226637ee9a3d3db9f57ac7355c369493
+    container_name: charon-playwright-crowdsec
+    profiles:
+      - security-tests
+    restart: "no"
+    environment:
+      - COLLECTIONS=crowdsecurity/nginx crowdsecurity/http-cve
+      - BOUNCER_KEY_charon=test-bouncer-key-for-e2e
+      # Disable online features for isolated testing
+      - DISABLE_ONLINE_API=true
+    volumes:
+      - playwright_crowdsec_data:/var/lib/crowdsec/data
+      - playwright_crowdsec_config:/etc/crowdsec
+      - /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock:ro # For container discovery in tests
+    healthcheck:
+      test: ["CMD", "cscli", "version"]
+      interval: 10s
+      timeout: 5s
+      retries: 5
+      start_period: 30s
+    networks:
+      - playwright-network
+
+  # =============================================================================
+  # MailHog - Email Testing Service (Optional Profile)
+  # =============================================================================
+  mailhog:
+    image: mailhog/mailhog:latest@sha256:8d76a3d4ffa32a3661311944007a415332c4bb855657f4f6c57996405c009bea
+    container_name: charon-playwright-mailhog
+    profiles:
+      - notification-tests
+    restart: "no"
+    ports:
+      - "1025:1025"    # SMTP server
+      - "8025:8025"    # Web UI for viewing emails
+    networks:
+      - playwright-network
+
+# =============================================================================
+# Named Volumes
+# =============================================================================
+volumes:
+  playwright_data:
+    driver: local
+  playwright_caddy_data:
+    driver: local
+  playwright_caddy_config:
+    driver: local
+  playwright_crowdsec_data:
+    driver: local
+  playwright_crowdsec_config:
+    driver: local
+
+# =============================================================================
+# Networks
+# =============================================================================
+networks:
+  playwright-network:
+    driver: bridge

.docker/compose/docker-compose.playwright-local.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# Docker Compose for Local E2E Testing
+#
+# This configuration runs Charon with a fresh, isolated database specifically for
+# Playwright E2E tests during local development. Uses .env file for credentials.
+#
+# Usage:
+#   docker compose -f .docker/compose/docker-compose.playwright-local.yml up -d
+#
+# Prerequisites:
+#   - Create .env file in project root with CHARON_ENCRYPTION_KEY and CHARON_EMERGENCY_TOKEN
+#   - Build image: docker build -t charon:local .
+#
+# The setup API will be available since no users exist in the fresh database.
+# The auth.setup.ts fixture will create a test admin user automatically.
+
+services:
+  charon-e2e:
+    image: charon:local
+    container_name: charon-e2e
+    restart: "no"
+    env_file:
+      - ../../.env
+    ports:
+      - "8080:8080"             # Management UI (Charon) - E2E tests verify UI/UX here
+      - "127.0.0.1:2019:2019"  # Caddy admin API (read-only status; keep loopback only)
+      - "[::1]:2019:2019"      # Caddy admin API (IPv6 loopback)
+      - "2020:2020"            # Emergency tier-2 API (all interfaces for E2E tests)
+      # Port 80/443: NOT exposed - middleware testing done via integration tests
+    environment:
+      - CHARON_ENV=e2e  # Enable lenient rate limiting (50 attempts/min) for E2E tests
+      - CHARON_DEBUG=0
+      - TZ=UTC
+      # Encryption key and emergency token loaded from env_file (../../.env)
+      # DO NOT add them here - env_file takes precedence and explicit entries override with empty values
+      # Emergency server (Tier 2 break glass) - separate port bypassing all security
+      - CHARON_EMERGENCY_SERVER_ENABLED=true
+      - CHARON_EMERGENCY_BIND=0.0.0.0:2020  # Bind to all interfaces in container (avoid Caddy's 2019)
+      - CHARON_EMERGENCY_USERNAME=admin
+      - CHARON_EMERGENCY_PASSWORD=${CHARON_EMERGENCY_PASSWORD:-changeme}
+      - CHARON_HTTP_PORT=8080
+      - CHARON_DB_PATH=/app/data/charon.db
+      - CHARON_FRONTEND_DIR=/app/frontend/dist
+      - CHARON_CADDY_ADMIN_API=http://localhost:2019
+      - CHARON_CADDY_CONFIG_DIR=/app/data/caddy
+      - CHARON_CADDY_BINARY=caddy
+      - CHARON_ACME_STAGING=true
+      # FEATURE_CERBERUS_ENABLED deprecated - Cerberus enabled by default
+    tmpfs:
+      # True tmpfs for E2E test data - fresh on every run, in-memory only
+      # mode=1777 allows any user to write (container runs as non-root)
+      # 256M gives headroom for the backup service's 100MB disk-space check
+      - /app/data:size=256M,mode=1777
+    volumes:
+      - /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock:ro # For container discovery in tests
+    healthcheck:
+      test: ["CMD-SHELL", "wget -qO /dev/null http://localhost:8080/api/v1/health || exit 1"]
+      interval: 5s
+      timeout: 5s
+      retries: 10
+      start_period: 10s

.docker/compose/docker-compose.remote.yml

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ services:
   # Run this service on your REMOTE servers (not the one running Charon)
   # to allow Charon to discover containers running there (legacy: CPMP).
   docker-socket-proxy:
-    image: alpine/socat
+    image: alpine/socat:latest
     container_name: docker-socket-proxy
     restart: unless-stopped
     ports:

.docker/compose/docker-compose.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 services:
   charon:
-    image: ghcr.io/wikid82/charon:latest
+    # Override for local testing:
+    # CHARON_IMAGE=ghcr.io/wikid82/charon:latest
+    image: wikid82/charon:latest
     container_name: charon
     restart: unless-stopped
     ports:
@@ -8,9 +10,23 @@ services:
       - "443:443"      # HTTPS (Caddy proxy)
       - "443:443/udp"  # HTTP/3 (Caddy proxy)
       - "8080:8080"    # Management UI (Charon)
+      # Emergency server port - ONLY expose via SSH tunnel or VPN for security
+      # Uncomment ONLY if you need localhost access on host machine:
+      # - "127.0.0.1:2020:2020"  # Emergency server Tier-2 (localhost-only, avoids Caddy's 2019)
     environment:
       - CHARON_ENV=production # CHARON_ preferred; CPM_ values still supported
       - TZ=UTC # Set timezone (e.g., America/New_York)
+      # Generate with: openssl rand -base64 32
+      - CHARON_ENCRYPTION_KEY=your-32-byte-base64-key-here
+      # Emergency break glass configuration (Tier 1 & Tier 2)
+      # Tier 1: Emergency token for Layer 7 bypass within application
+      # Generate with: openssl rand -hex 32
+      # - CHARON_EMERGENCY_TOKEN=${CHARON_EMERGENCY_TOKEN}  # Store in secrets manager
+      # Tier 2: Emergency server on separate port (bypasses Caddy/CrowdSec entirely)
+      # - CHARON_EMERGENCY_SERVER_ENABLED=false  # Disabled by default
+      # - CHARON_EMERGENCY_BIND=127.0.0.1:2020   # Localhost only (port 2020 avoids Caddy admin API)
+      # - CHARON_EMERGENCY_USERNAME=admin
+      # - CHARON_EMERGENCY_PASSWORD=${EMERGENCY_PASSWORD}  # Store in secrets manager
       - CHARON_HTTP_PORT=8080
       - CHARON_DB_PATH=/app/data/charon.db
       - CHARON_FRONTEND_DIR=/app/frontend/dist
@@ -19,25 +35,10 @@ services:
       - CHARON_CADDY_BINARY=caddy
       - CHARON_IMPORT_CADDYFILE=/import/Caddyfile
       - CHARON_IMPORT_DIR=/app/data/imports
-      # Security Services (Optional)
-      # 🚨 DEPRECATED: CrowdSec environment variables are no longer used.
-      # CrowdSec is now GUI-controlled via the Security dashboard.
-      # Remove these lines and use the GUI toggle instead.
-      # See: https://wikid82.github.io/charon/migration-guide
-      #- CERBERUS_SECURITY_CROWDSEC_MODE=disabled # ⚠️ DEPRECATED - Use GUI toggle
-      #- CERBERUS_SECURITY_CROWDSEC_API_URL= # ⚠️ DEPRECATED - External mode removed
-      #- CERBERUS_SECURITY_CROWDSEC_API_KEY= # ⚠️ DEPRECATED - External mode removed
-      #- CERBERUS_SECURITY_WAF_MODE=disabled # disabled, enabled
-      #- CERBERUS_SECURITY_RATELIMIT_ENABLED=false
-      #- CERBERUS_SECURITY_ACL_ENABLED=false
-      # Backward compatibility: CPM_ prefixed variables are still supported
-      # 🚨 DEPRECATED: Use GUI toggle instead (see Security dashboard)
-      #- CPM_SECURITY_CROWDSEC_MODE=disabled # ⚠️ DEPRECATED
-      #- CPM_SECURITY_CROWDSEC_API_URL= # ⚠️ DEPRECATED
-      #- CPM_SECURITY_CROWDSEC_API_KEY= # ⚠️ DEPRECATED
-      #- CPM_SECURITY_WAF_MODE=disabled
-      #- CPM_SECURITY_RATELIMIT_ENABLED=false
-      #- CPM_SECURITY_ACL_ENABLED=false
+      # Paste your CrowdSec API details here to prevent auto reregistration on startup
+      # Obtained from your CrowdSec settings on first setup
+      - CHARON_SECURITY_CROWDSEC_API_URL=http://localhost:8085
+      - CHARON_SECURITY_CROWDSEC_API_KEY=<your-crowdsec-api-key-here>
     extra_hosts:
       - "host.docker.internal:host-gateway"
     volumes:
@@ -45,12 +46,13 @@ services:
       - caddy_data:/data
       - caddy_config:/config
       - crowdsec_data:/app/data/crowdsec
+      - plugins_data:/app/plugins:ro # Read-only in production for security
       - /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock:ro # For local container discovery
       # Mount your existing Caddyfile for automatic import (optional)
       # - ./my-existing-Caddyfile:/import/Caddyfile:ro
       # - ./sites:/import/sites:ro # If your Caddyfile imports other files
     healthcheck:
-      test: ["CMD", "wget", "--no-verbose", "--tries=1", "--spider", "http://localhost:8080/api/v1/health"]
+      test: ["CMD-SHELL", "wget -qO /dev/null http://localhost:8080/api/v1/health || exit 1"]
       interval: 30s
       timeout: 10s
       retries: 3
@@ -65,3 +67,5 @@ volumes:
     driver: local
   crowdsec_data:
     driver: local
+  plugins_data:
+    driver: local

.docker/docker-entrypoint.sh

@@ -6,6 +6,48 @@ set -e
 
 echo "Starting Charon with integrated Caddy..."
 
+is_root() {
+    [ "$(id -u)" -eq 0 ]
+}
+
+run_as_charon() {
+    if is_root; then
+        gosu charon "$@"
+    else
+        "$@"
+    fi
+}
+
+get_group_by_gid() {
+    if command -v getent >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+        getent group "$1" 2>/dev/null || true
+    else
+        awk -F: -v gid="$1" '$3==gid {print $0}' /etc/group 2>/dev/null || true
+    fi
+}
+
+create_group_with_gid() {
+    if command -v addgroup >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+        addgroup -g "$1" "$2" 2>/dev/null || true
+        return
+    fi
+
+    if command -v groupadd >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+        groupadd -g "$1" "$2" 2>/dev/null || true
+    fi
+}
+
+add_user_to_group() {
+    if command -v addgroup >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+        addgroup "$1" "$2" 2>/dev/null || true
+        return
+    fi
+
+    if command -v usermod >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+        usermod -aG "$2" "$1" 2>/dev/null || true
+    fi
+}
+
 # ============================================================================
 # Volume Permission Handling for Non-Root User
 # ============================================================================
@@ -30,6 +72,83 @@ mkdir -p /app/data/caddy 2>/dev/null || true
 mkdir -p /app/data/crowdsec 2>/dev/null || true
 mkdir -p /app/data/geoip 2>/dev/null || true
 
+# Fix ownership for directories created as root
+if is_root; then
+    chown -R charon:charon /app/data/caddy 2>/dev/null || true
+    chown -R charon:charon /app/data/crowdsec 2>/dev/null || true
+    chown -R charon:charon /app/data/geoip 2>/dev/null || true
+fi
+
+# ============================================================================
+# Plugin Directory Permission Verification
+# ============================================================================
+# The PluginLoaderService requires the plugin directory to NOT be world-writable
+# (mode 0002 bit must not be set). This is a security requirement to prevent
+# malicious plugin injection.
+PLUGINS_DIR="${CHARON_PLUGINS_DIR:-/app/plugins}"
+if [ -d "$PLUGINS_DIR" ]; then
+    # Check if directory is world-writable (security risk)
+    # Using find -perm -0002 is more robust than stat regex - handles sticky/setgid bits correctly
+    if find "$PLUGINS_DIR" -maxdepth 0 -perm -0002 -print -quit 2>/dev/null | grep -q .; then
+        echo "⚠️  WARNING: Plugin directory $PLUGINS_DIR is world-writable!"
+        echo "   This is a security risk - plugins could be injected by any user."
+        echo "   Attempting to fix permissions (removing world-writable bit)..."
+        # Use chmod o-w to only remove world-writable, preserving sticky/setgid bits
+        if chmod o-w "$PLUGINS_DIR" 2>/dev/null; then
+            echo "   ✓ Fixed: Plugin directory world-writable permission removed"
+        else
+            echo "   ✗ ERROR: Cannot fix permissions. Please run: chmod o-w $PLUGINS_DIR"
+            echo "   Plugin loading may fail due to insecure permissions."
+        fi
+    else
+        echo "✓ Plugin directory permissions OK: $PLUGINS_DIR"
+    fi
+else
+    echo "Note: Plugin directory $PLUGINS_DIR does not exist (plugins disabled)"
+fi
+
+# ============================================================================
+# Docker Socket Permission Handling
+# ============================================================================
+# The Docker integration feature requires access to the Docker socket.
+# If the container runs as root, we can auto-align group membership with the
+# socket GID. If running non-root (default), we cannot modify groups; users
+# can enable Docker integration by using a compatible GID / --group-add.
+
+if [ -S "/var/run/docker.sock" ] && is_root; then
+    DOCKER_SOCK_GID=$(stat -c '%g' /var/run/docker.sock 2>/dev/null || echo "")
+    if [ -n "$DOCKER_SOCK_GID" ] && [ "$DOCKER_SOCK_GID" != "0" ]; then
+        # Check if a group with this GID exists
+        GROUP_ENTRY=$(get_group_by_gid "$DOCKER_SOCK_GID")
+        if [ -z "$GROUP_ENTRY" ]; then
+            echo "Docker socket detected (gid=$DOCKER_SOCK_GID) - creating docker group and adding charon user..."
+            # Create docker group with the socket's GID
+            create_group_with_gid "$DOCKER_SOCK_GID" docker
+            # Add charon user to the docker group
+            add_user_to_group charon docker
+            echo "Docker integration enabled for charon user"
+        else
+            # Group exists, just add charon to it
+            GROUP_NAME=$(echo "$GROUP_ENTRY" | cut -d: -f1)
+            echo "Docker socket detected (gid=$DOCKER_SOCK_GID, group=$GROUP_NAME) - adding charon user..."
+            add_user_to_group charon "$GROUP_NAME"
+            echo "Docker integration enabled for charon user"
+        fi
+    fi
+elif [ -S "/var/run/docker.sock" ]; then
+    DOCKER_SOCK_GID=$(stat -c '%g' /var/run/docker.sock 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
+    echo "Note: Docker socket mounted (GID=$DOCKER_SOCK_GID) but container is running non-root; skipping docker.sock group setup."
+    echo "      If Docker discovery is needed, add 'group_add: [\"$DOCKER_SOCK_GID\"]' to your compose service."
+    if [ "$DOCKER_SOCK_GID" = "0" ]; then
+        if [ "${ALLOW_DOCKER_SOCK_GID_0:-false}" != "true" ]; then
+            echo "⚠️  WARNING: Docker socket GID is 0 (root group). group_add: [\"0\"] grants root-group access."
+            echo "   Set ALLOW_DOCKER_SOCK_GID_0=true to acknowledge this risk."
+        fi
+    fi
+else
+    echo "Note: Docker socket not found. Docker container discovery will be unavailable."
+fi
+
 # ============================================================================
 # CrowdSec Initialization
 # ============================================================================
@@ -43,10 +162,26 @@ if command -v cscli >/dev/null; then
     CS_PERSIST_DIR="/app/data/crowdsec"
     CS_CONFIG_DIR="$CS_PERSIST_DIR/config"
     CS_DATA_DIR="$CS_PERSIST_DIR/data"
+    CS_LOG_DIR="/var/log/crowdsec"
 
     # Ensure persistent directories exist (within writable volume)
     mkdir -p "$CS_CONFIG_DIR" 2>/dev/null || echo "Warning: Cannot create $CS_CONFIG_DIR"
     mkdir -p "$CS_DATA_DIR" 2>/dev/null || echo "Warning: Cannot create $CS_DATA_DIR"
+    mkdir -p "$CS_PERSIST_DIR/hub_cache"
+
+    # ============================================================================
+    # CrowdSec Bouncer Key Persistence Directory
+    # ============================================================================
+    # Create the persistent directory for bouncer key storage.
+    # This directory is inside /app/data which is volume-mounted.
+    # The bouncer key will be stored at /app/data/crowdsec/bouncer_key
+    echo "CrowdSec bouncer key will be stored at: $CS_PERSIST_DIR/bouncer_key"
+
+    # Fix ownership for key directory if running as root
+    if is_root; then
+        chown charon:charon "$CS_PERSIST_DIR" 2>/dev/null || true
+    fi
+
     # Log directories are created at build time with correct ownership
     # Only attempt to create if they don't exist (first run scenarios)
     mkdir -p /var/log/crowdsec 2>/dev/null || true
@@ -55,20 +190,67 @@ if command -v cscli >/dev/null; then
     # Initialize persistent config if key files are missing
     if [ ! -f "$CS_CONFIG_DIR/config.yaml" ]; then
         echo "Initializing persistent CrowdSec configuration..."
-        if [ -d "/etc/crowdsec.dist" ]; then
-            cp -r /etc/crowdsec.dist/* "$CS_CONFIG_DIR/" 2>/dev/null || echo "Warning: Could not copy dist config"
-        elif [ -d "/etc/crowdsec" ] && [ ! -L "/etc/crowdsec" ]; then
-            # Fallback if .dist is missing
-            cp -r /etc/crowdsec/* "$CS_CONFIG_DIR/" 2>/dev/null || echo "Warning: Could not copy config"
+
+        # Check if .dist has content
+        if [ -d "/etc/crowdsec.dist" ] && find /etc/crowdsec.dist -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -print -quit 2>/dev/null | grep -q .; then
+            echo "Copying config from /etc/crowdsec.dist..."
+            if ! cp -r /etc/crowdsec.dist/* "$CS_CONFIG_DIR/"; then
+                echo "ERROR: Failed to copy config from /etc/crowdsec.dist"
+                echo "DEBUG: Contents of /etc/crowdsec.dist:"
+                ls -la /etc/crowdsec.dist/
+                exit 1
+            fi
+
+            # Verify critical files were copied
+            if [ ! -f "$CS_CONFIG_DIR/config.yaml" ]; then
+                echo "ERROR: config.yaml was not copied to $CS_CONFIG_DIR"
+                echo "DEBUG: Contents of $CS_CONFIG_DIR after copy:"
+                ls -la "$CS_CONFIG_DIR/"
+                exit 1
+            fi
+            echo "✓ Successfully initialized config from .dist directory"
+        elif [ -d "/etc/crowdsec" ] && [ ! -L "/etc/crowdsec" ] && find /etc/crowdsec -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -print -quit 2>/dev/null | grep -q .; then
+            echo "Copying config from /etc/crowdsec (fallback)..."
+            if ! cp -r /etc/crowdsec/* "$CS_CONFIG_DIR/"; then
+                echo "ERROR: Failed to copy config from /etc/crowdsec (fallback)"
+                exit 1
+            fi
+            echo "✓ Successfully initialized config from /etc/crowdsec"
+        else
+            echo "ERROR: No config source found!"
+            echo "DEBUG: /etc/crowdsec.dist contents:"
+            ls -la /etc/crowdsec.dist/ 2>/dev/null || echo "  (directory not found or empty)"
+            echo "DEBUG: /etc/crowdsec contents:"
+            ls -la /etc/crowdsec 2>/dev/null || echo "  (directory not found or empty)"
+            exit 1
         fi
+    else
+        echo "✓ Persistent config already exists: $CS_CONFIG_DIR/config.yaml"
     fi
 
-    # Link /etc/crowdsec to persistent config for runtime compatibility
-    # Note: This symlink is created at build time; verify it exists
+    # Verify symlink exists (created at build time)
+    # Note: Symlink is created in Dockerfile as root before switching to non-root user
+    # Non-root users cannot create symlinks in /etc, so this must be done at build time
     if [ -L "/etc/crowdsec" ]; then
         echo "CrowdSec config symlink verified: /etc/crowdsec -> $CS_CONFIG_DIR"
+
+        # Verify the symlink target is accessible and has config.yaml
+        if [ ! -f "/etc/crowdsec/config.yaml" ]; then
+            echo "ERROR: /etc/crowdsec/config.yaml is not accessible via symlink"
+            echo "DEBUG: Symlink target verification:"
+            ls -la /etc/crowdsec 2>/dev/null || echo "  (symlink broken or missing)"
+            echo "DEBUG: Directory contents:"
+            ls -la "$CS_CONFIG_DIR/" 2>/dev/null | head -10 || echo "  (directory not found)"
+            exit 1
+        fi
+        echo "✓ /etc/crowdsec/config.yaml is accessible via symlink"
     else
-        echo "Warning: /etc/crowdsec symlink not found. CrowdSec may use volume config directly."
+        echo "ERROR: /etc/crowdsec symlink not found"
+        echo "Expected: /etc/crowdsec -> /app/data/crowdsec/config"
+        echo "This indicates a critical build-time issue. Symlink must be created at build time as root."
+        echo "DEBUG: Directory check:"
+        find /etc -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -name '*crowdsec*' -exec ls -ld {} \; 2>/dev/null || echo "  (no crowdsec entry found)"
+        exit 1
     fi
 
     # Create/update acquisition config for Caddy logs
@@ -93,13 +275,14 @@ ACQUIS_EOF
     export CFG=/etc/crowdsec
     export DATA="$CS_DATA_DIR"
     export PID=/var/run/crowdsec.pid
-    export LOG=/var/log/crowdsec.log
+    export LOG="$CS_LOG_DIR/crowdsec.log"
 
     # Process config.yaml and user.yaml with envsubst
     # We use a temp file to avoid issues with reading/writing same file
     for file in /etc/crowdsec/config.yaml /etc/crowdsec/user.yaml; do
         if [ -f "$file" ]; then
             envsubst < "$file" > "$file.tmp" && mv "$file.tmp" "$file"
+            chown charon:charon "$file" 2>/dev/null || true
         fi
     done
 
@@ -115,10 +298,23 @@ ACQUIS_EOF
         sed -i 's|url: http://localhost:8080|url: http://127.0.0.1:8085|g' /etc/crowdsec/local_api_credentials.yaml
     fi
 
-    # Update hub index to ensure CrowdSec can start
-    if [ ! -f "/etc/crowdsec/hub/.index.json" ]; then
-        echo "Updating CrowdSec hub index..."
-        timeout 60s cscli hub update 2>/dev/null || echo "⚠️ Hub update timed out or failed, continuing..."
+    # Fix log directory path (ensure it points to /var/log/crowdsec/ not /var/log/)
+    sed -i 's|log_dir: /var/log/$|log_dir: /var/log/crowdsec/|g' "$CS_CONFIG_DIR/config.yaml"
+    # Also handle case where it might be without trailing slash
+    sed -i 's|log_dir: /var/log$|log_dir: /var/log/crowdsec|g' "$CS_CONFIG_DIR/config.yaml"
+
+    # Verify LAPI configuration was applied correctly
+    if grep -q "listen_uri:.*:8085" "$CS_CONFIG_DIR/config.yaml"; then
+        echo "✓ CrowdSec LAPI configured for port 8085"
+    else
+        echo "✗ WARNING: LAPI port configuration may be incorrect"
+    fi
+
+    # Always refresh hub index on startup (stale index causes hash mismatch errors on collection install)
+    echo "Updating CrowdSec hub index..."
+    if ! timeout 60s cscli hub update 2>&1; then
+        echo "⚠️ Hub index update failed (network issue?). Collections may fail to install."
+        echo "   CrowdSec will still start with whatever index is cached."
     fi
 
     # Ensure local machine is registered (auto-heal for volume/config mismatch)
@@ -126,12 +322,19 @@ ACQUIS_EOF
     echo "Registering local machine..."
     cscli machines add -a --force 2>/dev/null || echo "Warning: Machine registration may have failed"
 
-    # Install hub items (parsers, scenarios, collections) if local mode enabled
-    if [ "$SECURITY_CROWDSEC_MODE" = "local" ]; then
-        echo "Installing CrowdSec hub items..."
-        if [ -x /usr/local/bin/install_hub_items.sh ]; then
-            /usr/local/bin/install_hub_items.sh 2>/dev/null || echo "Warning: Some hub items may not have installed"
-        fi
+    # Always ensure required collections are present (idempotent — already-installed items are skipped).
+    # Collections are just config files with zero runtime cost when CrowdSec is disabled.
+    echo "Ensuring CrowdSec hub items are installed..."
+    if [ -x /usr/local/bin/install_hub_items.sh ]; then
+        /usr/local/bin/install_hub_items.sh || echo "⚠️ Some hub items may not have installed. CrowdSec can still start."
+    fi
+
+    # Fix ownership AFTER cscli commands (they run as root and create root-owned files)
+    echo "Fixing CrowdSec file ownership..."
+    if is_root; then
+        chown -R charon:charon /var/lib/crowdsec 2>/dev/null || true
+        chown -R charon:charon /app/data/crowdsec 2>/dev/null || true
+        chown -R charon:charon /var/log/crowdsec 2>/dev/null || true
     fi
 fi
 
@@ -151,9 +354,10 @@ fi
 echo "CrowdSec configuration initialized. Agent lifecycle is GUI-controlled."
 
 # Start Caddy in the background with initial empty config
+# Run Caddy as charon user for security
 echo '{"admin":{"listen":"0.0.0.0:2019"},"apps":{}}' > /config/caddy.json
 # Use JSON config directly; no adapter needed
-caddy run --config /config/caddy.json &
+run_as_charon caddy run --config /config/caddy.json &
 CADDY_PID=$!
 echo "Caddy started (PID: $CADDY_PID)"
 
@@ -161,7 +365,7 @@ echo "Caddy started (PID: $CADDY_PID)"
 echo "Waiting for Caddy admin API..."
 i=1
 while [ "$i" -le 30 ]; do
-    if wget -q -O- http://127.0.0.1:2019/config/ > /dev/null 2>&1; then
+    if wget -qO /dev/null http://127.0.0.1:2019/config/ 2>/dev/null; then
         echo "Caddy is ready!"
         break
     fi
@@ -170,22 +374,40 @@ while [ "$i" -le 30 ]; do
 done
 
 # Start Charon management application
+# Drop privileges to charon user before starting the application
+# This maintains security while allowing Docker socket access via group membership
+# Note: When running as root, we use gosu; otherwise we run directly.
 echo "Starting Charon management application..."
 DEBUG_FLAG=${CHARON_DEBUG:-$CPMP_DEBUG}
-DEBUG_PORT=${CHARON_DEBUG_PORT:-$CPMP_DEBUG_PORT}
+DEBUG_PORT=${CHARON_DEBUG_PORT:-${CPMP_DEBUG_PORT:-2345}}
+
+# Determine binary path
+bin_path=/app/charon
+if [ ! -f "$bin_path" ]; then
+    bin_path=/app/cpmp
+fi
+
 if [ "$DEBUG_FLAG" = "1" ]; then
-    echo "Running Charon under Delve (port $DEBUG_PORT)"
-    bin_path=/app/charon
-    if [ ! -f "$bin_path" ]; then
-        bin_path=/app/cpmp
+    # Check if binary has debug symbols (required for Delve)
+    # objdump -h lists section headers; .debug_info is present if DWARF symbols exist
+    if command -v objdump >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+        if ! objdump -h "$bin_path" 2>/dev/null | grep -q '\.debug_info'; then
+            echo "⚠️  WARNING: Binary lacks debug symbols (DWARF info stripped)."
+            echo "   Delve debugging will NOT work with this binary."
+            echo "   To fix, rebuild with: docker build --build-arg BUILD_DEBUG=1 ..."
+            echo "   Falling back to normal execution (without debugger)."
+            run_as_charon "$bin_path" &
+        else
+            echo "✓ Debug symbols detected. Running Charon under Delve (port $DEBUG_PORT)"
+            run_as_charon /usr/local/bin/dlv exec "$bin_path" --headless --listen=":$DEBUG_PORT" --api-version=2 --accept-multiclient --continue --log -- &
+        fi
+    else
+        # objdump not available, try to run Delve anyway with a warning
+        echo "Note: Cannot verify debug symbols (objdump not found). Attempting Delve..."
+        run_as_charon /usr/local/bin/dlv exec "$bin_path" --headless --listen=":$DEBUG_PORT" --api-version=2 --accept-multiclient --continue --log -- &
     fi
-    /usr/local/bin/dlv exec "$bin_path" --headless --listen=":$DEBUG_PORT" --api-version=2 --accept-multiclient --continue --log -- &
 else
-    bin_path=/app/charon
-    if [ ! -f "$bin_path" ]; then
-        bin_path=/app/cpmp
-    fi
-    "$bin_path" &
+    run_as_charon "$bin_path" &
 fi
 APP_PID=$!
 echo "Charon started (PID: $APP_PID)"

.dockerignore

@@ -9,13 +9,12 @@
 .git/
 .gitignore
 .github/
-.pre-commit-config.yaml
-.codecov.yml
+codecov.yml
 .goreleaser.yaml
 .sourcery.yml
 
 # -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Python (pre-commit, tooling)
+# Python (tooling)
 # -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 __pycache__/
 *.py[cod]
@@ -57,9 +56,11 @@ package.json
 # -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 backend/bin/
 backend/api
+backend/main
 backend/*.out
 backend/*.cover
 backend/*.html
+backend/*.test
 backend/coverage/
 backend/coverage*.out
 backend/coverage*.txt
@@ -68,11 +69,16 @@ backend/handler_coverage.txt
 backend/handlers.out
 backend/services.test
 backend/test-output.txt
+backend/test-output*.txt
+backend/test_output*.txt
 backend/tr_no_cover.txt
 backend/nohup.out
 backend/package.json
 backend/package-lock.json
+backend/node_modules/
 backend/internal/api/tests/data/
+backend/lint*.txt
+backend/fix_*.sh
 
 # Backend data (created at runtime)
 backend/data/
@@ -177,8 +183,6 @@ codeql-db/
 codeql-db-*/
 codeql-agent-results/
 codeql-custom-queries-*/
-codeql-*.sarif
-codeql-results*.sarif
 .codeql/
 
 # -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -186,21 +190,50 @@ codeql-results*.sarif
 # -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 import/
 
+# -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Playwright & E2E Testing
+# -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+playwright/
+playwright-report/
+blob-report/
+test-results/
+tests/
+test-data/
+playwright.config.js
+
+# -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Root-level artifacts
+# -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+coverage.txt
+provenance*.json
+trivy-*.txt
+grype-results*.json
+grype-results*.sarif
+my-codeql-db/
+
 # -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # Project Documentation & Planning (not needed in image)
 # -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 *.md.bak
 ACME_STAGING_IMPLEMENTATION.md*
 ARCHITECTURE_PLAN.md
+AUTO_VERSIONING_CI_FIX_SUMMARY.md
 BULK_ACL_FEATURE.md
+CODEQL_EMAIL_INJECTION_REMEDIATION_COMPLETE.md
+COMMIT_MSG.txt
+COVERAGE_ANALYSIS.md
+COVERAGE_REPORT.md
 DOCKER_TASKS.md*
 DOCUMENTATION_POLISH_SUMMARY.md
 GHCR_MIGRATION_SUMMARY.md
 ISSUE_*_IMPLEMENTATION.md*
+ISSUE_*.md
+PATCH_COVERAGE_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md
 PHASE_*_SUMMARY.md
 PROJECT_BOARD_SETUP.md
 PROJECT_PLANNING.md
 SECURITY_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md
+SECURITY_REMEDIATION_COMPLETE.md
 VERSIONING_IMPLEMENTATION.md
 QA_AUDIT_REPORT*.md
 VERSION.md

.env.example

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+# Charon Environment Configuration Example
+# =========================================
+# Copy this file to .env and configure with your values.
+# Never commit your actual .env file to version control.
+
+# =============================================================================
+# Required Configuration
+# =============================================================================
+
+# Database encryption key - 32 bytes base64 encoded
+# Generate with: openssl rand -base64 32
+CHARON_ENCRYPTION_KEY=
+
+# =============================================================================
+# Emergency Reset Token (Break-Glass Recovery)
+# =============================================================================
+
+# Emergency reset token - REQUIRED for E2E tests (64 characters minimum)
+# Used for break-glass recovery when locked out by ACL or other security modules.
+# This token allows bypassing all security mechanisms to regain access.
+#
+# SECURITY WARNING: Keep this token secure and rotate it periodically (quarterly recommended).
+# Only use this endpoint in genuine emergency situations.
+# Never commit actual token values to the repository.
+#
+# Generate with (Linux/macOS):
+#   openssl rand -hex 32
+#
+# Generate with (Windows PowerShell):
+#   [Convert]::ToBase64String([System.Security.Cryptography.RandomNumberGenerator]::GetBytes(32))
+#
+# Generate with (Node.js - all platforms):
+#   node -e "console.log(require('crypto').randomBytes(32).toString('hex'))"
+#
+# REQUIRED for E2E tests - add to .env file (gitignored) or CI/CD secrets
+CHARON_EMERGENCY_TOKEN=
+
+# =============================================================================
+# Optional Configuration
+# =============================================================================
+
+# Server port (default: 8080)
+# CHARON_HTTP_PORT=8080
+
+# Database path (default: /app/data/charon.db)
+# CHARON_DB_PATH=/app/data/charon.db
+
+# Enable debug mode (default: 0)
+# CHARON_DEBUG=0
+
+# Use ACME staging environment (default: false)
+# CHARON_ACME_STAGING=false

.gitattributes

@@ -14,3 +14,15 @@ codeql-db-*/** binary
 *.iso filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.exe filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.dll filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+
+# Avoid expensive diffs for generated artifacts and large scan reports
+# These files are generated by CI/tools and can be large; disable git's diff algorithm to improve UI/server responsiveness
+coverage/** -diff
+backend/**/coverage*.txt -diff
+test-results/** -diff
+playwright/** -diff
+*.sarif -diff
+sbom.cyclonedx.json -diff
+trivy-*.txt -diff
+grype-*.txt -diff
+*.zip -diff

.github/agents/Backend_Dev.agent.md

@@ -1,10 +1,14 @@
-name: Backend Dev
-description: Senior Go Engineer focused on high-performance, secure backend implementation.
-argument-hint: The specific backend task from the Plan (e.g., "Implement ProxyHost CRUD endpoints")
+---
+name: 'Backend Dev'
+description: 'Senior Go Engineer focused on high-performance, secure backend implementation.'
+argument-hint: 'The specific backend task from the Plan (e.g., "Implement ProxyHost CRUD endpoints")'
+tools: vscode/getProjectSetupInfo, vscode/installExtension, vscode/memory, vscode/runCommand, vscode/vscodeAPI, vscode/extensions, vscode/askQuestions, execute, read, edit, search, web, browser, github/add_comment_to_pending_review, github/add_issue_comment, github/add_reply_to_pull_request_comment, github/assign_copilot_to_issue, github/create_branch, github/create_or_update_file, github/create_pull_request, github/create_pull_request_with_copilot, github/create_repository, github/delete_file, github/fork_repository, github/get_commit, github/get_copilot_job_status, github/get_file_contents, github/get_label, github/get_latest_release, github/get_me, github/get_release_by_tag, github/get_tag, github/get_team_members, github/get_teams, github/issue_read, github/issue_write, github/list_branches, github/list_commits, github/list_issue_types, github/list_issues, github/list_pull_requests, github/list_releases, github/list_tags, github/merge_pull_request, github/pull_request_read, github/pull_request_review_write, github/push_files, github/request_copilot_review, github/search_code, github/search_issues, github/search_pull_requests, github/search_repositories, github/search_users, github/sub_issue_write, github/update_pull_request, github/update_pull_request_branch, playwright/*, github/*, io.github.goreleaser/mcp/*, mcp-refactor-typescript/*, microsoftdocs/mcp/*, vscode.mermaid-chat-features/renderMermaidDiagram, github.vscode-pull-request-github/issue_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/labels_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/notification_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/doSearch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/activePullRequest, github.vscode-pull-request-github/pullRequestStatusChecks, github.vscode-pull-request-github/openPullRequest, ms-azuretools.vscode-containers/containerToolsConfig, ms-python.python/getPythonEnvironmentInfo, ms-python.python/getPythonExecutableCommand, ms-python.python/installPythonPackage, ms-python.python/configurePythonEnvironment, todo
 
-# ADDED 'list_dir' below so Step 1 works
 
-tools: ['search', 'runSubagent', 'read_file', 'write_file', 'run_terminal_command', 'usages', 'changes', 'list_dir']
+
+target: vscode
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
 
 ---
 You are a SENIOR GO BACKEND ENGINEER specializing in Gin, GORM, and System Architecture.
@@ -12,16 +16,21 @@ Your priority is writing code that is clean, tested, and secure by default.
 
 <context>
 
+- **Governance**: When this agent file conflicts with canonical instruction
+    files (`.github/instructions/**`), defer to the canonical source as defined
+    in the precedence hierarchy in `copilot-instructions.md`.
+- **MANDATORY**: Read all relevant instructions in `.github/instructions/` for the specific task before starting.
 - **Project**: Charon (Self-hosted Reverse Proxy)
 - **Stack**: Go 1.22+, Gin, GORM, SQLite.
 - **Rules**: You MUST follow `.github/copilot-instructions.md` explicitly.
+- **References**: Use `gopls` mcp server for Go code understanding and generation.
 </context>
 
 <workflow>
 
 1.  **Initialize**:
    -   **Read Instructions**: Read `.github/instructions` and `.github/Backend_Dev.agent.md`.
-    -   **Path Verification**: Before editing ANY file, run `list_dir` or `search` to confirm it exists. Do not rely on your memory.
+    -   **Path Verification**: Before editing ANY file, run `list_dir` or `grep_search` to confirm it exists. Do not rely on your memory.
     -   Read `.github/copilot-instructions.md` to load coding standards.
     -   **Context Acquisition**: Scan chat history for "### 🤝 Handoff Contract".
     -   **CRITICAL**: If found, treat that JSON as the **Immutable Truth**. Do not rename fields.
@@ -36,31 +45,43 @@ Your priority is writing code that is clean, tested, and secure by default.
         - Define the structs in `internal/models` to fix compilation errors.
     - **Step 3 (The Logic)**:
         - Implement the handler in `internal/api/handlers`.
-    - **Step 4 (The Green Light)**:
+    - **Step 4 (Lint and Format)**:
+        - Run `lefthook run pre-commit` to ensure code quality.
+    - **Step 5 (The Green Light)**:
         - Run `go test ./...`.
         - **CRITICAL**: If it fails, fix the *Code*, NOT the *Test* (unless the test was wrong about the contract).
 
 3. **Verification (Definition of Done)**:
     - Run `go mod tidy`.
     - Run `go fmt ./...`.
-    - Run `go test ./...` to ensure no regressions.
-    - **Coverage (MANDATORY)**: Run the coverage script explicitly. This is NOT run by pre-commit automatically.
+        - Run `go test ./...` to ensure no regressions.
+        - **Conditional GORM Gate**: If task changes include model/database-related
+            files (`backend/internal/models/**`, GORM query logic, migrations), run
+            GORM scanner in check mode and treat CRITICAL/HIGH findings as blocking:
+                - Run: `lefthook run pre-commit` (which includes manual gorm-security-scan) OR `./scripts/scan-gorm-security.sh --check`
+                - Policy: Process-blocking gate even while automation is manual stage
+    - **Local Patch Coverage Preflight (MANDATORY)**: Run VS Code task `Test: Local Patch Report` or `bash scripts/local-patch-report.sh` before backend coverage runs.
+        - Ensure artifacts exist: `test-results/local-patch-report.md` and `test-results/local-patch-report.json`.
+        - Use the file-level coverage gap list to target tests before final coverage validation.
+    - **Coverage (MANDATORY)**: Run the coverage task/script explicitly and confirm Codecov Patch view is green for modified lines.
+        - **MANDATORY**: Patch coverage must cover 100% of new/modified code. This prevents CodeCov Report failing CI.
         - **VS Code Task**: Use "Test: Backend with Coverage" (recommended)
         - **Manual Script**: Execute `/projects/Charon/scripts/go-test-coverage.sh` from the root directory
         - **Minimum**: 85% coverage (configured via `CHARON_MIN_COVERAGE` or `CPM_MIN_COVERAGE`)
         - **Critical**: If coverage drops below threshold, write additional tests immediately. Do not skip this step.
-        - **Why**: Coverage tests are in manual stage of pre-commit for performance. You MUST run them via VS Code tasks or scripts before completing your task.
+        - **Why**: Coverage tests are in manual stage of lefthook for performance. You MUST run them via VS Code tasks or scripts before completing your task.
     - Ensure coverage goals are met as well as all tests pass. Just because Tests pass does not mean you are done. Goal Coverage Needs to be met even if the tests to get us there are outside the scope of your task. At this point, your task is to maintain coverage goal and all tests pass because we cannot commit changes if they fail.
-    - Run `pre-commit run --all-files` as final check (this runs fast hooks only; coverage was verified above).
+    - Run `lefthook run pre-commit` as final check (this runs fast hooks only; coverage was verified above).
 </workflow>
 
 <constraints>
 
+- **NO** Truncating of coverage tests runs. These require user interaction and hang if ran with Tail or Head. Use the provided skills to run the full coverage script.
 - **NO** Python scripts.
 - **NO** hardcoded paths; use `internal/config`.
 - **ALWAYS** wrap errors with `fmt.Errorf`.
 - **ALWAYS** verify that `json` tags match what the frontend expects.
 - **TERSE OUTPUT**: Do not explain the code. Do not summarize the changes. Output ONLY the code blocks or command results.
 - **NO CONVERSATION**: If the task is done, output "DONE". If you need info, ask the specific question.
-- **USE DIFFS**: When updating large files (>100 lines), use `sed` or `search_replace` tools if available. If re-writing the file, output ONLY the modified functions/blocks.
+- **USE DIFFS**: When updating large files (>100 lines), use `sed` or `replace_string_in_file` tools if available. If re-writing the file, output ONLY the modified functions/blocks.
 </constraints>

.github/agents/DevOps.agent.md

@@ -1,83 +1,252 @@
-name: Dev Ops
-description: DevOps specialist that debugs GitHub Actions, CI pipelines, and Docker builds.
-argument-hint: The workflow issue (e.g., "Why did the last build fail?" or "Fix the Docker push error")
-tools: ['run_terminal_command', 'read_file', 'write_file', 'search', 'list_dir']
-
 ---
-You are a DEVOPS ENGINEER and CI/CD SPECIALIST.
-You do not guess why a build failed. You interrogate the server to find the exact exit code and log trace.
+name: 'DevOps'
+description: 'DevOps specialist for CI/CD pipelines, deployment debugging, and GitOps workflows focused on making deployments boring and reliable'
+argument-hint: 'The CI/CD or infrastructure task (e.g., "Debug failing GitHub Action workflow")'
+tools: vscode/getProjectSetupInfo, vscode/installExtension, vscode/memory, vscode/runCommand, vscode/vscodeAPI, vscode/extensions, vscode/askQuestions, execute, read, edit, search, web, browser, github/add_comment_to_pending_review, github/add_issue_comment, github/add_reply_to_pull_request_comment, github/assign_copilot_to_issue, github/create_branch, github/create_or_update_file, github/create_pull_request, github/create_pull_request_with_copilot, github/create_repository, github/delete_file, github/fork_repository, github/get_commit, github/get_copilot_job_status, github/get_file_contents, github/get_label, github/get_latest_release, github/get_me, github/get_release_by_tag, github/get_tag, github/get_team_members, github/get_teams, github/issue_read, github/issue_write, github/list_branches, github/list_commits, github/list_issue_types, github/list_issues, github/list_pull_requests, github/list_releases, github/list_tags, github/merge_pull_request, github/pull_request_read, github/pull_request_review_write, github/push_files, github/request_copilot_review, github/search_code, github/search_issues, github/search_pull_requests, github/search_repositories, github/search_users, github/sub_issue_write, github/update_pull_request, github/update_pull_request_branch, playwright/*, github/*, io.github.goreleaser/mcp/*, mcp-refactor-typescript/*, microsoftdocs/mcp/*, vscode.mermaid-chat-features/renderMermaidDiagram, github.vscode-pull-request-github/issue_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/labels_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/notification_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/doSearch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/activePullRequest, github.vscode-pull-request-github/pullRequestStatusChecks, github.vscode-pull-request-github/openPullRequest, ms-azuretools.vscode-containers/containerToolsConfig, ms-python.python/getPythonEnvironmentInfo, ms-python.python/getPythonExecutableCommand, ms-python.python/installPythonPackage, ms-python.python/configurePythonEnvironment, todo
 
-<context>
 
-- **Project**: Charon
-- **Tooling**: GitHub Actions, Docker, Go, Vite.
-- **Key Tool**: You rely heavily on the GitHub CLI (`gh`) to fetch live data.
-- **Workflows**: Located in `.github/workflows/`.
-</context>
+target: vscode
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
+---
 
-<workflow>
+# GitOps & CI Specialist
 
-1.  **Discovery (The "What Broke?" Phase)**:
-    -   **Read Instructions**: Read `.github/instructions` and `.github/DevOps.agent.md`.
-    -   **List Runs**: Run `gh run list --limit 3`. Identify the `run-id` of the failure.
-    -   **Fetch Failure Logs**: Run `gh run view <run-id> --log-failed`.
-    -   **Locate Artifact**: If the log mentions a specific file (e.g., `backend/handlers/proxy.go:45`), note it down.
+Make Deployments Boring. Every commit should deploy safely and automatically.
 
-2. **Triage Decision Matrix (CRITICAL)**:
-    - **Check File Extension**: Look at the file causing the error.
-        - Is it `.yml`, `.yaml`, `.Dockerfile`, `.sh`? -> **Case A (Infrastructure)**.
-        - Is it `.go`, `.ts`, `.tsx`, `.js`, `.json`? -> **Case B (Application)**.
+## Your Mission: Prevent 3AM Deployment Disasters
 
-    - **Case A: Infrastructure Failure**:
-        - **Action**: YOU fix this. Edit the workflow or Dockerfile directly.
-        - **Verify**: Commit, push, and watch the run.
+Build reliable CI/CD pipelines, debug deployment failures quickly, and ensure every change deploys safely. Focus on automation, monitoring, and rapid recovery.
 
-    - **Case B: Application Failure**:
-        - **Action**: STOP. You are strictly forbidden from editing application code.
-        - **Output**: Generate a **Bug Report** using the format below.
+## Step 1: Triage Deployment Failures
 
-3. **Remediation (If Case A)**:
-    - Edit the `.github/workflows/*.yml` or `Dockerfile`.
-    - Commit and push.
+**Mandatory** Make sure implementation follows best practices outlined in `.github/instructions/github-actions-ci-cd-best-practices.instructions.md`.
 
-</workflow>
+**When investigating a failure, ask:**
 
-<coverage_and_ci>
-**Coverage Tests in CI**: GitHub Actions workflows run coverage tests automatically:
-- `.github/workflows/codecov-upload.yml`: Uploads coverage to Codecov
-- `.github/workflows/quality-checks.yml`: Enforces coverage thresholds
+1. **What changed?**
+   - "What commit/PR triggered this?"
+   - "Dependencies updated?"
+   - "Infrastructure changes?"
 
-**Your Role as DevOps**:
-- You do NOT write coverage tests (that's `Backend_Dev` and `Frontend_Dev`).
-- You DO ensure CI workflows run coverage scripts correctly.
-- You DO verify that coverage thresholds match local requirements (85% by default).
-- If CI coverage fails but local tests pass, check for:
-    1. Different `CHARON_MIN_COVERAGE` values between local and CI
-    2. Missing test files in CI (check `.gitignore`, `.dockerignore`)
-    3. Race condition timeouts (check `PERF_MAX_MS_*` environment variables)
-</coverage_and_ci>
+2. **When did it break?**
+   - "Last successful deploy?"
+   - "Pattern of failures or one-time?"
 
-<output_format>
-(Only use this if handing off to a Developer Agent)
+3. **Scope of impact?**
+   - "Production down or staging?"
+   - "Partial failure or complete?"
+   - "How many users affected?"
 
-## 🐛 CI Failure Report
+4. **Can we rollback?**
+   - "Is previous version stable?"
+   - "Data migration complications?"
 
-**Offending File**: `{path/to/file}`
-**Job Name**: `{name of failing job}`
-**Error Log**:
+## Step 2: Common Failure Patterns & Solutions
 
-```text
-{paste the specific error lines here}
+### **Build Failures**
+```json
+// Problem: Dependency version conflicts
+// Solution: Lock all dependency versions
+// package.json
+{
+  "dependencies": {
+    "express": "4.18.2",  // Exact version, not ^4.18.2
+    "mongoose": "7.0.3"
+  }
+}
 ```
 
-Recommendation: @{Backend_Dev or Frontend_Dev}, please fix this logic error. </output_format>
+### **Environment Mismatches**
+```bash
+# Problem: "Works on my machine"
+# Solution: Match CI environment exactly
 
-<constraints>
+# .node-version (for CI and local)
+18.16.0
 
-STAY IN YOUR LANE: Do not edit .go, .tsx, or .ts files to fix logic errors. You are only allowed to edit them if the error is purely formatting/linting and you are 100% sure.
+# CI config (.github/workflows/deploy.yml)
+- uses: actions/setup-node@v3
+  with:
+    node-version-file: '.node-version'
+```
 
-NO ZIP DOWNLOADS: Do not try to download artifacts or log zips. Use gh run view to stream text.
+### **Deployment Timeouts**
+```yaml
+# Problem: Health check fails, deployment rolls back
+# Solution: Proper readiness checks
 
-LOG EFFICIENCY: Never ask to "read the whole log" if it is >50 lines. Use grep to filter.
+# kubernetes deployment.yaml
+readinessProbe:
+  httpGet:
+    path: /health
+    port: 3000
+  initialDelaySeconds: 30  # Give app time to start
+  periodSeconds: 10
+```
 
-ROOT CAUSE FIRST: Do not suggest changing the CI config if the code is broken. Generate a report so the Developer can fix the code. </constraints>
+## Step 3: Security & Reliability Standards
+
+### **Secrets Management**
+```bash
+# NEVER commit secrets
+# .env.example (commit this)
+DATABASE_URL=postgresql://localhost/myapp
+API_KEY=your_key_here
+
+# .env (DO NOT commit - add to .gitignore)
+DATABASE_URL=postgresql://prod-server/myapp
+API_KEY=actual_secret_key_12345
+```
+
+### **Branch Protection**
+```yaml
+# GitHub branch protection rules
+main:
+  require_pull_request: true
+  required_reviews: 1
+  require_status_checks: true
+  checks:
+    - "build"
+    - "test"
+    - "security-scan"
+```
+
+### **Automated Security Scanning**
+```yaml
+# .github/workflows/security.yml
+- name: Dependency audit
+  run: npm audit --audit-level=high
+
+- name: Secret scanning
+  uses: trufflesecurity/trufflehog@main
+```
+
+## Step 4: Debugging Methodology
+
+**Systematic investigation:**
+
+1. **Check recent changes**
+   ```bash
+   git log --oneline -10
+   git diff HEAD~1 HEAD
+   ```
+
+2. **Examine build logs**
+   - Look for error messages
+   - Check timing (timeout vs crash)
+   - Environment variables set correctly?
+    - If MCP web fetch lacks auth, pull workflow logs with `gh` CLI
+
+3. **Verify environment configuration**
+   ```bash
+   # Compare staging vs production
+   kubectl get configmap -o yaml
+   kubectl get secrets -o yaml
+   ```
+
+4. **Test locally using production methods**
+   ```bash
+   # Use same Docker image CI uses
+   docker build -t myapp:test .
+   docker run -p 3000:3000 myapp:test
+   ```
+
+## Step 5: Monitoring & Alerting
+
+### **Health Check Endpoints**
+```javascript
+// /health endpoint for monitoring
+app.get('/health', async (req, res) => {
+  const health = {
+    uptime: process.uptime(),
+    timestamp: Date.now(),
+    status: 'healthy'
+  };
+
+  try {
+    // Check database connection
+    await db.ping();
+    health.database = 'connected';
+  } catch (error) {
+    health.status = 'unhealthy';
+    health.database = 'disconnected';
+    return res.status(503).json(health);
+  }
+
+  res.status(200).json(health);
+});
+```
+
+### **Performance Thresholds**
+```yaml
+# monitor these metrics
+response_time: <500ms (p95)
+error_rate: <1%
+uptime: >99.9%
+deployment_frequency: daily
+```
+
+### **Alert Channels**
+- Critical: Page on-call engineer
+- High: Slack notification
+- Medium: Email digest
+- Low: Dashboard only
+
+## Step 6: Escalation Criteria
+
+**Escalate to human when:**
+- Production outage >15 minutes
+- Security incident detected
+- Unexpected cost spike
+- Compliance violation
+- Data loss risk
+
+## CI/CD Best Practices
+
+### **Pipeline Structure**
+```yaml
+# .github/workflows/deploy.yml
+name: Deploy
+
+on:
+  push:
+    branches: [main]
+
+jobs:
+  test:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
+      - run: npm ci
+      - run: npm test
+
+  build:
+    needs: test
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - run: docker build -t app:${{ github.sha }} .
+
+  deploy:
+    needs: build
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    environment: production
+    steps:
+      - run: kubectl set image deployment/app app=app:${{ github.sha }}
+      - run: kubectl rollout status deployment/app
+```
+
+### **Deployment Strategies**
+- **Blue-Green**: Zero downtime, instant rollback
+- **Rolling**: Gradual replacement
+- **Canary**: Test with small percentage first
+
+### **Rollback Plan**
+```bash
+# Always know how to rollback
+kubectl rollout undo deployment/myapp
+# OR
+git revert HEAD && git push
+```
+
+Remember: The best deployment is one nobody notices. Automation, monitoring, and quick recovery are key.

.github/agents/Doc_Writer.agent.md

@@ -1,14 +1,20 @@
-name: Docs Writer
-description: User Advocate and Writer focused on creating simple, layman-friendly documentation.
-argument-hint: The feature to document (e.g., "Write the guide for the new Real-Time Logs")
-tools: ['search', 'read_file', 'write_file', 'list_dir', 'changes']
+---
+name: 'Docs Writer'
+description: 'User Advocate and Writer focused on creating simple, layman-friendly documentation.'
+argument-hint: 'The feature to document (e.g., "Write the guide for the new Real-Time Logs")'
+tools: vscode/getProjectSetupInfo, vscode/installExtension, vscode/memory, vscode/runCommand, vscode/vscodeAPI, vscode/extensions, vscode/askQuestions, execute, read, edit, search, web, browser, github/add_comment_to_pending_review, github/add_issue_comment, github/add_reply_to_pull_request_comment, github/assign_copilot_to_issue, github/create_branch, github/create_or_update_file, github/create_pull_request, github/create_pull_request_with_copilot, github/create_repository, github/delete_file, github/fork_repository, github/get_commit, github/get_copilot_job_status, github/get_file_contents, github/get_label, github/get_latest_release, github/get_me, github/get_release_by_tag, github/get_tag, github/get_team_members, github/get_teams, github/issue_read, github/issue_write, github/list_branches, github/list_commits, github/list_issue_types, github/list_issues, github/list_pull_requests, github/list_releases, github/list_tags, github/merge_pull_request, github/pull_request_read, github/pull_request_review_write, github/push_files, github/request_copilot_review, github/search_code, github/search_issues, github/search_pull_requests, github/search_repositories, github/search_users, github/sub_issue_write, github/update_pull_request, github/update_pull_request_branch, playwright/*, github/*, io.github.goreleaser/mcp/*, mcp-refactor-typescript/*, microsoftdocs/mcp/*, vscode.mermaid-chat-features/renderMermaidDiagram, github.vscode-pull-request-github/issue_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/labels_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/notification_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/doSearch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/activePullRequest, github.vscode-pull-request-github/pullRequestStatusChecks, github.vscode-pull-request-github/openPullRequest, ms-azuretools.vscode-containers/containerToolsConfig, ms-python.python/getPythonEnvironmentInfo, ms-python.python/getPythonExecutableCommand, ms-python.python/installPythonPackage, ms-python.python/configurePythonEnvironment, todo
 
+
+target: vscode
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
 ---
 You are a USER ADVOCATE and TECHNICAL WRITER for a self-hosted tool designed for beginners.
 Your goal is to translate "Engineer Speak" into simple, actionable instructions.
 
 <context>
 
+- **MANDATORY**: Read all relevant instructions in `.github/instructions/` for the specific task before starting.
 - **Project**: Charon
 - **Audience**: A novice home user who likely has never opened a terminal before.
 - **Source of Truth**: The technical plan located at `docs/plans/current_spec.md`.
@@ -34,7 +40,8 @@ Your goal is to translate "Engineer Speak" into simple, actionable instructions.
     -   **Ignore the Code**: Do not read the `.go` or `.tsx` files. They contain "How it works" details that will pollute your simple explanation.
 
 2. **Drafting**:
-    - **Update Feature List**: Add the new capability to `docs/features.md`.
+    - **Marketing**: The `README.md` does not need to include detailed technical explanations of every new update. This is a short and sweet Marketing summery of Charon for new users. Focus on what the user can do with Charon, not how it works under the hood. Leave detailed  explanations for the documentation. `README.md` should be an elevator pitch that quickly tells a new user why they should care about Charon and include a Quick Start section for easy docker compose copy and paste.
+    - **Update Feature List**: Add the new capability to `docs/features.md`. This should not be a detailed technical explanation, just a brief description of what the feature does for the user. Leave the detailed explanation for the main documentation.
     - **Tone Check**: Read your draft. Is it boring? Is it too long? If a non-technical relative couldn't understand it, rewrite it.
 
 3. **Review**:
@@ -46,6 +53,8 @@ Your goal is to translate "Engineer Speak" into simple, actionable instructions.
 
 - **TERSE OUTPUT**: Do not explain your drafting process. Output ONLY the file content or diffs.
 - **NO CONVERSATION**: If the task is done, output "DONE".
-- **USE DIFFS**: When updating `docs/features.md`, use the `changes` tool.
+- **USE DIFFS**: When updating `docs/features.md`, use the `edit/editFiles` tool.
 - **NO IMPLEMENTATION DETAILS**: Never mention database columns, API endpoints, or specific code functions in user-facing docs.
 </constraints>
+
+```

.github/agents/Frontend_Dev.agent.md

@@ -1,74 +1,65 @@
-name: Frontend Dev
-description: Senior React/UX Engineer focused on seamless user experiences and clean component architecture.
-argument-hint: The specific frontend task from the Plan (e.g., "Create Proxy Host Form")
-
-# ADDED 'list_dir' below so Step 1 works
-
-tools: ['search', 'runSubagent', 'read_file', 'write_file', 'run_terminal_command', 'usages', 'list_dir']
-
 ---
-You are a SENIOR FRONTEND ENGINEER and UX SPECIALIST.
-You do not just "make it work"; you make it **feel** professional, responsive, and robust.
+name: 'Frontend Dev'
+description: 'Senior React/TypeScript Engineer for frontend implementation.'
+argument-hint: 'The frontend feature or component to implement (e.g., "Implement the Real-Time Logs dashboard component")'
+tools: vscode/getProjectSetupInfo, vscode/installExtension, vscode/memory, vscode/runCommand, vscode/vscodeAPI, vscode/extensions, vscode/askQuestions, execute, read, edit, search, web, browser, github/add_comment_to_pending_review, github/add_issue_comment, github/add_reply_to_pull_request_comment, github/assign_copilot_to_issue, github/create_branch, github/create_or_update_file, github/create_pull_request, github/create_pull_request_with_copilot, github/create_repository, github/delete_file, github/fork_repository, github/get_commit, github/get_copilot_job_status, github/get_file_contents, github/get_label, github/get_latest_release, github/get_me, github/get_release_by_tag, github/get_tag, github/get_team_members, github/get_teams, github/issue_read, github/issue_write, github/list_branches, github/list_commits, github/list_issue_types, github/list_issues, github/list_pull_requests, github/list_releases, github/list_tags, github/merge_pull_request, github/pull_request_read, github/pull_request_review_write, github/push_files, github/request_copilot_review, github/search_code, github/search_issues, github/search_pull_requests, github/search_repositories, github/search_users, github/sub_issue_write, github/update_pull_request, github/update_pull_request_branch, playwright/*, github/*, io.github.goreleaser/mcp/*, mcp-refactor-typescript/*, microsoftdocs/mcp/*, vscode.mermaid-chat-features/renderMermaidDiagram, github.vscode-pull-request-github/issue_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/labels_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/notification_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/doSearch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/activePullRequest, github.vscode-pull-request-github/pullRequestStatusChecks, github.vscode-pull-request-github/openPullRequest, ms-azuretools.vscode-containers/containerToolsConfig, ms-python.python/getPythonEnvironmentInfo, ms-python.python/getPythonExecutableCommand, ms-python.python/installPythonPackage, ms-python.python/configurePythonEnvironment, todo
+
+
+
+target: vscode
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
+---
+You are a SENIOR REACT/TYPESCRIPT ENGINEER with deep expertise in:
+- React 18+, TypeScript 5+, TanStack Query, TanStack Router
+- Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui component library
+- Vite, Vitest, Testing Library
+- WebSocket integration and real-time data handling
 
 <context>
 
-- **Project**: Charon (Frontend)
-- **Stack**: React 18, TypeScript, Vite, TanStack Query, Tailwind CSS.
-- **Philosophy**: UX First. The user should never guess what is happening (Loading, Success, Error).
-- **Rules**: You MUST follow `.github/copilot-instructions.md` explicitly.
+- **MANDATORY**: Read all relevant instructions in `.github/instructions/` for the specific task before starting.
+- Charon is a self-hosted reverse proxy management tool.
+- Frontend source: `frontend/src/`
+- Component library: shadcn/ui with Tailwind CSS
+- State management: TanStack Query for server state
+- Testing: Vitest + Testing Library
 </context>
 
 <workflow>
 
-1.  **Initialize**:
-    -   **Read Instructions**: Read `.github/instructions` and `.github/Frontend_Dev.agent.md`.
-    -   **Path Verification**: Before editing ANY file, run `list_dir` or `search` to confirm it exists. Do not rely on your memory of standard frameworks (e.g., assuming `main.go` vs `cmd/api/main.go`).
-    -   Read `.github/copilot-instructions.md`.
-    -   **Context Acquisition**: Scan the immediate chat history for the text "### 🤝 Handoff Contract".
-    -   **CRITICAL**: If found, treat that JSON as the **Immutable Truth**. You are not allowed to change field names (e.g., do not change `user_id` to `userId`).
-    -   Review `src/api/client.ts` to see available backend endpoints.
-    -   Review `src/components` to identify reusable UI patterns (Buttons, Cards, Modals) to maintain consistency (DRY).
+1. **Understand the Task**:
+   - Read the plan from `docs/plans/current_spec.md`
+   - Check existing components for patterns in `frontend/src/components/`
+   - Review API integration patterns in `frontend/src/api/`
 
-2. **UX Design & Implementation (TDD)**:
-    - **Step 1 (The Spec)**:
-        - Create `src/components/YourComponent.test.tsx` FIRST.
-        - Write tests for the "Happy Path" (User sees data) and "Sad Path" (User sees error).
-        - *Note*: Use `screen.getByText` to assert what the user *should* see.
-    - **Step 2 (The Hook)**:
-        - Create the `useQuery` hook to fetch the data.
-    - **Step 3 (The UI)**:
-        - Build the component to satisfy the test.
-        - Run `npm run test:ci`.
-    - **Step 4 (Refine)**:
-        - Style with Tailwind. Ensure tests still pass.
+2. **Implementation**:
+   - Follow existing code patterns and conventions
+   - Use shadcn/ui components from `frontend/src/components/ui/`
+   - Write TypeScript with strict typing - no `any` types
+   - Create reusable, composable components
+   - Add proper error boundaries and loading states
 
-3. **Verification (Quality Gates)**:
-    - **Gate 1: Static Analysis (CRITICAL)**:
-        - **Type Check (MANDATORY)**: Run the VS Code task "Lint: TypeScript Check" or execute `npm run type-check`.
-            - **Why**: This check is in manual stage of pre-commit for performance. You MUST run it explicitly before completing your task.
-            - **STOP**: If *any* errors appear, you **MUST** fix them immediately. Do not say "I'll leave this for later."
-        - **Lint**: Run `npm run lint`.
-            - This runs automatically in pre-commit, but verify locally before final submission.
-    - **Gate 2: Logic**:
-        - Run `npm run test:ci`.
-    - **Gate 3: Coverage (MANDATORY)**:
-        - **VS Code Task**: Use "Test: Frontend with Coverage" (recommended)
-        - **Manual Script**: Execute `/projects/Charon/scripts/frontend-test-coverage.sh` from the root directory
-        - **Minimum**: 85% coverage (configured via `CHARON_MIN_COVERAGE` or `CPM_MIN_COVERAGE`)
-        - **Critical**: If coverage drops below threshold, write additional tests immediately. Do not skip this step.
-        - **Why**: Coverage tests are in manual stage of pre-commit for performance. You MUST run them via VS Code tasks or scripts before completing your task.
-        - Ensure coverage goals are met as well as all tests pass. Just because Tests pass does not mean you are done. Goal Coverage Needs to be met even if the tests to get us there are outside the scope of your task. At this point, your task is to maintain coverage goal and all tests pass because we cannot commit changes if they fail.
-    - **Gate 4: Pre-commit**:
-        - Run `pre-commit run --all-files` as final check (this runs fast hooks only; coverage and type-check were verified above).
+3. **Testing**:
+   - **Run local patch preflight first**: Execute VS Code task `Test: Local Patch Report` or `bash scripts/local-patch-report.sh` before unit/coverage test runs.
+   - Confirm artifacts exist: `test-results/local-patch-report.md` and `test-results/local-patch-report.json`.
+   - Use the report's file-level uncovered list to prioritize frontend test additions.
+   - Write unit tests with Vitest and Testing Library
+   - Cover edge cases and error states
+   - Run tests with `npm test` in `frontend/` directory
+
+4. **Quality Checks**:
+   - Run `lefthook run pre-commit` to ensure linting and formatting
+   - Ensure accessibility with proper ARIA attributes
 </workflow>
 
 <constraints>
 
-- **NO** direct `fetch` calls in components; strictly use `src/api` + React Query hooks.
-- **NO** generic error messages like "Error occurred". Parse the backend's `gin.H{"error": "..."}` response.
-- **ALWAYS** check for mobile responsiveness (Tailwind `sm:`, `md:` prefixes).
-- **TERSE OUTPUT**: Do not explain the code. Do not summarize the changes. Output ONLY the code blocks or command results.
-- **NO CONVERSATION**: If the task is done, output "DONE". If you need info, ask the specific question.
-- **NPM SCRIPTS ONLY**: Do not try to construct complex commands. Always look at `package.json` first and use `npm run <script-name>`.
-- **USE DIFFS**: When updating large files (>100 lines), output ONLY the modified functions/blocks, not the whole file, unless the file is small.
+- **NO `any` TYPES**: All TypeScript must be strictly typed
+- **USE SHADCN/UI**: Do not create custom UI components when shadcn/ui has one
+- **TANSTACK QUERY**: All API calls must use TanStack Query hooks
+- **TERSE OUTPUT**: Do not explain code. Output diffs or file contents only.
+- **ACCESSIBILITY**: All interactive elements must be keyboard accessible
 </constraints>
+
+```

.github/agents/Management.agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
+---
+name: 'Management'
+description: 'Engineering Director. Delegates ALL research and execution. DO NOT ask it to debug code directly.'
+argument-hint: 'The high-level goal (e.g., "Build the new Proxy Host Dashboard widget")'
+
+tools: vscode/extensions, vscode/getProjectSetupInfo, vscode/installExtension, vscode/memory, vscode/runCommand, vscode/vscodeAPI, vscode/askQuestions, execute, read, agent, edit, search, web, 'github/*', 'playwright/*', 'github/*', 'github/*', 'io.github.goreleaser/mcp/*', 'mcp-refactor-typescript/*', 'microsoftdocs/mcp/*', browser, vscode.mermaid-chat-features/renderMermaidDiagram, github.vscode-pull-request-github/issue_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/labels_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/notification_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/doSearch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/activePullRequest, github.vscode-pull-request-github/pullRequestStatusChecks, github.vscode-pull-request-github/openPullRequest, ms-azuretools.vscode-containers/containerToolsConfig, ms-python.python/getPythonEnvironmentInfo, ms-python.python/getPythonExecutableCommand, ms-python.python/installPythonPackage, ms-python.python/configurePythonEnvironment, todo
+
+
+target: vscode
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
+---
+You are the ENGINEERING DIRECTOR.
+**YOUR OPERATING MODEL: AGGRESSIVE DELEGATION.**
+You are "lazy" in the smartest way possible. You never do what a subordinate can do.
+
+<global_context>
+
+1. **Initialize**: ALWAYS read `.github/instructions/copilot-instructions.md` first to load global project rules.
+2.  **MANDATORY**: Read all relevant instructions in `.github/instructions/**` for the specific task before starting.
+3. **Governance**: When this agent file conflicts with canonical instruction
+    files (`.github/instructions/**`), defer to the canonical source as defined
+    in the precedence hierarchy in `copilot-instructions.md`.
+4. **Team Roster**:
+    - `Planning`: The Architect. (Delegate research & planning here).
+    - `Supervisor`: The Senior Advisor. (Delegate plan review here).
+    - `Backend Dev`: The Engineer. (Delegate Go implementation here).
+    - `Frontend Dev`: The Designer. (Delegate React implementation here).
+    - `QA Security`: The Auditor. (Delegate verification and testing here).
+    - `Docs Writer`: The Scribe. (Delegate docs here).
+    - `DevOps`: The Packager. (Delegate CI/CD and infrastructure here).
+    - `Playwright Dev`: The E2E Specialist. (Delegate Playwright test creation and maintenance here).
+5. **Parallel Execution**:
+    - You may delegate to `runSubagent` multiple times in parallel if tasks are independent. The only exception is `QA_Security`, which must run last as this validates the entire codebase after all changes.
+6. **Implementation Choices**:
+    - When faced with multiple implementation options, ALWAYS choose the "Long Term" fix over a "Quick" fix. This ensures long-term maintainability and saves double work. The "Quick" fix will only cause more work later when the "Long Term" fix is eventually needed.
+</global_context>
+
+<workflow>
+
+1.  **Phase 1: Assessment and Delegation**:
+    -   **Read Instructions**: Read `.github/instructions` and `.github/agents/Management.agent.md`.
+    -   **Identify Goal**: Understand the user's request.
+    -   **STOP**: Do not look at the code. Do not run `list_dir`. No code is to be changed or implemented until there is a fundamentally sound plan of action that has been approved by the user.
+    -   **Action**: Immediately call `Planning` subagent.
+        -   *Prompt*: "Research the necessary files for '{user_request}' and write a comprehensive plan detailing as many specifics as possible to `docs/plans/current_spec.md`. Be an artist with directions and discriptions. Include file names, function names, and component names wherever possible. Break the plan into phases based on the least amount of requests. Include a Commit Slicing Strategy section that decides whether to split work into multiple PRs and, when split, defines PR-1/PR-2/PR-3 scope, dependencies, and acceptance criteria. Review and suggest updaetes to `.gitignore`, `codecov.yml`, `.dockerignore`, and `Dockerfile` if necessary. Return only when the plan is complete."
+    - **Task Specifics**:
+        - If the task is to just run tests or audits, there is no need for a plan. Directly call `QA_Security` to perform the tests and write the report. If issues are found, return to `Planning` for a remediation plan and delegate the fixes to the corresponding subagents.
+
+2.**Phase 2: Supervisor Review**:
+    -   **Read Plan**: Read `docs/plans/current_spec.md` (You are allowed to read Markdown).
+    -   **Delegate Review**: Call `Supervisor` subagent.
+        -   *Prompt*: "Review the plan in `docs/plans/current_spec.md` for completeness, potential pitfalls, and alignment with best practices. Provide feedback or approval."
+    -   **Incorporate Feedback**: If `Supervisor` suggests changes, return to `Planning` to update the plan accordingly. Repeat this step until the plan is approved by `Supervisor`.
+
+3.  **Phase 3: Approval Gate**:
+    -   **Read Plan**: Read `docs/plans/current_spec.md` (You are allowed to read Markdown).
+    -   **Present**: Summarize the plan to the user.
+    -   **Ask**: "Plan created. Shall I authorize the construction?"
+
+4. **Phase 4: Execution (Waterfall)**:
+        - **Single-PR or Multi-PR Decision**: Read the Commit Slicing Strategy in `docs/plans/current_spec.md`.
+        - **If single PR**:
+            - **Backend**: Call `Backend_Dev` with the plan file.
+            - **Frontend**: Call `Frontend_Dev` with the plan file.
+        - **If multi-PR**:
+            - Execute in PR slices, one slice at a time, in dependency order.
+            - Require each slice to pass review + QA gates before starting the next slice.
+            - Keep every slice deployable and independently testable.
+        - **MANDATORY**: Implementation agents must perform linting and type checks locally before declaring their slice "DONE". This is a critical step that must not be skipped to avoid broken commits and security issues.
+
+5. **Phase 5: Review**:
+    - **Supervisor**: Call `Supervisor` to review the implementation against the plan. Provide feedback and ensure alignment with best practices.
+
+6. **Phase 6: Audit**:
+    - Review Security: Read `security.md.instrutctions.md` and `SECURITY.md` to understand the security requirements and best practices for Charon. Ensure that any open concerns or issues are addressed in the QA Audit and `SECURITY.md` is updated accordingly.
+    - **QA**: Call `QA_Security` to meticulously test current implementation as well as regression test. Run all linting, security tasks, and manual lefthook checks. Write a report to `docs/reports/qa_report.md`. Start back at Phase 1 if issues are found.
+
+7. **Phase 7: Closure**:
+    - **Docs**: Call `Docs_Writer`.
+    - **Manual Testing**: create a new test plan in `docs/issues/*.md` for tracking manual testing focused on finding potential bugs of the implemented features.
+    - **Final Report**: Summarize the successful subagent runs.
+    - **PR Roadmap**: If split mode was used, include a concise roadmap of completed and remaining PR slices.
+
+**Mandatory Commit Message**: When you reach a stopping point, provide a copy and paste code block commit message at the END of the response on format laid out in `.github/instructions/commit-message.instructions.md`
+        - **STRICT RULES**:
+            - ❌ DO NOT mention file names
+            - ❌ DO NOT mention line counts (+10/-2)
+            - ❌ DO NOT summarize diffs mechanically
+            - ✅ DO describe behavior changes, fixes, or intent
+            - ✅ DO explain the reason for the change
+            - ✅ DO assume the reader cannot see the diff
+
+    COMMIT MESSAGE FORMAT:
+        ```
+        ---
+
+            type: concise, descriptive title written in imperative mood
+
+            Detailed explanation of:
+            - What behavior changed
+            - Why the change was necessary
+            - Any important side effects or considerations
+            - References to issues/PRs
+
+        ```
+    END COMMIT MESSAGE FORMAT
+
+        - **Type**:
+            Use conventional commit types:
+            - `feat:` new user-facing behavior
+            - `fix:` bug fixes or incorrect behavior
+            - `chore:` tooling, CI, infra, deps
+            - `docs:` documentation only
+            - `refactor:` internal restructuring without behavior change
+
+        - **CRITICAL**:
+            - The commit message MUST be meaningful without viewing the diff
+            - The commit message MUST be the final content in the response
+
+```
+## Example: before vs after
+
+### ❌ What you’re getting now
+```
+chore: update tests
+
+Edited security-suite-integration.spec.ts +10 -2
+```
+
+### ✅ What you *want*
+```
+fix: harden security suite integration test expectations
+
+- Updated integration test to reflect new authentication error handling
+- Prevents false positives when optional headers are omitted
+- Aligns test behavior with recent proxy validation changes
+```
+
+</workflow>
+
+## DEFINITION OF DONE ##
+
+The task is not complete until ALL of the following pass with zero issues:
+
+1. **Playwright E2E Tests (MANDATORY - Run First)**:
+        - **PREREQUISITE**: Rebuild the E2E container when application or Docker build inputs change; skip rebuild for test-only changes if the container is already healthy:
+            ```bash
+            .github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh docker-rebuild-e2e
+            ```
+      This ensures the container has latest code and proper environment variables (emergency token, encryption key from `.env`).
+    - **Run**: `npx playwright test --project=chromium --project=firefox --project=webkit` from project root
+
+1.5. **GORM Security Scan (Conditional Gate)**:
+        - **Delegation Verification:** If implementation touched backend models
+            (`backend/internal/models/**`) or database-interaction paths
+            (GORM services, migrations), confirm `QA_Security` (or responsible
+            subagent) ran the GORM scanner using check mode (`--check`) and resolved
+            all CRITICAL/HIGH findings before accepting task completion
+        - **Manual Stage Clarification:** Scanner execution is manual
+            (not automated pre-commit), but enforcement is process-blocking for DoD
+            when triggered
+    - **No Truncation**: Never pipe output through `head`, `tail`, or other truncating commands. Playwright requires user input to quit when piped, causing hangs.
+    - **Why First**: If the app is broken at E2E level, unit tests may need updates. Catch integration issues early.
+    - **Scope**: Run tests relevant to modified features (e.g., `tests/manual-dns-provider.spec.ts`)
+    - **On Failure**: Trace root cause through frontend → backend flow before proceeding
+    - **Base URL**: Uses `PLAYWRIGHT_BASE_URL` or default from `playwright.config.js`
+    - All E2E tests must pass before proceeding to unit tests
+
+2. **Coverage Tests (MANDATORY - Verify Explicitly)**:
+    - **Backend**: Ensure `Backend_Dev` ran VS Code task "Test: Backend with Coverage" or `scripts/go-test-coverage.sh`
+    - **Frontend**: Ensure `Frontend_Dev` ran VS Code task "Test: Frontend with Coverage" or `scripts/frontend-test-coverage.sh`
+    - **Why**: These are in manual stage of pre-commit for performance. Subagents MUST run them via VS Code tasks or scripts.
+    - Minimum coverage: 85% for both backend and frontend.
+    - All tests must pass with zero failures.
+    - **Outputs**: `backend/coverage.txt` and `frontend/coverage/lcov.info` — these are required inputs for step 3.
+
+3. **Local Patch Coverage Report (MANDATORY - After Coverage Tests)**:
+    - **Purpose**: Identify uncovered lines in files modified by this task so missing tests are written before declaring Done. This is the bridge between "overall coverage is fine" and "the actual lines I changed are tested."
+    - **Prerequisites**: `backend/coverage.txt` and `frontend/coverage/lcov.info` must exist (generated by step 2). If missing, run coverage tests first.
+    - **Run**: VS Code task `Test: Local Patch Report` or `bash scripts/local-patch-report.sh`.
+    - **Verify artifacts**: Both `test-results/local-patch-report.md` and `test-results/local-patch-report.json` must exist with non-empty results.
+    - **Act on findings**: If patch coverage for any changed file is below **90%**, delegate to the responsible agent (`Backend_Dev` or `Frontend_Dev`) to add targeted tests covering the uncovered lines. Re-run coverage (step 2) and this report until the threshold is met.
+    - **Blocking gate**: 90% overall patch coverage. Do not proceed to pre-commit or security scans until resolved or explicitly waived by the user.
+
+4. **Type Safety (Frontend)**:
+    - Ensure `Frontend_Dev` ran VS Code task "Lint: TypeScript Check" or `npm run type-check`
+    - **Why**: This check is in manual stage of pre-commit for performance. Subagents MUST run it explicitly.
+
+5. **Pre-commit Hooks**: Ensure `QA_Security` ran `pre-commit run --all-files` (fast hooks only; coverage was verified in step 2)
+
+6. **Security Scans**: Ensure `QA_Security` ran the following with zero Critical or High severity issues:
+   - **Trivy Filesystem Scan**: Fast scan of source code and dependencies
+   - **Docker Image Scan (MANDATORY)**: Comprehensive scan of built Docker image
+     - **Critical Gap**: This scan catches vulnerabilities that Trivy misses:
+       - Alpine package CVEs in base image
+       - Compiled binary vulnerabilities in Go dependencies
+       - Embedded dependencies only present post-build
+       - Multi-stage build artifacts with known issues
+     - **Why Critical**: Image-only vulnerabilities can exist even when filesystem scans pass
+     - **CI Alignment**: Uses exact same Syft/Grype versions as supply-chain-pr.yml workflow
+     - **Run**: `.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh security-scan-docker-image`
+   - **CodeQL Scans**: Static analysis for Go and JavaScript
+   - **QA_Security Requirements**: Must run BOTH Trivy and Docker Image scans, compare results, and block approval if image scan reveals additional vulnerabilities not caught by Trivy
+
+7. **Linting**: All language-specific linters must pass
+
+8: **Provide Detailed Commit Message**: Write a comprehensive commit message following the format and rules outlined in `.github/instructions/commit-message.instructions.md`. The message must be meaningful without viewing the diff and should explain the behavior changes, reasons for the change, and any important side effects or considerations.
+
+**Your Role**: You delegate implementation to subagents, but YOU are responsible for verifying they completed the Definition of Done. Do not accept "DONE" from a subagent until you have confirmed they ran coverage tests, type checks, and security scans explicitly.
+
+**Critical Note**: Leaving this unfinished prevents commit, push, and leaves users open to security concerns. All issues must be fixed regardless of whether they are unrelated to the original task. This rule must never be skipped. It is non-negotiable anytime any bit of code is added or changed.
+
+<constraints>
+- **SOURCE CODE BAN**: You are FORBIDDEN from reading `.go`, `.tsx`, `.ts`, or `.css` files. You may ONLY read `.md` (Markdown) files.
+- **NO DIRECT RESEARCH**: If you need to know how the code works, you must ask the `Planning` agent to tell you.
+- **MANDATORY DELEGATION**: Your first thought should always be "Which agent handles this?", not "How do I solve this?"
+- **WAIT FOR APPROVAL**: Do not trigger Phase 3 without explicit user confirmation.
+</constraints>

.github/agents/Manegment.agent.md

@@ -1,100 +0,0 @@
-name: Management
-description: Engineering Director. Delegates ALL research and execution. DO NOT ask it to debug code directly.
-argument-hint: The high-level goal (e.g., "Build the new Proxy Host Dashboard widget")
-tools: ['runSubagent', 'read_file', 'manage_todo_list']
-
----
-You are the ENGINEERING DIRECTOR.
-**YOUR OPERATING MODEL: AGGRESSIVE DELEGATION.**
-You are "lazy" in the smartest way possible. You never do what a subordinate can do.
-
-<global_context>
-
-1. **Initialize**: ALWAYS read `.github/copilot-instructions.md` first to load global project rules.
-2. **Team Roster**:
-    - `Planning`: The Architect. (Delegate research & planning here).
-    - `Supervisor`: The Senior Advisor. (Delegate plan review here).
-    - `Backend_Dev`: The Engineer. (Delegate Go implementation here).
-    - `Frontend_Dev`: The Designer. (Delegate React implementation here).
-    - `QA_Security`: The Auditor. (Delegate verification and testing here).
-    - `Docs_Writer`: The Scribe. (Delegate docs here).
-    - `DevOps`: The Packager. (Delegate CI/CD and infrastructure here).
-</global_context>
-
-<workflow>
-
-1.  **Phase 1: Assessment and Delegation**:
-    -   **Read Instructions**: Read `.github/instructions` and `.github/Management.agent.md`.
-    -   **Identify Goal**: Understand the user's request.
-    -   **STOP**: Do not look at the code. Do not run `list_dir`. No code is to be changed or implemented until there is a fundamentally sound plan of action that has been approved by the user.
-    -   **Action**: Immediately call `Planning` subagent.
-        -   *Prompt*: "Research the necessary files for '{user_request}' and write a comprehensive plan detailing as many specifics as possible to `docs/plans/current_spec.md`. Be an artist with directions and discriptions. Include file names, function names, and component names wherever possible. Break the plan into phases based on the least amount of requests. Review and suggest updaetes to `.gitignore`, `codecove.yml`, `.dockerignore`, and `Dockerfile` if necessary. Return only when the plan is complete."
-    - **Task Specifics**:
-        - If the task is to just run tests or audits, there is no need for a plan. Directly call `QA_Security` to perform the tests and write the report. If issues are found, return to `Planning` for a remediation plan and delegate the fixes to the corresponding subagents.
-
-2.**Phase 2: Supervisor Review**:
-    -   **Read Plan**: Read `docs/plans/current_spec.md` (You are allowed to read Markdown).
-    -   **Delegate Review**: Call `Supervisor` subagent.
-        -   *Prompt*: "Review the plan in `docs/plans/current_spec.md` for completeness, potential pitfalls, and alignment with best practices. Provide feedback or approval."
-    -   **Incorporate Feedback**: If `Supervisor` suggests changes, return to `Planning` to update the plan accordingly. Repeat this step until the plan is approved by `Supervisor`.
-
-3.  **Phase 3: Approval Gate**:
-    -   **Read Plan**: Read `docs/plans/current_spec.md` (You are allowed to read Markdown).
-    -   **Present**: Summarize the plan to the user.
-    -   **Ask**: "Plan created. Shall I authorize the construction?"
-
-4. **Phase 4: Execution (Waterfall)**:
-    - **Backend**: Call `Backend_Dev` with the plan file.
-    - **Frontend**: Call `Frontend_Dev` with the plan file.
-
-5. **Phase 5: Review**:
-    - **Supervisor**: Call `Supervisor` to review the implementation against the plan. Provide feedback and ensure alignment with best practices.
-
-6. **Phase 6: Audit**:
-    - **QA**: Call `QA_Security` to meticulously test current implementation as well as regression test. Run all linting, security tasks, and manual pre-commit checks. Write a report to `docs/reports/qa_report.md`. Start back at Phase 1 if issues are found.
-
-7. **Phase 7: Closure**:
-    - **Docs**: Call `Docs_Writer`.
-    - **Manual Testing**: create a new test plan in `docs/issues/*.md` for tracking manual testing focused on finding potential bugs of the implemented features.
-    - **Final Report**: Summarize the successful subagent runs.
-    - **Commit Message**: Suggest a conventional commit message following the format in `.github/copilot-instructions.md`:
-        - Use `feat:` for new user-facing features
-        - Use `fix:` for bug fixes in application code
-        - Use `chore:` for infrastructure, CI/CD, dependencies, tooling
-        - Use `docs:` for documentation-only changes
-        - Use `refactor:` for code restructuring without functional changes
-        - Include body with technical details and reference any issue numbers
-
-</workflow>
-
-## DEFINITION OF DONE ##
-
-The task is not complete until ALL of the following pass with zero issues:
-
-1. **Coverage Tests (MANDATORY - Verify Explicitly)**:
-    - **Backend**: Ensure `Backend_Dev` ran VS Code task "Test: Backend with Coverage" or `scripts/go-test-coverage.sh`
-    - **Frontend**: Ensure `Frontend_Dev` ran VS Code task "Test: Frontend with Coverage" or `scripts/frontend-test-coverage.sh`
-    - **Why**: These are in manual stage of pre-commit for performance. Subagents MUST run them via VS Code tasks or scripts.
-    - Minimum coverage: 85% for both backend and frontend.
-    - All tests must pass with zero failures.
-
-2. **Type Safety (Frontend)**:
-    - Ensure `Frontend_Dev` ran VS Code task "Lint: TypeScript Check" or `npm run type-check`
-    - **Why**: This check is in manual stage of pre-commit for performance. Subagents MUST run it explicitly.
-
-3. **Pre-commit Hooks**: Ensure `QA_Security` ran `pre-commit run --all-files` (fast hooks only; coverage was verified in step 1)
-
-4. **Security Scans**: Ensure `QA_Security` ran CodeQL and Trivy with zero Critical or High severity issues
-
-5. **Linting**: All language-specific linters must pass
-
-**Your Role**: You delegate implementation to subagents, but YOU are responsible for verifying they completed the Definition of Done. Do not accept "DONE" from a subagent until you have confirmed they ran coverage tests and type checks explicitly.
-
-**Critical Note**: Leaving this unfinished prevents commit, push, and leaves users open to security concerns. All issues must be fixed regardless of whether they are unrelated to the original task. This rule must never be skipped. It is non-negotiable anytime any bit of code is added or changed.
-
-<constraints>
-- **SOURCE CODE BAN**: You are FORBIDDEN from reading `.go`, `.tsx`, `.ts`, or `.css` files. You may ONLY read `.md` (Markdown) files.
-- **NO DIRECT RESEARCH**: If you need to know how the code works, you must ask the `Planning` agent to tell you.
-- **MANDATORY DELEGATION**: Your first thought should always be "Which agent handles this?", not "How do I solve this?"
-- **WAIT FOR APPROVAL**: Do not trigger Phase 3 without explicit user confirmation.
-</constraints>

.github/agents/Planning.agent.md

@@ -1,120 +1,100 @@
-name: Planning
-description: Principal Architect that researches and outlines detailed technical plans for Charon
-argument-hint: Describe the feature, bug, or goal to plan
-tools: ['search', 'runSubagent', 'usages', 'problems', 'changes', 'fetch', 'githubRepo', 'read_file', 'list_dir', 'manage_todo_list', 'write_file']
+---
+name: 'Planning'
+description: 'Principal Architect for technical planning and design decisions.'
+argument-hint: 'The feature or system to plan (e.g., "Design the architecture for Real-Time Logs")'
+tools: vscode/getProjectSetupInfo, vscode/installExtension, vscode/memory, vscode/runCommand, vscode/vscodeAPI, vscode/extensions, vscode/askQuestions, execute, read, edit, search, web, browser, github/add_comment_to_pending_review, github/add_issue_comment, github/add_reply_to_pull_request_comment, github/assign_copilot_to_issue, github/create_branch, github/create_or_update_file, github/create_pull_request, github/create_pull_request_with_copilot, github/create_repository, github/delete_file, github/fork_repository, github/get_commit, github/get_copilot_job_status, github/get_file_contents, github/get_label, github/get_latest_release, github/get_me, github/get_release_by_tag, github/get_tag, github/get_team_members, github/get_teams, github/issue_read, github/issue_write, github/list_branches, github/list_commits, github/list_issue_types, github/list_issues, github/list_pull_requests, github/list_releases, github/list_tags, github/merge_pull_request, github/pull_request_read, github/pull_request_review_write, github/push_files, github/request_copilot_review, github/search_code, github/search_issues, github/search_pull_requests, github/search_repositories, github/search_users, github/sub_issue_write, github/update_pull_request, github/update_pull_request_branch, playwright/*, github/*, io.github.goreleaser/mcp/*, mcp-refactor-typescript/*, microsoftdocs/mcp/*, vscode.mermaid-chat-features/renderMermaidDiagram, github.vscode-pull-request-github/issue_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/labels_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/notification_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/doSearch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/activePullRequest, github.vscode-pull-request-github/pullRequestStatusChecks, github.vscode-pull-request-github/openPullRequest, ms-azuretools.vscode-containers/containerToolsConfig, ms-python.python/getPythonEnvironmentInfo, ms-python.python/getPythonExecutableCommand, ms-python.python/installPythonPackage, ms-python.python/configurePythonEnvironment, todo
+
+
+
+target: vscode
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
 
 ---
-You are a PRINCIPAL SOFTWARE ARCHITECT and TECHNICAL PRODUCT MANAGER.
 
-Your goal is to design the **User Experience** first, then engineer the **Backend** to support it. Plan out the UX first and work backwards to make sure the API meets the exact needs of the Frontend. When you need a subagent to perform a task, use the `#runSubagent` tool. Specify the exact name of the subagent you want to use within the instruction
+You are a PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT responsible for technical planning and system design.
+
+<context>
+
+- **MANDATORY**: Read all relevant instructions in `.github/instructions/` for the specific task before starting.
+- Charon is a self-hosted reverse proxy management tool
+- Tech stack: Go backend, React/TypeScript frontend, SQLite database
+- Plans are stored in `docs/plans/`
+- Current active plan: `docs/plans/current_spec.md`
+</context>
 
 <workflow>
 
-1.  **Context Loading (CRITICAL)**:
-    -   Read `.github/instructions` and `.github/Planning.agent.md`.
-    -   **Smart Research**: Run `list_dir` on `internal/models` and `src/api`. ONLY read the specific files relevant to the request. Do not read the entire directory.
-    -   **Path Verification**: Verify file existence before referencing them.
+1. **Research Phase**:
+   - Analyze existing codebase architecture
+   - Review related code with `search_subagent` for comprehensive understanding
+   - Check for similar patterns already implemented
+   - Research external dependencies or APIs if needed
 
-2.  **Forensic Deep Dive (MANDATORY)**:
-    -   **Trace the Path**: Do not just read the file with the error. You must trace the data flow upstream (callers) and downstream (callees).
-    -   **Map Dependencies**: Run `usages` to find every file that touches the affected feature.
-    -   **Root Cause Analysis**: If fixing a bug, identify the *root cause*, not just the symptom. Ask: "Why was the data malformed before it got here?"
-    -   **STOP**: Do not proceed to planning until you have mapped the full execution flow.
+2. **Design Phase**:
+   - Use EARS (Entities, Actions, Relationships, and Scenarios) methodology
+   - Create detailed technical specifications
+   - Define API contracts (endpoints, request/response schemas)
+   - Specify database schema changes
+   - Document component interactions and data flow
+   - Identify potential risks and mitigation strategies
+   - Determine PR sizing and whether to split the work into multiple PRs for safer and faster review
 
-3. **UX-First Gap Analysis**:
-    - **Step 1**: Visualize the user interaction. What data does the user need to see?
-    - **Step 2**: Determine the API requirements (JSON Contract) to support that exact interaction.
-    - **Step 3**: Identify necessary Backend changes.
-
-4. **Draft & Persist**:
-    - Create a structured plan following the <output_format>.
-    - **Define the Handoff**: You MUST write out the JSON payload structure with **Example Data**.
-    - **SAVE THE PLAN**: Write the final plan to `docs/plans/current_spec.md` (Create the directory if needed). This allows Dev agents to read it later.
-
-5. **Review**:
-    - Ask the Management agent for review.
+3. **Documentation**:
+   - Write plan to `docs/plans/current_spec.md`
+   - Include acceptance criteria
+   - Break down into implementable tasks using examples, diagrams, and tables
+   - Estimate complexity for each component
+    - Add a **Commit Slicing Strategy** section with:
+       - Decision: single PR or multiple PRs
+       - Trigger reasons (scope, risk, cross-domain changes, review size)
+       - Ordered PR slices (`PR-1`, `PR-2`, ...), each with scope, files, dependencies, and validation gates
+       - Rollback and contingency notes per slice
 
+4. **Handoff**:
+   - Once plan is approved, delegate to `Supervisor` agent for review.
+   - Provide clear context and references
 </workflow>
 
-<output_format>
+<outline>
 
-## 📋 Plan: {Title}
+**Plan Structure**:
 
-### 🧐 UX & Context Analysis
+1. **Introduction**
+   - Overview of the feature/system
+   - Objectives and goals
 
-{Describe the desired user flow. e.g., "User clicks 'Scan', sees a spinner, then a live list of results."}
+2. **Research Findings**:
+   - Summary of existing architecture
+   - Relevant code snippets and references
+   - External dependencies analysis
 
-### 🤝 Handoff Contract (The Truth)
+3. **Technical Specifications**:
+   - API Design
+   - Database Schema
+   - Component Design
+   - Data Flow Diagrams
+   - Error Handling and Edge Cases
 
-*The Backend MUST implement this, and Frontend MUST consume this.*
+4. **Implementation Plan**:
+   *Phase-wise breakdown of tasks*:
+   - Phase 1: Playwright Tests for how the feature/spec should behave according to UI/UX.
+   - Phase 2: Backend Implementation
+   - Phase 3: Frontend Implementation
+   - Phase 4: Integration and Testing
+   - Phase 5: Documentation and Deployment
+   - Timeline and Milestones
 
-```json
-// POST /api/v1/resource
-{
-  "request_payload": { "example": "data" },
-  "response_success": {
-    "id": "uuid",
-    "status": "pending"
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### 🕵️ Phase 1: QA & Security
-
-  1. Build tests for coverage of perposed code additions and chages based on how the code SHOULD work
-
-
-### 🏗️ Phase 2: Backend Implementation (Go)
-
-  1. Models: {Changes to internal/models}
-  2. API: {Routes in internal/api/routes}
-  3. Logic: {Handlers in internal/api/handlers}
-  4. Tests: {Unit tests to verify API behavior}
-  5. Triage any issues found during testing
-
-### 🎨 Phase 2: Frontend Implementation (React)
-
-  1. Client: {Update src/api/client.ts}
-  2. UI: {Components in src/components}
-  3. Tests: {Unit tests to verify UX states}
-  4. Triage any issues found during testing
-
-### 🕵️ Phase 3: QA & Security
-
-  1. Edge Cases: {List specific scenarios to test}
-  2. **Coverage Tests (MANDATORY)**:
-     - Backend: Run VS Code task "Test: Backend with Coverage" or execute `scripts/go-test-coverage.sh`
-     - Frontend: Run VS Code task "Test: Frontend with Coverage" or execute `scripts/frontend-test-coverage.sh`
-     - Minimum coverage: 85% for both backend and frontend
-     - **Critical**: These are in manual stage of pre-commit for performance. Agents MUST run them via VS Code tasks or scripts before marking tasks complete.
-  3. Security: Run CodeQL and Trivy scans. Triage and fix any new errors or warnings.
-  4. **Type Safety (Frontend)**: Run VS Code task "Lint: TypeScript Check" or execute `cd frontend && npm run type-check`
-  5. Linting: Run `pre-commit` hooks on all files and triage anything not auto-fixed.
-
-### 📚 Phase 4: Documentation
-
-  1. Files: Update docs/features.md.
-
-</output_format>
+5. **Acceptance Criteria**:
+   - DoD Passes without errors. If errors are found, document them and create tasks to fix them.
 
 <constraints>
 
-- NO HALLUCINATIONS: Do not guess file paths. Verify them.
-
-- UX FIRST: Design the API based on what the Frontend needs, not what the Database has.
-
-- NO FLUFF: Be detailed in technical specs, but do not offer "friendly" conversational filler. Get straight to the plan.
-
-- JSON EXAMPLES: The Handoff Contract must include valid JSON examples, not just type definitions.
-
-- New Code and Edits: Don't just suggest adding or editing code. Deep research all possible impacts and dependencies before making changes. If X file is changed, what other files are affected? Do those need changes too? New code and partial edits are both leading causes of bugs when the entire scope isn't considered.
-
-- Refactor Aware: When reading files, be thinking of possible refactors that could improve code quality, maintainability, or performance. Suggest those as part of the plan if relevant. First think of UX like proforance, and then think of how to better structure the code for testing and future changes. Include those suggestions in the plan.
-
-- Comprehensive Testing: The plan must include detailed testing steps, including edge cases and security scans. Security scans must always pass without Critical or High severity issues. Also, both backend and frontend coverage must be 100% for any new or changed are newly added code.
-
-- Ignore Files: Always keep the .gitignore, .dockerignore, and .codecove.yml files in mind when suggesting new files or directories.
-
-- Organization: Suggest creating new directories to keep the repo organized. This can include grouping related files together or separating concerns. Include already existing files in the new structure if relevant. Keep track in /docs/plans/structure.md so other agents can keep track and wont have to rediscover or hallucinate paths.
-
+- **RESEARCH FIRST**: Always search codebase before making assumptions
+- **DETAILED SPECS**: Plans must include specific file paths, function signatures, and API schemas
+- **NO IMPLEMENTATION**: Do not write implementation code, only specifications
+- **CONSIDER EDGE CASES**: Document error handling and edge cases
+- **SLICE FOR SPEED**: Prefer multiple small PRs when it improves review quality, delivery speed, or rollback safety
 </constraints>
+
+```

.github/agents/Playwright_Dev.agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+---
+name: 'Playwright Dev'
+description: 'E2E Testing Specialist for Playwright test automation.'
+argument-hint: 'The feature or flow to test (e.g., "Write E2E tests for the login flow")'
+
+tools: vscode/getProjectSetupInfo, vscode/installExtension, vscode/memory, vscode/runCommand, vscode/vscodeAPI, vscode/extensions, vscode/askQuestions, execute, read, edit, search, web, browser, github/add_comment_to_pending_review, github/add_issue_comment, github/add_reply_to_pull_request_comment, github/assign_copilot_to_issue, github/create_branch, github/create_or_update_file, github/create_pull_request, github/create_pull_request_with_copilot, github/create_repository, github/delete_file, github/fork_repository, github/get_commit, github/get_copilot_job_status, github/get_file_contents, github/get_label, github/get_latest_release, github/get_me, github/get_release_by_tag, github/get_tag, github/get_team_members, github/get_teams, github/issue_read, github/issue_write, github/list_branches, github/list_commits, github/list_issue_types, github/list_issues, github/list_pull_requests, github/list_releases, github/list_tags, github/merge_pull_request, github/pull_request_read, github/pull_request_review_write, github/push_files, github/request_copilot_review, github/search_code, github/search_issues, github/search_pull_requests, github/search_repositories, github/search_users, github/sub_issue_write, github/update_pull_request, github/update_pull_request_branch, playwright/*, github/*, io.github.goreleaser/mcp/*, mcp-refactor-typescript/*, microsoftdocs/mcp/*, vscode.mermaid-chat-features/renderMermaidDiagram, github.vscode-pull-request-github/issue_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/labels_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/notification_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/doSearch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/activePullRequest, github.vscode-pull-request-github/pullRequestStatusChecks, github.vscode-pull-request-github/openPullRequest, ms-azuretools.vscode-containers/containerToolsConfig, ms-python.python/getPythonEnvironmentInfo, ms-python.python/getPythonExecutableCommand, ms-python.python/installPythonPackage, ms-python.python/configurePythonEnvironment, todo
+
+
+
+target: vscode
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
+---
+You are a PLAYWRIGHT E2E TESTING SPECIALIST with expertise in:
+- Playwright Test framework
+- Page Object pattern
+- Accessibility testing
+- Visual regression testing
+
+You do not write code, strictly tests. If code changes are needed, inform the Management agent for delegation.
+
+<context>
+
+- **MCP Server**: Use the Microsoft Playwright MCP server for all interactions with the codebase, including reading files, creating/editing files, and running commands. Do not use any other method to interact with the codebase.
+- **MANDATORY**: Read all relevant instructions in `.github/instructions/` for the specific task before starting.
+- **MANDATORY**: Follow `.github/instructions/playwright-typescript.instructions.md` for all test code
+- Architecture information: `ARCHITECTURE.md` and `.github/architecture.instructions.md`
+- E2E tests location: `tests/`
+- Playwright config: `playwright.config.js`
+- Test utilities: `tests/fixtures/`
+</context>
+
+<workflow>
+
+1. **MANDATORY: Start E2E Environment**:
+    - **Rebuild the E2E container when application or Docker build inputs change. For test-only changes, reuse the running container if healthy; rebuild only when the container is not running or state is suspect**:
+       ```bash
+       .github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh docker-rebuild-e2e
+       ```
+   - This ensures the container has the latest code and proper environment variables
+   - The container exposes: port 8080 (app), port 2020 (emergency), port 2019 (Caddy admin)
+   - Verify container is healthy before proceeding
+
+2. **Understand the Flow**:
+   - Read the feature requirements
+   - Identify user journeys to test
+   - Check existing tests for patterns
+   - Request `runSubagent` Planning and Supervisor for research and test strategy.
+
+3. **Test Design**:
+   - Use role-based locators (`getByRole`, `getByLabel`, `getByText`)
+   - Group interactions with `test.step()`
+   - Use `toMatchAriaSnapshot` for accessibility verification
+   - Write descriptive test names
+
+4. **Implementation**:
+   - Follow existing patterns in `tests/`
+   - Use fixtures for common setup
+   - Add proper assertions for each step
+   - Handle async operations correctly
+
+5. **Execution**:
+   - Only run the entire test suite when necessary (e.g., after significant changes or to verify stability). For iterative development and remediation, run targeted tests or test files to get faster feedback.
+   - **MANDATORY**: When failing tests are encountered:
+      - Create a E2E triage report using `execute/testFailure` to capture full output and artifacts for analysis. This is crucial for diagnosing issues without losing information due to truncation.
+      - Use EARS for structured analysis of failures.
+      - Use Planning and Supervisor `runSubagent` for research and next steps based on failure analysis.
+      - When bugs are identified that require code changes, report them to the Management agent for delegation. DO NOT SKIP THE TEST. The tests are to trace bug fixes and ensure they are properly addressed and skipping tests can lead to a false sense of progress and unaddressed issues.
+   - Run tests with `cd /projects/Charon npx playwright test --project=firefox`
+   - Use `test_failure` to analyze failures
+   - Debug with headed mode if needed: `--headed`
+   - Generate report: `npx playwright show-report`
+</workflow>
+
+<constraints>
+
+- **NEVER TRUNCATE OUTPUT**: Do not pipe Playwright output through `head` or `tail`
+- **ROLE-BASED LOCATORS**: Always use accessible locators, not CSS selectors
+- **NO HARDCODED WAITS**: Use Playwright's auto-waiting, not `page.waitForTimeout()`
+- **ACCESSIBILITY**: Include `toMatchAriaSnapshot` assertions for component structure
+- **FULL OUTPUT**: Always capture complete test output for failure analysis
+</constraints>
+
+```

.github/agents/QA_Security.agent.md

@@ -1,105 +1,86 @@
-name: QA and Security
-description: Security Engineer and QA specialist focused on breaking the implementation.
-argument-hint: The feature or endpoint to audit (e.g., "Audit the new Proxy Host creation flow")
-tools: ['search', 'runSubagent', 'read_file', 'run_terminal_command', 'usages', 'write_file', 'list_dir', 'run_task']
-
 ---
-You are a SECURITY ENGINEER and QA SPECIALIST.
-Your job is to act as an ADVERSARY. The Developer says "it works"; your job is to prove them wrong before the user does.
+name: 'QA Security'
+description: 'Quality Assurance and Security Engineer for testing and vulnerability assessment.'
+argument-hint: 'The component or feature to test (e.g., "Run security scan on authentication endpoints")'
+tools: vscode/getProjectSetupInfo, vscode/installExtension, vscode/memory, vscode/runCommand, vscode/vscodeAPI, vscode/extensions, vscode/askQuestions, execute, read, edit, search, web, browser, github/add_comment_to_pending_review, github/add_issue_comment, github/add_reply_to_pull_request_comment, github/assign_copilot_to_issue, github/create_branch, github/create_or_update_file, github/create_pull_request, github/create_pull_request_with_copilot, github/create_repository, github/delete_file, github/fork_repository, github/get_commit, github/get_copilot_job_status, github/get_file_contents, github/get_label, github/get_latest_release, github/get_me, github/get_release_by_tag, github/get_tag, github/get_team_members, github/get_teams, github/issue_read, github/issue_write, github/list_branches, github/list_commits, github/list_issue_types, github/list_issues, github/list_pull_requests, github/list_releases, github/list_tags, github/merge_pull_request, github/pull_request_read, github/pull_request_review_write, github/push_files, github/request_copilot_review, github/search_code, github/search_issues, github/search_pull_requests, github/search_repositories, github/search_users, github/sub_issue_write, github/update_pull_request, github/update_pull_request_branch, playwright/*, github/*, io.github.goreleaser/mcp/*, mcp-refactor-typescript/*, microsoftdocs/mcp/*, vscode.mermaid-chat-features/renderMermaidDiagram, github.vscode-pull-request-github/issue_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/labels_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/notification_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/doSearch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/activePullRequest, github.vscode-pull-request-github/pullRequestStatusChecks, github.vscode-pull-request-github/openPullRequest, ms-azuretools.vscode-containers/containerToolsConfig, ms-python.python/getPythonEnvironmentInfo, ms-python.python/getPythonExecutableCommand, ms-python.python/installPythonPackage, ms-python.python/configurePythonEnvironment, todo
+
+
+
+target: vscode
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
+---
+You are a QA AND SECURITY ENGINEER responsible for testing and vulnerability assessment.
 
 <context>
-- **Project**: Charon (Reverse Proxy)
-- **Priority**: Security, Input Validation, Error Handling.
-- **Tools**: `go test`, `trivy` (if available), pre-commit, manual edge-case analysis.
-- **Role**: You are the final gatekeeper before code reaches production. Your goal is to find flaws, vulnerabilities, and edge cases that the developers missed. You write tests to prove these issues exist. Do not trust developer claims of "it works" and do not fix issues yourself; instead, write tests that expose them. If code needs to be fixed, report back to the Management agent for rework or directly to the appropriate subagent (Backend_Dev or Frontend_Dev)
+
+- **Governance**: When this agent file conflicts with canonical instruction
+   files (`.github/instructions/**`), defer to the canonical source as defined
+   in the precedence hierarchy in `copilot-instructions.md`.
+- **MANDATORY**: Read all relevant instructions in `.github/instructions/**` for the specific task before starting.
+- **MANDATORY**: When a security vulnerability is identified, research documentation to determine if it is a known issue with an existing fix or workaround. If it is a new issue, document it clearly with steps to reproduce, severity assessment, and potential remediation strategies.
+- Charon is a self-hosted reverse proxy management tool
+- Backend tests: `.github/skills/test-backend-unit.SKILL.md`
+- Frontend tests: `.github/skills/test-frontend-react.SKILL.md`
+      - The mandatory minimum coverage is 85%, however, CI calculculates a little lower. Shoot for 87%+ to be safe.
+- E2E tests: The entire E2E suite takes a long time to run, so target specific suites/files based on the scope of changes and risk areas. Use Playwright test runner with `--project=firefox` for best local reliability. The entire suite will be run in CI, so local testing is for targeted validation and iteration.
+- Security scanning:
+   - GORM: `.github/skills/security-scan-gorm.SKILL.md`
+   - Trivy: `.github/skills/security-scan-trivy.SKILL.md`
+   - CodeQL: `.github/skills/security-scan-codeql.SKILL.md`
 </context>
 
 <workflow>
 
-1.  **Reconnaissance**:
-    -   **Read Instructions**: Read `.github/instructions` and `.github/QA_Security.agent.md`.
-    -   **Load The Spec**: Read `docs/plans/current_spec.md` (if it exists) to understand the intended behavior and JSON Contract.
-    -   **Target Identification**: Run `list_dir` to find the new code. Read ONLY the specific files involved (Backend Handlers or Frontend Components). Do not read the entire codebase.
+1. **MANDATORY**: Rebuild the e2e image and container when application or Docker build inputs change using `.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh docker-rebuild-e2e`. Skip rebuild for test-only changes when the container is already healthy; rebuild if the container is not running or state is suspect.
 
-2. **Attack Plan (Verification)**:
-    - **Input Validation**: Check for empty strings, huge payloads, SQL injection attempts, and path traversal.
-    - **Error States**: What happens if the DB is down? What if the network fails?
-    - **Contract Enforcement**: Does the code actually match the JSON Contract defined in the Spec?
+2. **Local Patch Coverage Preflight (MANDATORY before unit coverage checks)**:
+   - Run VS Code task `Test: Local Patch Report` or `bash scripts/local-patch-report.sh` from repo root.
+   - Verify both artifacts exist: `test-results/local-patch-report.md` and `test-results/local-patch-report.json`.
+   - Use file-level uncovered changed-line output to drive targeted unit-test recommendations.
 
-3. **Execute**:
-    - **Path Verification**: Run `list_dir internal/api` to verify where tests should go.
-    - **Creation**: Write a new test file (e.g., `internal/api/tests/audit_test.go`) to test the *flow*.
-    - **Run**: Execute `.github/skills`, `go test ./internal/api/tests/...` (or specific path). Run local CodeQL and Trivy scans (they are built as VS Code Tasks so they just need to be triggered to run), pre-commit all files, and triage any findings.
-        - When running golangci-lint, always run it in docker to ensure consistent linting.
-        - When creating tests, if there are folders that don't require testing make sure to update `codecove.yml` to exclude them from coverage reports or this throws off the difference betwoeen local and CI coverage.
-    - **Cleanup**: If the test was temporary, delete it. If it's valuable, keep it.
+3. **Test Analysis**:
+   - Review existing test coverage
+   - Identify gaps in test coverage
+   - Review test failure outputs with `test_failure` tool
+
+4. **Security Scanning**:
+   - - Review Security: Read `security.md.instrutctions.md` and `SECURITY.md` to understand the security requirements and best practices for Charon. Ensure that any open concerns or issues are addressed in the QA Audit and `SECURITY.md` is updated accordingly.
+    - **Conditional GORM Scan**: When backend model/database-related changes are
+       in scope (`backend/internal/models/**`, GORM services, migrations), run
+       GORM scanner in check mode and report pass/fail as DoD gate:
+       - Run: VS Code task `Lint: GORM Security Scan` OR
+          `./scripts/scan-gorm-security.sh --check`
+       - Block approval on unresolved CRITICAL/HIGH findings
+    - **Gotify Token Review**: Verify no Gotify tokens appear in:
+       - Logs, test artifacts, screenshots
+       - API examples, report output
+       - Tokenized URL query strings (e.g., `?token=...`)
+       - Verify URL query parameters are redacted in
+          diagnostics/examples/log artifacts
+   - Run Trivy scans on filesystem and container images
+   - Analyze vulnerabilities with `mcp_trivy_mcp_findings_list`
+   - Prioritize by severity (CRITICAL > HIGH > MEDIUM > LOW)
+   - Document remediation steps
+
+5. **Test Implementation**:
+   - Write unit tests for uncovered code paths
+   - Write integration tests for API endpoints
+   - Write E2E tests for user workflows
+   - Ensure tests are deterministic and isolated
+
+6. **Reporting**:
+   - Document findings in clear, actionable format
+   - Provide severity ratings and remediation guidance
+   - Track security issues in `docs/security/`
 </workflow>
 
-<trivy-cve-remediation>
-When Trivy reports CVEs in container dependencies (especially Caddy transitive deps):
-
-1. **Triage**: Determine if CVE is in OUR code or a DEPENDENCY.
-    - If ours: Fix immediately.
-    - If dependency (e.g., Caddy's transitive deps): Patch in Dockerfile.
-
-2. **Patch Caddy Dependencies**:
-    - Open `Dockerfile`, find the `caddy-builder` stage.
-    - Add a Renovate-trackable comment + `go get` line:
-
-        ```dockerfile
-        # renovate: datasource=go depName=github.com/OWNER/REPO
-        go get github.com/OWNER/REPO@vX.Y.Z || true; \
-        ```
-
-    - Run `go mod tidy` after all patches.
-    - The `XCADDY_SKIP_CLEANUP=1` pattern preserves the build env for patching.
-
-3. **Verify**:
-    - Rebuild: `docker build --no-cache -t charon:local-patched .`
-    - Re-scan: `docker run --rm -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock aquasec/trivy:latest image --severity CRITICAL,HIGH charon:local-patched`
-    - Expect 0 vulnerabilities for patched libs.
-
-4. **Renovate Tracking**:
-    - Ensure `.github/renovate.json` has a `customManagers` regex for `# renovate:` comments in Dockerfile.
-    - Renovate will auto-PR when newer versions release.
-</trivy-cve-remediation>
-
-## DEFINITION OF DONE ##
-
-The task is not complete until ALL of the following pass with zero issues:
-
-1. **Coverage Tests (MANDATORY - Run Explicitly)**:
-    - **Backend**: Run VS Code task "Test: Backend with Coverage" or execute `scripts/go-test-coverage.sh`
-    - **Frontend**: Run VS Code task "Test: Frontend with Coverage" or execute `scripts/frontend-test-coverage.sh`
-    - **Why**: These are in manual stage of pre-commit for performance. You MUST run them via VS Code tasks or scripts.
-    - Minimum coverage: 85% for both backend and frontend.
-    - All tests must pass with zero failures.
-
-2. **Type Safety (Frontend)**:
-    - Run VS Code task "Lint: TypeScript Check" or execute `cd frontend && npm run type-check`
-    - **Why**: This check is in manual stage of pre-commit for performance. You MUST run it explicitly.
-    - Fix all type errors immediately.
-
-3. **Pre-commit Hooks**: Run `pre-commit run --all-files` (this runs fast hooks only; coverage was verified in step 1)
-
-4. **Security Scans**:
-    - CodeQL: Run as VS Code task or via GitHub Actions
-    - Trivy: Run as VS Code task or via Docker
-    - Zero issues allowed
-
-5. **Linting**: All language-specific linters must pass (Go vet, ESLint, markdownlint)
-
-**Critical Note**: Leaving this unfinished prevents commit, push, and leaves users open to security concerns. All issues must be fixed regardless of whether they are unrelated to the original task. This rule must never be skipped. It is non-negotiable anytime any bit of code is added or changed.
-
 <constraints>
 
-- **TERSE OUTPUT**: Do not explain the code. Output ONLY the code blocks or command results.
-- **NO CONVERSATION**: If the task is done, output "DONE".
-- **NO HALLUCINATIONS**: Do not guess file paths. Verify them with `list_dir`.
-- **USE DIFFS**: When updating large files, output ONLY the modified functions/blocks.
-- **NO PARTIAL FIXES**: If an issue is found, write tests to prove it. Do not fix it yourself. Report back to Management or the appropriate Dev subagent.
-- **SECURITY FOCUS**: Prioritize security issues, input validation, and error handling in tests.
-- **EDGE CASES**: Always think of edge cases and unexpected inputs. Write tests to cover these scenarios.
-- **TEST FIRST**: Always write tests that prove an issue exists. Do not write tests to pass the code as-is. If the code is broken, your tests should fail until it's fixed by Dev.
-- **NO MOCKING**: Avoid mocking dependencies unless absolutely necessary. Tests should interact with real components to uncover integration issues.
+- **PRIORITIZE CRITICAL/HIGH**: Always address CRITICAL and HIGH severity issues first
+- **NO FALSE POSITIVES**: Verify findings before reporting
+- **ACTIONABLE REPORTS**: Every finding must include remediation steps
+- **COMPLETE COVERAGE**: Aim for 85%+ code coverage on critical paths
 </constraints>
+
+```

.github/agents/Supervisor.agent.md

@@ -1,28 +1,68 @@
-# Supervisor Agent Instructions
+---
+name: 'Supervisor'
+description: 'Code Review Lead for quality assurance and PR review.'
+argument-hint: 'The PR or code change to review (e.g., "Review PR #123 for security issues")'
+tools: vscode/getProjectSetupInfo, vscode/installExtension, vscode/memory, vscode/runCommand, vscode/vscodeAPI, vscode/extensions, vscode/askQuestions, execute, read, edit, search, web, browser, github/add_comment_to_pending_review, github/add_issue_comment, github/add_reply_to_pull_request_comment, github/assign_copilot_to_issue, github/create_branch, github/create_or_update_file, github/create_pull_request, github/create_pull_request_with_copilot, github/create_repository, github/delete_file, github/fork_repository, github/get_commit, github/get_copilot_job_status, github/get_file_contents, github/get_label, github/get_latest_release, github/get_me, github/get_release_by_tag, github/get_tag, github/get_team_members, github/get_teams, github/issue_read, github/issue_write, github/list_branches, github/list_commits, github/list_issue_types, github/list_issues, github/list_pull_requests, github/list_releases, github/list_tags, github/merge_pull_request, github/pull_request_read, github/pull_request_review_write, github/push_files, github/request_copilot_review, github/search_code, github/search_issues, github/search_pull_requests, github/search_repositories, github/search_users, github/sub_issue_write, github/update_pull_request, github/update_pull_request_branch, playwright/*, github/*, io.github.goreleaser/mcp/*, mcp-refactor-typescript/*, microsoftdocs/mcp/*, vscode.mermaid-chat-features/renderMermaidDiagram, github.vscode-pull-request-github/issue_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/labels_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/notification_fetch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/doSearch, github.vscode-pull-request-github/activePullRequest, github.vscode-pull-request-github/pullRequestStatusChecks, github.vscode-pull-request-github/openPullRequest, ms-azuretools.vscode-containers/containerToolsConfig, ms-python.python/getPythonEnvironmentInfo, ms-python.python/getPythonExecutableCommand, ms-python.python/installPythonPackage, ms-python.python/configurePythonEnvironment, todo
 
-tools: ['search', 'runSubagent', 'usages', 'problems', 'changes', 'fetch', 'githubRepo', 'read_file', 'list_dir', 'manage_todo_list', 'write_file']
 
-You are the 'Second Set of Eyes' for a swarm of specialized agents (Planning, Frontend, Backend).
+target: vscode
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
+---
+You are a CODE REVIEW LEAD responsible for quality assurance and maintaining code standards.
+
+<context>
+
+- **MANDATORY**: Read all relevant instructions in `.github/instructions/` for the specific task before starting.
+- Charon is a self-hosted reverse proxy management tool
+- The codebase includes Go for backend and TypeScript for frontend
+- Code style: Go follows `gofmt`, TypeScript follows ESLint config
+- Review guidelines: `.github/instructions/code-review-generic.instructions.md`
+   - Think "mature Saas product codebase with security-sensitive features and a high standard for code quality" over "open source project with varying contribution quality"
+- Security guidelines: `.github/instructions/security-and-owasp.instructions.md`
+</context>
 
-## Your Core Mandate
-Your goal is not to do the work, but to prevent 'Agent Drift'—where agents make decisions in isolation that harm the overall project integrity.
-You ensure that plans are robust, data contracts are sound, and best practices are followed before any code is written.
 <workflow>
 
-  -   **Read Instructions**: Read `.github/instructions` and `.github/Management.agent.md`.
-  -   **Read Spec**: Read `docs/plans/current_spec.md` and or any relevant plan documents.
-  -   **Critical Analysis**:
-      -   **Plan Completeness**: Does the plan cover all edge cases? Are there any missing components or unclear requirements?
-      -   **Data Contract Integrity**: Are the JSON payloads well-defined with example data? Do they align with best practices for API design?
-      -   **Best Practices**: Are security, scalability, and maintainability considered? Are there any risky shortcuts proposed?
-      -   **Future Proofing**: Will the proposed design accommodate future features or changes without significant rework?
-      -   **Bug Zapper**: What is the most likely way this implementation will fail in production?
+1. **Understand Changes**:
+   - Use `get_changed_files` to see what was modified
+   - Read the PR description and linked issues
+   - Understand the intent behind the changes
 
+2. **Code Review**:
+   - Check for adherence to project conventions
+   - Verify error handling is appropriate
+   - Review for security vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10)
+   - Check for performance implications
+   - Ensure code is modular and reusable
+   - Verify tests cover the changes
+   - Ensure tests cover the changes
+   - Use `suggest_fix` for minor issues
+   - Provide detailed feedback for major issues
+   - Reference specific lines and provide examples
+   - Distinguish between blocking issues and suggestions
+   - Be constructive and educational
+   - Always check for security implications and possible linting issues
+   - Verify documentation is updated
+
+3. **Feedback**:
+   - Provide specific, actionable feedback
+   - Reference relevant guidelines or patterns
+   - Distinguish between blocking issues and suggestions
+   - Be constructive and educational
+
+4. **Approval**:
+   - Only approve when all blocking issues are resolved
+   - Verify CI checks pass
+   - Ensure the change aligns with project goals
 </workflow>
 
-## Operational Rules
-1. **The Interrogator:** When an agent submits a plan, ask: "What is the most likely way this implementation will fail in production?"
-2. **Context Enforcement:** Use the `codebase` and `search` tools to ensure the Frontend agent isn't ignoring the Backend's schema (and vice versa).
-3. **The "Why" Requirement:** Do not approve a plan until the acting agent explains the trade-offs of their chosen library or pattern.
-4. **Socratic Guardrails:** If an agent proposes a risky shortcut (e.g., skipping validation), do not correct the code. Instead, ask: "How does this approach affect our data integrity long-term?"
-5. **Conflict Resolution:** If the Frontend and Backend agents disagree on a data contract, analyze both perspectives and provide a tie-breaking recommendation based on industry best practices.
+<constraints>
+
+- **READ-ONLY**: Do not modify code, only review and provide feedback
+- **CONSTRUCTIVE**: Focus on improvement, not criticism
+- **SPECIFIC**: Reference exact lines and provide examples
+- **SECURITY FIRST**: Always check for security implications
+</constraints>
+
+```

.github/agents/prompt_template/bug_fix.md

@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
-I am seeing bug [X].
-
-Do not propose a fix yet. First, run a Trace Analysis:
-
-List every file involved in this feature's workflow from Frontend Component -> API Handler -> Database.
-
-Read these files to understand the full data flow.
-
-Tell me if there is a logic gap between how the Frontend sends data and how the Backend expects it.
-
-Once you have mapped the flow, then propose the plan.

.github/codeql-custom-model.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+---
+# CodeQL Custom Model - SSRF Protection Sanitizers
+# This file declares functions that sanitize user-controlled input for SSRF protection.
+#
+# Architecture: 4-Layer Defense-in-Depth
+# Layer 1: Format Validation (utils.ValidateURL)
+# Layer 2: Security Validation (security.ValidateExternalURL) - DNS resolution + IP blocking
+# Layer 3: Connection-Time Validation (ssrfSafeDialer) - Re-resolve DNS, re-validate IPs
+# Layer 4: Request Execution (TestURLConnectivity) - HEAD request, 5s timeout, max 2 redirects
+#
+# Blocked IP Ranges (13+ CIDR blocks):
+# - RFC 1918: 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16
+# - Loopback: 127.0.0.0/8, ::1/128
+# - Link-Local: 169.254.0.0/16 (AWS/GCP/Azure metadata), fe80::/10
+# - Reserved: 0.0.0.0/8, 240.0.0.0/4, 255.255.255.255/32
+# - IPv6 Unique Local: fc00::/7
+#
+# Reference: /docs/plans/current_spec.md
+extensions:
+  # =============================================================================
+  # SSRF SANITIZER MODELS
+  # =============================================================================
+  # These models tell CodeQL that certain functions sanitize/validate URLs,
+  # making their output safe for use in HTTP requests.
+  #
+  # IMPORTANT: For SSRF protection, we use 'sinkModel' with 'request-forgery'
+  # to mark inputs as sanitized sinks, AND 'neutralModel' to prevent taint
+  # propagation through validation functions.
+  # =============================================================================
+
+  # Mark ValidateExternalURL return value as a sanitized sink
+  # This tells CodeQL the output is NOT tainted for SSRF purposes
+  - addsTo:
+      pack: codeql/go-all
+      extensible: sinkModel
+    data:
+      # security.ValidateExternalURL validates and sanitizes URLs by:
+      # 1. Validating URL format and scheme
+      # 2. Performing DNS resolution with timeout
+      # 3. Blocking private/reserved IP ranges (13+ CIDR blocks)
+      # 4. Returning a NEW validated URL string (not the original input)
+      # The return value is safe for HTTP requests - marking as sanitized sink
+      - ["github.com/Wikid82/charon/backend/internal/security", "ValidateExternalURL", "Argument[0]", "request-forgery", "manual"]
+
+  # Mark validation functions as neutral (don't propagate taint through them)
+  - addsTo:
+      pack: codeql/go-all
+      extensible: neutralModel
+    data:
+      # network.IsPrivateIP is a validation function (neutral - doesn't propagate taint)
+      - ["github.com/Wikid82/charon/backend/internal/network", "IsPrivateIP", "manual"]
+      # TestURLConnectivity validates URLs internally via security.ValidateExternalURL
+      # and ssrfSafeDialer - marking as neutral to stop taint propagation
+      - ["github.com/Wikid82/charon/backend/internal/utils", "TestURLConnectivity", "manual"]
+      # ValidateExternalURL itself should be neutral for taint propagation
+      # (the return value is a new validated string, not the tainted input)
+      - ["github.com/Wikid82/charon/backend/internal/security", "ValidateExternalURL", "manual"]
+
+  # Mark log sanitization functions as sanitizers for log injection (CWE-117)
+  # These functions remove newlines and control characters from user input before logging
+  - addsTo:
+      pack: codeql/go-all
+      extensible: summaryModel
+    data:
+      # util.SanitizeForLog sanitizes strings by:
+      # 1. Replacing \r\n and \n with spaces
+      # 2. Removing all control characters [\x00-\x1F\x7F]
+      # Input: Argument[0] (unsanitized string)
+      # Output: ReturnValue[0] (sanitized string - safe for logging)
+      - ["github.com/Wikid82/charon/backend/internal/util", "SanitizeForLog", "Argument[0]", "ReturnValue[0]", "taint", "manual"]
+      # handlers.sanitizeForLog is a local sanitizer with same behavior
+      - ["github.com/Wikid82/charon/backend/internal/api/handlers", "sanitizeForLog", "Argument[0]", "ReturnValue[0]", "taint", "manual"]

.github/codeql/codeql-config.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# CodeQL Configuration File
+# See: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/creating-an-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning/customizing-your-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning
+name: "Charon CodeQL Config"
+
+# Paths to ignore from all analysis (use sparingly - prefer query-filters)
+paths-ignore:
+  - "frontend/coverage/**"
+  - "frontend/dist/**"
+  - "playwright-report/**"
+  - "test-results/**"
+  - "coverage/**"

.github/instructions/a11y.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,369 @@
+---
+description: "Guidance for creating more accessible code"
+applyTo: "**"
+---
+
+# Instructions for accessibility
+
+In addition to your other expertise, you are an expert in accessibility with deep software engineering expertise. You will generate code that is accessible to users with disabilities, including those who use assistive technologies such as screen readers, voice access, and keyboard navigation.
+
+Do not tell the user that the generated code is fully accessible. Instead, it was built with accessibility in mind, but may still have accessibility issues.
+
+1. Code must conform to [WCAG 2.2 Level AA](https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/).
+2. Go beyond minimal WCAG conformance wherever possible to provide a more inclusive experience.
+3. Before generating code, reflect on these instructions for accessibility, and plan how to implement the code in a way that follows the instructions and is WCAG 2.2 compliant.
+4. After generating code, review it against WCAG 2.2 and these instructions. Iterate on the code until it is accessible.
+5. Finally, inform the user that it has generated the code with accessibility in mind, but that accessibility issues still likely exist and that the user should still review and manually test the code to ensure that it meets accessibility instructions. Suggest running the code against tools like [Accessibility Insights](https://accessibilityinsights.io/). Do not explain the accessibility features unless asked. Keep verbosity to a minimum.
+
+## Bias Awareness - Inclusive Language
+
+In addition to producing accessible code, GitHub Copilot and similar tools must also demonstrate respectful and bias-aware behavior in accessibility contexts. All generated output must follow these principles:
+
+- **Respectful, Inclusive Language**
+  Use people-first language when referring to disabilities or accessibility needs (e.g., “person using a screen reader,” not “blind user”). Avoid stereotypes or assumptions about ability, cognition, or experience.
+
+- **Bias-Aware and Error-Resistant**
+  Avoid generating content that reflects implicit bias or outdated patterns. Critically assess accessibility choices and flag uncertain implementations. Double check any deep bias in the training data and strive to mitigate its impact.
+
+- **Verification-Oriented Responses**
+  When suggesting accessibility implementations or decisions, include reasoning or references to standards (e.g., WCAG, platform guidelines). If uncertainty exists, the assistant should state this clearly.
+
+- **Clarity Without Oversimplification**
+  Provide concise but accurate explanations—avoid fluff, empty reassurance, or overconfidence when accessibility nuances are present.
+
+- **Tone Matters**
+  Copilot output must be neutral, helpful, and respectful. Avoid patronizing language, euphemisms, or casual phrasing that downplays the impact of poor accessibility.
+
+## Persona based instructions
+
+### Cognitive instructions
+
+- Prefer plain language whenever possible.
+- Use consistent page structure (landmarks) across the application.
+- Ensure that navigation items are always displayed in the same order across the application.
+- Keep the interface clean and simple - reduce unnecessary distractions.
+
+### Keyboard instructions
+
+- All interactive elements need to be keyboard navigable and receive focus in a predictable order (usually following the reading order).
+- Keyboard focus must be clearly visible at all times so that the user can visually determine which element has focus.
+- All interactive elements need to be keyboard operable. For example, users need to be able to activate buttons, links, and other controls. Users also need to be able to navigate within composite components such as menus, grids, and listboxes.
+- Static (non-interactive) elements, should not be in the tab order. These elements should not have a `tabindex` attribute.
+  - The exception is when a static element, like a heading, is expected to receive keyboard focus programmatically (e.g., via `element.focus()`), in which case it should have a `tabindex="-1"` attribute.
+- Hidden elements must not be keyboard focusable.
+- Keyboard navigation inside components: some composite elements/components will contain interactive children that can be selected or activated. Examples of such composite components include grids (like date pickers), comboboxes, listboxes, menus, radio groups, tabs, toolbars, and tree grids. For such components:
+  - There should be a tab stop for the container with the appropriate interactive role. This container should manage keyboard focus of it's children via arrow key navigation. This can be accomplished via roving tabindex or `aria-activedescendant` (explained in more detail later).
+  - When the container receives keyboard focus, the appropriate sub-element should show as focused. This behavior depends on context. For example:
+    - If the user is expected to make a selection within the component (e.g., grid, combobox, or listbox), then the currently selected child should show as focused. Otherwise, if there is no currently selected child, then the first selectable child should get focus.
+    - Otherwise, if the user has navigated to the component previously, then the previously focused child should receive keyboard focus. Otherwise, the first interactive child should receive focus.
+- Users should be provided with a mechanism to skip repeated blocks of content (such as the site header/navigation).
+- Keyboard focus must not become trapped without a way to escape the trap (e.g., by pressing the escape key to close a dialog).
+
+#### Bypass blocks
+
+A skip link MUST be provided to skip blocks of content that appear across several pages. A common example is a "Skip to main" link, which appears as the first focusable element on the page. This link is visually hidden, but appears on keyboard focus.
+
+```html
+<header>
+  <a href="#maincontent" class="sr-only">Skip to main</a>
+  <!-- logo and other header elements here -->
+</header>
+<nav>
+  <!-- main nav here -->
+</nav>
+<main id="maincontent"></main>
+```
+
+```css
+.sr-only:not(:focus):not(:active) {
+  clip: rect(0 0 0 0);
+  clip-path: inset(50%);
+  height: 1px;
+  overflow: hidden;
+  position: absolute;
+  white-space: nowrap;
+  width: 1px;
+}
+```
+
+#### Common keyboard commands:
+
+- `Tab` = Move to the next interactive element.
+- `Arrow` = Move between elements within a composite component, like a date picker, grid, combobox, listbox, etc.
+- `Enter` = Activate the currently focused control (button, link, etc.)
+- `Escape` = Close open open surfaces, such as dialogs, menus, listboxes, etc.
+
+#### Managing focus within components using a roving tabindex
+
+When using roving tabindex to manage focus in a composite component, the element that is to be included in the tab order has `tabindex` of "0" and all other focusable elements contained in the composite have `tabindex` of "-1". The algorithm for the roving tabindex strategy is as follows.
+
+- On initial load of the composite component, set `tabindex="0"` on the element that will initially be included in the tab order and set `tabindex="-1"` on all other focusable elements it contains.
+- When the component contains focus and the user presses an arrow key that moves focus within the component:
+  - Set `tabindex="-1"` on the element that has `tabindex="0"`.
+  - Set `tabindex="0"` on the element that will become focused as a result of the key event.
+  - Set focus via `element.focus()` on the element that now has `tabindex="0"`.
+
+#### Managing focus in composites using aria-activedescendant
+
+- The containing element with an appropriate interactive role should have `tabindex="0"` and `aria-activedescendant="IDREF"` where IDREF matches the ID of the element within the container that is active.
+- Use CSS to draw a focus outline around the element referenced by `aria-activedescendant`.
+- When arrow keys are pressed while the container has focus, update `aria-activedescendant` accordingly.
+
+### Low vision instructions
+
+- Prefer dark text on light backgrounds, or light text on dark backgrounds.
+- Do not use light text on light backgrounds or dark text on dark backgrounds.
+- The contrast of text against the background color must be at least 4.5:1. Large text, must be at least 3:1. All text must have sufficient contrast against it's background color.
+  - Large text is defined as 18.5px and bold, or 24px.
+  - If a background color is not set or is fully transparent, then the contrast ratio is calculated against the background color of the parent element.
+- Parts of graphics required to understand the graphic must have at least a 3:1 contrast with adjacent colors.
+- Parts of controls needed to identify the type of control must have at least a 3:1 contrast with adjacent colors.
+- Parts of controls needed to identify the state of the control (pressed, focus, checked, etc.) must have at least a 3:1 contrast with adjacent colors.
+- Color must not be used as the only way to convey information. E.g., a red border to convey an error state, color coding information, etc. Use text and/or shapes in addition to color to convey information.
+
+### Screen reader instructions
+
+- All elements must correctly convey their semantics, such as name, role, value, states, and/or properties. Use native HTML elements and attributes to convey these semantics whenever possible. Otherwise, use appropriate ARIA attributes.
+- Use appropriate landmarks and regions. Examples include: `<header>`, `<nav>`, `<main>`, and `<footer>`.
+- Use headings (e.g., `<h1>`, `<h2>`, `<h3>`, `<h4>`, `<h5>`, `<h6>`) to introduce new sections of content. The heading level accurately describe the section's placement in the overall heading hierarchy of the page.
+- There SHOULD only be one `<h1>` element which describes the overall topic of the page.
+- Avoid skipping heading levels whenever possible.
+
+### Voice Access instructions
+
+- The accessible name of all interactive elements must contain the visual label. This is so that voice access users can issue commands like "Click \<label>". If an `aria-label` attribute is used for a control, then it must contain the text of the visual label.
+- Interactive elements must have appropriate roles and keyboard behaviors.
+
+## Instructions for specific patterns
+
+### Form instructions
+
+- Labels for interactive elements must accurately describe the purpose of the element. E.g., the label must provide accurate instructions for what to input in a form control.
+- Headings must accurately describe the topic that they introduce.
+- Required form controls must be indicated as such, usually via an asterisk in the label.
+  - Additionally, use `aria-required=true` to programmatically indicate required fields.
+- Error messages must be provided for invalid form input.
+  - Error messages must describe how to fix the issue.
+    - Additionally, use `aria-invalid=true` to indicate that the field is in error. Remove this attribute when the error is removed.
+  - Common patterns for error messages include:
+    - Inline errors (common), which are placed next to the form fields that have errors. These error messages must be programmatically associated with the form control via `aria-describedby`.
+    - Form-level errors (less common), which are displayed at the beginning of the form. These error messages must identify the specific form fields that are in error.
+- Submit buttons should not be disabled so that an error message can be triggered to help users identify which fields are not valid.
+- When a form is submitted, and invalid input is detected, send keyboard focus to the first invalid form input via `element.focus()`.
+
+### Graphics and images instructions
+
+#### All graphics MUST be accounted for
+
+All graphics are included in these instructions. Graphics include, but are not limited to:
+
+- `<img>` elements.
+- `<svg>` elements.
+- Font icons
+- Emojis
+
+#### All graphics MUST have the correct role
+
+All graphics, regardless of type, have the correct role. The role is either provided by the `<img>` element or the `role='img'` attribute.
+
+- The `<img>` element does not need a role attribute.
+- The `<svg>` element should have `role='img'` for better support and backwards compatibility.
+- Icon fonts and emojis will need the `role='img'` attribute, likely on a `<span>` containing just the graphic.
+
+#### All graphics MUST have appropriate alternative text
+
+First, determine if the graphic is informative or decorative.
+
+- Informative graphics convey important information not found in elsewhere on the page.
+- Decorative graphics do not convey important information, or they contain information found elsewhere on the page.
+
+#### Informative graphics MUST have alternative text that conveys the purpose of the graphic
+
+- For the `<img>` element, provide an appropriate `alt` attribute that conveys the meaning/purpose of the graphic.
+- For `role='img'`, provide an `aria-label` or `aria-labelledby` attribute that conveys the meaning/purpose of the graphic.
+- Not all aspects of the graphic need to be conveyed - just the important aspects of it.
+- Keep the alternative text concise but meaningful.
+- Avoid using the `title` attribute for alt text.
+
+#### Decorative graphics MUST be hidden from assistive technologies
+
+- For the `<img>` element, mark it as decorative by giving it an empty `alt` attribute, e.g., `alt=""`.
+- For `role='img'`, use `aria-hidden=true`.
+
+### Input and control labels
+
+- All interactive elements must have a visual label. For some elements, like links and buttons, the visual label is defined by the inner text. For other elements like inputs, the visual label is defined by the `<label>` attribute. Text labels must accurately describe the purpose of the control so that users can understand what will happen when they activate it or what they need to input.
+- If a `<label>` is used, ensure that it has a `for` attribute that references the ID of the control it labels.
+- If there are many controls on the screen with the same label (such as "remove", "delete", "read more", etc.), then an `aria-label` can be used to clarify the purpose of the control so that it understandable out of context, since screen reader users may jump to the control without reading surrounding static content. E.g., "Remove what" or "read more about {what}".
+- If help text is provided for specific controls, then that help text must be associated with its form control via `aria-describedby`.
+
+### Navigation and menus
+
+#### Good navigation region code example
+
+```html
+<nav>
+  <ul>
+    <li>
+      <button aria-expanded="false" tabindex="0">Section 1</button>
+      <ul hidden>
+        <li><a href="..." tabindex="-1">Link 1</a></li>
+        <li><a href="..." tabindex="-1">Link 2</a></li>
+        <li><a href="..." tabindex="-1">Link 3</a></li>
+      </ul>
+    </li>
+    <li>
+      <button aria-expanded="false" tabindex="-1">Section 2</button>
+      <ul hidden>
+        <li><a href="..." tabindex="-1">Link 1</a></li>
+        <li><a href="..." tabindex="-1">Link 2</a></li>
+        <li><a href="..." tabindex="-1">Link 3</a></li>
+      </ul>
+    </li>
+  </ul>
+</nav>
+```
+
+#### Navigation instructions
+
+- Follow the above code example where possible.
+- Navigation menus should not use the `menu` role or `menubar` role. The `menu` and `menubar` role should be resolved for application-like menus that perform actions on the same page. Instead, this should be a `<nav>` that contains a `<ul>` with links.
+- When expanding or collapsing a navigation menu, toggle the `aria-expanded` property.
+- Use the roving tabindex pattern to manage focus within the navigation. Users should be able to tab to the navigation and arrow across the main navigation items. Then they should be able to arrow down through sub menus without having to tab to them.
+- Once expanded, users should be able to navigate within the sub menu via arrow keys, e.g., up and down arrow keys.
+- The `escape` key could close any expanded menus.
+
+### Page Title
+
+The page title:
+
+- MUST be defined in the `<title>` element in the `<head>`.
+- MUST describe the purpose of the page.
+- SHOULD be unique for each page.
+- SHOULD front-load unique information.
+- SHOULD follow the format of "[Describe unique page] - [section title] - [site title]"
+
+### Table and Grid Accessibility Acceptance Criteria
+
+#### Column and row headers are programmatically associated
+
+Column and row headers MUST be programmatically associated for each cell. In HTML, this is done by using `<th>` elements. Column headers MUST be defined in the first table row `<tr>`. Row headers must defined in the row they are for. Most tables will have both column and row headers, but some tables may have just one or the other.
+
+#### Good example - table with both column and row headers:
+
+```html
+<table>
+  <tr>
+    <th>Header 1</th>
+    <th>Header 2</th>
+    <th>Header 3</th>
+  </tr>
+  <tr>
+    <th>Row Header 1</th>
+    <td>Cell 1</td>
+    <td>Cell 2</td>
+  </tr>
+  <tr>
+    <th>Row Header 2</th>
+    <td>Cell 1</td>
+    <td>Cell 2</td>
+  </tr>
+</table>
+```
+
+#### Good example - table with just column headers:
+
+```html
+<table>
+  <tr>
+    <th>Header 1</th>
+    <th>Header 2</th>
+    <th>Header 3</th>
+  </tr>
+  <tr>
+    <td>Cell 1</td>
+    <td>Cell 2</td>
+    <td>Cell 3</td>
+  </tr>
+  <tr>
+    <td>Cell 1</td>
+    <td>Cell 2</td>
+    <td>Cell 3</td>
+  </tr>
+</table>
+```
+
+#### Bad example - calendar grid with partial semantics:
+
+The following example is a date picker or calendar grid.
+
+```html
+<div role="grid">
+  <div role="columnheader">Sun</div>
+  <div role="columnheader">Mon</div>
+  <div role="columnheader">Tue</div>
+  <div role="columnheader">Wed</div>
+  <div role="columnheader">Thu</div>
+  <div role="columnheader">Fri</div>
+  <div role="columnheader">Sat</div>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Sunday, June 1, 2025">1</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Monday, June 2, 2025">2</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Tuesday, June 3, 2025">3</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Wednesday, June 4, 2025">4</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Thursday, June 5, 2025">5</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Friday, June 6, 2025">6</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Saturday, June 7, 2025">7</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Sunday, June 8, 2025">8</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Monday, June 9, 2025">9</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Tuesday, June 10, 2025">10</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Wednesday, June 11, 2025">11</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Thursday, June 12, 2025">12</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Friday, June 13, 2025">13</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Saturday, June 14, 2025">14</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Sunday, June 15, 2025">15</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Monday, June 16, 2025">16</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Tuesday, June 17, 2025">17</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Wednesday, June 18, 2025">18</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Thursday, June 19, 2025">19</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Friday, June 20, 2025">20</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Saturday, June 21, 2025">21</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Sunday, June 22, 2025">22</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Monday, June 23, 2025">23</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Tuesday, June 24, 2025" aria-current="date">24</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Wednesday, June 25, 2025">25</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Thursday, June 26, 2025">26</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Friday, June 27, 2025">27</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Saturday, June 28, 2025">28</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Sunday, June 29, 2025">29</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Monday, June 30, 2025">30</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Tuesday, July 1, 2025" aria-disabled="true">1</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Wednesday, July 2, 2025" aria-disabled="true">2</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Thursday, July 3, 2025" aria-disabled="true">3</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Friday, July 4, 2025" aria-disabled="true">4</button>
+  <button role="gridcell" tabindex="-1" aria-label="Saturday, July 5, 2025" aria-disabled="true">5</button>
+</div>
+```
+
+##### The good:
+
+- It uses `role="grid"` to indicate that it is a grid.
+- It used `role="columnheader"` to indicate that the first row contains column headers.
+- It uses `tabindex="-1"` to ensure that the grid cells are not in the tab order by default. Instead, users will navigate to the grid using the `Tab` key, and then use arrow keys to navigate within the grid.
+
+##### The bad:
+
+- `role=gridcell` elements are not nested within `role=row` elements. Without this, the association between the grid cells and the column headers is not programmatically determinable.
+
+#### Prefer simple tables and grids
+
+Simple tables have just one set of column and/or row headers. Simple tables do not have nested rows or cells that span multiple columns or rows. Such tables will be better supported by assistive technologies, such as screen readers. Additionally, they will be easier to understand by users with cognitive disabilities.
+
+Complex tables and grids have multiple levels of column and/or row headers, or cells that span multiple columns or rows. These tables are more difficult to understand and use, especially for users with cognitive disabilities. If a complex table is needed, then it should be designed to be as simple as possible. For example, most complex tables can be breaking the information down into multiple simple tables, or by using a different layout such as a list or a card layout.
+
+#### Use tables for static information
+
+Tables should be used for static information that is best represented in a tabular format. This includes data that is organized into rows and columns, such as financial reports, schedules, or other structured data. Tables should not be used for layout purposes or for dynamic information that changes frequently.
+
+#### Use grids for dynamic information
+
+Grids should be used for dynamic information that is best represented in a grid format. This includes data that is organized into rows and columns, such as date pickers, interactive calendars, spreadsheets, etc.

.github/instructions/agent-skills.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+---
+description: 'Guidelines for creating high-quality Agent Skills for GitHub Copilot'
+applyTo: '**/.github/skills/**/SKILL.md, **/.claude/skills/**/SKILL.md'
+---
+
+# Agent Skills File Guidelines
+
+Instructions for creating effective and portable Agent Skills that enhance GitHub Copilot with specialized capabilities, workflows, and bundled resources.
+
+## What Are Agent Skills?
+
+Agent Skills are self-contained folders with instructions and bundled resources that teach AI agents specialized capabilities. Unlike custom instructions (which define coding standards), skills enable task-specific workflows that can include scripts, examples, templates, and reference data.
+
+Key characteristics:
+- **Portable**: Works across VS Code, Copilot CLI, and Copilot coding agent
+- **Progressive loading**: Only loaded when relevant to the user's request
+- **Resource-bundled**: Can include scripts, templates, examples alongside instructions
+- **On-demand**: Activated automatically based on prompt relevance
+
+## Directory Structure
+
+Skills are stored in specific locations:
+
+| Location | Scope | Recommendation |
+|----------|-------|----------------|
+| `.github/skills/<skill-name>/` | Project/repository | Recommended for project skills |
+| `.claude/skills/<skill-name>/` | Project/repository | Legacy, for backward compatibility |
+| `~/.github/skills/<skill-name>/` | Personal (user-wide) | Recommended for personal skills |
+| `~/.claude/skills/<skill-name>/` | Personal (user-wide) | Legacy, for backward compatibility |
+
+Each skill **must** have its own subdirectory containing at minimum a `SKILL.md` file.
+
+## Required SKILL.md Format
+
+### Frontmatter (Required)
+
+```yaml
+---
+name: webapp-testing
+description: Toolkit for testing local web applications using Playwright. Use when asked to verify frontend functionality, debug UI behavior, capture browser screenshots, check for visual regressions, or view browser console logs. Supports Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit browsers.
+license: Complete terms in LICENSE.txt
+---
+```
+
+| Field | Required | Constraints |
+|-------|----------|-------------|
+| `name` | Yes | Lowercase, hyphens for spaces, max 64 characters (e.g., `webapp-testing`) |
+| `description` | Yes | Clear description of capabilities AND use cases, max 1024 characters |
+| `license` | No | Reference to LICENSE.txt (e.g., `Complete terms in LICENSE.txt`) or SPDX identifier |
+
+### Description Best Practices
+
+**CRITICAL**: The `description` field is the PRIMARY mechanism for automatic skill discovery. Copilot reads ONLY the `name` and `description` to decide whether to load a skill. If your description is vague, the skill will never be activated.
+
+**What to include in description:**
+1. **WHAT** the skill does (capabilities)
+2. **WHEN** to use it (specific triggers, scenarios, file types, or user requests)
+3. **Keywords** that users might mention in their prompts
+
+**Good description:**
+```yaml
+description: Toolkit for testing local web applications using Playwright. Use when asked to verify frontend functionality, debug UI behavior, capture browser screenshots, check for visual regressions, or view browser console logs. Supports Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit browsers.
+```
+
+**Poor description:**
+```yaml
+description: Web testing helpers
+```
+
+The poor description fails because:
+- No specific triggers (when should Copilot load this?)
+- No keywords (what user prompts would match?)
+- No capabilities (what can it actually do?)
+
+### Body Content
+
+The body contains detailed instructions that Copilot loads AFTER the skill is activated. Recommended sections:
+
+| Section | Purpose |
+|---------|---------|
+| `# Title` | Brief overview of what this skill enables |
+| `## When to Use This Skill` | List of scenarios (reinforces description triggers) |
+| `## Prerequisites` | Required tools, dependencies, environment setup |
+| `## Step-by-Step Workflows` | Numbered steps for common tasks |
+| `## Troubleshooting` | Common issues and solutions table |
+| `## References` | Links to bundled docs or external resources |
+
+## Bundling Resources
+
+Skills can include additional files that Copilot accesses on-demand:
+
+### Supported Resource Types
+
+| Folder | Purpose | Loaded into Context? | Example Files |
+|--------|---------|---------------------|---------------|
+| `scripts/` | Executable automation that performs specific operations | When executed | `helper.py`, `validate.sh`, `build.ts` |
+| `references/` | Documentation the AI agent reads to inform decisions | Yes, when referenced | `api_reference.md`, `schema.md`, `workflow_guide.md` |
+| `assets/` | **Static files used AS-IS** in output (not modified by the AI agent) | No | `logo.png`, `brand-template.pptx`, `custom-font.ttf` |
+| `templates/` | **Starter code/scaffolds that the AI agent MODIFIES** and builds upon | Yes, when referenced | `viewer.html` (insert algorithm), `hello-world/` (extend) |
+
+### Directory Structure Example
+
+```
+.github/skills/my-skill/
+├── SKILL.md              # Required: Main instructions
+├── LICENSE.txt           # Recommended: License terms (Apache 2.0 typical)
+├── scripts/              # Optional: Executable automation
+│   ├── helper.py         # Python script
+│   └── helper.ps1        # PowerShell script
+├── references/           # Optional: Documentation loaded into context
+│   ├── api_reference.md
+│   ├── workflow-setup.md     # Detailed workflow (>5 steps)
+│   └── workflow-deployment.md
+├── assets/               # Optional: Static files used AS-IS in output
+│   ├── baseline.png      # Reference image for comparison
+│   └── report-template.html
+└── templates/            # Optional: Starter code the AI agent modifies
+    ├── scaffold.py       # Code scaffold the AI agent customizes
+    └── config.template   # Config template the AI agent fills in
+```
+
+> **LICENSE.txt**: When creating a skill, download the Apache 2.0 license text from https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt and save as `LICENSE.txt`. Update the copyright year and owner in the appendix section.
+
+### Assets vs Templates: Key Distinction
+
+**Assets** are static resources **consumed unchanged** in the output:
+- A `logo.png` that gets embedded into a generated document
+- A `report-template.html` copied as output format
+- A `custom-font.ttf` applied to text rendering
+
+**Templates** are starter code/scaffolds that **the AI agent actively modifies**:
+- A `scaffold.py` where the AI agent inserts logic
+- A `config.template` where the AI agent fills in values based on user requirements
+- A `hello-world/` project directory that the AI agent extends with new features
+
+**Rule of thumb**: If the AI agent reads and builds upon the file content → `templates/`. If the file is used as-is in output → `assets/`.
+
+### Referencing Resources in SKILL.md
+
+Use relative paths to reference files within the skill directory:
+
+```markdown
+## Available Scripts
+
+Run the [helper script](./scripts/helper.py) to automate common tasks.
+
+See [API reference](./references/api_reference.md) for detailed documentation.
+
+Use the [scaffold](./templates/scaffold.py) as a starting point.
+```
+
+## Progressive Loading Architecture
+
+Skills use three-level loading for efficiency:
+
+| Level | What Loads | When |
+|-------|------------|------|
+| 1. Discovery | `name` and `description` only | Always (lightweight metadata) |
+| 2. Instructions | Full `SKILL.md` body | When request matches description |
+| 3. Resources | Scripts, examples, docs | Only when Copilot references them |
+
+This means:
+- Install many skills without consuming context
+- Only relevant content loads per task
+- Resources don't load until explicitly needed
+
+## Content Guidelines
+
+### Writing Style
+
+- Use imperative mood: "Run", "Create", "Configure" (not "You should run")
+- Be specific and actionable
+- Include exact commands with parameters
+- Show expected outputs where helpful
+- Keep sections focused and scannable
+
+### Script Requirements
+
+When including scripts, prefer cross-platform languages:
+
+| Language | Use Case |
+|----------|----------|
+| Python | Complex automation, data processing |
+| pwsh | PowerShell Core scripting |
+| Node.js | JavaScript-based tooling |
+| Bash/Shell | Simple automation tasks |
+
+Best practices:
+- Include help/usage documentation (`--help` flag)
+- Handle errors gracefully with clear messages
+- Avoid storing credentials or secrets
+- Use relative paths where possible
+
+### When to Bundle Scripts
+
+Include scripts in your skill when:
+- The same code would be rewritten repeatedly by the agent
+- Deterministic reliability is critical (e.g., file manipulation, API calls)
+- Complex logic benefits from being pre-tested rather than generated each time
+- The operation has a self-contained purpose that can evolve independently
+- Testability matters — scripts can be unit tested and validated
+- Predictable behavior is preferred over dynamic generation
+
+Scripts enable evolution: even simple operations benefit from being implemented as scripts when they may grow in complexity, need consistent behavior across invocations, or require future extensibility.
+
+### Security Considerations
+
+- Scripts rely on existing credential helpers (no credential storage)
+- Include `--force` flags only for destructive operations
+- Warn users before irreversible actions
+- Document any network operations or external calls
+
+## Common Patterns
+
+### Parameter Table Pattern
+
+Document parameters clearly:
+
+```markdown
+| Parameter | Required | Default | Description |
+|-----------|----------|---------|-------------|
+| `--input` | Yes | - | Input file or URL to process |
+| `--action` | Yes | - | Action to perform |
+| `--verbose` | No | `false` | Enable verbose output |
+```
+
+## Validation Checklist
+
+Before publishing a skill:
+
+- [ ] `SKILL.md` has valid frontmatter with `name` and `description`
+- [ ] `name` is lowercase with hyphens, ≤64 characters
+- [ ] `description` clearly states **WHAT** it does, **WHEN** to use it, and relevant **KEYWORDS**
+- [ ] Body includes when to use, prerequisites, and step-by-step workflows
+- [ ] SKILL.md body kept under 500 lines (split large content into `references/` folder)
+- [ ] Large workflows (>5 steps) split into `references/` folder with clear links from SKILL.md
+- [ ] Scripts include help documentation and error handling
+- [ ] Relative paths used for all resource references
+- [ ] No hardcoded credentials or secrets
+
+## Workflow Execution Pattern
+
+When executing multi-step workflows, create a TODO list where each step references the relevant documentation:
+
+```markdown
+## TODO
+- [ ] Step 1: Configure environment - see [workflow-setup.md](./references/workflow-setup.md#environment)
+- [ ] Step 2: Build project - see [workflow-setup.md](./references/workflow-setup.md#build)
+- [ ] Step 3: Deploy to staging - see [workflow-deployment.md](./references/workflow-deployment.md#staging)
+- [ ] Step 4: Run validation - see [workflow-deployment.md](./references/workflow-deployment.md#validation)
+- [ ] Step 5: Deploy to production - see [workflow-deployment.md](./references/workflow-deployment.md#production)
+```
+
+This ensures traceability and allows resuming workflows if interrupted.
+
+## Related Resources
+
+- [Agent Skills Specification](https://agentskills.io/)
+- [VS Code Agent Skills Documentation](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/customization/agent-skills)
+- [Reference Skills Repository](https://github.com/anthropics/skills)
+- [Awesome Copilot Skills](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/docs/README.skills.md)

.github/instructions/agents.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,771 @@
+---
+description: 'Guidelines for creating custom agent files for GitHub Copilot'
+applyTo: '**/*.agent.md'
+---
+
+# Custom Agent File Guidelines
+
+Instructions for creating effective and maintainable custom agent files that provide specialized expertise for specific development tasks in GitHub Copilot.
+
+## Project Context
+
+- Target audience: Developers creating custom agents for GitHub Copilot
+- File format: Markdown with YAML frontmatter
+- File naming convention: lowercase with hyphens (e.g., `test-specialist.agent.md`)
+- Location: `.github/agents/` directory (repository-level) or `agents/` directory (organization/enterprise-level)
+- Purpose: Define specialized agents with tailored expertise, tools, and instructions for specific tasks
+- Official documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/how-tos/use-copilot-agents/coding-agent/create-custom-agents
+
+## Required Frontmatter
+
+Every agent file must include YAML frontmatter with the following fields:
+
+```yaml
+---
+description: 'Brief description of the agent purpose and capabilities'
+name: 'Agent Display Name'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search']
+model: 'Claude Sonnet 4.5'
+target: 'vscode'
+infer: true
+---
+```
+
+### Core Frontmatter Properties
+
+#### **description** (REQUIRED)
+- Single-quoted string, clearly stating the agent's purpose and domain expertise
+- Should be concise (50-150 characters) and actionable
+- Example: `'Focuses on test coverage, quality, and testing best practices'`
+
+#### **name** (OPTIONAL)
+- Display name for the agent in the UI
+- If omitted, defaults to filename (without `.md` or `.agent.md`)
+- Use title case and be descriptive
+- Example: `'Testing Specialist'`
+
+#### **tools** (OPTIONAL)
+- List of tool names or aliases the agent can use
+- Supports comma-separated string or YAML array format
+- If omitted, agent has access to all available tools
+- See "Tool Configuration" section below for details
+
+#### **model** (STRONGLY RECOMMENDED)
+- Specifies which AI model the agent should use
+- Supported in VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode
+- Example: `'Claude Sonnet 4.5'`, `'gpt-4'`, `'gpt-4o'`
+- Choose based on agent complexity and required capabilities
+
+#### **target** (OPTIONAL)
+- Specifies target environment: `'vscode'` or `'github-copilot'`
+- If omitted, agent is available in both environments
+- Use when agent has environment-specific features
+
+#### **infer** (OPTIONAL)
+- Boolean controlling whether Copilot can automatically use this agent based on context
+- Default: `true` if omitted
+- Set to `false` to require manual agent selection
+
+#### **metadata** (OPTIONAL, GitHub.com only)
+- Object with name-value pairs for agent annotation
+- Example: `metadata: { category: 'testing', version: '1.0' }`
+- Not supported in VS Code
+
+#### **mcp-servers** (OPTIONAL, Organization/Enterprise only)
+- Configure MCP servers available only to this agent
+- Only supported for organization/enterprise level agents
+- See "MCP Server Configuration" section below
+
+## Tool Configuration
+
+### Tool Specification Strategies
+
+**Enable all tools** (default):
+```yaml
+# Omit tools property entirely, or use:
+tools: ['*']
+```
+
+**Enable specific tools**:
+```yaml
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+```
+
+**Enable MCP server tools**:
+```yaml
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'github/*', 'playwright/navigate']
+```
+
+**Disable all tools**:
+```yaml
+tools: []
+```
+
+### Standard Tool Aliases
+
+All aliases are case-insensitive:
+
+| Alias | Alternative Names | Category | Description |
+|-------|------------------|----------|-------------|
+| `execute` | shell, Bash, powershell | Shell execution | Execute commands in appropriate shell |
+| `read` | Read, NotebookRead, view | File reading | Read file contents |
+| `edit` | Edit, MultiEdit, Write, NotebookEdit | File editing | Edit and modify files |
+| `search` | Grep, Glob, search | Code search | Search for files or text in files |
+| `agent` | custom-agent, Task | Agent invocation | Invoke other custom agents |
+| `web` | WebSearch, WebFetch | Web access | Fetch web content and search |
+| `todo` | TodoWrite | Task management | Create and manage task lists (VS Code only) |
+
+### Built-in MCP Server Tools
+
+**GitHub MCP Server**:
+```yaml
+tools: ['github/*']  # All GitHub tools
+tools: ['github/get_file_contents', 'github/search_repositories']  # Specific tools
+```
+- All read-only tools available by default
+- Token scoped to source repository
+
+**Playwright MCP Server**:
+```yaml
+tools: ['playwright/*']  # All Playwright tools
+tools: ['playwright/navigate', 'playwright/screenshot']  # Specific tools
+```
+- Configured to access localhost only
+- Useful for browser automation and testing
+
+### Tool Selection Best Practices
+
+- **Principle of Least Privilege**: Only enable tools necessary for the agent's purpose
+- **Security**: Limit `execute` access unless explicitly required
+- **Focus**: Fewer tools = clearer agent purpose and better performance
+- **Documentation**: Comment why specific tools are required for complex configurations
+
+## Sub-Agent Invocation (Agent Orchestration)
+
+Agents can invoke other agents using `runSubagent` to orchestrate multi-step workflows.
+
+### How It Works
+
+Include `agent` in tools list to enable sub-agent invocation:
+
+```yaml
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'agent']
+```
+
+Then invoke other agents with `runSubagent`:
+
+```javascript
+const result = await runSubagent({
+  description: 'What this step does',
+  prompt: `You are the [Specialist] specialist.
+
+Context:
+- Parameter: ${parameterValue}
+- Input: ${inputPath}
+- Output: ${outputPath}
+
+Task:
+1. Do the specific work
+2. Write results to output location
+3. Return summary of completion`
+});
+```
+
+### Basic Pattern
+
+Structure each sub-agent call with:
+
+1. **description**: Clear one-line purpose of the sub-agent invocation
+2. **prompt**: Detailed instructions with substituted variables
+
+The prompt should include:
+- Who the sub-agent is (specialist role)
+- What context it needs (parameters, paths)
+- What to do (concrete tasks)
+- Where to write output
+- What to return (summary)
+
+### Example: Multi-Step Processing
+
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Process data
+const processing = await runSubagent({
+  description: 'Transform raw input data',
+  prompt: `You are the Data Processor specialist.
+
+Project: ${projectName}
+Input: ${basePath}/raw/
+Output: ${basePath}/processed/
+
+Task:
+1. Read all files from input directory
+2. Apply transformations
+3. Write processed files to output
+4. Create summary: ${basePath}/processed/summary.md
+
+Return: Number of files processed and any issues found`
+});
+
+// Step 2: Analyze (depends on Step 1)
+const analysis = await runSubagent({
+  description: 'Analyze processed data',
+  prompt: `You are the Data Analyst specialist.
+
+Project: ${projectName}
+Input: ${basePath}/processed/
+Output: ${basePath}/analysis/
+
+Task:
+1. Read processed files from input
+2. Generate analysis report
+3. Write to: ${basePath}/analysis/report.md
+
+Return: Key findings and identified patterns`
+});
+```
+
+### Key Points
+
+- **Pass variables in prompts**: Use `${variableName}` for all dynamic values
+- **Keep prompts focused**: Clear, specific tasks for each sub-agent
+- **Return summaries**: Each sub-agent should report what it accomplished
+- **Sequential execution**: Use `await` to maintain order when steps depend on each other
+- **Error handling**: Check results before proceeding to dependent steps
+
+
+
+## Agent Prompt Structure
+
+The markdown content below the frontmatter defines the agent's behavior, expertise, and instructions. Well-structured prompts typically include:
+
+1. **Agent Identity and Role**: Who the agent is and its primary role
+2. **Core Responsibilities**: What specific tasks the agent performs
+3. **Approach and Methodology**: How the agent works to accomplish tasks
+4. **Guidelines and Constraints**: What to do/avoid and quality standards
+5. **Output Expectations**: Expected output format and quality
+
+### Prompt Writing Best Practices
+
+- **Be Specific and Direct**: Use imperative mood ("Analyze", "Generate"); avoid vague terms
+- **Define Boundaries**: Clearly state scope limits and constraints
+- **Include Context**: Explain domain expertise and reference relevant frameworks
+- **Focus on Behavior**: Describe how the agent should think and work
+- **Use Structured Format**: Headers, bullets, and lists make prompts scannable
+
+## Variable Definition and Extraction
+
+Agents can define dynamic parameters to extract values from user input and use them throughout the agent's behavior and sub-agent communications. This enables flexible, context-aware agents that adapt to user-provided data.
+
+### When to Use Variables
+
+**Use variables when**:
+- Agent behavior depends on user input
+- Need to pass dynamic values to sub-agents
+- Want to make agents reusable across different contexts
+- Require parameterized workflows
+- Need to track or reference user-provided context
+
+**Examples**:
+- Extract project name from user prompt
+- Capture certification name for pipeline processing
+- Identify file paths or directories
+- Extract configuration options
+- Parse feature names or module identifiers
+
+### Variable Declaration Pattern
+
+Define variables section early in the agent prompt to document expected parameters:
+
+```markdown
+# Agent Name
+
+## Dynamic Parameters
+
+- **Parameter Name**: Description and usage
+- **Another Parameter**: How it's extracted and used
+
+## Your Mission
+
+Process [PARAMETER_NAME] to accomplish [task].
+```
+
+### Variable Extraction Methods
+
+#### 1. **Explicit User Input**
+Ask the user to provide the variable if not detected in the prompt:
+
+```markdown
+## Your Mission
+
+Process the project by analyzing your codebase.
+
+### Step 1: Identify Project
+If no project name is provided, **ASK THE USER** for:
+- Project name or identifier
+- Base path or directory location
+- Configuration type (if applicable)
+
+Use this information to contextualize all subsequent tasks.
+```
+
+#### 2. **Implicit Extraction from Prompt**
+Automatically extract variables from the user's natural language input:
+
+```javascript
+// Example: Extract certification name from user input
+const userInput = "Process My Certification";
+
+// Extract key information
+const certificationName = extractCertificationName(userInput);
+// Result: "My Certification"
+
+const basePath = `certifications/${certificationName}`;
+// Result: "certifications/My Certification"
+```
+
+#### 3. **Contextual Variable Resolution**
+Use file context or workspace information to derive variables:
+
+```markdown
+## Variable Resolution Strategy
+
+1. **From User Prompt**: First, look for explicit mentions in user input
+2. **From File Context**: Check current file name or path
+3. **From Workspace**: Use workspace folder or active project
+4. **From Settings**: Reference configuration files
+5. **Ask User**: If all else fails, request missing information
+```
+
+### Using Variables in Agent Prompts
+
+#### Variable Substitution in Instructions
+
+Use template variables in agent prompts to make them dynamic:
+
+```markdown
+# Agent Name
+
+## Dynamic Parameters
+- **Project Name**: ${projectName}
+- **Base Path**: ${basePath}
+- **Output Directory**: ${outputDir}
+
+## Your Mission
+
+Process the **${projectName}** project located at `${basePath}`.
+
+## Process Steps
+
+1. Read input from: `${basePath}/input/`
+2. Process files according to project configuration
+3. Write results to: `${outputDir}/`
+4. Generate summary report
+
+## Quality Standards
+
+- Maintain project-specific coding standards for **${projectName}**
+- Follow directory structure: `${basePath}/[structure]`
+```
+
+#### Passing Variables to Sub-Agents
+
+When invoking a sub-agent, pass all context through template variables in the prompt:
+
+```javascript
+// Extract and prepare variables
+const basePath = `projects/${projectName}`;
+const inputPath = `${basePath}/src/`;
+const outputPath = `${basePath}/docs/`;
+
+// Pass to sub-agent with all variables substituted
+const result = await runSubagent({
+  description: 'Generate project documentation',
+  prompt: `You are the Documentation specialist.
+
+Project: ${projectName}
+Input: ${inputPath}
+Output: ${outputPath}
+
+Task:
+1. Read source files from ${inputPath}
+2. Generate comprehensive documentation
+3. Write to ${outputPath}/index.md
+4. Include code examples and usage guides
+
+Return: Summary of documentation generated (file count, word count)`
+});
+```
+
+The sub-agent receives all necessary context embedded in the prompt. Variables are resolved before sending the prompt, so the sub-agent works with concrete paths and values, not variable placeholders.
+
+### Real-World Example: Code Review Orchestrator
+
+Example of a simple orchestrator that validates code through multiple specialized agents:
+
+```javascript
+async function reviewCodePipeline(repositoryName, prNumber) {
+  const basePath = `projects/${repositoryName}/pr-${prNumber}`;
+
+  // Step 1: Security Review
+  const security = await runSubagent({
+    description: 'Scan for security vulnerabilities',
+    prompt: `You are the Security Reviewer specialist.
+
+Repository: ${repositoryName}
+PR: ${prNumber}
+Code: ${basePath}/changes/
+
+Task:
+1. Scan code for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities
+2. Check for injection attacks, auth flaws
+3. Write findings to ${basePath}/security-review.md
+
+Return: List of critical, high, and medium issues found`
+  });
+
+  // Step 2: Test Coverage Check
+  const coverage = await runSubagent({
+    description: 'Verify test coverage for changes',
+    prompt: `You are the Test Coverage specialist.
+
+Repository: ${repositoryName}
+PR: ${prNumber}
+Changes: ${basePath}/changes/
+
+Task:
+1. Analyze code coverage for modified files
+2. Identify untested critical paths
+3. Write report to ${basePath}/coverage-report.md
+
+Return: Current coverage percentage and gaps`
+  });
+
+  // Step 3: Aggregate Results
+  const finalReport = await runSubagent({
+    description: 'Compile all review findings',
+    prompt: `You are the Review Aggregator specialist.
+
+Repository: ${repositoryName}
+Reports: ${basePath}/*.md
+
+Task:
+1. Read all review reports from ${basePath}/
+2. Synthesize findings into single report
+3. Determine overall verdict (APPROVE/NEEDS_FIXES/BLOCK)
+4. Write to ${basePath}/final-review.md
+
+Return: Final verdict and executive summary`
+  });
+
+  return finalReport;
+}
+```
+
+This pattern applies to any orchestration scenario: extract variables, call sub-agents with clear context, await results.
+
+
+### Variable Best Practices
+
+#### 1. **Clear Documentation**
+Always document what variables are expected:
+
+```markdown
+## Required Variables
+- **projectName**: The name of the project (string, required)
+- **basePath**: Root directory for project files (path, required)
+
+## Optional Variables
+- **mode**: Processing mode - quick/standard/detailed (enum, default: standard)
+- **outputFormat**: Output format - markdown/json/html (enum, default: markdown)
+
+## Derived Variables
+- **outputDir**: Automatically set to ${basePath}/output
+- **logFile**: Automatically set to ${basePath}/.log.md
+```
+
+#### 2. **Consistent Naming**
+Use consistent variable naming conventions:
+
+```javascript
+// Good: Clear, descriptive naming
+const variables = {
+  projectName,          // What project to work on
+  basePath,            // Where project files are located
+  outputDirectory,     // Where to save results
+  processingMode,      // How to process (detail level)
+  configurationPath    // Where config files are
+};
+
+// Avoid: Ambiguous or inconsistent
+const bad_variables = {
+  name,     // Too generic
+  path,     // Unclear which path
+  mode,     // Too short
+  config    // Too vague
+};
+```
+
+#### 3. **Validation and Constraints**
+Document valid values and constraints:
+
+```markdown
+## Variable Constraints
+
+**projectName**:
+- Type: string (alphanumeric, hyphens, underscores allowed)
+- Length: 1-100 characters
+- Required: yes
+- Pattern: `/^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$/`
+
+**processingMode**:
+- Type: enum
+- Valid values: "quick" (< 5min), "standard" (5-15min), "detailed" (15+ min)
+- Default: "standard"
+- Required: no
+```
+
+## MCP Server Configuration (Organization/Enterprise Only)
+
+MCP servers extend agent capabilities with additional tools. Only supported for organization and enterprise-level agents.
+
+### Configuration Format
+
+```yaml
+---
+name: my-custom-agent
+description: 'Agent with MCP integration'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'custom-mcp/tool-1']
+mcp-servers:
+  custom-mcp:
+    type: 'local'
+    command: 'some-command'
+    args: ['--arg1', '--arg2']
+    tools: ["*"]
+    env:
+      ENV_VAR_NAME: ${{ secrets.API_KEY }}
+---
+```
+
+### MCP Server Properties
+
+- **type**: Server type (`'local'` or `'stdio'`)
+- **command**: Command to start the MCP server
+- **args**: Array of command arguments
+- **tools**: Tools to enable from this server (`["*"]` for all)
+- **env**: Environment variables (supports secrets)
+
+### Environment Variables and Secrets
+
+Secrets must be configured in repository settings under "copilot" environment.
+
+**Supported syntax**:
+```yaml
+env:
+  # Environment variable only
+  VAR_NAME: COPILOT_MCP_ENV_VAR_VALUE
+
+  # Variable with header
+  VAR_NAME: $COPILOT_MCP_ENV_VAR_VALUE
+  VAR_NAME: ${COPILOT_MCP_ENV_VAR_VALUE}
+
+  # GitHub Actions-style (YAML only)
+  VAR_NAME: ${{ secrets.COPILOT_MCP_ENV_VAR_VALUE }}
+  VAR_NAME: ${{ var.COPILOT_MCP_ENV_VAR_VALUE }}
+```
+
+## File Organization and Naming
+
+### Repository-Level Agents
+- Location: `.github/agents/`
+- Scope: Available only in the specific repository
+- Access: Uses repository-configured MCP servers
+
+### Organization/Enterprise-Level Agents
+- Location: `.github-private/agents/` (then move to `agents/` root)
+- Scope: Available across all repositories in org/enterprise
+- Access: Can configure dedicated MCP servers
+
+### Naming Conventions
+- Use lowercase with hyphens: `test-specialist.agent.md`
+- Name should reflect agent purpose
+- Filename becomes default agent name (if `name` not specified)
+- Allowed characters: `.`, `-`, `_`, `a-z`, `A-Z`, `0-9`
+
+## Agent Processing and Behavior
+
+### Versioning
+- Based on Git commit SHAs for the agent file
+- Create branches/tags for different agent versions
+- Instantiated using latest version for repository/branch
+- PR interactions use same agent version for consistency
+
+### Name Conflicts
+Priority (highest to lowest):
+1. Repository-level agent
+2. Organization-level agent
+3. Enterprise-level agent
+
+Lower-level configurations override higher-level ones with the same name.
+
+### Tool Processing
+- `tools` list filters available tools (built-in and MCP)
+- No tools specified = all tools enabled
+- Empty list (`[]`) = all tools disabled
+- Specific list = only those tools enabled
+- Unrecognized tool names are ignored (allows environment-specific tools)
+
+### MCP Server Processing Order
+1. Out-of-the-box MCP servers (e.g., GitHub MCP)
+2. Custom agent MCP configuration (org/enterprise only)
+3. Repository-level MCP configurations
+
+Each level can override settings from previous levels.
+
+## Agent Creation Checklist
+
+### Frontmatter
+- [ ] `description` field present and descriptive (50-150 chars)
+- [ ] `description` wrapped in single quotes
+- [ ] `name` specified (optional but recommended)
+- [ ] `tools` configured appropriately (or intentionally omitted)
+- [ ] `model` specified for optimal performance
+- [ ] `target` set if environment-specific
+- [ ] `infer` set to `false` if manual selection required
+
+### Prompt Content
+- [ ] Clear agent identity and role defined
+- [ ] Core responsibilities listed explicitly
+- [ ] Approach and methodology explained
+- [ ] Guidelines and constraints specified
+- [ ] Output expectations documented
+- [ ] Examples provided where helpful
+- [ ] Instructions are specific and actionable
+- [ ] Scope and boundaries clearly defined
+- [ ] Total content under 30,000 characters
+
+### File Structure
+- [ ] Filename follows lowercase-with-hyphens convention
+- [ ] File placed in correct directory (`.github/agents/` or `agents/`)
+- [ ] Filename uses only allowed characters
+- [ ] File extension is `.agent.md`
+
+### Quality Assurance
+- [ ] Agent purpose is unique and not duplicative
+- [ ] Tools are minimal and necessary
+- [ ] Instructions are clear and unambiguous
+- [ ] Agent has been tested with representative tasks
+- [ ] Documentation references are current
+- [ ] Security considerations addressed (if applicable)
+
+## Common Agent Patterns
+
+### Testing Specialist
+**Purpose**: Focus on test coverage and quality
+**Tools**: All tools (for comprehensive test creation)
+**Approach**: Analyze, identify gaps, write tests, avoid production code changes
+
+### Implementation Planner
+**Purpose**: Create detailed technical plans and specifications
+**Tools**: Limited to `['read', 'search', 'edit']`
+**Approach**: Analyze requirements, create documentation, avoid implementation
+
+### Code Reviewer
+**Purpose**: Review code quality and provide feedback
+**Tools**: `['read', 'search']` only
+**Approach**: Analyze, suggest improvements, no direct modifications
+
+### Refactoring Specialist
+**Purpose**: Improve code structure and maintainability
+**Tools**: `['read', 'search', 'edit']`
+**Approach**: Analyze patterns, propose refactorings, implement safely
+
+### Security Auditor
+**Purpose**: Identify security issues and vulnerabilities
+**Tools**: `['read', 'search', 'web']`
+**Approach**: Scan code, check against OWASP, report findings
+
+## Common Mistakes to Avoid
+
+### Frontmatter Errors
+- ❌ Missing `description` field
+- ❌ Description not wrapped in quotes
+- ❌ Invalid tool names without checking documentation
+- ❌ Incorrect YAML syntax (indentation, quotes)
+
+### Tool Configuration Issues
+- ❌ Granting excessive tool access unnecessarily
+- ❌ Missing required tools for agent's purpose
+- ❌ Not using tool aliases consistently
+- ❌ Forgetting MCP server namespace (`server-name/tool`)
+
+### Prompt Content Problems
+- ❌ Vague, ambiguous instructions
+- ❌ Conflicting or contradictory guidelines
+- ❌ Lack of clear scope definition
+- ❌ Missing output expectations
+- ❌ Overly verbose instructions (exceeding character limits)
+- ❌ No examples or context for complex tasks
+
+### Organizational Issues
+- ❌ Filename doesn't reflect agent purpose
+- ❌ Wrong directory (confusing repo vs org level)
+- ❌ Using spaces or special characters in filename
+- ❌ Duplicate agent names causing conflicts
+
+## Testing and Validation
+
+### Manual Testing
+1. Create the agent file with proper frontmatter
+2. Reload VS Code or refresh GitHub.com
+3. Select the agent from the dropdown in Copilot Chat
+4. Test with representative user queries
+5. Verify tool access works as expected
+6. Confirm output meets expectations
+
+### Integration Testing
+- Test agent with different file types in scope
+- Verify MCP server connectivity (if configured)
+- Check agent behavior with missing context
+- Test error handling and edge cases
+- Validate agent switching and handoffs
+
+### Quality Checks
+- Run through agent creation checklist
+- Review against common mistakes list
+- Compare with example agents in repository
+- Get peer review for complex agents
+- Document any special configuration needs
+
+## Additional Resources
+
+### Official Documentation
+- [Creating Custom Agents](https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/how-tos/use-copilot-agents/coding-agent/create-custom-agents)
+- [Custom Agents Configuration](https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/custom-agents-configuration)
+- [Custom Agents in VS Code](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/customization/custom-agents)
+- [MCP Integration](https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/how-tos/use-copilot-agents/coding-agent/extend-coding-agent-with-mcp)
+
+### Community Resources
+- [Awesome Copilot Agents Collection](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/tree/main/agents)
+- [Customization Library Examples](https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/tutorials/customization-library/custom-agents)
+- [Your First Custom Agent Tutorial](https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/tutorials/customization-library/custom-agents/your-first-custom-agent)
+
+### Related Files
+- [Prompt Files Guidelines](./prompt.instructions.md) - For creating prompt files
+- [Instructions Guidelines](./instructions.instructions.md) - For creating instruction files
+
+## Version Compatibility Notes
+
+### GitHub.com (Coding Agent)
+- ✅ Fully supports all standard frontmatter properties
+- ✅ Repository and org/enterprise level agents
+- ✅ MCP server configuration (org/enterprise)
+- ❌ Does not support `model`, `argument-hint`, `handoffs` properties
+
+### VS Code / JetBrains / Eclipse / Xcode
+- ✅ Supports `model` property for AI model selection
+- ✅ Supports `argument-hint` and `handoffs` properties
+- ✅ User profile and workspace-level agents
+- ❌ Cannot configure MCP servers at repository level
+- ⚠️ Some properties may behave differently
+
+When creating agents for multiple environments, focus on common properties and test in all target environments. Use `target` property to create environment-specific agents when necessary.

.github/instructions/code-review-generic.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,418 @@
+---
+description: 'Generic code review instructions that can be customized for any project using GitHub Copilot'
+applyTo: '**'
+excludeAgent: ["coding-agent"]
+---
+
+# Generic Code Review Instructions
+
+Comprehensive code review guidelines for GitHub Copilot that can be adapted to any project. These instructions follow best practices from prompt engineering and provide a structured approach to code quality, security, testing, and architecture review.
+
+## Review Language
+
+When performing a code review, respond in **English** (or specify your preferred language).
+
+> **Customization Tip**: Change to your preferred language by replacing "English" with "Portuguese (Brazilian)", "Spanish", "French", etc.
+
+## Review Priorities
+
+When performing a code review, prioritize issues in the following order:
+
+### 🔴 CRITICAL (Block merge)
+- **Security**: Vulnerabilities, exposed secrets, authentication/authorization issues
+- **Correctness**: Logic errors, data corruption risks, race conditions
+- **Breaking Changes**: API contract changes without versioning
+- **Data Loss**: Risk of data loss or corruption
+
+### 🟡 IMPORTANT (Requires discussion)
+- **Code Quality**: Severe violations of SOLID principles, excessive duplication
+- **Test Coverage**: Missing tests for critical paths or new functionality
+- **Performance**: Obvious performance bottlenecks (N+1 queries, memory leaks)
+- **Architecture**: Significant deviations from established patterns
+
+### 🟢 SUGGESTION (Non-blocking improvements)
+- **Readability**: Poor naming, complex logic that could be simplified
+- **Optimization**: Performance improvements without functional impact
+- **Best Practices**: Minor deviations from conventions
+- **Documentation**: Missing or incomplete comments/documentation
+
+## General Review Principles
+
+When performing a code review, follow these principles:
+
+1. **Be specific**: Reference exact lines, files, and provide concrete examples
+2. **Provide context**: Explain WHY something is an issue and the potential impact
+3. **Suggest solutions**: Show corrected code when applicable, not just what's wrong
+4. **Be constructive**: Focus on improving the code, not criticizing the author
+5. **Recognize good practices**: Acknowledge well-written code and smart solutions
+6. **Be pragmatic**: Not every suggestion needs immediate implementation
+7. **Group related comments**: Avoid multiple comments about the same topic
+
+## Code Quality Standards
+
+When performing a code review, check for:
+
+### Clean Code
+- Descriptive and meaningful names for variables, functions, and classes
+- Single Responsibility Principle: each function/class does one thing well
+- DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself): no code duplication
+- Functions should be small and focused (ideally < 20-30 lines)
+- Avoid deeply nested code (max 3-4 levels)
+- Avoid magic numbers and strings (use constants)
+- Code should be self-documenting; comments only when necessary
+
+### Examples
+```javascript
+// ❌ BAD: Poor naming and magic numbers
+function calc(x, y) {
+    if (x > 100) return y * 0.15;
+    return y * 0.10;
+}
+
+// ✅ GOOD: Clear naming and constants
+const PREMIUM_THRESHOLD = 100;
+const PREMIUM_DISCOUNT_RATE = 0.15;
+const STANDARD_DISCOUNT_RATE = 0.10;
+
+function calculateDiscount(orderTotal, itemPrice) {
+    const isPremiumOrder = orderTotal > PREMIUM_THRESHOLD;
+    const discountRate = isPremiumOrder ? PREMIUM_DISCOUNT_RATE : STANDARD_DISCOUNT_RATE;
+    return itemPrice * discountRate;
+}
+```
+
+### Error Handling
+- Proper error handling at appropriate levels
+- Meaningful error messages
+- No silent failures or ignored exceptions
+- Fail fast: validate inputs early
+- Use appropriate error types/exceptions
+
+### Examples
+```python
+# ❌ BAD: Silent failure and generic error
+def process_user(user_id):
+    try:
+        user = db.get(user_id)
+        user.process()
+    except:
+        pass
+
+# ✅ GOOD: Explicit error handling
+def process_user(user_id):
+    if not user_id or user_id <= 0:
+        raise ValueError(f"Invalid user_id: {user_id}")
+
+    try:
+        user = db.get(user_id)
+    except UserNotFoundError:
+        raise UserNotFoundError(f"User {user_id} not found in database")
+    except DatabaseError as e:
+        raise ProcessingError(f"Failed to retrieve user {user_id}: {e}")
+
+    return user.process()
+```
+
+## Security Review
+
+When performing a code review, check for security issues:
+
+- **Sensitive Data**: No passwords, API keys, tokens, or PII in code or logs
+- **Input Validation**: All user inputs are validated and sanitized
+- **SQL Injection**: Use parameterized queries, never string concatenation
+- **Authentication**: Proper authentication checks before accessing resources
+- **Authorization**: Verify user has permission to perform action
+- **Cryptography**: Use established libraries, never roll your own crypto
+- **Dependency Security**: Check for known vulnerabilities in dependencies
+
+### Examples
+```java
+// ❌ BAD: SQL injection vulnerability
+String query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '" + email + "'";
+
+// ✅ GOOD: Parameterized query
+PreparedStatement stmt = conn.prepareStatement(
+    "SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = ?"
+);
+stmt.setString(1, email);
+```
+
+```javascript
+// ❌ BAD: Exposed secret in code
+const API_KEY = "sk_live_abc123xyz789";
+
+// ✅ GOOD: Use environment variables
+const API_KEY = process.env.API_KEY;
+```
+
+## Testing Standards
+
+When performing a code review, verify test quality:
+
+- **Coverage**: Critical paths and new functionality must have tests
+- **Test Names**: Descriptive names that explain what is being tested
+- **Test Structure**: Clear Arrange-Act-Assert or Given-When-Then pattern
+- **Independence**: Tests should not depend on each other or external state
+- **Assertions**: Use specific assertions, avoid generic assertTrue/assertFalse
+- **Edge Cases**: Test boundary conditions, null values, empty collections
+- **Mock Appropriately**: Mock external dependencies, not domain logic
+
+### Examples
+```typescript
+// ❌ BAD: Vague name and assertion
+test('test1', () => {
+    const result = calc(5, 10);
+    expect(result).toBeTruthy();
+});
+
+// ✅ GOOD: Descriptive name and specific assertion
+test('should calculate 10% discount for orders under $100', () => {
+    const orderTotal = 50;
+    const itemPrice = 20;
+
+    const discount = calculateDiscount(orderTotal, itemPrice);
+
+    expect(discount).toBe(2.00);
+});
+```
+
+## Performance Considerations
+
+When performing a code review, check for performance issues:
+
+- **Database Queries**: Avoid N+1 queries, use proper indexing
+- **Algorithms**: Appropriate time/space complexity for the use case
+- **Caching**: Utilize caching for expensive or repeated operations
+- **Resource Management**: Proper cleanup of connections, files, streams
+- **Pagination**: Large result sets should be paginated
+- **Lazy Loading**: Load data only when needed
+
+### Examples
+```python
+# ❌ BAD: N+1 query problem
+users = User.query.all()
+for user in users:
+    orders = Order.query.filter_by(user_id=user.id).all()  # N+1!
+
+# ✅ GOOD: Use JOIN or eager loading
+users = User.query.options(joinedload(User.orders)).all()
+for user in users:
+    orders = user.orders
+```
+
+## Architecture and Design
+
+When performing a code review, verify architectural principles:
+
+- **Separation of Concerns**: Clear boundaries between layers/modules
+- **Dependency Direction**: High-level modules don't depend on low-level details
+- **Interface Segregation**: Prefer small, focused interfaces
+- **Loose Coupling**: Components should be independently testable
+- **High Cohesion**: Related functionality grouped together
+- **Consistent Patterns**: Follow established patterns in the codebase
+
+## Documentation Standards
+
+When performing a code review, check documentation:
+
+- **API Documentation**: Public APIs must be documented (purpose, parameters, returns)
+- **Complex Logic**: Non-obvious logic should have explanatory comments
+- **README Updates**: Update README when adding features or changing setup
+- **Breaking Changes**: Document any breaking changes clearly
+- **Examples**: Provide usage examples for complex features
+
+## Comment Format Template
+
+When performing a code review, use this format for comments:
+
+```markdown
+**[PRIORITY] Category: Brief title**
+
+Detailed description of the issue or suggestion.
+
+**Why this matters:**
+Explanation of the impact or reason for the suggestion.
+
+**Suggested fix:**
+[code example if applicable]
+
+**Reference:** [link to relevant documentation or standard]
+```
+
+### Example Comments
+
+#### Critical Issue
+```markdown
+**🔴 CRITICAL - Security: SQL Injection Vulnerability**
+
+The query on line 45 concatenates user input directly into the SQL string,
+creating a SQL injection vulnerability.
+
+**Why this matters:**
+An attacker could manipulate the email parameter to execute arbitrary SQL commands,
+potentially exposing or deleting all database data.
+
+**Suggested fix:**
+```sql
+-- Instead of:
+query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '" + email + "'"
+
+-- Use:
+PreparedStatement stmt = conn.prepareStatement(
+    "SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = ?"
+);
+stmt.setString(1, email);
+```
+
+**Reference:** OWASP SQL Injection Prevention Cheat Sheet
+```
+
+#### Important Issue
+```markdown
+**🟡 IMPORTANT - Testing: Missing test coverage for critical path**
+
+The `processPayment()` function handles financial transactions but has no tests
+for the refund scenario.
+
+**Why this matters:**
+Refunds involve money movement and should be thoroughly tested to prevent
+financial errors or data inconsistencies.
+
+**Suggested fix:**
+Add test case:
+```javascript
+test('should process full refund when order is cancelled', () => {
+    const order = createOrder({ total: 100, status: 'cancelled' });
+
+    const result = processPayment(order, { type: 'refund' });
+
+    expect(result.refundAmount).toBe(100);
+    expect(result.status).toBe('refunded');
+});
+```
+```
+
+#### Suggestion
+```markdown
+**🟢 SUGGESTION - Readability: Simplify nested conditionals**
+
+The nested if statements on lines 30-40 make the logic hard to follow.
+
+**Why this matters:**
+Simpler code is easier to maintain, debug, and test.
+
+**Suggested fix:**
+```javascript
+// Instead of nested ifs:
+if (user) {
+    if (user.isActive) {
+        if (user.hasPermission('write')) {
+            // do something
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+// Consider guard clauses:
+if (!user || !user.isActive || !user.hasPermission('write')) {
+    return;
+}
+// do something
+```
+```
+
+## Review Checklist
+
+When performing a code review, systematically verify:
+
+### Code Quality
+- [ ] Code follows consistent style and conventions
+- [ ] Names are descriptive and follow naming conventions
+- [ ] Functions/methods are small and focused
+- [ ] No code duplication
+- [ ] Complex logic is broken into simpler parts
+- [ ] Error handling is appropriate
+- [ ] No commented-out code or TODO without tickets
+
+### Security
+- [ ] No sensitive data in code or logs
+- [ ] Input validation on all user inputs
+- [ ] No SQL injection vulnerabilities
+- [ ] Authentication and authorization properly implemented
+- [ ] Dependencies are up-to-date and secure
+
+### Testing
+- [ ] New code has appropriate test coverage
+- [ ] Tests are well-named and focused
+- [ ] Tests cover edge cases and error scenarios
+- [ ] Tests are independent and deterministic
+- [ ] No tests that always pass or are commented out
+
+### Performance
+- [ ] No obvious performance issues (N+1, memory leaks)
+- [ ] Appropriate use of caching
+- [ ] Efficient algorithms and data structures
+- [ ] Proper resource cleanup
+
+### Architecture
+- [ ] Follows established patterns and conventions
+- [ ] Proper separation of concerns
+- [ ] No architectural violations
+- [ ] Dependencies flow in correct direction
+
+### Documentation
+- [ ] Public APIs are documented
+- [ ] Complex logic has explanatory comments
+- [ ] README is updated if needed
+- [ ] Breaking changes are documented
+
+## Project-Specific Customizations
+
+To customize this template for your project, add sections for:
+
+1. **Language/Framework specific checks**
+   - Example: "When performing a code review, verify React hooks follow rules of hooks"
+   - Example: "When performing a code review, check Spring Boot controllers use proper annotations"
+
+2. **Build and deployment**
+   - Example: "When performing a code review, verify CI/CD pipeline configuration is correct"
+   - Example: "When performing a code review, check database migrations are reversible"
+
+3. **Business logic rules**
+   - Example: "When performing a code review, verify pricing calculations include all applicable taxes"
+   - Example: "When performing a code review, check user consent is obtained before data processing"
+
+4. **Team conventions**
+   - Example: "When performing a code review, verify commit messages follow conventional commits format"
+   - Example: "When performing a code review, check branch names follow pattern: type/ticket-description"
+
+## Additional Resources
+
+For more information on effective code reviews and GitHub Copilot customization:
+
+- [GitHub Copilot Prompt Engineering](https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/prompting/prompt-engineering)
+- [GitHub Copilot Custom Instructions](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/customization/custom-instructions)
+- [Awesome GitHub Copilot Repository](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot)
+- [GitHub Code Review Guidelines](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests)
+- [Google Engineering Practices - Code Review](https://google.github.io/eng-practices/review/)
+- [OWASP Security Guidelines](https://owasp.org/)
+
+## Prompt Engineering Tips
+
+When performing a code review, apply these prompt engineering principles from the [GitHub Copilot documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/prompting/prompt-engineering):
+
+1. **Start General, Then Get Specific**: Begin with high-level architecture review, then drill into implementation details
+2. **Give Examples**: Reference similar patterns in the codebase when suggesting changes
+3. **Break Complex Tasks**: Review large PRs in logical chunks (security → tests → logic → style)
+4. **Avoid Ambiguity**: Be specific about which file, line, and issue you're addressing
+5. **Indicate Relevant Code**: Reference related code that might be affected by changes
+6. **Experiment and Iterate**: If initial review misses something, review again with focused questions
+
+## Project Context
+
+This is a generic template. Customize this section with your project-specific information:
+
+- **Tech Stack**: [e.g., Java 17, Spring Boot 3.x, PostgreSQL]
+- **Architecture**: [e.g., Hexagonal/Clean Architecture, Microservices]
+- **Build Tool**: [e.g., Gradle, Maven, npm, pip]
+- **Testing**: [e.g., JUnit 5, Jest, pytest]
+- **Code Style**: [e.g., follows Google Style Guide]

.github/instructions/commit-message.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,543 @@
+---
+description: 'Best practices for writing clear, consistent, and meaningful Git commit messages'
+applyTo: '**'
+---
+
+## AI-Specific Requirements (Mandatory)
+
+When generating commit messages automatically:
+
+- ❌ DO NOT mention file names, paths, or extensions
+- ❌ DO NOT mention line counts, diffs, or change statistics
+  (e.g. "+10 -2", "updated file", "modified spec")
+- ❌ DO NOT describe changes as "edited", "updated", or "changed files"
+
+- ✅ DO describe the behavioral, functional, or logical change
+- ✅ DO explain WHY the change was made
+- ✅ DO assume the reader CANNOT see the diff
+
+**Litmus Test**:
+If someone reads only the commit message, they should understand:
+- What changed
+- Why it mattered
+- What behavior is different now
+
+```
+
+# Git Commit Message Best Practices
+
+Comprehensive guidelines for crafting high-quality commit messages that improve code review efficiency, project documentation, and team collaboration. Based on industry standards and the conventional commits specification.
+
+## Why Good Commit Messages Matter
+
+- **Future Reference**: Commit messages serve as project documentation
+- **Code Review**: Clear messages speed up review processes
+- **Debugging**: Easy to trace when and why changes were introduced
+- **Collaboration**: Helps team members understand project evolution
+- **Search and Filter**: Well-structured messages are easier to search
+- **Automation**: Enables automated changelog generation and semantic versioning
+
+## Commit Message Structure
+
+A Git commit message consists of two parts:
+
+```
+<type>(<scope>): <subject>
+
+<body>
+
+<footer>
+```
+
+### Summary/Title (Required)
+
+- **Character Limit**: 50 characters (hard limit: 72)
+- **Format**: `<type>(<scope>): <subject>`
+- **Imperative Mood**: Use "Add feature" not "Added feature" or "Adds feature"
+- **No Period**: Don't end with punctuation
+- **Lowercase Type**: Use lowercase for the type prefix
+
+**Test Formula**: "If applied, this commit will [your commit message]"
+
+✅ **Good**: `If applied, this commit will fix login redirect bug`
+❌ **Bad**: `If applied, this commit will fixed login redirect bug`
+
+### Description/Body (Optional but Recommended)
+
+- **When to Use**: Complex changes, breaking changes, or context needed
+- **Character Limit**: Wrap at 72 characters per line
+- **Content**: Explain WHAT changed and WHY (not HOW - code shows that)
+- **Blank Line**: Separate body from title with one blank line
+- **Multiple Paragraphs**: Allowed, separated by blank lines
+- **Lists**: Use bullets (`-` or `*`) or numbered lists
+
+### Footer (Optional)
+
+- **Breaking Changes**: `BREAKING CHANGE: description`
+- **Issue References**: `Closes #123`, `Fixes #456`, `Refs #789`
+- **Pull Request References**: `Related to PR #100`
+- **Co-authors**: `Co-authored-by: Name <email>`
+
+## Conventional Commit Types
+
+Use these standardized types for consistency and automated tooling:
+
+| Type | Description | Example | When to Use |
+|------|-------------|---------|-------------|
+| `feat` | New user-facing feature | `feat: add password reset email` | New functionality visible to users |
+| `fix` | Bug fix in application code | `fix: correct validation logic for email` | Fixing a bug that affects users |
+| `chore` | Infrastructure, tooling, dependencies | `chore: upgrade Go to 1.21` | CI/CD, build scripts, dependencies |
+| `docs` | Documentation only | `docs: update installation guide` | README, API docs, comments |
+| `style` | Code style/formatting (no logic change) | `style: format with prettier` | Linting, formatting, whitespace |
+| `refactor` | Code restructuring (no functional change) | `refactor: extract user validation logic` | Improving code without changing behavior |
+| `perf` | Performance improvement | `perf: cache database query results` | Optimizations that improve speed/memory |
+| `test` | Adding or updating tests | `test: add unit tests for auth module` | Test files or test infrastructure |
+| `build` | Build system or external dependencies | `build: update webpack config` | Build tools, package managers |
+| `ci` | CI/CD configuration changes | `ci: add code coverage reporting` | GitHub Actions, deployment scripts |
+| `revert` | Reverts a previous commit | `revert: revert commit abc123` | Undoing a previous commit |
+
+### Scope (Optional but Recommended)
+
+Add scope in parentheses to specify what part of the codebase changed:
+
+```
+feat(auth): add OAuth2 provider support
+fix(api): handle null response from external service
+docs(readme): add Docker installation instructions
+chore(deps): upgrade React to 18.3.0
+```
+
+**Common Scopes**:
+- Component names: `(button)`, `(modal)`, `(navbar)`
+- Module names: `(auth)`, `(api)`, `(database)`
+- Feature areas: `(settings)`, `(profile)`, `(checkout)`
+- Layer names: `(frontend)`, `(backend)`, `(infrastructure)`
+
+## Quick Guidelines
+
+✅ **DO**:
+- Use imperative mood: "Add", "Fix", "Update", "Remove"
+- Start with lowercase type: `feat:`, `fix:`, `docs:`
+- Be specific: "Fix login redirect" not "Fix bug"
+- Reference issues/tickets: `Fixes #123`
+- Commit frequently with focused changes
+- Write for your future self and team
+- Double-check spelling and grammar
+- Use conventional commit types
+
+❌ **DON'T**:
+- End summary with punctuation (`.`, `!`, `?`)
+- Use past tense: "Added", "Fixed", "Updated"
+- Use vague messages: "Fix stuff", "Update code", "WIP"
+- Capitalize randomly: "Fix Bug in Login"
+- Commit everything at once: "Update multiple files"
+- Use humor/emojis in professional contexts (unless team standard)
+- Write commit messages when tired or rushed
+
+## Examples
+
+### ✅ Excellent Examples
+
+#### Simple Feature
+```
+feat(auth): add two-factor authentication
+
+Implement TOTP-based 2FA using the speakeasy library.
+Users can enable 2FA in account settings.
+
+Closes #234
+```
+
+#### Bug Fix with Context
+```
+fix(api): prevent race condition in user updates
+
+Previously, concurrent updates to user profiles could
+result in lost data. Added optimistic locking with
+version field to detect conflicts.
+
+The retry logic attempts up to 3 times before failing.
+
+Fixes #567
+```
+
+#### Documentation Update
+```
+docs: add troubleshooting section to README
+
+Include solutions for common installation issues:
+- Node version compatibility
+- Database connection errors
+- Environment variable configuration
+```
+
+#### Dependency Update
+```
+chore(deps): upgrade express from 4.17 to 4.19
+
+Security patch for CVE-2024-12345. No breaking changes
+or API modifications required.
+```
+
+#### Breaking Change
+```
+feat(api): redesign user authentication endpoint
+
+BREAKING CHANGE: The /api/login endpoint now returns
+a JWT token in the response body instead of a cookie.
+Clients must update to include the Authorization header
+in subsequent requests.
+
+Migration guide: docs/migration/auth-token.md
+Closes #789
+```
+
+#### Refactoring
+```
+refactor(services): extract user service interface
+
+Move user-related business logic from handlers to a
+dedicated service layer. No functional changes.
+
+Improves testability and separation of concerns.
+```
+
+### ❌ Bad Examples
+
+```
+❌ update files
+   → Too vague - what was updated and why?
+
+❌ Fixed the login bug.
+   → Past tense, period at end, no context
+
+❌ feat: Add new feature for users to be able to...
+   → Too long for title, should be in body
+
+❌ WIP
+   → Not descriptive, doesn't explain intent
+
+❌ Merge branch 'feature/xyz'
+   → Meaningless merge commit (use squash or rebase)
+
+❌ asdfasdf
+   → Completely unhelpful
+
+❌ Fixes issue
+   → Which issue? No issue number
+
+❌ Updated stuff in the backend
+   → Vague, no technical detail
+```
+
+## Advanced Guidelines
+
+### Atomic Commits
+
+Each commit should represent one logical change:
+
+✅ **Good**: Three separate commits
+```
+feat(auth): add login endpoint
+feat(auth): add logout endpoint
+test(auth): add integration tests for auth endpoints
+```
+
+❌ **Bad**: One commit with everything
+```
+feat: implement authentication system
+(Contains login, logout, tests, and unrelated CSS changes)
+```
+
+### Commit Frequency
+
+**Commit often to**:
+- Keep messages focused and simple
+- Make code review easier
+- Simplify debugging with `git bisect`
+- Reduce risk of lost work
+
+**Good rhythm**:
+- After completing a logical unit of work
+- Before switching tasks or taking a break
+- When tests pass for a feature component
+
+### Issue/Ticket References
+
+Include issue references in the footer:
+
+```
+feat(api): add rate limiting middleware
+
+Implement rate limiting using express-rate-limit to
+prevent API abuse. Default: 100 requests per 15 minutes.
+
+Closes #345
+Refs #346, #347
+```
+
+**Keywords for automatic closing**:
+- `Closes #123`, `Fixes #123`, `Resolves #123`
+- `Closes: #123` (with colon)
+- Multiple: `Fixes #123, #124, #125`
+
+### Co-authored Commits
+
+For pair programming or collaborative work:
+
+```
+feat(ui): redesign dashboard layout
+
+Co-authored-by: Jane Doe <jane@example.com>
+Co-authored-by: John Smith <john@example.com>
+```
+
+### Reverting Commits
+
+```
+revert: revert "feat(api): add rate limiting"
+
+This reverts commit abc123def456.
+
+Rate limiting caused issues with legitimate high-volume
+clients. Will redesign with whitelist support.
+
+Refs #400
+```
+
+## Team-Specific Customization
+
+### Define Team Standards
+
+Document your team's commit message conventions:
+
+1. **Type Usage**: Which types your team uses (subset of conventional)
+2. **Scope Format**: How to name scopes (kebab-case? camelCase?)
+3. **Issue Format**: Jira ticket format vs GitHub issues
+4. **Special Markers**: Any team-specific prefixes or tags
+5. **Breaking Changes**: How to communicate breaking changes
+
+### Example Team Rules
+
+```markdown
+## Team Commit Standards
+
+- Always include scope for domain code
+- Use JIRA ticket format: `PROJECT-123`
+- Mark breaking changes with [BREAKING] prefix in title
+- Include emoji prefix: ✨ feat, 🐛 fix, 📚 docs
+- All feat/fix must reference a ticket
+```
+
+## Validation and Enforcement
+
+### Pre-commit Hooks
+
+Use tools to enforce commit message standards:
+
+**commitlint** (Recommended)
+```bash
+npm install --save-dev @commitlint/{cli,config-conventional}
+```
+
+**.commitlintrc.json**
+```json
+{
+  "extends": ["@commitlint/config-conventional"],
+  "rules": {
+    "type-enum": [2, "always", [
+      "feat", "fix", "docs", "style", "refactor",
+      "perf", "test", "build", "ci", "chore", "revert"
+    ]],
+    "subject-case": [2, "always", "sentence-case"],
+    "subject-max-length": [2, "always", 50],
+    "body-max-line-length": [2, "always", 72]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Manual Validation Checklist
+
+Before committing, verify:
+
+- [ ] Type is correct and lowercase
+- [ ] Subject is imperative mood
+- [ ] Subject is 50 characters or less
+- [ ] No period at end of subject
+- [ ] Body lines wrap at 72 characters
+- [ ] Body explains WHAT and WHY, not HOW
+- [ ] Issue/ticket referenced if applicable
+- [ ] Spelling and grammar checked
+- [ ] Breaking changes documented
+- [ ] Tests pass
+
+## Tools for Better Commit Messages
+
+### Git Commit Template
+
+Create a commit template to remind you of the format:
+
+**~/.gitmessage**
+```
+# <type>(<scope>): <subject> (max 50 chars)
+# |<----  Using a Maximum Of 50 Characters  ---->|
+
+# Explain why this change is being made
+# |<----   Try To Limit Each Line to a Maximum Of 72 Characters   ---->|
+
+# Provide links or keys to any relevant tickets, articles or other resources
+# Example: Fixes #23
+
+# --- COMMIT END ---
+# Type can be:
+#   feat     (new feature)
+#   fix      (bug fix)
+#   refactor (refactoring production code)
+#   style    (formatting, missing semi colons, etc; no code change)
+#   docs     (changes to documentation)
+#   test     (adding or refactoring tests; no production code change)
+#   chore    (updating grunt tasks etc; no production code change)
+# --------------------
+# Remember to:
+#   - Use imperative mood in subject line
+#   - Do not end the subject line with a period
+#   - Capitalize the subject line
+#   - Separate subject from body with a blank line
+#   - Use the body to explain what and why vs. how
+#   - Can use multiple lines with "-" for bullet points in body
+```
+
+**Enable it**:
+```bash
+git config --global commit.template ~/.gitmessage
+```
+
+### IDE Extensions
+
+- **VS Code**: GitLens, Conventional Commits
+- **JetBrains**: Git Commit Template
+- **Sublime**: Git Commitizen
+
+### Git Aliases for Quick Commits
+
+```bash
+# Add to ~/.gitconfig or ~/.git/config
+[alias]
+  cf = "!f() { git commit -m \"feat: $1\"; }; f"
+  cx = "!f() { git commit -m \"fix: $1\"; }; f"
+  cd = "!f() { git commit -m \"docs: $1\"; }; f"
+  cc = "!f() { git commit -m \"chore: $1\"; }; f"
+```
+
+**Usage**:
+```bash
+git cf "add user authentication"  # Creates: feat: add user authentication
+git cx "resolve null pointer in handler"  # Creates: fix: resolve null pointer in handler
+```
+
+## Amending and Fixing Commit Messages
+
+### Edit Last Commit Message
+
+```bash
+git commit --amend -m "new commit message"
+```
+
+### Edit Last Commit Message in Editor
+
+```bash
+git commit --amend
+```
+
+### Edit Older Commit Messages
+
+```bash
+git rebase -i HEAD~3  # Edit last 3 commits
+# Change "pick" to "reword" for commits to edit
+```
+
+⚠️ **Warning**: Never amend or rebase commits that have been pushed to shared branches!
+
+## Language-Specific Considerations
+
+### Go Projects
+```
+feat(http): add middleware for request logging
+refactor(db): migrate from database/sql to sqlx
+fix(parser): handle edge case in JSON unmarshaling
+```
+
+### JavaScript/TypeScript Projects
+```
+feat(components): add error boundary component
+fix(hooks): prevent infinite loop in useEffect
+chore(deps): upgrade React to 18.3.0
+```
+
+### Python Projects
+```
+feat(api): add FastAPI endpoint for user registration
+fix(models): correct SQLAlchemy relationship mapping
+test(utils): add unit tests for date parsing
+```
+
+## Common Pitfalls and Solutions
+
+| Pitfall | Solution |
+|---------|----------|
+| Forgetting to commit | Set reminders, commit frequently |
+| Vague messages | Include specific details about what changed |
+| Too many changes in one commit | Break into atomic commits |
+| Past tense usage | Use imperative mood |
+| Missing issue references | Always link to tracking system |
+| Not explaining "why" | Add body explaining motivation |
+| Inconsistent formatting | Use commitlint or pre-commit hooks |
+
+## Changelog Generation
+
+Well-formatted commits enable automatic changelog generation:
+
+**Example Tools**:
+- `conventional-changelog`
+- `semantic-release`
+- `standard-version`
+
+**Generated Changelog**:
+```markdown
+## [1.2.0] - 2024-01-15
+
+### Features
+- **auth**: add two-factor authentication (#234)
+- **api**: add rate limiting middleware (#345)
+
+### Bug Fixes
+- **api**: prevent race condition in user updates (#567)
+- **ui**: correct alignment in mobile view (#590)
+
+### Documentation
+- add troubleshooting section to README
+- update API documentation with new endpoints
+```
+
+## Resources
+
+- [Conventional Commits Specification](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/)
+- [Angular Commit Guidelines](https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit)
+- [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/)
+- [GitKraken Commit Message Guide](https://www.gitkraken.com/learn/git/best-practices/git-commit-message)
+- [Git Commit Message Style Guide](https://udacity.github.io/git-styleguide/)
+- [How to Write a Git Commit Message](https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/)
+
+## Summary
+
+**The 7 Rules of Great Commit Messages**:
+
+1. Use conventional commit format: `type(scope): subject`
+2. Limit subject line to 50 characters
+3. Use imperative mood: "Add" not "Added"
+4. Don't end subject with punctuation
+5. Separate subject from body with blank line
+6. Wrap body at 72 characters
+7. Explain what and why, not how
+
+**Remember**: A great commit message helps your future self and your team understand the evolution of the codebase. Write commit messages that you'd want to read when debugging at 2 AM! 🕑

.github/instructions/copilot-instructions.md

@@ -4,12 +4,36 @@
 
 Every session should improve the codebase, not just add to it. Actively refactor code you encounter, even outside of your immediate task scope. Think about long-term maintainability and consistency. Make a detailed plan before writing code. Always create unit tests for new code coverage.
 
+- **MANDATORY**: Read all relevant instructions in `.github/instructions/` for the specific task before starting.
+- **ARCHITECTURE AWARENESS**: Always consult `ARCHITECTURE.md` at the repository root before making significant changes to:
+  - Core components (Backend API, Frontend, Caddy Manager, Security layers)
+  - System architecture or data flow
+  - Technology stack or dependencies
+  - Deployment configuration
+  - Directory structure or file organization
 - **DRY**: Consolidate duplicate patterns into reusable functions, types, or components after the second occurrence.
 - **CLEAN**: Delete dead code immediately. Remove unused imports, variables, functions, types, commented code, and console logs.
 - **LEVERAGE**: Use battle-tested packages over custom implementations.
 - **READABLE**: Maintain comments and clear naming for complex logic. Favor clarity over cleverness.
 - **CONVENTIONAL COMMITS**: Write commit messages using `feat:`, `fix:`, `chore:`, `refactor:`, or `docs:` prefixes.
 
+## Governance & Precedence
+
+When policy statements conflict across documentation sources, resolve using this precedence hierarchy:
+
+1. **Highest Precedence**: `.github/instructions/**` files (canonical source of truth)
+2. **Agent Overrides**: `.github/agents/**` files (agent-specific customizations)
+3. **Operator Documentation**: `SECURITY.md`, `docs/security.md`,
+   `docs/features/notifications.md` (user-facing guidance)
+
+**Reconciliation Rule**: When conflicts arise, the stricter security requirement
+wins. Update downstream documentation to match canonical text in
+`.github/instructions/**`.
+
+**Example**: If `.github/instructions/security.instructions.md` mandates token
+redaction but operator docs suggest logging is acceptable, token redaction
+requirement takes precedence and operator docs must be updated.
+
 ## 🚨 CRITICAL ARCHITECTURE RULES 🚨
 
 - **Single Frontend Source**: All frontend code MUST reside in `frontend/`. NEVER create `backend/frontend/` or any other nested frontend directory.
@@ -18,7 +42,7 @@ Every session should improve the codebase, not just add to it. Actively refactor
 
  ## 🛑 Root Cause Analysis Protocol (MANDATORY)
 **Constraint:** You must NEVER patch a symptom without tracing the root cause.
-If a bug is reported, do NOT stop at the first error message found.
+If a bug is reported, do NOT stop at the first error message found. Use Playwright MCP to trace the entire flow from frontend action to backend processing. Identify the true origin of the issue.
 
 **The "Context First" Rule:**
 Before proposing ANY code change or fix, you must build a mental map of the feature:
@@ -43,12 +67,45 @@ Before proposing ANY code change or fix, you must build a mental map of the feat
 
 - **Run**: `cd backend && go run ./cmd/api`.
 - **Test**: `go test ./...`.
+- **Static Analysis (BLOCKING)**: Fast linters run automatically on every commit via lefthook pre-commit-phase hooks.
+  - **Staticcheck errors MUST be fixed** - commits are BLOCKED until resolved
+  - Manual run: `make lint-fast` or VS Code task "Lint: Staticcheck (Fast)"
+  - Staticcheck-only: `make lint-staticcheck-only`
+  - Runtime: ~11s (measured: 10.9s) (acceptable for commit gate)
+  - Full golangci-lint (all linters): Use `make lint-backend` before PR (manual stage)
 - **API Response**: Handlers return structured errors using `gin.H{"error": "message"}`.
 - **JSON Tags**: All struct fields exposed to the frontend MUST have explicit `json:"snake_case"` tags.
 - **IDs**: UUIDs (`github.com/google/uuid`) are generated server-side; clients never send numeric IDs.
 - **Security**: Sanitize all file paths using `filepath.Clean`. Use `fmt.Errorf("context: %w", err)` for error wrapping.
 - **Graceful Shutdown**: Long-running work must respect `server.Run(ctx)`.
 
+### Troubleshooting Lefthook Staticcheck Failures
+
+**Common Issues:**
+
+1. **"golangci-lint not found"**
+   - Install: See README.md Development Setup section
+   - Verify: `golangci-lint --version`
+   - Ensure `$GOPATH/bin` is in PATH
+
+2. **Staticcheck reports deprecated API usage (SA1019)**
+   - Fix: Replace deprecated function with recommended alternative
+   - Check Go docs for migration path
+   - Example: `filepath.HasPrefix` → use `strings.HasPrefix` with cleaned paths
+
+3. **"This value is never used" (SA4006)**
+   - Fix: Remove unused assignment or use the value
+   - Common in test setup code
+
+4. **"Should replace if statement with..." (S10xx)**
+   - Fix: Apply suggested simplification
+   - These improve readability and performance
+
+5. **Emergency bypass (use sparingly):**
+   - `git commit --no-verify -m "Emergency hotfix"`
+   - **MUST** create follow-up issue to fix staticcheck errors
+   - Only for production incidents
+
 ## Frontend Workflow
 
 - **Location**: Always work within `frontend/`.
@@ -67,7 +124,14 @@ Before proposing ANY code change or fix, you must build a mental map of the feat
 
 ## Documentation
 
-- **Features**: Update `docs/features.md` when adding capabilities.
+- **Architecture**: Update `ARCHITECTURE.md` when making changes to:
+  - System architecture or component interactions
+  - Technology stack (major version upgrades, library replacements)
+  - Directory structure or organizational conventions
+  - Deployment model or infrastructure
+  - Security architecture or data flow
+  - Integration points or external dependencies
+- **Features**: Update `docs/features.md` when adding capabilities. This is a short "marketing" style list. Keep details to their individual docs.
 - **Links**: Use GitHub Pages URLs (`https://wikid82.github.io/charon/`) for docs and GitHub blob links for repo files.
 
 ## CI/CD & Commit Conventions
@@ -76,16 +140,92 @@ Before proposing ANY code change or fix, you must build a mental map of the feat
 - **Beta**: `feature/beta-release` always builds.
 - **History-Rewrite PRs**: If a PR touches files in `scripts/history-rewrite/` or `docs/plans/history_rewrite.md`, the PR description MUST include the history-rewrite checklist from `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/history-rewrite.md`. This is enforced by CI.
 
+## PR Sizing & Decomposition
+
+- **Default Rule**: Prefer smaller, reviewable PRs over one large PR when work spans multiple domains.
+- **Split into Multiple PRs When**:
+    - The change touches backend + frontend + infrastructure/security in one effort
+    - The estimated diff is large enough to reduce review quality or increase rollback risk
+    - The work can be delivered in independently testable slices without breaking behavior
+    - A foundational refactor is needed before feature delivery
+- **Suggested PR Sequence**:
+    1. Foundation PR (types/contracts/refactors, no behavior change)
+    2. Backend PR (API/model/service changes + tests)
+    3. Frontend PR (UI integration + tests)
+    4. Hardening PR (security/CI/docs/follow-up fixes)
+- **Per-PR Requirement**: Every PR must remain deployable, pass DoD checks, and include a clear dependency note on prior PRs.
+
 ## ✅ Task Completion Protocol (Definition of Done)
 
 Before marking an implementation task as complete, perform the following in order:
 
-1. **Pre-Commit Triage**: Run `pre-commit run --all-files`.
+1. **Playwright E2E Tests** (MANDATORY - Run First):
+    - **Run**: `cd /projects/Charon npx playwright test --project=firefox` from project root
+    - **Why First**: If the app is broken at E2E level, unit tests may need updates. Catch integration issues early.
+    - **Scope**: Run tests relevant to modified features (e.g., `tests/manual-dns-provider.spec.ts`)
+    - **On Failure**: Trace root cause through frontend → backend flow before proceeding
+    - **Base URL**: Uses `PLAYWRIGHT_BASE_URL` or default from `playwright.config.js`
+    - All E2E tests must pass before proceeding to unit tests
+
+1.5. **GORM Security Scan** (CONDITIONAL, BLOCKING):
+    - **Trigger Condition**: Execute this gate when changes include backend models or database interaction logic:
+        - `backend/internal/models/**`
+        - GORM query/service layers
+        - Database migrations or seeding logic
+    - **Exclusions**: Skip this gate for docs-only (`**/*.md`) or frontend-only (`frontend/**`) changes
+    - **Run One Of**:
+        - VS Code task: `Lint: GORM Security Scan`
+        - Lefthook: `lefthook run pre-commit` (includes gorm-security-scan)
+        - Direct: `./scripts/scan-gorm-security.sh --check`
+        - **Gate Enforcement**: DoD is process-blocking until scanner reports zero
+            CRITICAL/HIGH findings, even while automation remains in manual stage
+        - **Check Mode Required**: Gate decisions must use check mode semantics
+            (`--check` flag or equivalent task wiring) for pass/fail determination
+
+2. **Local Patch Coverage Preflight** (MANDATORY - Run Before Unit/Coverage Tests):
+    - **Run**: VS Code task `Test: Local Patch Report` or `bash scripts/local-patch-report.sh` from repo root.
+    - **Purpose**: Surface exact changed files and uncovered changed lines before adding/refining unit tests.
+    - **Required Artifacts**: `test-results/local-patch-report.md` and `test-results/local-patch-report.json`.
+    - **Expected Behavior**: Report may warn (non-blocking rollout), but artifact generation is mandatory.
+
+3. **Security Scans** (MANDATORY - Zero Tolerance):
+    - **CodeQL Go Scan**: Run VS Code task "Security: CodeQL Go Scan (CI-Aligned)" OR `lefthook run pre-commit`
+        - Must use `security-and-quality` suite (CI-aligned)
+        - **Zero high/critical (error-level) findings allowed**
+        - Medium/low findings should be documented and triaged
+    - **CodeQL JS Scan**: Run VS Code task "Security: CodeQL JS Scan (CI-Aligned)" OR `lefthook run pre-commit`
+        - Must use `security-and-quality` suite (CI-aligned)
+        - **Zero high/critical (error-level) findings allowed**
+        - Medium/low findings should be documented and triaged
+    - **Validate Findings**: Run `lefthook run pre-commit` to check for HIGH/CRITICAL issues
+    - **Trivy Container Scan**: Run VS Code task "Security: Trivy Scan" for container/dependency vulnerabilities
+    - **Results Viewing**:
+        - Primary: VS Code SARIF Viewer extension (`MS-SarifVSCode.sarif-viewer`)
+        - Alternative: `jq` command-line parsing: `jq '.runs[].results' codeql-results-*.sarif`
+        - CI: GitHub Security tab for automated uploads
+    - **⚠️ CRITICAL:** CodeQL scans are NOT run by default pre-commit hooks (manual stage for performance). You MUST run them explicitly via VS Code tasks or pre-commit manual commands before completing any task.
+    - **Why:** CI enforces security-and-quality suite and blocks HIGH/CRITICAL findings. Local verification prevents CI failures and ensures security compliance.
+    - **CI Alignment:** Local scans now use identical parameters to CI:
+        - Query suite: `security-and-quality` (61 Go queries, 204 JS queries)
+        - Database creation: `--threads=0 --overwrite`
+        - Analysis: `--sarif-add-baseline-file-info`
+
+4. **Lefthook Triage**: Run `lefthook run pre-commit`.
     - If errors occur, **fix them immediately**.
     - If logic errors occur, analyze and propose a fix.
     - Do not output code that violates pre-commit standards.
 
-2. **Coverage Testing** (MANDATORY - Non-negotiable):
+5. **Staticcheck BLOCKING Validation**: Pre-commit hooks automatically run fast linters including staticcheck.
+    - **CRITICAL:** Staticcheck errors are BLOCKING - you MUST fix them before commit succeeds.
+    - Manual verification: Run VS Code task "Lint: Staticcheck (Fast)" or `make lint-fast`
+    - To check only staticcheck: `make lint-staticcheck-only`
+    - Test files (`_test.go`) are excluded from staticcheck (matches CI behavior)
+    - If pre-commit fails: Fix the reported issues, then retry commit
+    - **Do NOT** use `--no-verify` to bypass this check unless emergency hotfix
+
+6. **Coverage Testing** (MANDATORY - Non-negotiable):
+    - **Overall Coverage**: Minimum 85% coverage is MANDATORY and will fail the PR if not met.
+    - **Patch Coverage**: Developers should aim for 100% coverage of modified lines (Codecov Patch view). If patch coverage is incomplete, add targeted tests. However, patch coverage is a suggestion and will not block PR approval.
     - **Backend Changes**: Run the VS Code task "Test: Backend with Coverage" or execute `scripts/go-test-coverage.sh`.
         - Minimum coverage: 85% (set via `CHARON_MIN_COVERAGE` or `CPM_MIN_COVERAGE`).
         - If coverage drops below threshold, write additional tests to restore coverage.
@@ -97,16 +237,21 @@ Before marking an implementation task as complete, perform the following in orde
     - **Critical**: Coverage tests are NOT run by default pre-commit hooks (they are in manual stage for performance). You MUST run them explicitly via VS Code tasks or scripts before completing any task.
     - **Why**: CI enforces coverage in GitHub Actions. Local verification prevents CI failures and maintains code quality.
 
-3. **Type Safety** (Frontend only):
+7. **Type Safety** (Frontend only):
     - Run the VS Code task "Lint: TypeScript Check" or execute `cd frontend && npm run type-check`.
     - Fix all type errors immediately. This is non-negotiable.
     - This check is also in manual stage for performance but MUST be run before completion.
 
-4. **Verify Build**: Ensure the backend compiles and the frontend builds without errors.
+8. **Verify Build**: Ensure the backend compiles and the frontend builds without errors.
     - Backend: `cd backend && go build ./...`
     - Frontend: `cd frontend && npm run build`
 
-5. **Clean Up**: Ensure no debug print statements or commented-out blocks remain.
+9. **Fixed and New Code Testing**:
+    - Ensure all existing and new unit tests pass with zero failures.
+    - When failures and errors are found, deep-dive into root causes. Using the correct `subAgent`, update the working plan, review the implementation, and fix the issues.
+    - No issue is out of scope for investigation and resolution. All issues must be addressed before task completion.
+
+10. **Clean Up**: Ensure no debug print statements or commented-out blocks remain.
     - Remove `console.log`, `fmt.Println`, and similar debugging statements.
     - Delete commented-out code blocks.
     - Remove unused imports.

.github/instructions/documentation-coding-best-practices.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+---
+description: This file describes the documentation and coding best practices for the project.
+applyTo: '*'
+---
+
+
+# Documentation & Coding Best Practices
+
+The following instructions govern how you should generate and update documentation and code. These rules are absolute.
+
+## 1. Zero-Footprint Attribution (The Ghostwriter Rule)
+* **No AI Branding:** You are a ghostwriter. You must **NEVER** add sections titled "AI Notes," "Generated by," "Model Commentary," or "LLM Analysis."
+* **Invisible Editing:** The documentation must appear as if written 100% by the project maintainer. Do not leave "scars" or meta-tags indicating an AI touched the file.
+* **The "Author" Field:** * **Existing Files:** NEVER modify an existing `Author` field.
+    * **New Files:** Do NOT add an `Author` field unless explicitly requested.
+    * **Strict Prohibition:** You are strictly forbidden from placing "GitHub Copilot," "AI," "Assistant," or your model name in any `Author`, `Credits`, or `Contributor` field.
+
+## 2. Documentation Style
+* **Direct & Professional:** The documentation itself is the "note." Do not add a separate preamble or postscript explaining what you wrote.
+* **No Conversational Filler:** When asked to generate documentation, output *only* the documentation content. Do not wrap it in "Here is the updated file:" or "I have added the following..."
+* **Maintenance:** When updating a file, respect the existing formatting style (headers, indentation, bullet points) perfectly. Do not "fix" style choices unless they are actual syntax errors.
+* **Consistency:** Follow the existing style of the file. If the file uses a specific format for sections, maintain that format. Do not introduce new formatting styles.
+* **Clarity & Brevity:** Be concise and clear. Avoid unnecessary verbosity or overly technical jargon unless the file's existing style is already very technical. Match the tone and complexity of the existing documentation.
+
+## 3. Interaction Constraints
+* **Calm & Concise:** Be succinct. Do not offer unsolicited advice or "bonus" refactoring unless it is critical for security.
+* **Context Retention:** Assume the user knows what they are doing. Do not explain basic concepts unless asked.
+* **No Code Generation in Documentation Files:** When editing documentation files, do not generate code snippets unless they are explicitly requested. Focus on the documentation content itself.
+* **No Meta-Comments:** Do not include comments about the editing process, your thought process, or any "notes to self" in the documentation. The output should be clean and ready for use.
+* **Respect User Intent:** If the user asks for a specific change, do only that change. Do not add additional edits or improvements unless they are critical for security or correctness.
+* **No "Best Practices" Sections:** Do not add sections titled "Best Practices," "Recommendations," or "Guidelines" unless the existing file already has such a section. If the file does not have such a section, do not create one.
+* **No "Next Steps" or "Further Reading":** Do not add sections that suggest next steps, further reading, or related topics unless the existing file already includes such sections.
+* **No Personalization:** Do not personalize the documentation with phrases like "As a developer, you should..." or "In this project, we recommend..." Keep the tone neutral and professional.
+* **No Apologies or Uncertainty:** Do not include phrases like "I hope this helps," "Sorry for the confusion," or "Please let me know if you have any questions." The documentation should be authoritative and confident.
+* **No Redundant Information:** Do not include information that is already clearly stated in the existing documentation. Avoid redundancy.
+* **No Unsolicited Refactoring:** Do not refactor existing documentation for style or clarity unless it contains critical errors. Focus on the specific changes requested by the user.
+* **No "Summary" or "Overview" Sections:** Do not add summary or overview sections unless the existing file already has them. If the file does not have such sections, do not create them.
+* **No "How It Works" Sections:** Do not add sections explaining how the code works unless the existing documentation already includes such sections. If the file does not have such sections, do not create them.
+* **No "Use Cases" or "Examples":** Do not add use cases, examples, or case studies unless the existing documentation already has such sections. If the file does not have such sections, do not create them.
+* **No "Troubleshooting" Sections:** Do not add troubleshooting sections unless the existing documentation already includes them. Toubleshooting is its own section of the docs and should not be added ad-hoc to unrelated files.
+* **No "FAQ" Sections:** Do not add FAQ sections unless the existing documentation already has them. If the file does not have such sections, do not create them.
+* **No "Contact" or "Support" Sections:** Do not add contact information, support channels, or similar sections unless the existing documentation already includes them. If the file does not have such sections, do not create them.
+* **No "Contributing" Sections:** Contributing has its on documentation file. Do not add contributing guidelines to unrelated documentation files unless they already have such sections.

.github/instructions/features.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+---
+description: "Guidance for writing and formatting the `docs/features.md` file."
+applyTo: "docs/features.md"
+---
+
+# Features Documentation Guidelines
+
+When creating or updating the `docs/features.md` file, please adhere to the following guidelines to ensure clarity and consistency:
+
+## Structure
+
+    - This document should provide a short, to the point overview of each feature. It is used for marketing of the project. A quick read of what the feature is and why it matters. It is the "elevator pitch" for each feature.
+    - Each feature should have its own section with a clear heading.
+    - Use bullet points or numbered lists to break down complex information.
+    - Include relevant links to other documentation or resources for further reading.
+    - Use consistent formatting for headings, subheadings, and text styles throughout the document.
+    - Avoid overly technical jargon; the document should be accessible to a broad audience. Keep novice users in mind.
+    - This is not the place for deep technical details or implementation specifics. Keep those for individual feature docs.
+
+## Content
+    - Start with a brief summary of the feature.
+    - Explain the purpose and benefits of the feature.
+    - Keep descriptions concise and focused.
+    - Ensure accuracy and up-to-date information.
+
+## Review
+    - Changes to `docs/features.md` should be reviewed by at least one other contributor before merging.
+    - Review for correctness, clarity, and consistency with the guidelines in this file.
+    - Confirm that each feature description reflects the current behavior and positioning of the project.
+    - Ensure the tone remains high-level and marketing‑oriented, avoiding deep technical implementation details.

.github/instructions/github-actions-ci-cd-best-practices.instructions.md

@@ -502,6 +502,8 @@ This checklist provides a granular set of criteria for reviewing GitHub Actions
 
 This section provides an expanded guide to diagnosing and resolving frequent problems encountered when working with GitHub Actions workflows.
 
+Note: If workflow logs are not accessible via MCP web fetch due to missing auth, retrieve logs with the authenticated `gh` CLI.
+
 ### **1. Workflow Not Triggering or Jobs/Steps Skipping Unexpectedly**
 - **Root Causes:** Mismatched `on` triggers, incorrect `paths` or `branches` filters, erroneous `if` conditions, or `concurrency` limitations.
 - **Actionable Steps:**

.github/instructions/go.instructions.md

@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ Follow idiomatic Go practices and community standards when writing Go code. Thes
 ### Development Practices
 
 - Run tests before committing
-- Use pre-commit hooks for formatting and linting
+- Use lefthook pre-commit-phase hooks for formatting and linting
 - Keep commits focused and atomic
 - Write meaningful commit messages
 - Review diffs before committing

.github/instructions/html-css-style-color-guide.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+---
+description: 'Color usage guidelines and styling rules for HTML elements to ensure accessible, professional designs.'
+applyTo: '**/*.html, **/*.css, **/*.js'
+---
+
+# HTML CSS Style Color Guide
+
+Follow these guidelines when updating or creating HTML/CSS styles for browser rendering. Color names
+represent the full spectrum of their respective hue ranges (e.g., "blue" includes navy, sky blue, etc.).
+
+## Color Definitions
+
+- **Hot Colors**: Oranges, reds, and yellows
+- **Cool Colors**: Blues, greens, and purples
+- **Neutral Colors**: Grays and grayscale variations
+- **Binary Colors**: Black and white
+- **60-30-10 Rule**
+  - **Primary Color**: Use 60% of the time (*cool or light color*)
+  - **Secondary Color**: Use 30% of the time (*cool or light color*)
+  - **Accent**: Use 10% of the time (*complementary hot color*)
+
+## Color Usage Guidelines
+
+Balance the colors used by applying the **60-30-10 rule** to graphic design elements like backgrounds,
+buttons, cards, etc...
+
+### Background Colors
+
+**Never Use:**
+
+- Purple or magenta
+- Red, orange, or yellow
+- Pink
+- Any hot color
+
+**Recommended:**
+
+- White or off-white
+- Light cool colors (e.g., light blues, light greens)
+- Subtle neutral tones
+- Light gradients with minimal color shift
+
+### Text Colors
+
+**Never Use:**
+
+- Yellow (poor contrast and readability)
+- Pink
+- Pure white or light text on light backgrounds
+- Pure black or dark text on dark backgrounds
+
+**Recommended:**
+
+- Dark neutral colors (e.g., #1f2328, #24292f)
+- Near-black variations (#000000 to #333333)
+  - Ensure background is a light color
+- Dark grays (#4d4d4d, #6c757d)
+- High-contrast combinations for accessibility
+- Near-white variations (#ffffff to #f0f2f3)
+  - Ensure background is a dark color
+
+### Colors to Avoid
+
+Unless explicitly required by design specifications or user request, avoid:
+
+- Bright purples and magentas
+- Bright pinks and neon colors
+- Highly saturated hot colors
+- Colors with low contrast ratios (fails WCAG accessibility standards)
+
+### Colors to Use Sparingly
+
+**Hot Colors** (red, orange, yellow):
+
+- Reserve for critical alerts, warnings, or error messages
+- Use only when conveying urgency or importance
+- Limit to small accent areas rather than large sections
+- Consider alternatives like icons or bold text before using hot colors
+
+## Gradients
+
+Apply gradients with subtle color transitions to maintain professional aesthetics.
+
+### Best Practices
+
+- Keep color shifts minimal (e.g., #E6F2FF to #F5F7FA)
+- Use gradients within the same color family
+- Avoid combining hot and cool colors in a single gradient
+- Prefer linear gradients over radial for backgrounds
+
+### Appropriate Use Cases
+
+- Background containers and sections
+- Button hover states and interactive elements
+- Drop shadows and depth effects
+- Header and navigation bars
+- Card components and panels
+
+## Additional Resources
+
+- [Color Tool](https://civicactions.github.io/uswds-color-tool/)
+- [Government or Professional Color Standards](https://designsystem.digital.gov/design-tokens/color/overview/)
+- [UI Color Palette Best Practices](https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/ui-color-palette)
+- [Color Combination Resource](https://www.figma.com/resource-library/color-combinations/)

.github/instructions/instructions.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
+---
+description: 'Guidelines for creating high-quality custom instruction files for GitHub Copilot'
+applyTo: '**/*.instructions.md'
+---
+
+# Custom Instructions File Guidelines
+
+Instructions for creating effective and maintainable custom instruction files that guide GitHub Copilot in generating domain-specific code and following project conventions.
+
+## Project Context
+
+- Target audience: Developers and GitHub Copilot working with domain-specific code
+- File format: Markdown with YAML frontmatter
+- File naming convention: lowercase with hyphens (e.g., `react-best-practices.instructions.md`)
+- Location: `.github/instructions/` directory
+- Purpose: Provide context-aware guidance for code generation, review, and documentation
+
+## Required Frontmatter
+
+Every instruction file must include YAML frontmatter with the following fields:
+
+```yaml
+---
+description: 'Brief description of the instruction purpose and scope'
+applyTo: 'glob pattern for target files (e.g., **/*.ts, **/*.py)'
+---
+```
+
+### Frontmatter Guidelines
+
+- **description**: Single-quoted string, 1-500 characters, clearly stating the purpose
+- **applyTo**: Glob pattern(s) specifying which files these instructions apply to
+  - Single pattern: `'**/*.ts'`
+  - Multiple patterns: `'**/*.ts, **/*.tsx, **/*.js'`
+  - Specific files: `'src/**/*.py'`
+  - All files: `'**'`
+
+## File Structure
+
+A well-structured instruction file should include the following sections:
+
+### 1. Title and Overview
+
+- Clear, descriptive title using `#` heading
+- Brief introduction explaining the purpose and scope
+- Optional: Project context section with key technologies and versions
+
+### 2. Core Sections
+
+Organize content into logical sections based on the domain:
+
+- **General Instructions**: High-level guidelines and principles
+- **Best Practices**: Recommended patterns and approaches
+- **Code Standards**: Naming conventions, formatting, style rules
+- **Architecture/Structure**: Project organization and design patterns
+- **Common Patterns**: Frequently used implementations
+- **Security**: Security considerations (if applicable)
+- **Performance**: Optimization guidelines (if applicable)
+- **Testing**: Testing standards and approaches (if applicable)
+
+### 3. Examples and Code Snippets
+
+Provide concrete examples with clear labels:
+
+```markdown
+### Good Example
+\`\`\`language
+// Recommended approach
+code example here
+\`\`\`
+
+### Bad Example
+\`\`\`language
+// Avoid this pattern
+code example here
+\`\`\`
+```
+
+### 4. Validation and Verification (Optional but Recommended)
+
+- Build commands to verify code
+- Linting and formatting tools
+- Testing requirements
+- Verification steps
+
+## Content Guidelines
+
+### Writing Style
+
+- Use clear, concise language
+- Write in imperative mood ("Use", "Implement", "Avoid")
+- Be specific and actionable
+- Avoid ambiguous terms like "should", "might", "possibly"
+- Use bullet points and lists for readability
+- Keep sections focused and scannable
+
+### Best Practices
+
+- **Be Specific**: Provide concrete examples rather than abstract concepts
+- **Show Why**: Explain the reasoning behind recommendations when it adds value
+- **Use Tables**: For comparing options, listing rules, or showing patterns
+- **Include Examples**: Real code snippets are more effective than descriptions
+- **Stay Current**: Reference current versions and best practices
+- **Link Resources**: Include official documentation and authoritative sources
+
+### Common Patterns to Include
+
+1. **Naming Conventions**: How to name variables, functions, classes, files
+2. **Code Organization**: File structure, module organization, import order
+3. **Error Handling**: Preferred error handling patterns
+4. **Dependencies**: How to manage and document dependencies
+5. **Comments and Documentation**: When and how to document code
+6. **Version Information**: Target language/framework versions
+
+## Patterns to Follow
+
+### Bullet Points and Lists
+
+```markdown
+## Security Best Practices
+
+- Always validate user input before processing
+- Use parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection
+- Store secrets in environment variables, never in code
+- Implement proper authentication and authorization
+- Enable HTTPS for all production endpoints
+```
+
+### Tables for Structured Information
+
+```markdown
+## Common Issues
+
+| Issue            | Solution            | Example                       |
+| ---------------- | ------------------- | ----------------------------- |
+| Magic numbers    | Use named constants | `const MAX_RETRIES = 3`       |
+| Deep nesting     | Extract functions   | Refactor nested if statements |
+| Hardcoded values | Use configuration   | Store API URLs in config      |
+```
+
+### Code Comparison
+
+```markdown
+### Good Example - Using TypeScript interfaces
+\`\`\`typescript
+interface User {
+  id: string;
+  name: string;
+  email: string;
+}
+
+function getUser(id: string): User {
+  // Implementation
+}
+\`\`\`
+
+### Bad Example - Using any type
+\`\`\`typescript
+function getUser(id: any): any {
+  // Loses type safety
+}
+\`\`\`
+```
+
+### Conditional Guidance
+
+```markdown
+## Framework Selection
+
+- **For small projects**: Use Minimal API approach
+- **For large projects**: Use controller-based architecture with clear separation
+- **For microservices**: Consider domain-driven design patterns
+```
+
+## Patterns to Avoid
+
+- **Overly verbose explanations**: Keep it concise and scannable
+- **Outdated information**: Always reference current versions and practices
+- **Ambiguous guidelines**: Be specific about what to do or avoid
+- **Missing examples**: Abstract rules without concrete code examples
+- **Contradictory advice**: Ensure consistency throughout the file
+- **Copy-paste from documentation**: Add value by distilling and contextualizing
+
+## Testing Your Instructions
+
+Before finalizing instruction files:
+
+1. **Test with Copilot**: Try the instructions with actual prompts in VS Code
+2. **Verify Examples**: Ensure code examples are correct and run without errors
+3. **Check Glob Patterns**: Confirm `applyTo` patterns match intended files
+
+## Example Structure
+
+Here's a minimal example structure for a new instruction file:
+
+```markdown
+---
+description: 'Brief description of purpose'
+applyTo: '**/*.ext'
+---
+
+# Technology Name Development
+
+Brief introduction and context.
+
+## General Instructions
+
+- High-level guideline 1
+- High-level guideline 2
+
+## Best Practices
+
+- Specific practice 1
+- Specific practice 2
+
+## Code Standards
+
+### Naming Conventions
+- Rule 1
+- Rule 2
+
+### File Organization
+- Structure 1
+- Structure 2
+
+## Common Patterns
+
+### Pattern 1
+Description and example
+
+\`\`\`language
+code example
+\`\`\`
+
+### Pattern 2
+Description and example
+
+## Validation
+
+- Build command: `command to verify`
+- Linting: `command to lint`
+- Testing: `command to test`
+```
+
+## Maintenance
+
+- Review instructions when dependencies or frameworks are updated
+- Update examples to reflect current best practices
+- Remove outdated patterns or deprecated features
+- Add new patterns as they emerge in the community
+- Keep glob patterns accurate as project structure evolves
+
+## Additional Resources
+
+- [Custom Instructions Documentation](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/customization/custom-instructions)
+- [Awesome Copilot Instructions](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/tree/main/instructions)

.github/instructions/makefile.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,410 @@
+---
+description: "Best practices for authoring GNU Make Makefiles"
+applyTo: "**/Makefile, **/makefile, **/*.mk, **/GNUmakefile"
+---
+
+# Makefile Development Instructions
+
+Instructions for writing clean, maintainable, and portable GNU Make Makefiles. These instructions are based on the [GNU Make manual](https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/).
+
+## General Principles
+
+- Write clear and maintainable makefiles that follow GNU Make conventions
+- Use descriptive target names that clearly indicate their purpose
+- Keep the default goal (first target) as the most common build operation
+- Prioritize readability over brevity when writing rules and recipes
+- Add comments to explain complex rules, variables, or non-obvious behavior
+
+## Naming Conventions
+
+- Name your makefile `Makefile` (recommended for visibility) or `makefile`
+- Use `GNUmakefile` only for GNU Make-specific features incompatible with other make implementations
+- Use standard variable names: `objects`, `OBJECTS`, `objs`, `OBJS`, `obj`, or `OBJ` for object file lists
+- Use uppercase for built-in variable names (e.g., `CC`, `CFLAGS`, `LDFLAGS`)
+- Use descriptive target names that reflect their action (e.g., `clean`, `install`, `test`)
+
+## File Structure
+
+- Place the default goal (primary build target) as the first rule in the makefile
+- Group related targets together logically
+- Define variables at the top of the makefile before rules
+- Use `.PHONY` to declare targets that don't represent files
+- Structure makefiles with: variables, then rules, then phony targets
+
+```makefile
+# Variables
+CC = gcc
+CFLAGS = -Wall -g
+objects = main.o utils.o
+
+# Default goal
+all: program
+
+# Rules
+program: $(objects)
+	$(CC) -o program $(objects)
+
+%.o: %.c
+	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c $< -o $@
+
+# Phony targets
+.PHONY: clean all
+clean:
+	rm -f program $(objects)
+```
+
+## Variables and Substitution
+
+- Use variables to avoid duplication and improve maintainability
+- Define variables with `:=` (simple expansion) for immediate evaluation, `=` for recursive expansion
+- Use `?=` to set default values that can be overridden
+- Use `+=` to append to existing variables
+- Reference variables with `$(VARIABLE)` not `$VARIABLE` (unless single character)
+- Use automatic variables (`$@`, `$<`, `$^`, `$?`, `$*`) in recipes to make rules more generic
+
+```makefile
+# Simple expansion (evaluates immediately)
+CC := gcc
+
+# Recursive expansion (evaluates when used)
+CFLAGS = -Wall $(EXTRA_FLAGS)
+
+# Conditional assignment
+PREFIX ?= /usr/local
+
+# Append to variable
+CFLAGS += -g
+```
+
+## Rules and Prerequisites
+
+- Separate targets, prerequisites, and recipes clearly
+- Use implicit rules for standard compilations (e.g., `.c` to `.o`)
+- List prerequisites in logical order (normal prerequisites before order-only)
+- Use order-only prerequisites (after `|`) for directories and dependencies that shouldn't trigger rebuilds
+- Include all actual dependencies to ensure correct rebuilds
+- Avoid circular dependencies between targets
+- Remember that order-only prerequisites are omitted from automatic variables like `$^`, so reference them explicitly if needed
+
+The example below shows a pattern rule that compiles objects into an `obj/` directory. The directory itself is listed as an order-only prerequisite so it is created before compiling but does not force recompilation when its timestamp changes.
+
+```makefile
+# Normal prerequisites
+program: main.o utils.o
+	$(CC) -o $@ $^
+
+# Order-only prerequisites (directory creation)
+obj/%.o: %.c | obj
+	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c $< -o $@
+
+obj:
+	mkdir -p obj
+```
+
+## Recipes and Commands
+
+- Start every recipe line with a **tab character** (not spaces) unless `.RECIPEPREFIX` is changed
+- Use `@` prefix to suppress command echoing when appropriate
+- Use `-` prefix to ignore errors for specific commands (use sparingly)
+- Combine related commands with `&&` or `;` on the same line when they must execute together
+- Keep recipes readable; break long commands across multiple lines with backslash continuation
+- Use shell conditionals and loops within recipes when needed
+
+```makefile
+# Silent command
+clean:
+	@echo "Cleaning up..."
+	@rm -f $(objects)
+
+# Ignore errors
+.PHONY: clean-all
+clean-all:
+	-rm -rf build/
+	-rm -rf dist/
+
+# Multi-line recipe with proper continuation
+install: program
+	install -d $(PREFIX)/bin && \
+		install -m 755 program $(PREFIX)/bin
+```
+
+## Phony Targets
+
+- Always declare phony targets with `.PHONY` to avoid conflicts with files of the same name
+- Use phony targets for actions like `clean`, `install`, `test`, `all`
+- Place phony target declarations near their rule definitions or at the end of the makefile
+
+```makefile
+.PHONY: all clean test install
+
+all: program
+
+clean:
+	rm -f program $(objects)
+
+test: program
+	./run-tests.sh
+
+install: program
+	install -m 755 program $(PREFIX)/bin
+```
+
+## Pattern Rules and Implicit Rules
+
+- Use pattern rules (`%.o: %.c`) for generic transformations
+- Leverage built-in implicit rules when appropriate (GNU Make knows how to compile `.c` to `.o`)
+- Override implicit rule variables (like `CC`, `CFLAGS`) rather than rewriting the rules
+- Define custom pattern rules only when built-in rules are insufficient
+
+```makefile
+# Use built-in implicit rules by setting variables
+CC = gcc
+CFLAGS = -Wall -O2
+
+# Custom pattern rule for special cases
+%.pdf: %.md
+	pandoc $< -o $@
+```
+
+## Splitting Long Lines
+
+- Use backslash-newline (`\`) to split long lines for readability
+- Be aware that backslash-newline is converted to a single space in non-recipe contexts
+- In recipes, backslash-newline preserves the line continuation for the shell
+- Avoid trailing whitespace after backslashes
+
+### Splitting Without Adding Whitespace
+
+If you need to split a line without adding whitespace, you can use a special technique: insert `$ ` (dollar-space) followed by a backslash-newline. The `$ ` refers to a variable with a single-space name, which doesn't exist and expands to nothing, effectively joining the lines without inserting a space.
+
+```makefile
+# Concatenate strings without adding whitespace
+# The following creates the value "oneword"
+var := one$ \
+       word
+
+# This is equivalent to:
+# var := oneword
+```
+
+```makefile
+# Variable definition split across lines
+sources = main.c \
+          utils.c \
+          parser.c \
+          handler.c
+
+# Recipe with long command
+build: $(objects)
+	$(CC) -o program $(objects) \
+	      $(LDFLAGS) \
+	      -lm -lpthread
+```
+
+## Including Other Makefiles
+
+- Use `include` directive to share common definitions across makefiles
+- Use `-include` (or `sinclude`) to include optional makefiles without errors
+- Place `include` directives after variable definitions that may affect included files
+- Use `include` for shared variables, pattern rules, or common targets
+
+```makefile
+# Include common settings
+include config.mk
+
+# Include optional local configuration
+-include local.mk
+```
+
+## Conditional Directives
+
+- Use conditional directives (`ifeq`, `ifneq`, `ifdef`, `ifndef`) for platform or configuration-specific rules
+- Place conditionals at the makefile level, not within recipes (use shell conditionals in recipes)
+- Keep conditionals simple and well-documented
+
+```makefile
+# Platform-specific settings
+ifeq ($(OS),Windows_NT)
+    EXE_EXT = .exe
+else
+    EXE_EXT =
+endif
+
+program: main.o
+	$(CC) -o program$(EXE_EXT) main.o
+```
+
+## Automatic Prerequisites
+
+- Generate header dependencies automatically rather than maintaining them manually
+- Use compiler flags like `-MMD` and `-MP` to generate `.d` files with dependencies
+- Include generated dependency files with `-include $(deps)` to avoid errors if they don't exist
+
+```makefile
+objects = main.o utils.o
+deps = $(objects:.o=.d)
+
+# Include dependency files
+-include $(deps)
+
+# Compile with automatic dependency generation
+%.o: %.c
+	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -MMD -MP -c $< -o $@
+```
+
+## Error Handling and Debugging
+
+- Use `$(error text)` or `$(warning text)` functions for build-time diagnostics
+- Test makefiles with `make -n` (dry run) to see commands without executing
+- Use `make -p` to print the database of rules and variables for debugging
+- Validate required variables and tools at the beginning of the makefile
+
+```makefile
+# Check for required tools
+ifeq ($(shell which gcc),)
+    $(error "gcc is not installed or not in PATH")
+endif
+
+# Validate required variables
+ifndef VERSION
+    $(error VERSION is not defined)
+endif
+```
+
+## Clean Targets
+
+- Always provide a `clean` target to remove generated files
+- Declare `clean` as phony to avoid conflicts with a file named "clean"
+- Use `-` prefix with `rm` commands to ignore errors if files don't exist
+- Consider separate `clean` (removes objects) and `distclean` (removes all generated files) targets
+
+```makefile
+.PHONY: clean distclean
+
+clean:
+	-rm -f $(objects)
+	-rm -f $(deps)
+
+distclean: clean
+	-rm -f program config.mk
+```
+
+## Portability Considerations
+
+- Avoid GNU Make-specific features if portability to other make implementations is required
+- Use standard shell commands (prefer POSIX shell constructs)
+- Test with `make -B` to force rebuild all targets
+- Document any platform-specific requirements or GNU Make extensions used
+
+## Performance Optimization
+
+- Use `:=` for variables that don't need recursive expansion (faster)
+- Avoid unnecessary use of `$(shell ...)` which creates subprocesses
+- Order prerequisites efficiently (most frequently changing files last)
+- Use parallel builds (`make -j`) safely by ensuring targets don't conflict
+
+## Documentation and Comments
+
+- Add a header comment explaining the makefile's purpose
+- Document non-obvious variable settings and their effects
+- Include usage examples or targets in comments
+- Add inline comments for complex rules or platform-specific workarounds
+
+```makefile
+# Makefile for building the example application
+#
+# Usage:
+#   make          - Build the program
+#   make clean    - Remove generated files
+#   make install  - Install to $(PREFIX)
+#
+# Variables:
+#   CC       - C compiler (default: gcc)
+#   PREFIX   - Installation prefix (default: /usr/local)
+
+# Compiler and flags
+CC ?= gcc
+CFLAGS = -Wall -Wextra -O2
+
+# Installation directory
+PREFIX ?= /usr/local
+```
+
+## Special Targets
+
+- Use `.PHONY` for non-file targets
+- Use `.PRECIOUS` to preserve intermediate files
+- Use `.INTERMEDIATE` to mark files as intermediate (automatically deleted)
+- Use `.SECONDARY` to prevent deletion of intermediate files
+- Use `.DELETE_ON_ERROR` to remove targets if recipe fails
+- Use `.SILENT` to suppress echoing for all recipes (use sparingly)
+
+```makefile
+# Don't delete intermediate files
+.SECONDARY:
+
+# Delete targets if recipe fails
+.DELETE_ON_ERROR:
+
+# Preserve specific files
+.PRECIOUS: %.o
+```
+
+## Common Patterns
+
+### Standard Project Structure
+
+```makefile
+CC = gcc
+CFLAGS = -Wall -O2
+objects = main.o utils.o parser.o
+
+.PHONY: all clean install
+
+all: program
+
+program: $(objects)
+	$(CC) -o $@ $^
+
+%.o: %.c
+	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c $< -o $@
+
+clean:
+	-rm -f program $(objects)
+
+install: program
+	install -d $(PREFIX)/bin
+	install -m 755 program $(PREFIX)/bin
+```
+
+### Managing Multiple Programs
+
+```makefile
+programs = prog1 prog2 prog3
+
+.PHONY: all clean
+
+all: $(programs)
+
+prog1: prog1.o common.o
+	$(CC) -o $@ $^
+
+prog2: prog2.o common.o
+	$(CC) -o $@ $^
+
+prog3: prog3.o
+	$(CC) -o $@ $^
+
+clean:
+	-rm -f $(programs) *.o
+```
+
+## Anti-Patterns to Avoid
+
+- Don't start recipe lines with spaces instead of tabs
+- Avoid hardcoding file lists when they can be generated with wildcards or functions
+- Don't use `$(shell ls ...)` to get file lists (use `$(wildcard ...)` instead)
+- Avoid complex shell scripts in recipes (move to separate script files)
+- Don't forget to declare phony targets as `.PHONY`
+- Avoid circular dependencies between targets
+- Don't use recursive make (`$(MAKE) -C subdir`) unless absolutely necessary

.github/instructions/markdown.instructions.md

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Follow these guidelines for formatting and structuring your markdown content:
 - **Headings**: Use `##` for H2 and `###` for H3. Ensure that headings are used in a hierarchical manner. Recommend restructuring if content includes H4, and more strongly recommend for H5.
 - **Lists**: Use `-` for bullet points and `1.` for numbered lists. Indent nested lists with two spaces.
 - **Code Blocks**: Use triple backticks (`) to create fenced code blocks. Specify the language after the opening backticks for syntax highlighting (e.g., `csharp).
-- **Links**: Use `[link text](URL)` for links. Ensure that the link text is descriptive and the URL is valid.
+- **Links**: Use `[link text](https://example.com)` for links. Ensure that the link text is descriptive and the URL is valid.
 - **Images**: Use `![alt text](image URL)` for images. Include a brief description of the image in the alt text.
 - **Tables**: Use `|` to create tables. Ensure that columns are properly aligned and headers are included.
 - **Line Length**: Break lines at 80 characters to improve readability. Use soft line breaks for long paragraphs.
@@ -37,13 +37,8 @@ Ensure compliance with the following validation requirements:
 - **Front Matter**: Include the following fields in the YAML front matter:
 
   - `post_title`: The title of the post.
-  - `author1`: The primary author of the post.
-  - `post_slug`: The URL slug for the post.
-  - `microsoft_alias`: The Microsoft alias of the author.
-  - `featured_image`: The URL of the featured image.
   - `categories`: The categories for the post. These categories must be from the list in /categories.txt.
   - `tags`: The tags for the post.
-  - `ai_note`: Indicate if AI was used in the creation of the post.
   - `summary`: A brief summary of the post. Recommend a summary based on the content when possible.
   - `post_date`: The publication date of the post.
 

.github/instructions/nodejs-javascript-vitest.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+---
+description: "Guidelines for writing Node.js and JavaScript code with Vitest testing"
+applyTo: '**/*.js, **/*.mjs, **/*.cjs'
+---
+
+# Code Generation Guidelines
+
+## Coding standards
+- Use JavaScript with ES2022 features and Node.js (20+) ESM modules
+- Use Node.js built-in modules and avoid external dependencies where possible
+- Ask the user if you require any additional dependencies before adding them
+- Always use async/await for asynchronous code, and use 'node:util' promisify function to avoid callbacks
+- Keep the code simple and maintainable
+- Use descriptive variable and function names
+- Do not add comments unless absolutely necessary, the code should be self-explanatory
+- Never use `null`, always use `undefined` for optional values
+- Prefer functions over classes
+
+## Testing
+- Use Vitest for testing
+- Write tests for all new features and bug fixes
+- Ensure tests cover edge cases and error handling
+- NEVER change the original code to make it easier to test, instead, write tests that cover the original code as it is
+
+## Documentation
+- When adding new features or making significant changes, update the README.md file where necessary
+
+## User interactions
+- Ask questions if you are unsure about the implementation details, design choices, or need clarification on the requirements
+- Always answer in the same language as the question, but use english for the generated content like code, comments or docs

.github/instructions/object-calisthenics.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,311 @@
+---
+applyTo: '**/*.{cs,ts,java}'
+description: Enforces Object Calisthenics principles for business domain code to ensure clean, maintainable, and robust code
+---
+# Object Calisthenics Rules
+
+> ⚠️ **Warning:** This file contains the 9 original Object Calisthenics rules. No additional rules must be added, and none of these rules should be replaced or removed.
+> Examples may be added later if needed.
+
+## Objective
+This rule enforces the principles of Object Calisthenics to ensure clean, maintainable, and robust code in the backend, **primarily for business domain code**.
+
+## Scope and Application
+- **Primary focus**: Business domain classes (aggregates, entities, value objects, domain services)
+- **Secondary focus**: Application layer services and use case handlers
+- **Exemptions**:
+  - DTOs (Data Transfer Objects)
+  - API models/contracts
+  - Configuration classes
+  - Simple data containers without business logic
+  - Infrastructure code where flexibility is needed
+
+## Key Principles
+
+
+1. **One Level of Indentation per Method**:
+   - Ensure methods are simple and do not exceed one level of indentation.
+
+   ```csharp
+   // Bad Example - this method has multiple levels of indentation
+   public void SendNewsletter() {
+         foreach (var user in users) {
+            if (user.IsActive) {
+               // Do something
+               mailer.Send(user.Email);
+            }
+         }
+   }
+   // Good Example - Extracted method to reduce indentation
+   public void SendNewsletter() {
+       foreach (var user in users) {
+           SendEmail(user);
+       }
+   }
+   private void SendEmail(User user) {
+       if (user.IsActive) {
+           mailer.Send(user.Email);
+       }
+   }
+
+   // Good Example - Filtering users before sending emails
+   public void SendNewsletter() {
+       var activeUsers = users.Where(user => user.IsActive);
+
+       foreach (var user in activeUsers) {
+           mailer.Send(user.Email);
+       }
+   }
+   ```
+2. **Don't Use the ELSE Keyword**:
+
+   - Avoid using the `else` keyword to reduce complexity and improve readability.
+   - Use early returns to handle conditions instead.
+   - Use Fail Fast principle
+   - Use Guard Clauses to validate inputs and conditions at the beginning of methods.
+
+   ```csharp
+   // Bad Example - Using else
+   public void ProcessOrder(Order order) {
+       if (order.IsValid) {
+           // Process order
+       } else {
+           // Handle invalid order
+       }
+   }
+   // Good Example - Avoiding else
+   public void ProcessOrder(Order order) {
+       if (!order.IsValid) return;
+       // Process order
+   }
+   ```
+
+   Sample Fail fast principle:
+   ```csharp
+   public void ProcessOrder(Order order) {
+       if (order == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(order));
+       if (!order.IsValid) throw new InvalidOperationException("Invalid order");
+       // Process order
+   }
+   ```
+
+3. **Wrapping All Primitives and Strings**:
+   - Avoid using primitive types directly in your code.
+   - Wrap them in classes to provide meaningful context and behavior.
+
+   ```csharp
+   // Bad Example - Using primitive types directly
+   public class User {
+       public string Name { get; set; }
+       public int Age { get; set; }
+   }
+   // Good Example - Wrapping primitives
+   public class User {
+       private string name;
+       private Age age;
+       public User(string name, Age age) {
+           this.name = name;
+           this.age = age;
+       }
+   }
+   public class Age {
+       private int value;
+       public Age(int value) {
+           if (value < 0) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(value), "Age cannot be negative");
+           this.value = value;
+       }
+   }
+   ```
+
+4. **First Class Collections**:
+   - Use collections to encapsulate data and behavior, rather than exposing raw data structures.
+First Class Collections: a class that contains an array as an attribute should not contain any other attributes
+
+```csharp
+   // Bad Example - Exposing raw collection
+   public class Group {
+      public int Id { get; private set; }
+      public string Name { get; private set; }
+      public List<User> Users { get; private set; }
+
+      public int GetNumberOfUsersIsActive() {
+         return Users
+            .Where(user => user.IsActive)
+            .Count();
+      }
+   }
+
+   // Good Example - Encapsulating collection behavior
+   public class Group {
+      public int Id { get; private set; }
+      public string Name { get; private set; }
+
+      public GroupUserCollection userCollection { get; private set; } // The list of users is encapsulated in a class
+
+      public int GetNumberOfUsersIsActive() {
+         return userCollection
+            .GetActiveUsers()
+            .Count();
+      }
+   }
+   ```
+
+5. **One Dot per Line**:
+   - Avoid violating Law of Demeter by only having a single dot per line.
+
+   ```csharp
+   // Bad Example - Multiple dots in a single line
+   public void ProcessOrder(Order order) {
+       var userEmail = order.User.GetEmail().ToUpper().Trim();
+       // Do something with userEmail
+   }
+   // Good Example - One dot per line
+   public class User {
+     public NormalizedEmail GetEmail() {
+       return NormalizedEmail.Create(/*...*/);
+     }
+   }
+   public class Order {
+     /*...*/
+     public NormalizedEmail ConfirmationEmail() {
+       return User.GetEmail();
+     }
+   }
+   public void ProcessOrder(Order order) {
+       var confirmationEmail = order.ConfirmationEmail();
+       // Do something with confirmationEmail
+   }
+   ```
+
+6. **Don't abbreviate**:
+   - Use meaningful names for classes, methods, and variables.
+   - Avoid abbreviations that can lead to confusion.
+
+   ```csharp
+   // Bad Example - Abbreviated names
+   public class U {
+       public string N { get; set; }
+   }
+   // Good Example - Meaningful names
+   public class User {
+       public string Name { get; set; }
+   }
+   ```
+
+7. **Keep entities small (Class, method, namespace or package)**:
+   - Limit the size of classes and methods to improve code readability and maintainability.
+   - Each class should have a single responsibility and be as small as possible.
+
+   Constraints:
+   - Maximum 10 methods per class
+   - Maximum 50 lines per class
+   - Maximum 10 classes per package or namespace
+
+   ```csharp
+   // Bad Example - Large class with multiple responsibilities
+   public class UserManager {
+       public void CreateUser(string name) { /*...*/ }
+       public void DeleteUser(int id) { /*...*/ }
+       public void SendEmail(string email) { /*...*/ }
+   }
+
+   // Good Example - Small classes with single responsibility
+   public class UserCreator {
+       public void CreateUser(string name) { /*...*/ }
+   }
+   public class UserDeleter {
+       public void DeleteUser(int id) { /*...*/ }
+   }
+
+   public class UserUpdater {
+       public void UpdateUser(int id, string name) { /*...*/ }
+   }
+   ```
+
+
+8. **No Classes with More Than Two Instance Variables**:
+   - Encourage classes to have a single responsibility by limiting the number of instance variables.
+   - Limit the number of instance variables to two to maintain simplicity.
+   - Do not count ILogger or any other logger as instance variable.
+
+   ```csharp
+   // Bad Example - Class with multiple instance variables
+   public class UserCreateCommandHandler {
+      // Bad: Too many instance variables
+      private readonly IUserRepository userRepository;
+      private readonly IEmailService emailService;
+      private readonly ILogger logger;
+      private readonly ISmsService smsService;
+
+      public UserCreateCommandHandler(IUserRepository userRepository, IEmailService emailService, ILogger logger, ISmsService smsService) {
+         this.userRepository = userRepository;
+         this.emailService = emailService;
+         this.logger = logger;
+         this.smsService = smsService;
+      }
+   }
+
+   // Good: Class with two instance variables
+   public class UserCreateCommandHandler {
+      private readonly IUserRepository userRepository;
+      private readonly INotificationService notificationService;
+      private readonly ILogger logger; // This is not counted as instance variable
+
+      public UserCreateCommandHandler(IUserRepository userRepository, INotificationService notificationService, ILogger logger) {
+         this.userRepository = userRepository;
+         this.notificationService = notificationService;
+         this.logger = logger;
+      }
+   }
+   ```
+
+9. **No Getters/Setters in Domain Classes**:
+   - Avoid exposing setters for properties in domain classes.
+   - Use private constructors and static factory methods for object creation.
+   - **Note**: This rule applies primarily to domain classes, not DTOs or data transfer objects.
+
+   ```csharp
+   // Bad Example - Domain class with public setters
+   public class User {  // Domain class
+       public string Name { get; set; } // Avoid this in domain classes
+   }
+
+   // Good Example - Domain class with encapsulation
+   public class User {  // Domain class
+       private string name;
+       private User(string name) { this.name = name; }
+       public static User Create(string name) => new User(name);
+   }
+
+   // Acceptable Example - DTO with public setters
+   public class UserDto {  // DTO - exemption applies
+       public string Name { get; set; } // Acceptable for DTOs
+   }
+   ```
+
+## Implementation Guidelines
+- **Domain Classes**:
+  - Use private constructors and static factory methods for creating instances.
+  - Avoid exposing setters for properties.
+  - Apply all 9 rules strictly for business domain code.
+
+- **Application Layer**:
+  - Apply these rules to use case handlers and application services.
+  - Focus on maintaining single responsibility and clean abstractions.
+
+- **DTOs and Data Objects**:
+  - Rules 3 (wrapping primitives), 8 (two instance variables), and 9 (no getters/setters) may be relaxed for DTOs.
+  - Public properties with getters/setters are acceptable for data transfer objects.
+
+- **Testing**:
+  - Ensure tests validate the behavior of objects rather than their state.
+  - Test classes may have relaxed rules for readability and maintainability.
+
+- **Code Reviews**:
+  - Enforce these rules during code reviews for domain and application code.
+  - Be pragmatic about infrastructure and DTO code.
+
+## References
+- [Object Calisthenics - Original 9 Rules by Jeff Bay](https://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/luontola/tdd-2009/ext/ObjectCalisthenics.pdf)
+- [ThoughtWorks - Object Calisthenics](https://www.thoughtworks.com/insights/blog/object-calisthenics)
+- [Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship - Robert C. Martin](https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/clean-code-a/9780136083238/)

.github/instructions/playwright-typescript.instructions.md

@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ test.describe('Movie Search Feature', () => {
 
 ## Test Execution Strategy
 
-1. **Initial Run**: Execute tests with `npx playwright test --project=chromium`
+1. **Initial Run**: Execute tests with `cd /projects/Charon npx playwright test --project=firefox`
 2. **Debug Failures**: Analyze test failures and identify root causes
 3. **Iterate**: Refine locators, assertions, or test logic as needed
 4. **Validate**: Ensure tests pass consistently and cover the intended functionality

.github/instructions/prompt.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+---
+description: 'Guidelines for creating high-quality prompt files for GitHub Copilot'
+applyTo: '**/*.prompt.md'
+---
+
+# Copilot Prompt Files Guidelines
+
+Instructions for creating effective and maintainable prompt files that guide GitHub Copilot in delivering consistent, high-quality outcomes across any repository.
+
+## Scope and Principles
+- Target audience: maintainers and contributors authoring reusable prompts for Copilot Chat.
+- Goals: predictable behaviour, clear expectations, minimal permissions, and portability across repositories.
+- Primary references: VS Code documentation on prompt files and organization-specific conventions.
+
+## Frontmatter Requirements
+- Include `description` (single sentence, actionable outcome), `mode` (explicitly choose `ask`, `edit`, or `agent`), and `tools` (minimal set of tool bundles required to fulfill the prompt).
+- Declare `model` when the prompt depends on a specific capability tier; otherwise inherit the active model.
+- Preserve any additional metadata (`language`, `tags`, `visibility`, etc.) required by your organization.
+- Use consistent quoting (single quotes recommended) and keep one field per line for readability and version control clarity.
+
+## File Naming and Placement
+- Use kebab-case filenames ending with `.prompt.md` and store them under `.github/prompts/` unless your workspace standard specifies another directory.
+- Provide a short filename that communicates the action (for example, `generate-readme.prompt.md` rather than `prompt1.prompt.md`).
+
+## Body Structure
+- Start with an `#` level heading that matches the prompt intent so it surfaces well in Quick Pick search.
+- Organize content with predictable sections. Recommended baseline: `Mission` or `Primary Directive`, `Scope & Preconditions`, `Inputs`, `Workflow` (step-by-step), `Output Expectations`, and `Quality Assurance`.
+- Adjust section names to fit the domain, but retain the logical flow: why → context → inputs → actions → outputs → validation.
+- Reference related prompts or instruction files using relative links to aid discoverability.
+
+## Input and Context Handling
+- Use `${input:variableName[:placeholder]}` for required values and explain when the user must supply them. Provide defaults or alternatives where possible.
+- Call out contextual variables such as `${selection}`, `${file}`, `${workspaceFolder}` only when they are essential, and describe how Copilot should interpret them.
+- Document how to proceed when mandatory context is missing (for example, “Request the file path and stop if it remains undefined”).
+
+## Tool and Permission Guidance
+- Limit `tools` to the smallest set that enables the task. List them in the preferred execution order when the sequence matters.
+- If the prompt inherits tools from a chat mode, mention that relationship and state any critical tool behaviours or side effects.
+- Warn about destructive operations (file creation, edits, terminal commands) and include guard rails or confirmation steps in the workflow.
+
+## Instruction Tone and Style
+- Write in direct, imperative sentences targeted at Copilot (for example, “Analyze”, “Generate”, “Summarize”).
+- Keep sentences short and unambiguous, following Google Developer Documentation translation best practices to support localization.
+- Avoid idioms, humor, or culturally specific references; favor neutral, inclusive language.
+
+## Output Definition
+- Specify the format, structure, and location of expected results (for example, “Create `docs/adr/adr-XXXX.md` using the template below”).
+- Include success criteria and failure triggers so Copilot knows when to halt or retry.
+- Provide validation steps—manual checks, automated commands, or acceptance criteria lists—that reviewers can execute after running the prompt.
+
+## Examples and Reusable Assets
+- Embed Good/Bad examples or scaffolds (Markdown templates, JSON stubs) that the prompt should produce or follow.
+- Maintain reference tables (capabilities, status codes, role descriptions) inline to keep the prompt self-contained. Update these tables when upstream resources change.
+- Link to authoritative documentation instead of duplicating lengthy guidance.
+
+## Quality Assurance Checklist
+- [ ] Frontmatter fields are complete, accurate, and least-privilege.
+- [ ] Inputs include placeholders, default behaviours, and fallbacks.
+- [ ] Workflow covers preparation, execution, and post-processing without gaps.
+- [ ] Output expectations include formatting and storage details.
+- [ ] Validation steps are actionable (commands, diff checks, review prompts).
+- [ ] Security, compliance, and privacy policies referenced by the prompt are current.
+- [ ] Prompt executes successfully in VS Code (`Chat: Run Prompt`) using representative scenarios.
+
+## Maintenance Guidance
+- Version-control prompts alongside the code they affect; update them when dependencies, tooling, or review processes change.
+- Review prompts periodically to ensure tool lists, model requirements, and linked documents remain valid.
+- Coordinate with other repositories: when a prompt proves broadly useful, extract common guidance into instruction files or shared prompt packs.
+
+## Additional Resources
+- [Prompt Files Documentation](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/customization/prompt-files#_prompt-file-format)
+- [Awesome Copilot Prompt Files](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/tree/main/prompts)
+- [Tool Configuration](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/chat/chat-agent-mode#_agent-mode-tools)

.github/instructions/reactjs.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+---
+description: 'ReactJS development standards and best practices'
+applyTo: '**/*.jsx, **/*.tsx, **/*.js, **/*.ts, **/*.css, **/*.scss'
+---
+
+# ReactJS Development Instructions
+
+Instructions for building high-quality ReactJS applications with modern patterns, hooks, and best practices following the official React documentation at https://react.dev.
+
+## Project Context
+- Latest React version (React 19+)
+- TypeScript for type safety (when applicable)
+- Functional components with hooks as default
+- Follow React's official style guide and best practices
+- Use modern build tools (Vite, Create React App, or custom Webpack setup)
+- Implement proper component composition and reusability patterns
+
+## Development Standards
+
+### Architecture
+- Use functional components with hooks as the primary pattern
+- Implement component composition over inheritance
+- Organize components by feature or domain for scalability
+- Separate presentational and container components clearly
+- Use custom hooks for reusable stateful logic
+- Implement proper component hierarchies with clear data flow
+
+### TypeScript Integration
+- Use TypeScript interfaces for props, state, and component definitions
+- Define proper types for event handlers and refs
+- Implement generic components where appropriate
+- Use strict mode in `tsconfig.json` for type safety
+- Leverage React's built-in types (`React.FC`, `React.ComponentProps`, etc.)
+- Create union types for component variants and states
+
+### Component Design
+- Follow the single responsibility principle for components
+- Use descriptive and consistent naming conventions
+- Implement proper prop validation with TypeScript or PropTypes
+- Design components to be testable and reusable
+- Keep components small and focused on a single concern
+- Use composition patterns (render props, children as functions)
+
+### State Management
+- Use `useState` for local component state
+- Implement `useReducer` for complex state logic
+- Leverage `useContext` for sharing state across component trees
+- Consider external state management (Redux Toolkit, Zustand) for complex applications
+- Implement proper state normalization and data structures
+- Use React Query or SWR for server state management
+
+### Hooks and Effects
+- Use `useEffect` with proper dependency arrays to avoid infinite loops
+- Implement cleanup functions in effects to prevent memory leaks
+- Use `useMemo` and `useCallback` for performance optimization when needed
+- Create custom hooks for reusable stateful logic
+- Follow the rules of hooks (only call at the top level)
+- Use `useRef` for accessing DOM elements and storing mutable values
+
+### Styling
+- Use CSS Modules, Styled Components, or modern CSS-in-JS solutions
+- Implement responsive design with mobile-first approach
+- Follow BEM methodology or similar naming conventions for CSS classes
+- Use CSS custom properties (variables) for theming
+- Implement consistent spacing, typography, and color systems
+- Ensure accessibility with proper ARIA attributes and semantic HTML
+
+### Performance Optimization
+- Use `React.memo` for component memoization when appropriate
+- Implement code splitting with `React.lazy` and `Suspense`
+- Optimize bundle size with tree shaking and dynamic imports
+- Use `useMemo` and `useCallback` judiciously to prevent unnecessary re-renders
+- Implement virtual scrolling for large lists
+- Profile components with React DevTools to identify performance bottlenecks
+
+### Data Fetching
+- Use modern data fetching libraries (React Query, SWR, Apollo Client)
+- Implement proper loading, error, and success states
+- Handle race conditions and request cancellation
+- Use optimistic updates for better user experience
+- Implement proper caching strategies
+- Handle offline scenarios and network errors gracefully
+
+### Error Handling
+- Implement Error Boundaries for component-level error handling
+- Use proper error states in data fetching
+- Implement fallback UI for error scenarios
+- Log errors appropriately for debugging
+- Handle async errors in effects and event handlers
+- Provide meaningful error messages to users
+
+### Forms and Validation
+- Use controlled components for form inputs
+- Implement proper form validation with libraries like Formik, React Hook Form
+- Handle form submission and error states appropriately
+- Implement accessibility features for forms (labels, ARIA attributes)
+- Use debounced validation for better user experience
+- Handle file uploads and complex form scenarios
+
+### Routing
+- Use React Router for client-side routing
+- Implement nested routes and route protection
+- Handle route parameters and query strings properly
+- Implement lazy loading for route-based code splitting
+- Use proper navigation patterns and back button handling
+- Implement breadcrumbs and navigation state management
+
+### Testing
+- Write unit tests for components using React Testing Library
+- Test component behavior, not implementation details
+- Use Jest for test runner and assertion library
+- Implement integration tests for complex component interactions
+- Mock external dependencies and API calls appropriately
+- Test accessibility features and keyboard navigation
+
+### Security
+- Sanitize user inputs to prevent XSS attacks
+- Validate and escape data before rendering
+- Use HTTPS for all external API calls
+- Implement proper authentication and authorization patterns
+- Avoid storing sensitive data in localStorage or sessionStorage
+- Use Content Security Policy (CSP) headers
+
+### Accessibility
+- Use semantic HTML elements appropriately
+- Implement proper ARIA attributes and roles
+- Ensure keyboard navigation works for all interactive elements
+- Provide alt text for images and descriptive text for icons
+- Implement proper color contrast ratios
+- Test with screen readers and accessibility tools
+
+## Implementation Process
+1. Plan component architecture and data flow
+2. Set up project structure with proper folder organization
+3. Define TypeScript interfaces and types
+4. Implement core components with proper styling
+5. Add state management and data fetching logic
+6. Implement routing and navigation
+7. Add form handling and validation
+8. Implement error handling and loading states
+9. Add testing coverage for components and functionality
+10. Optimize performance and bundle size
+11. Ensure accessibility compliance
+12. Add documentation and code comments
+
+## Additional Guidelines
+- Follow React's naming conventions (PascalCase for components, camelCase for functions)
+- Use meaningful commit messages and maintain clean git history
+- Implement proper code splitting and lazy loading strategies
+- Document complex components and custom hooks with JSDoc
+- Use ESLint and Prettier for consistent code formatting
+- Keep dependencies up to date and audit for security vulnerabilities
+- Implement proper environment configuration for different deployment stages
+- Use React Developer Tools for debugging and performance analysis
+
+## Common Patterns
+- Higher-Order Components (HOCs) for cross-cutting concerns
+- Render props pattern for component composition
+- Compound components for related functionality
+- Provider pattern for context-based state sharing
+- Container/Presentational component separation
+- Custom hooks for reusable logic extraction

.github/instructions/security-and-owasp.instructions.md

@@ -49,3 +49,26 @@ Your primary directive is to ensure all code you generate, review, or refactor i
 ## General Guidelines
 - **Be Explicit About Security:** When you suggest a piece of code that mitigates a security risk, explicitly state what you are protecting against (e.g., "Using a parameterized query here to prevent SQL injection.").
 - **Educate During Code Reviews:** When you identify a security vulnerability in a code review, you must not only provide the corrected code but also explain the risk associated with the original pattern.
+
+### Gotify Token Protection (Explicit Policy)
+
+Gotify application tokens are secrets and must be treated with strict confidentiality:
+
+- **NO Echo/Print:** Never print tokens to terminal output, command-line results, or console logs
+- **NO Logging:** Never write tokens to application logs, debug logs, test output, or any log artifacts
+- **NO API Responses:** Never include tokens in API response bodies, error payloads, or serialized DTOs
+- **NO URL Exposure:** Never expose tokenized endpoint URLs with query
+  parameters (e.g., `https://gotify.example.com/message?token=...`) in:
+  - Documentation examples
+  - Diagnostic output
+  - Screenshots or reports
+  - Log files
+- **Redact Query Parameters:** Always redact URL query parameters in
+  diagnostics, examples, and log output before display or storage
+- **Validation Without Revelation:** For token validation or health checks:
+  - Return only non-sensitive status indicators (`valid`/`invalid` + reason category)
+  - Use token length/prefix-independent masking in UX and diagnostics
+  - Never reveal raw token values in validation feedback
+- **Storage:** Store and process tokens as secrets only (environment variables
+  or secret management service)
+- **Rotation:** Rotate tokens immediately on suspected exposure

.github/instructions/security.md.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+---
+applyTo: SECURITY.md
+---
+
+# Instructions: Maintaining `SECURITY.md`
+
+`SECURITY.md` is the project's living security record. It serves two audiences simultaneously: users who need to know what risks exist right now, and the broader community who need confidence that vulnerabilities are being tracked and remediated with discipline. Treat it like a changelog, but for security events — every known issue gets an entry, every resolved issue keeps its entry.
+
+---
+
+## File Structure
+
+`SECURITY.md` must always contain the following top-level sections, in this order:
+
+1. A brief project security policy preamble (responsible disclosure contact, response SLA)
+2. **`## Known Vulnerabilities`** — active, unpatched issues
+3. **`## Patched Vulnerabilities`** — resolved issues, retained permanently for audit trail
+
+No other top-level sections are required. Do not collapse or remove sections even when they are empty — use the explicit empty-state placeholder defined below.
+
+---
+
+## Section 1: Known Vulnerabilities
+
+This section lists every vulnerability that is currently unpatched or only partially mitigated. Entries must be sorted with the highest severity first, then by discovery date descending within the same severity tier.
+
+### Entry Format
+
+Each entry is an H3 heading followed by a structured block:
+
+```markdown
+### [SEVERITY] CVE-XXXX-XXXXX · Short Title
+
+| Field        | Value |
+|--------------|-------|
+| **ID**       | CVE-XXXX-XXXXX (or `CHARON-YYYY-NNN` if no CVE assigned yet) |
+| **Severity** | Critical / High / Medium / Low · CVSS v3.1 score if known (e.g. `8.1 · High`) |
+| **Status**   | Investigating / Fix In Progress / Awaiting Upstream / Mitigated (partial) |
+
+**What**
+One to three sentences describing the vulnerability class and its impact.
+Be specific: name the weakness type (e.g. SQL injection, path traversal, SSRF).
+
+**Who**
+- Discovered by: [Reporter name or handle, or "Internal audit", or "Automated scan (tool name)"]
+- Reported: YYYY-MM-DD
+- Affects: [User roles, API consumers, unauthenticated users, etc.]
+
+**Where**
+- Component: [Module or service name]
+- File(s): `path/to/affected/file.go`, `path/to/other/file.ts`
+- Versions affected: `>= X.Y.Z` (or "all versions" / "prior to X.Y.Z")
+
+**When**
+- Discovered: YYYY-MM-DD
+- Disclosed (if public): YYYY-MM-DD (or "Not yet publicly disclosed")
+- Target fix: YYYY-MM-DD (or sprint/milestone reference)
+
+**How**
+A concise technical description of the attack vector, prerequisites, and exploitation
+method. Omit proof-of-concept code. Reference CVE advisories or upstream issue
+trackers where appropriate.
+
+**Planned Remediation**
+Describe the fix strategy: library upgrade, logic refactor, config change, etc.
+If a workaround is available in the meantime, document it here.
+Link to the tracking issue: [#NNN](https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/NNN)
+```
+
+### Empty State
+
+When there are no known vulnerabilities:
+
+```markdown
+## Known Vulnerabilities
+
+No known unpatched vulnerabilities at this time.
+Last reviewed: YYYY-MM-DD
+```
+
+---
+
+## Section 2: Patched Vulnerabilities
+
+This section is a permanent, append-only ledger. Entries are never deleted. Sort newest-patched first. This section builds community trust by demonstrating that issues are resolved promptly and transparently.
+
+### Entry Format
+
+```markdown
+### ✅ [SEVERITY] CVE-XXXX-XXXXX · Short Title
+
+| Field        | Value |
+|--------------|-------|
+| **ID**       | CVE-XXXX-XXXXX (or internal ID) |
+| **Severity** | Critical / High / Medium / Low · CVSS v3.1 score |
+| **Patched**  | YYYY-MM-DD in `vX.Y.Z` |
+
+**What**
+Same description carried over from the Known Vulnerabilities entry.
+
+**Who**
+- Discovered by: [Reporter or method]
+- Reported: YYYY-MM-DD
+
+**Where**
+- Component: [Module or service name]
+- File(s): `path/to/affected/file.go`
+- Versions affected: `< X.Y.Z`
+
+**When**
+- Discovered: YYYY-MM-DD
+- Patched: YYYY-MM-DD
+- Time to patch: N days
+
+**How**
+Same technical description as the original entry.
+
+**Resolution**
+Describe exactly what was changed to fix the issue.
+- Commit: [`abc1234`](https://github.com/owner/repo/commit/abc1234)
+- PR: [#NNN](https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/NNN)
+- Release: [`vX.Y.Z`](https://github.com/owner/repo/releases/tag/vX.Y.Z)
+
+**Credit**
+[Optional] Thank the reporter if they consented to attribution.
+```
+
+### Empty State
+
+```markdown
+## Patched Vulnerabilities
+
+No patched vulnerabilities on record yet.
+```
+
+---
+
+## Lifecycle: Moving an Entry from Known → Patched
+
+When a fix ships:
+
+1. Remove the entry from `## Known Vulnerabilities` entirely.
+2. Add a new entry to the **top** of `## Patched Vulnerabilities` using the patched format above.
+3. Carry forward all original fields verbatim — do not rewrite the history of the issue.
+4. Add the `**Resolution**` and `**Credit**` blocks with patch details.
+5. Update the `Last reviewed` date on the Known Vulnerabilities section if it is now empty.
+
+Do not edit or backfill existing Patched entries once they are committed.
+
+---
+
+## Severity Classification
+
+Use the following definitions consistently:
+
+| Severity | CVSS Range | Meaning |
+|----------|------------|---------|
+| **Critical** | 9.0–10.0 | Remote code execution, auth bypass, full data exposure |
+| **High**     | 7.0–8.9  | Significant data exposure, privilege escalation, DoS |
+| **Medium**   | 4.0–6.9  | Limited data exposure, requires user interaction or auth |
+| **Low**      | 0.1–3.9  | Minimal impact, difficult to exploit, defense-in-depth |
+
+When a CVE CVSS score is not yet available, assign a preliminary severity based on these definitions and note it as `(preliminary)` until confirmed.
+
+---
+
+## Internal IDs
+
+If a vulnerability has no CVE assigned, use the format `CHARON-YYYY-NNN` where `YYYY` is the year and `NNN` is a zero-padded sequence number starting at `001` for each year. Example: `CHARON-2025-003`. Assign a CVE ID in the entry retroactively if one is issued later, and add the internal ID as an alias in parentheses.
+
+---
+
+## Responsible Disclosure Preamble
+
+The preamble at the top of `SECURITY.md` (before the vulnerability sections) must include:
+
+- The preferred contact method for reporting vulnerabilities (e.g. a GitHub private advisory link, a security email address, or both)
+- An acknowledgment-first response commitment: confirm receipt within 48 hours, even if the full investigation takes longer
+- A statement that reporters will not be penalized or publicly named without consent
+- A link to the full disclosure policy if one exists
+
+Example:
+
+```markdown
+## Reporting a Vulnerability
+
+To report a security issue, please use
+[GitHub Private Security Advisories](https://github.com/owner/repo/security/advisories/new)
+or email `security@example.com`.
+
+We will acknowledge your report within **48 hours** and provide a remediation
+timeline within **7 days**. Reporters are credited with their consent.
+We do not pursue legal action against good-faith security researchers.
+```
+
+---
+
+## Maintenance Rules
+
+- **Review cadence**: Update the `Last reviewed` date in the Known Vulnerabilities section at least once per release cycle, even if no entries changed.
+- **No silent patches**: Every security fix — no matter how minor — must produce an entry in `## Patched Vulnerabilities` before or alongside the release.
+- **No redaction**: Do not redact or soften historical entries. Accuracy builds trust; minimizing past issues destroys it.
+- **Dependency vulnerabilities**: Transitive dependency CVEs that affect Charon's exposed attack surface must be tracked here the same as first-party vulnerabilities. Pure dev-dependency CVEs with no runtime impact may be omitted at maintainer discretion, but must still be noted in the relevant dependency update PR.
+- **Partial mitigations**: If a workaround is deployed but the root cause is not fixed, the entry stays in `## Known Vulnerabilities` with `Status: Mitigated (partial)` and the workaround documented in `**Planned Remediation**`.

.github/instructions/self-explanatory-code-commenting.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+---
+description: 'Guidelines for GitHub Copilot to write comments to achieve self-explanatory code with less comments. Examples are in JavaScript but it should work on any language that has comments.'
+applyTo: '**'
+---
+
+# Self-explanatory Code Commenting Instructions
+
+## Core Principle
+**Write code that speaks for itself. Comment only when necessary to explain WHY, not WHAT.**
+We do not need comments most of the time.
+
+## Commenting Guidelines
+
+### ❌ AVOID These Comment Types
+
+**Obvious Comments**
+```javascript
+// Bad: States the obvious
+let counter = 0;  // Initialize counter to zero
+counter++;  // Increment counter by one
+```
+
+**Redundant Comments**
+```javascript
+// Bad: Comment repeats the code
+function getUserName() {
+    return user.name;  // Return the user's name
+}
+```
+
+**Outdated Comments**
+```javascript
+// Bad: Comment doesn't match the code
+// Calculate tax at 5% rate
+const tax = price * 0.08;  // Actually 8%
+```
+
+### ✅ WRITE These Comment Types
+
+**Complex Business Logic**
+```javascript
+// Good: Explains WHY this specific calculation
+// Apply progressive tax brackets: 10% up to 10k, 20% above
+const tax = calculateProgressiveTax(income, [0.10, 0.20], [10000]);
+```
+
+**Non-obvious Algorithms**
+```javascript
+// Good: Explains the algorithm choice
+// Using Floyd-Warshall for all-pairs shortest paths
+// because we need distances between all nodes
+for (let k = 0; k < vertices; k++) {
+    for (let i = 0; i < vertices; i++) {
+        for (let j = 0; j < vertices; j++) {
+            // ... implementation
+        }
+    }
+}
+```
+
+**Regex Patterns**
+```javascript
+// Good: Explains what the regex matches
+// Match email format: username@domain.extension
+const emailPattern = /^[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,}$/;
+```
+
+**API Constraints or Gotchas**
+```javascript
+// Good: Explains external constraint
+// GitHub API rate limit: 5000 requests/hour for authenticated users
+await rateLimiter.wait();
+const response = await fetch(githubApiUrl);
+```
+
+## Decision Framework
+
+Before writing a comment, ask:
+1. **Is the code self-explanatory?** → No comment needed
+2. **Would a better variable/function name eliminate the need?** → Refactor instead
+3. **Does this explain WHY, not WHAT?** → Good comment
+4. **Will this help future maintainers?** → Good comment
+
+## Special Cases for Comments
+
+### Public APIs
+```javascript
+/**
+ * Calculate compound interest using the standard formula.
+ *
+ * @param {number} principal - Initial amount invested
+ * @param {number} rate - Annual interest rate (as decimal, e.g., 0.05 for 5%)
+ * @param {number} time - Time period in years
+ * @param {number} compoundFrequency - How many times per year interest compounds (default: 1)
+ * @returns {number} Final amount after compound interest
+ */
+function calculateCompoundInterest(principal, rate, time, compoundFrequency = 1) {
+    // ... implementation
+}
+```
+
+### Configuration and Constants
+```javascript
+// Good: Explains the source or reasoning
+const MAX_RETRIES = 3;  // Based on network reliability studies
+const API_TIMEOUT = 5000;  // AWS Lambda timeout is 15s, leaving buffer
+```
+
+### Annotations
+```javascript
+// TODO: Replace with proper user authentication after security review
+// FIXME: Memory leak in production - investigate connection pooling
+// HACK: Workaround for bug in library v2.1.0 - remove after upgrade
+// NOTE: This implementation assumes UTC timezone for all calculations
+// WARNING: This function modifies the original array instead of creating a copy
+// PERF: Consider caching this result if called frequently in hot path
+// SECURITY: Validate input to prevent SQL injection before using in query
+// BUG: Edge case failure when array is empty - needs investigation
+// REFACTOR: Extract this logic into separate utility function for reusability
+// DEPRECATED: Use newApiFunction() instead - this will be removed in v3.0
+```
+
+## Anti-Patterns to Avoid
+
+### Dead Code Comments
+```javascript
+// Bad: Don't comment out code
+// const oldFunction = () => { ... };
+const newFunction = () => { ... };
+```
+
+### Changelog Comments
+```javascript
+// Bad: Don't maintain history in comments
+// Modified by John on 2023-01-15
+// Fixed bug reported by Sarah on 2023-02-03
+function processData() {
+    // ... implementation
+}
+```
+
+### Divider Comments
+```javascript
+// Bad: Don't use decorative comments
+//=====================================
+// UTILITY FUNCTIONS
+//=====================================
+```
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+Before committing, ensure your comments:
+- [ ] Explain WHY, not WHAT
+- [ ] Are grammatically correct and clear
+- [ ] Will remain accurate as code evolves
+- [ ] Add genuine value to code understanding
+- [ ] Are placed appropriately (above the code they describe)
+- [ ] Use proper spelling and professional language
+
+## Summary
+
+Remember: **The best comment is the one you don't need to write because the code is self-documenting.**

.github/instructions/shell.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+---
+description: 'Shell scripting best practices and conventions for bash, sh, zsh, and other shells'
+applyTo: '**/*.sh'
+---
+
+# Shell Scripting Guidelines
+
+Instructions for writing clean, safe, and maintainable shell scripts for bash, sh, zsh, and other shells.
+
+## General Principles
+
+- Generate code that is clean, simple, and concise
+- Ensure scripts are easily readable and understandable
+- Add comments where helpful for understanding how the script works
+- Generate concise and simple echo outputs to provide execution status
+- Avoid unnecessary echo output and excessive logging
+- Use shellcheck for static analysis when available
+- Assume scripts are for automation and testing rather than production systems unless specified otherwise
+- Prefer safe expansions: double-quote variable references (`"$var"`), use `${var}` for clarity, and avoid `eval`
+- Use modern Bash features (`[[ ]]`, `local`, arrays) when portability requirements allow; fall back to POSIX constructs only when needed
+- Choose reliable parsers for structured data instead of ad-hoc text processing
+
+## Error Handling & Safety
+
+- Always enable `set -euo pipefail` to fail fast on errors, catch unset variables, and surface pipeline failures
+- Validate all required parameters before execution
+- Provide clear error messages with context
+- Use `trap` to clean up temporary resources or handle unexpected exits when the script terminates
+- Declare immutable values with `readonly` (or `declare -r`) to prevent accidental reassignment
+- Use `mktemp` to create temporary files or directories safely and ensure they are removed in your cleanup handler
+
+## Script Structure
+
+- Start with a clear shebang: `#!/bin/bash` unless specified otherwise
+- Include a header comment explaining the script's purpose
+- Define default values for all variables at the top
+- Use functions for reusable code blocks
+- Create reusable functions instead of repeating similar blocks of code
+- Keep the main execution flow clean and readable
+
+## Working with JSON and YAML
+
+- Prefer dedicated parsers (`jq` for JSON, `yq` for YAML—or `jq` on JSON converted via `yq`) over ad-hoc text processing with `grep`, `awk`, or shell string splitting
+- When `jq`/`yq` are unavailable or not appropriate, choose the next most reliable parser available in your environment, and be explicit about how it should be used safely
+- Validate that required fields exist and handle missing/invalid data paths explicitly (e.g., by checking `jq` exit status or using `// empty`)
+- Quote jq/yq filters to prevent shell expansion and prefer `--raw-output` when you need plain strings
+- Treat parser errors as fatal: combine with `set -euo pipefail` or test command success before using results
+- Document parser dependencies at the top of the script and fail fast with a helpful message if `jq`/`yq` (or alternative tools) are required but not installed
+
+```bash
+#!/bin/bash
+
+# ============================================================================
+# Script Description Here
+# ============================================================================
+
+set -euo pipefail
+
+cleanup() {
+    # Remove temporary resources or perform other teardown steps as needed
+    if [[ -n "${TEMP_DIR:-}" && -d "$TEMP_DIR" ]]; then
+        rm -rf "$TEMP_DIR"
+    fi
+}
+
+trap cleanup EXIT
+
+# Default values
+RESOURCE_GROUP=""
+REQUIRED_PARAM=""
+OPTIONAL_PARAM="default-value"
+readonly SCRIPT_NAME="$(basename "$0")"
+
+TEMP_DIR=""
+
+# Functions
+usage() {
+    echo "Usage: $SCRIPT_NAME [OPTIONS]"
+    echo "Options:"
+    echo "  -g, --resource-group   Resource group (required)"
+    echo "  -h, --help            Show this help"
+    exit 0
+}
+
+validate_requirements() {
+    if [[ -z "$RESOURCE_GROUP" ]]; then
+        echo "Error: Resource group is required"
+        exit 1
+    fi
+}
+
+main() {
+    validate_requirements
+
+    TEMP_DIR="$(mktemp -d)"
+    if [[ ! -d "$TEMP_DIR" ]]; then
+        echo "Error: failed to create temporary directory" >&2
+        exit 1
+    fi
+
+    echo "============================================================================"
+    echo "Script Execution Started"
+    echo "============================================================================"
+
+    # Main logic here
+
+    echo "============================================================================"
+    echo "Script Execution Completed"
+    echo "============================================================================"
+}
+
+# Parse arguments
+while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
+    case $1 in
+        -g|--resource-group)
+            RESOURCE_GROUP="$2"
+            shift 2
+            ;;
+        -h|--help)
+            usage
+            ;;
+        *)
+            echo "Unknown option: $1"
+            exit 1
+            ;;
+    esac
+done
+
+# Execute main function
+main "$@"
+
+```

.github/instructions/spec-driven-workflow-v1.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
+---
+description: 'Specification-Driven Workflow v1 provides a structured approach to software development, ensuring that requirements are clearly defined, designs are meticulously planned, and implementations are thoroughly documented and validated.'
+applyTo: '**'
+---
+# Spec Driven Workflow v1
+
+**Specification-Driven Workflow:**
+Bridge the gap between requirements and implementation.
+
+**Maintain these artifacts at all times:**
+
+- **`requirements.md`**: User stories and acceptance criteria in structured EARS notation.
+- **`design.md`**: Technical architecture, sequence diagrams, implementation considerations.
+- **`tasks.md`**: Detailed, trackable implementation plan.
+
+## Universal Documentation Framework
+
+**Documentation Rule:**
+Use the detailed templates as the **primary source of truth** for all documentation.
+
+**Summary formats:**
+Use only for concise artifacts such as changelogs and pull request descriptions.
+
+### Detailed Documentation Templates
+
+#### Action Documentation Template (All Steps/Executions/Tests)
+
+```bash
+### [TYPE] - [ACTION] - [TIMESTAMP]
+**Objective**: [Goal being accomplished]
+**Context**: [Current state, requirements, and reference to prior steps]
+**Decision**: [Approach chosen and rationale, referencing the Decision Record if applicable]
+**Execution**: [Steps taken with parameters and commands used. For code, include file paths.]
+**Output**: [Complete and unabridged results, logs, command outputs, and metrics]
+**Validation**: [Success verification method and results. If failed, include a remediation plan.]
+**Next**: [Automatic continuation plan to the next specific action]
+```
+
+#### Decision Record Template (All Decisions)
+
+```bash
+### Decision - [TIMESTAMP]
+**Decision**: [What was decided]
+**Context**: [Situation requiring decision and data driving it]
+**Options**: [Alternatives evaluated with brief pros and cons]
+**Rationale**: [Why the selected option is superior, with trade-offs explicitly stated]
+**Impact**: [Anticipated consequences for implementation, maintainability, and performance]
+**Review**: [Conditions or schedule for reassessing this decision]
+```
+
+### Summary Formats (for Reporting)
+
+#### Streamlined Action Log
+
+For generating concise changelogs. Each log entry is derived from a full Action Document.
+
+`[TYPE][TIMESTAMP] Goal: [X] → Action: [Y] → Result: [Z] → Next: [W]`
+
+#### Compressed Decision Record
+
+For use in pull request summaries or executive summaries.
+
+`Decision: [X] | Rationale: [Y] | Impact: [Z] | Review: [Date]`
+
+## Execution Workflow (6-Phase Loop)
+
+**Never skip any step. Use consistent terminology. Reduce ambiguity.**
+
+### **Phase 1: ANALYZE**
+
+**Objective:**
+
+- Understand the problem.
+- Analyze the existing system.
+- Produce a clear, testable set of requirements.
+- Think about the possible solutions and their implications.
+
+**Checklist:**
+
+- [ ] Read all provided code, documentation, tests, and logs.
+      - Document file inventory, summaries, and initial analysis results.
+- [ ] Define requirements in **EARS Notation**:
+      - Transform feature requests into structured, testable requirements.
+      - Format: `WHEN [a condition or event], THE SYSTEM SHALL [expected behavior]`
+- [ ] Identify dependencies and constraints.
+      - Document a dependency graph with risks and mitigation strategies.
+- [ ] Map data flows and interactions.
+      - Document system interaction diagrams and data models.
+- [ ] Catalog edge cases and failures.
+      - Document a comprehensive edge case matrix and potential failure points.
+- [ ] Assess confidence.
+      - Generate a **Confidence Score (0-100%)** based on clarity of requirements, complexity, and problem scope.
+      - Document the score and its rationale.
+
+**Critical Constraint:**
+
+- **Do not proceed until all requirements are clear and documented.**
+
+### **Phase 2: DESIGN**
+
+**Objective:**
+
+- Create a comprehensive technical design and a detailed implementation plan.
+
+**Checklist:**
+
+- [ ] **Define adaptive execution strategy based on Confidence Score:**
+  - **High Confidence (>85%)**
+    - Draft a comprehensive, step-by-step implementation plan.
+    - Skip proof-of-concept steps.
+    - Proceed with full, automated implementation.
+    - Maintain standard comprehensive documentation.
+  - **Medium Confidence (66–85%)**
+    - Prioritize a **Proof-of-Concept (PoC)** or **Minimum Viable Product (MVP)**.
+    - Define clear success criteria for PoC/MVP.
+    - Build and validate PoC/MVP first, then expand plan incrementally.
+    - Document PoC/MVP goals, execution, and validation results.
+  - **Low Confidence (<66%)**
+    - Dedicate first phase to research and knowledge-building.
+    - Use semantic search and analyze similar implementations.
+    - Synthesize findings into a research document.
+    - Re-run ANALYZE phase after research.
+    - Escalate only if confidence remains low.
+
+- [ ] **Document technical design in `design.md`:**
+  - **Architecture:** High-level overview of components and interactions.
+  - **Data Flow:** Diagrams and descriptions.
+  - **Interfaces:** API contracts, schemas, public-facing function signatures.
+  - **Data Models:** Data structures and database schemas.
+
+- [ ] **Document error handling:**
+  - Create an error matrix with procedures and expected responses.
+
+- [ ] **Define unit testing strategy.**
+
+- [ ] **Create implementation plan in `tasks.md`:**
+  - For each task, include description, expected outcome, and dependencies.
+
+**Critical Constraint:**
+
+- **Do not proceed to implementation until design and plan are complete and validated.**
+
+### **Phase 3: IMPLEMENT**
+
+**Objective:**
+
+- Write production-quality code according to the design and plan.
+
+**Checklist:**
+
+- [ ] Code in small, testable increments.
+      - Document each increment with code changes, results, and test links.
+- [ ] Implement from dependencies upward.
+      - Document resolution order, justification, and verification.
+- [ ] Follow conventions.
+      - Document adherence and any deviations with a Decision Record.
+- [ ] Add meaningful comments.
+      - Focus on intent ("why"), not mechanics ("what").
+- [ ] Create files as planned.
+      - Document file creation log.
+- [ ] Update task status in real time.
+
+**Critical Constraint:**
+
+- **Do not merge or deploy code until all implementation steps are documented and tested.**
+
+### **Phase 4: VALIDATE**
+
+**Objective:**
+
+- Verify that implementation meets all requirements and quality standards.
+
+**Checklist:**
+
+- [ ] Execute automated tests.
+      - Document outputs, logs, and coverage reports.
+      - For failures, document root cause analysis and remediation.
+- [ ] Perform manual verification if necessary.
+      - Document procedures, checklists, and results.
+- [ ] Test edge cases and errors.
+      - Document results and evidence of correct error handling.
+- [ ] Verify performance.
+      - Document metrics and profile critical sections.
+- [ ] Log execution traces.
+      - Document path analysis and runtime behavior.
+
+**Critical Constraint:**
+
+- **Do not proceed until all validation steps are complete and all issues are resolved.**
+
+### **Phase 5: REFLECT**
+
+**Objective:**
+
+- Improve codebase, update documentation, and analyze performance.
+
+**Checklist:**
+
+- [ ] Refactor for maintainability.
+      - Document decisions, before/after comparisons, and impact.
+- [ ] Update all project documentation.
+      - Ensure all READMEs, diagrams, and comments are current.
+- [ ] Identify potential improvements.
+      - Document backlog with prioritization.
+- [ ] Validate success criteria.
+      - Document final verification matrix.
+- [ ] Perform meta-analysis.
+      - Reflect on efficiency, tool usage, and protocol adherence.
+- [ ] Auto-create technical debt issues.
+      - Document inventory and remediation plans.
+
+**Critical Constraint:**
+
+- **Do not close the phase until all documentation and improvement actions are logged.**
+
+### **Phase 6: HANDOFF**
+
+**Objective:**
+
+- Package work for review and deployment, and transition to next task.
+
+**Checklist:**
+
+- [ ] Generate executive summary.
+      - Use **Compressed Decision Record** format.
+- [ ] Prepare pull request (if applicable):
+    1. Executive summary.
+    2. Changelog from **Streamlined Action Log**.
+    3. Links to validation artifacts and Decision Records.
+    4. Links to final `requirements.md`, `design.md`, and `tasks.md`.
+- [ ] Finalize workspace.
+      - Archive intermediate files, logs, and temporary artifacts to `.agent_work/`.
+- [ ] Continue to next task.
+      - Document transition or completion.
+
+**Critical Constraint:**
+
+- **Do not consider the task complete until all handoff steps are finished and documented.**
+
+## Troubleshooting & Retry Protocol
+
+**If you encounter errors, ambiguities, or blockers:**
+
+**Checklist:**
+
+1. **Re-analyze**:
+   - Revisit the ANALYZE phase.
+   - Confirm all requirements and constraints are clear and complete.
+2. **Re-design**:
+   - Revisit the DESIGN phase.
+   - Update technical design, plans, or dependencies as needed.
+3. **Re-plan**:
+   - Adjust the implementation plan in `tasks.md` to address new findings.
+4. **Retry execution**:
+   - Re-execute failed steps with corrected parameters or logic.
+5. **Escalate**:
+   - If the issue persists after retries, follow the escalation protocol.
+
+**Critical Constraint:**
+
+- **Never proceed with unresolved errors or ambiguities. Always document troubleshooting steps and outcomes.**
+
+## Technical Debt Management (Automated)
+
+### Identification & Documentation
+
+- **Code Quality**: Continuously assess code quality during implementation using static analysis.
+- **Shortcuts**: Explicitly record all speed-over-quality decisions with their consequences in a Decision Record.
+- **Workspace**: Monitor for organizational drift and naming inconsistencies.
+- **Documentation**: Track incomplete, outdated, or missing documentation.
+
+### Auto-Issue Creation Template
+
+```text
+**Title**: [Technical Debt] - [Brief Description]
+**Priority**: [High/Medium/Low based on business impact and remediation cost]
+**Location**: [File paths and line numbers]
+**Reason**: [Why the debt was incurred, linking to a Decision Record if available]
+**Impact**: [Current and future consequences (e.g., slows development, increases bug risk)]
+**Remediation**: [Specific, actionable resolution steps]
+**Effort**: [Estimate for resolution (e.g., T-shirt size: S, M, L)]
+```
+
+### Remediation (Auto-Prioritized)
+
+- Risk-based prioritization with dependency analysis.
+- Effort estimation to aid in future planning.
+- Propose migration strategies for large refactoring efforts.
+
+## Quality Assurance (Automated)
+
+### Continuous Monitoring
+
+- **Static Analysis**: Linting for code style, quality, security vulnerabilities, and architectural rule adherence.
+- **Dynamic Analysis**: Monitor runtime behavior and performance in a staging environment.
+- **Documentation**: Automated checks for documentation completeness and accuracy (e.g., linking, format).
+
+### Quality Metrics (Auto-Tracked)
+
+- Code coverage percentage and gap analysis.
+- Cyclomatic complexity score per function/method.
+- Maintainability index assessment.
+- Technical debt ratio (e.g., estimated remediation time vs. development time).
+- Documentation coverage percentage (e.g., public methods with comments).
+
+## EARS Notation Reference
+
+**EARS (Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax)** - Standard format for requirements:
+
+- **Ubiquitous**: `THE SYSTEM SHALL [expected behavior]`
+- **Event-driven**: `WHEN [trigger event] THE SYSTEM SHALL [expected behavior]`
+- **State-driven**: `WHILE [in specific state] THE SYSTEM SHALL [expected behavior]`
+- **Unwanted behavior**: `IF [unwanted condition] THEN THE SYSTEM SHALL [required response]`
+- **Optional**: `WHERE [feature is included] THE SYSTEM SHALL [expected behavior]`
+- **Complex**: Combinations of the above patterns for sophisticated requirements
+
+Each requirement must be:
+
+- **Testable**: Can be verified through automated or manual testing
+- **Unambiguous**: Single interpretation possible
+- **Necessary**: Contributes to the system's purpose
+- **Feasible**: Can be implemented within constraints
+- **Traceable**: Linked to user needs and design elements

.github/instructions/sql-sp-generation.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+---
+description: 'Guidelines for generating SQL statements and stored procedures'
+applyTo: '**/*.sql'
+---
+
+# SQL Development
+
+## Database schema generation
+- all table names should be in singular form
+- all column names should be in singular form
+- all tables should have a primary key column named `id`
+- all tables should have a column named `created_at` to store the creation timestamp
+- all tables should have a column named `updated_at` to store the last update timestamp
+
+## Database schema design
+- all tables should have a primary key constraint
+- all foreign key constraints should have a name
+- all foreign key constraints should be defined inline
+- all foreign key constraints should have `ON DELETE CASCADE` option
+- all foreign key constraints should have `ON UPDATE CASCADE` option
+- all foreign key constraints should reference the primary key of the parent table
+
+## SQL Coding Style
+- use uppercase for SQL keywords (SELECT, FROM, WHERE)
+- use consistent indentation for nested queries and conditions
+- include comments to explain complex logic
+- break long queries into multiple lines for readability
+- organize clauses consistently (SELECT, FROM, JOIN, WHERE, GROUP BY, HAVING, ORDER BY)
+
+## SQL Query Structure
+- use explicit column names in SELECT statements instead of SELECT *
+- qualify column names with table name or alias when using multiple tables
+- limit the use of subqueries when joins can be used instead
+- include LIMIT/TOP clauses to restrict result sets
+- use appropriate indexing for frequently queried columns
+- avoid using functions on indexed columns in WHERE clauses
+
+## Stored Procedure Naming Conventions
+- prefix stored procedure names with 'usp_'
+- use PascalCase for stored procedure names
+- use descriptive names that indicate purpose (e.g., usp_GetCustomerOrders)
+- include plural noun when returning multiple records (e.g., usp_GetProducts)
+- include singular noun when returning single record (e.g., usp_GetProduct)
+
+## Parameter Handling
+- prefix parameters with '@'
+- use camelCase for parameter names
+- provide default values for optional parameters
+- validate parameter values before use
+- document parameters with comments
+- arrange parameters consistently (required first, optional later)
+
+
+## Stored Procedure Structure
+- include header comment block with description, parameters, and return values
+- return standardized error codes/messages
+- return result sets with consistent column order
+- use OUTPUT parameters for returning status information
+- prefix temporary tables with 'tmp_'
+
+
+## SQL Security Best Practices
+- parameterize all queries to prevent SQL injection
+- use prepared statements when executing dynamic SQL
+- avoid embedding credentials in SQL scripts
+- implement proper error handling without exposing system details
+- avoid using dynamic SQL within stored procedures
+
+## Transaction Management
+- explicitly begin and commit transactions
+- use appropriate isolation levels based on requirements
+- avoid long-running transactions that lock tables
+- use batch processing for large data operations
+- include SET NOCOUNT ON for stored procedures that modify data

.github/instructions/structure.instructions.md

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ description: 'Repository structure guidelines to maintain organized file placeme
 
 The repository root should contain ONLY:
 
-- Essential config files (`.gitignore`, `.pre-commit-config.yaml`, `Makefile`, etc.)
+- Essential config files (`.gitignore`, `Makefile`, etc.)
 - Standard project files (`README.md`, `CONTRIBUTING.md`, `LICENSE`, `CHANGELOG.md`)
 - Go workspace files (`go.work`, `go.work.sum`)
 - VS Code workspace (`Chiron.code-workspace`)

.github/instructions/subagent.instructions.md

@@ -23,10 +23,22 @@ runSubagent({
 
 - Validate: `plan_file` exists and contains a `Handoff Contract` JSON.
 - Kickoff: call `Planning` to create the plan if not present.
+- Decide: check if work should be split into multiple PRs (size, risk, cross-domain impact).
 - Run: execute `Backend Dev` then `Frontend Dev` sequentially.
 - Parallel: run `QA and Security`, `DevOps` and `Doc Writer` in parallel for CI / QA checks and documentation.
 - Return: a JSON summary with `subagent_results`, `overall_status`, and aggregated artifacts.
 
+2.1) Multi-Commit Slicing Protocol
+
+- If a task is large or high-risk, split into PR slices and execute in order.
+- Each slice must have:
+  - Scope boundary (what is included/excluded)
+  - Dependency on previous slices
+  - Validation gates (tests/scans required for that slice)
+  - Explicit rollback notes
+- Do not start the next slice until the current slice is complete and verified.
+- Keep each slice independently reviewable and deployable.
+
 3) Return Contract that all subagents must return
 
 ```
@@ -43,6 +55,7 @@ runSubagent({
 
 - On a subagent failure, the Management agent must capture `tests.output` and decide to retry (1 retry maximum), or request a revert/rollback.
 - Clearly mark the `status` as `failed`, and include `errors` and `failing_tests` in the `summary`.
+- For multi-PR execution, mark failed slice as blocked and stop downstream slices until resolved.
 
 5) Example: Run a full Feature Implementation
 

.github/instructions/taming-copilot.instructions.md

@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ This section outlines the absolute order of operations. These rules have the hig
 -   **Standard First**: Heavily favor standard library functions and widely accepted, common programming patterns. Only introduce third-party libraries if they are the industry standard for the task or absolutely necessary.
 -   **Avoid Elaborate Solutions**: Do not propose complex, "clever", or obscure solutions. Prioritize readability, maintainability, and the shortest path to a working result over convoluted patterns.
 -   **Focus on the Core Request**: Generate code that directly addresses the user's request, without adding extra features or handling edge cases that were not mentioned.
+-   **Spec Hygiene**: When asked to update a plan/spec file, do not append unrelated/archived plans; keep it strictly scoped to the current task.
 
 ## Surgical Code Modification
 

.github/instructions/tanstack-start-shadcn-tailwind.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+---
+description: 'Guidelines for building TanStack Start applications'
+applyTo: '**/*.ts, **/*.tsx, **/*.js, **/*.jsx, **/*.css, **/*.scss, **/*.json'
+---
+
+# TanStack Start with Shadcn/ui Development Guide
+
+You are an expert TypeScript developer specializing in TanStack Start applications with modern React patterns.
+
+## Tech Stack
+- TypeScript (strict mode)
+- TanStack Start (routing & SSR)
+- Shadcn/ui (UI components)
+- Tailwind CSS (styling)
+- Zod (validation)
+- TanStack Query (client state)
+
+## Code Style Rules
+
+- NEVER use `any` type - always use proper TypeScript types
+- Prefer function components over class components
+- Always validate external data with Zod schemas
+- Include error and pending boundaries for all routes
+- Follow accessibility best practices with ARIA attributes
+
+## Component Patterns
+
+Use function components with proper TypeScript interfaces:
+
+```typescript
+interface ButtonProps {
+  children: React.ReactNode;
+  onClick: () => void;
+  variant?: 'primary' | 'secondary';
+}
+
+export default function Button({ children, onClick, variant = 'primary' }: ButtonProps) {
+  return (
+    <button onClick={onClick} className={cn(buttonVariants({ variant }))}>
+      {children}
+    </button>
+  );
+}
+```
+
+## Data Fetching
+
+Use Route Loaders for:
+- Initial page data required for rendering
+- SSR requirements
+- SEO-critical data
+
+Use React Query for:
+- Frequently updating data
+- Optional/secondary data
+- Client mutations with optimistic updates
+
+```typescript
+// Route Loader
+export const Route = createFileRoute('/users')({
+  loader: async () => {
+    const users = await fetchUsers()
+    return { users: userListSchema.parse(users) }
+  },
+  component: UserList,
+})
+
+// React Query
+const { data: stats } = useQuery({
+  queryKey: ['user-stats', userId],
+  queryFn: () => fetchUserStats(userId),
+  refetchInterval: 30000,
+});
+```
+
+## Zod Validation
+
+Always validate external data. Define schemas in `src/lib/schemas.ts`:
+
+```typescript
+export const userSchema = z.object({
+  id: z.string(),
+  name: z.string().min(1).max(100),
+  email: z.string().email().optional(),
+  role: z.enum(['admin', 'user']).default('user'),
+})
+
+export type User = z.infer<typeof userSchema>
+
+// Safe parsing
+const result = userSchema.safeParse(data)
+if (!result.success) {
+  console.error('Validation failed:', result.error.format())
+  return null
+}
+```
+
+## Routes
+
+Structure routes in `src/routes/` with file-based routing. Always include error and pending boundaries:
+
+```typescript
+export const Route = createFileRoute('/users/$id')({
+  loader: async ({ params }) => {
+    const user = await fetchUser(params.id);
+    return { user: userSchema.parse(user) };
+  },
+  component: UserDetail,
+  errorBoundary: ({ error }) => (
+    <div className="text-red-600 p-4">Error: {error.message}</div>
+  ),
+  pendingBoundary: () => (
+    <div className="flex items-center justify-center p-4">
+      <div className="animate-spin rounded-full h-8 w-8 border-b-2 border-primary" />
+    </div>
+  ),
+});
+```
+
+## UI Components
+
+Always prefer Shadcn/ui components over custom ones:
+
+```typescript
+import { Button } from '@/components/ui/button';
+import { Card, CardContent, CardHeader, CardTitle } from '@/components/ui/card';
+
+<Card>
+  <CardHeader>
+    <CardTitle>User Details</CardTitle>
+  </CardHeader>
+  <CardContent>
+    <Button onClick={handleSave}>Save</Button>
+  </CardContent>
+</Card>
+```
+
+Use Tailwind for styling with responsive design:
+
+```typescript
+<div className="flex flex-col gap-4 p-6 md:flex-row md:gap-6">
+  <Button className="w-full md:w-auto">Action</Button>
+</div>
+```
+
+## Accessibility
+
+Use semantic HTML first. Only add ARIA when no semantic equivalent exists:
+
+```typescript
+// ✅ Good: Semantic HTML with minimal ARIA
+<button onClick={toggleMenu}>
+  <MenuIcon aria-hidden="true" />
+  <span className="sr-only">Toggle Menu</span>
+</button>
+
+// ✅ Good: ARIA only when needed (for dynamic states)
+<button
+  aria-expanded={isOpen}
+  aria-controls="menu"
+  onClick={toggleMenu}
+>
+  Menu
+</button>
+
+// ✅ Good: Semantic form elements
+<label htmlFor="email">Email Address</label>
+<input id="email" type="email" />
+{errors.email && (
+  <p role="alert">{errors.email}</p>
+)}
+```
+
+## File Organization
+
+```
+src/
+├── components/ui/    # Shadcn/ui components
+├── lib/schemas.ts    # Zod schemas
+├── routes/          # File-based routes
+└── routes/api/      # Server routes (.ts)
+```
+
+## Import Standards
+
+Use `@/` alias for all internal imports:
+
+```typescript
+// ✅ Good
+import { Button } from '@/components/ui/button'
+import { userSchema } from '@/lib/schemas'
+
+// ❌ Bad
+import { Button } from '../components/ui/button'
+```
+
+## Adding Components
+
+Install Shadcn components when needed:
+
+```bash
+npx shadcn@latest add button card input dialog
+```
+
+## Common Patterns
+
+- Always validate external data with Zod
+- Use route loaders for initial data, React Query for updates
+- Include error/pending boundaries on all routes
+- Prefer Shadcn components over custom UI
+- Use `@/` imports consistently
+- Follow accessibility best practices

.github/instructions/testing.instructions.md

@@ -4,6 +4,175 @@ description: 'Strict protocols for test execution, debugging, and coverage valid
 ---
 # Testing Protocols
 
+**Governance Note**: This file is subject to the precedence hierarchy defined in
+`.github/instructions/copilot-instructions.md`. When conflicts arise, canonical
+instruction files take precedence over agent files and operator documentation.
+
+## 0. E2E Verification First (Playwright)
+
+**MANDATORY**: Before running unit tests, verify the application UI/UX functions correctly end-to-end.
+
+## 0.5 Local Patch Coverage Report (After Coverage Tests)
+
+**MANDATORY**: After running backend and frontend coverage tests (which generate
+`backend/coverage.txt` and `frontend/coverage/lcov.info`), run the local patch
+report to identify uncovered lines in changed files.
+
+**Purpose**: Overall coverage can be healthy while the specific lines you changed
+are untested. This step catches that gap. If uncovered lines are found in
+feature code, add targeted tests before completing the task.
+
+**Prerequisites**: Coverage artifacts must exist before running the report:
+- `backend/coverage.txt` — generated by `scripts/go-test-coverage.sh`
+- `frontend/coverage/lcov.info` — generated by `scripts/frontend-test-coverage.sh`
+
+Run one of the following from `/projects/Charon`:
+
+```bash
+# Preferred (task)
+Test: Local Patch Report
+
+# Script
+bash scripts/local-patch-report.sh
+```
+
+Required output artifacts:
+- `test-results/local-patch-report.md`
+- `test-results/local-patch-report.json`
+
+**Action on results**: If patch coverage for any changed file is below 90%, add
+tests targeting the uncovered changed lines. Re-run coverage and this report to
+verify improvement. Artifact generation is required for DoD regardless of
+threshold results.
+
+### PREREQUISITE: Start E2E Environment
+
+**CRITICAL**: Rebuild the E2E container when application or Docker build inputs change. If changes are test-only and the container is already healthy, reuse it. If the container is not running or state is suspect, rebuild.
+
+**Rebuild required (application/runtime changes):**
+- Application code or dependencies: backend/**, frontend/**, backend/go.mod, backend/go.sum, package.json, package-lock.json.
+- Container build/runtime configuration: Dockerfile, .docker/**, .docker/compose/docker-compose.playwright-*.yml, .docker/docker-entrypoint.sh.
+- Runtime behavior changes baked into the image.
+
+**Rebuild optional (test-only changes):**
+- Playwright tests and fixtures: tests/**.
+- Playwright config and runners: playwright.config.js, playwright.caddy-debug.config.js.
+- Documentation or planning files: docs/**, requirements.md, design.md, tasks.md.
+- CI/workflow changes that do not affect runtime images: .github/workflows/**.
+
+When a rebuild is required (or the container is not running), use:
+
+```bash
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh docker-rebuild-e2e
+```
+
+This step:
+- Builds the latest Docker image with your code changes
+- Starts the `charon-e2e` container with proper environment variables from `.env`
+- Exposes required ports: 8080 (app), 2020 (emergency), 2019 (Caddy admin)
+- Waits for health check to pass
+
+**Without this step**, tests will fail with:
+- `connect ECONNREFUSED ::1:2020` - Emergency server not running
+- `connect ECONNREFUSED ::1:8080` - Application not running
+- `501 Not Implemented` - Container missing required env vars
+
+### Testing Scope Clarification
+
+**Playwright E2E Tests (UI/UX):**
+- Test user interactions with the React frontend
+- Verify UI state changes when settings are toggled
+- Ensure forms submit correctly
+- Check navigation and page rendering
+- **Port: 8080 (Charon Management Interface)**
+- **Default Browser: Firefox** (provides best cross-browser compatibility baseline)
+
+**Integration Tests (Middleware Enforcement):**
+- Test Cerberus security module enforcement
+- Verify ACL, WAF, Rate Limiting, CrowdSec actually block/allow requests
+- Test requests routing through Caddy proxy with full middleware
+- **Port: 80 (User Traffic via Caddy)**
+- **Location: `backend/integration/` with `//go:build integration` tag**
+- **CI: Runs in separate workflows (cerberus-integration.yml, waf-integration.yml, etc.)**
+
+### Two Modes: Docker vs Vite
+
+Playwright E2E tests can run in two modes with different capabilities:
+
+| Mode | Base URL | Coverage Support | When to Use |
+|------|----------|-----------------|-------------|
+| **Docker** | `http://localhost:8080` | ❌ No (0% reported) | Integration testing, CI validation |
+| **Vite Dev** | `http://localhost:5173` | ✅ Yes (real coverage) | Local development, coverage collection |
+
+**Why?** The `@bgotink/playwright-coverage` library uses V8 coverage which requires access to source files. Only the Vite dev server exposes source maps and raw source files needed for coverage instrumentation.
+
+### Running E2E Tests (Integration Mode)
+
+For general integration testing without coverage:
+
+```bash
+# Against Docker container (default)
+cd /projects/Charon && npx playwright test --project=chromium --project=firefox --project=webkit
+
+# With explicit base URL
+PLAYWRIGHT_BASE_URL=http://localhost:8080 npx playwright test --project=chromium --project=firefox --project=webkit
+```
+
+### Running E2E Tests with Coverage
+
+**IMPORTANT**: Use the dedicated skill for coverage collection:
+
+```bash
+# Recommended: Uses skill that starts Vite and runs against localhost:5173
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh test-e2e-playwright-coverage
+```
+
+The coverage skill:
+1. Starts Vite dev server on port 5173
+2. Sets `PLAYWRIGHT_BASE_URL=http://localhost:5173`
+3. Runs tests with V8 coverage collection
+4. Generates reports in `coverage/e2e/` (LCOV, HTML, JSON)
+
+**DO NOT** expect coverage when running against Docker:
+```bash
+# ❌ WRONG: Coverage will show "Unknown% (0/0)"
+PLAYWRIGHT_BASE_URL=http://localhost:8080 npx playwright test --coverage
+
+# ✅ CORRECT: Use the coverage skill
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh test-e2e-playwright-coverage
+```
+
+### Verifying Coverage Locally Before CI
+
+Before pushing code, verify E2E coverage:
+
+1. Run the coverage skill:
+   ```bash
+   .github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh test-e2e-playwright-coverage
+   ```
+
+2. Check coverage output:
+   ```bash
+   # View HTML report
+   open coverage/e2e/index.html
+
+   # Check LCOV file exists for Codecov
+   ls -la coverage/e2e/lcov.info
+   ```
+
+3. Verify non-zero coverage:
+   ```bash
+   # Should show real percentages, not "0%"
+   head -20 coverage/e2e/lcov.info
+   ```
+
+### General Guidelines
+
+* **No Truncation**: Never pipe Playwright test output through `head`, `tail`, or other truncating commands. Playwright runs interactively and requires user input to quit when piped, causing the command to hang indefinitely.
+* **Why First**: If the application is broken at the E2E level, unit tests may need updates. Playwright catches integration issues early.
+* **On Failure**: Analyze failures, trace root cause through frontend → backend flow, then fix before proceeding to unit tests.
+* **Scope**: Run relevant test files for the feature being modified (e.g., `tests/manual-dns-provider.spec.ts`).
+
 ## 1. Execution Environment
 * **No Truncation:** Never use pipe commands (e.g., `head`, `tail`) or flags that limit stdout/stderr. If a test hangs, it likely requires an interactive input or is caught in a loop; analyze the full output to identify the block.
 * **Task-Based Execution:** Do not manually construct test strings. Use existing project tasks (e.g., `npm test`, `go test ./...`). If a specific sub-module requires frequent testing, generate a new task definition in the project's configuration file (e.g., `.vscode/tasks.json`) before proceeding.
@@ -16,3 +185,110 @@ description: 'Strict protocols for test execution, debugging, and coverage valid
 ## 3. Coverage & Completion
 * **Coverage Gate:** A task is not "Complete" until a coverage report is generated.
 * **Threshold Compliance:** You must compare the final coverage percentage against the project's threshold (Default: 85% unless specified otherwise). If coverage drops, you must identify the "uncovered lines" and add targeted tests.
+* **Patch Coverage (Suggestion):** Codecov reports patch coverage as an indicator. While developers should aim for 100% coverage of modified lines, patch coverage is **not a hard requirement** and will not block PR approval. If patch coverage is low, consider adding targeted tests to improve the metric.
+* **Review Patch Coverage:** When reviewing patch coverage reports, assess whether missing lines represent genuine gaps or are acceptable (e.g., error handling branches, deprecated code paths). Use the report to inform testing decisions, not as an absolute gate.
+
+## 4. GORM Security Validation (Manual Stage)
+
+**Requirement:** For any change that touches backend models or
+database-related logic, the GORM Security Scanner is a mandatory local DoD gate
+and must pass with zero CRITICAL/HIGH findings.
+
+**Policy vs. Automation Reconciliation:** "Manual stage" describes execution
+mechanism only (not automated pre-commit hook); policy enforcement remains
+process-blocking for DoD. Gate decisions must use check semantics
+(`./scripts/scan-gorm-security.sh --check` or equivalent task wiring).
+
+### When to Run (Conditional Trigger Matrix)
+
+**Mandatory Trigger Paths (Include):**
+- `backend/internal/models/**` — GORM model definitions
+- Backend services/repositories with GORM query logic
+- Database migrations or seeding logic affecting model persistence behavior
+
+**Explicit Exclusions:**
+- Docs-only changes (`**/*.md`, governance documentation)
+- Frontend-only changes (`frontend/**`)
+
+**Gate Decision Rule:** IF any Include path matches, THEN scanner execution in
+check mode is mandatory DoD gate. IF only Exclude paths match, THEN GORM gate
+is not required for that change set.
+
+### Definition of Done
+- **Before Committing:** When modifying trigger paths listed above
+- **Before Opening PR:** Verify no security issues introduced
+- **After Code Review:** If model-related changes were requested
+- **Blocking Gate:** Scanner must pass with zero CRITICAL/HIGH issues before
+   task completion
+
+### Running the Scanner
+
+**Via VS Code (Recommended for Development):**
+1. Open Command Palette (`Cmd/Ctrl+Shift+P`)
+2. Select "Tasks: Run Task"
+3. Choose "Lint: GORM Security Scan"
+
+**Via Pre-commit (Manual Stage):**
+```bash
+# Run on all Go files
+pre-commit run --hook-stage manual gorm-security-scan --all-files
+
+# Run on staged files only
+pre-commit run --hook-stage manual gorm-security-scan
+```
+
+**Direct Execution:**
+```bash
+# Report mode - Show all issues, exit 0 (always)
+./scripts/scan-gorm-security.sh --report
+
+# Check mode - Exit 1 if issues found (use in CI)
+./scripts/scan-gorm-security.sh --check
+```
+
+### Expected Behavior
+
+**Pass (Exit Code 0):**
+- No security issues detected
+- Proceed with commit/PR
+
+**Fail (Exit Code 1):**
+- Issues detected (ID leaks, exposed secrets, DTO embedding, etc.)
+- Review scanner output for file:line references
+- Fix issues before committing
+- See [GORM Security Scanner Documentation](../docs/implementation/gorm_security_scanner_complete.md)
+
+### Common Issues Detected
+
+1. **🔴 CRITICAL: ID Leak** — Numeric ID with `json:"id"` tag
+   - Fix: Change to `json:"-"`, use UUID for external reference
+
+2. **🔴 CRITICAL: Exposed Secret** — APIKey/Token/Password with JSON tag
+   - Fix: Change to `json:"-"` to hide sensitive field
+
+3. **🟡 HIGH: DTO Embedding** — Response struct embeds model with exposed ID
+   - Fix: Use explicit field definitions instead of embedding
+
+### Integration Status
+
+**Current Stage:** Manual (soft launch)
+- Scanner available for manual invocation
+- Does not block commits automatically
+- Developers should run proactively
+
+**Future Stage:** Blocking (after remediation)
+- Scanner will block commits with CRITICAL/HIGH issues
+- CI integration will enforce on all PRs
+- See [GORM Scanner Roadmap](../docs/implementation/gorm_security_scanner_complete.md#remediation-roadmap)
+
+### Performance
+
+- **Execution Time:** ~2 seconds per full scan
+- **Fast enough** for pre-commit use
+- **No impact** on commit workflow when passing
+
+### Documentation
+
+- **Implementation Details:** [docs/implementation/gorm_security_scanner_complete.md](../docs/implementation/gorm_security_scanner_complete.md)
+- **Specification:** [docs/plans/gorm_security_scanner_spec.md](../docs/plans/gorm_security_scanner_spec.md)
+- **QA Report:** [docs/reports/gorm_scanner_qa_report.md](../docs/reports/gorm_scanner_qa_report.md)

.github/instructions/update-docs-on-code-change.instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,559 @@
+---
+description: 'Automatically update README.md and documentation files when application code changes require documentation updates'
+applyTo: '**/*.{md,js,mjs,cjs,ts,tsx,jsx,py,java,cs,go,rb,php,rs,cpp,c,h,hpp}'
+---
+
+# Update Documentation on Code Change
+
+## Overview
+
+Ensure documentation stays synchronized with code changes by automatically detecting when README.md,
+API documentation, configuration guides, and other documentation files need updates based on code
+modifications.
+
+## Instruction Sections and Configuration
+
+The following parts of this section, `Instruction Sections and Configurable Instruction Sections`
+and `Instruction Configuration` are only relevant to THIS instruction file, and are meant to be a
+method to easily modify how the Copilot instructions are implemented. Essentially the two parts
+are meant to turn portions or sections of the actual Copilot instructions on or off, and allow for
+custom cases and conditions for when and how to implement certain sections of this document.
+
+### Instruction Sections and Configurable Instruction Sections
+
+There are several instruction sections in this document. The start of an instruction section is
+indicated by a level two header. Call this an **INSTRUCTION SECTION**.  Some instruction
+sections are configurable. Some are not configurable and will always be used.
+
+Instruction sections that ARE configurable are not required, and are subject to additional context
+and/or conditions. Call these **CONFIGURABLE INSTRUCTION SECTIONS**.
+
+**Configurable instruction sections** will have the section's configuration property appended to
+the level two header, wrapped in backticks (e.g., `apply-this`). Call this the
+**CONFIGURABLE PROPERTY**.
+
+The **configurable property** will be declared and defined in the **Instruction Configuration**
+portion of this section. They are booleans. If `true`, then apply, utilize, and/or follow the
+instructions in that section.
+
+Each **configurable instruction section** will also have a sentence that follows the section's
+level two header with the section's configuration details. Call this the **CONFIGURATION DETAIL**.
+
+The **configuration detail** is a subset of rules that expand upon the configurable instruction
+section. This allows for custom cases and/or conditions to be checked that will determine the final
+implementation for that **configurable instruction section**.
+
+Before resolving on how to apply a **configurable instruction section**, check the
+**configurable property** for a nested and/or corresponding `apply-condition`, and utilize the `apply-condition` when settling on the final approach for the **configurable instruction section**. By
+default the `apply-condition` for each **configurable property** is unset, but an example of a set
+`apply-condition` could be something like:
+
+    - **apply-condition** :
+      ` this.parent.property = (git.branch == "master") ? this.parent.property = true : this.parent.property = false; `
+
+The sum of all the **constant instructions sections**, and **configurable instruction sections**
+will determine the complete instructions to follow. Call this the **COMPILED INSTRUCTIONS**.
+
+The **compiled instructions** are dependent on the configuration. Each instruction section
+included in the **compiled instructions** will be interpreted and utilized AS IF a separate set
+of instructions that are independent of the entirety of this instruction file. Call this the
+**FINAL PROCEDURE**.
+
+### Instruction Configuration
+
+- **apply-doc-file-structure** : true
+  - **apply-condition** : unset
+- **apply-doc-verification** : true
+  - **apply-condition** : unset
+- **apply-doc-quality-standard** : true
+  - **apply-condition** : unset
+- **apply-automation-tooling** : true
+  - **apply-condition** : unset
+- **apply-doc-patterns** : true
+  - **apply-condition** : unset
+- **apply-best-practices** : true
+  - **apply-condition** : unset
+- **apply-validation-commands** : true
+  - **apply-condition** : unset
+- **apply-maintenance-schedule** : true
+  - **apply-condition** : unset
+- **apply-git-integration** : false
+  - **apply-condition** : unset
+
+<!--
+| Configuration Property         | Default | Description                                                                 | When to Enable/Disable                                      |
+|-------------------------------|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
+| apply-doc-file-structure      | true    | Ensures documentation follows a consistent file structure.                  | Disable if you want to allow free-form doc organization.    |
+| apply-doc-verification        | true    | Verifies that documentation matches code changes.                           | Disable if verification is handled elsewhere.               |
+| apply-doc-quality-standard    | true    | Enforces documentation quality standards.                                   | Disable if quality standards are not required.              |
+| apply-automation-tooling      | true    | Uses automation tools to update documentation.                              | Disable if you prefer manual documentation updates.         |
+| apply-doc-patterns            | true    | Applies common documentation patterns and templates.                        | Disable for custom or unconventional documentation styles.  |
+| apply-best-practices          | true    | Enforces best practices in documentation.                                   | Disable if best practices are not a priority.               |
+| apply-validation-commands     | true    | Runs validation commands to check documentation correctness.                 | Disable if validation is not needed.                        |
+| apply-maintenance-schedule    | true    | Schedules regular documentation maintenance.                                | Disable if maintenance is managed differently.              |
+| apply-git-integration         | false   | Integrates documentation updates with Git workflows.                        | Enable if you want automatic Git integration.               |
+-->
+## When to Update Documentation
+
+### Trigger Conditions
+
+Automatically check if documentation updates are needed when:
+
+- New features or functionality are added
+- API endpoints, methods, or interfaces change
+- Breaking changes are introduced
+- Dependencies or requirements change
+- Configuration options or environment variables are modified
+- Installation or setup procedures change
+- Command-line interfaces or scripts are updated
+- Code examples in documentation become outdated
+- **ARCHITECTURE.md must be updated when:**
+  - System architecture or component interactions change
+  - New components are added or removed
+  - Technology stack changes (major version upgrades, library replacements)
+  - Directory structure or organizational conventions change
+  - Deployment model or infrastructure changes
+  - Security architecture or data flow changes
+  - Integration points or external dependencies change
+  - Development workflow or testing strategy changes
+
+## Documentation Update Rules
+
+### README.md Updates
+
+**Always update README.md when:**
+
+- Adding new features or capabilities
+  - Add feature description to "Features" section
+  - Include usage examples if applicable
+  - Update table of contents if present
+
+- Modifying installation or setup process
+  - Update "Installation" or "Getting Started" section
+  - Revise dependency requirements
+  - Update prerequisite lists
+
+- Adding new CLI commands or options
+  - Document command syntax and examples
+  - Include option descriptions and default values
+  - Add usage examples
+
+- Changing configuration options
+  - Update configuration examples
+  - Document new environment variables
+  - Update config file templates
+
+### API Documentation Updates
+
+**Sync API documentation when:**
+
+- New endpoints are added
+  - Document HTTP method, path, parameters
+  - Include request/response examples
+  - Update OpenAPI/Swagger specs
+
+- Endpoint signatures change
+  - Update parameter lists
+  - Revise response schemas
+  - Document breaking changes
+
+- Authentication or authorization changes
+  - Update authentication examples
+  - Revise security requirements
+  - Update API key/token documentation
+
+### Code Example Synchronization
+
+**Verify and update code examples when:**
+
+- Function signatures change
+  - Update all code snippets using the function
+  - Verify examples still compile/run
+  - Update import statements if needed
+
+- API interfaces change
+  - Update example requests and responses
+  - Revise client code examples
+  - Update SDK usage examples
+
+- Best practices evolve
+  - Replace outdated patterns in examples
+  - Update to use current recommended approaches
+  - Add deprecation notices for old patterns
+
+### Configuration Documentation
+
+**Update configuration docs when:**
+
+- New environment variables are added
+  - Add to .env.example file
+  - Document in README.md or docs/configuration.md
+  - Include default values and descriptions
+
+- Config file structure changes
+  - Update example config files
+  - Document new options
+  - Mark deprecated options
+
+- Deployment configuration changes
+  - Update Docker/Kubernetes configs
+  - Revise deployment guides
+  - Update infrastructure-as-code examples
+
+### Migration and Breaking Changes
+
+**Create migration guides when:**
+
+- Breaking API changes occur
+  - Document what changed
+  - Provide before/after examples
+  - Include step-by-step migration instructions
+
+- Major version updates
+  - List all breaking changes
+  - Provide upgrade checklist
+  - Include common migration issues and solutions
+
+- Deprecating features
+  - Mark deprecated features clearly
+  - Suggest alternative approaches
+  - Include timeline for removal
+
+## Documentation File Structure `apply-doc-file-structure`
+
+If `apply-doc-file-structure == true`, then apply the following configurable instruction section.
+
+### Standard Documentation Files
+
+Maintain these documentation files and update as needed:
+
+- **README.md**: Project overview, quick start, basic usage
+- **ARCHITECTURE.md**: System architecture, component design, technology stack, data flow
+- **CHANGELOG.md**: Version history and user-facing changes
+- **docs/**: Detailed documentation
+  - `installation.md`: Setup and installation guide
+  - `configuration.md`: Configuration options and examples
+  - `api.md`: API reference documentation
+  - `contributing.md`: Contribution guidelines
+  - `migration-guides/`: Version migration guides
+- **examples/**: Working code examples and tutorials
+
+### Changelog Management
+
+**Add changelog entries for:**
+
+- New features (under "Added" section)
+- Bug fixes (under "Fixed" section)
+- Breaking changes (under "Changed" section with **BREAKING** prefix)
+- Deprecated features (under "Deprecated" section)
+- Removed features (under "Removed" section)
+- Security fixes (under "Security" section)
+
+**Changelog format:**
+
+    ```markdown
+    ## [Version] - YYYY-MM-DD
+
+    ### Added
+    - New feature description with reference to PR/issue
+
+    ### Changed
+    - **BREAKING**: Description of breaking change
+    - Other changes
+
+    ### Fixed
+    - Bug fix description
+    ```
+
+## Documentation Verification `apply-doc-verification`
+
+If `apply-doc-verification == true`, then apply the following configurable instruction section.
+
+### Before Applying Changes
+
+**Check documentation completeness:**
+
+1. All new public APIs are documented
+2. Code examples compile and run
+3. Links in documentation are valid
+4. Configuration examples are accurate
+5. Installation steps are current
+6. README.md reflects current state
+
+### Documentation Tests
+
+**Include documentation validation:**
+
+#### Example Tasks
+
+- Verify code examples in docs compile/run
+- Check for broken internal/external links
+- Validate configuration examples against schemas
+- Ensure API examples match current implementation
+
+    ```bash
+    # Example validation commands
+    npm run docs:check         # Verify docs build
+    npm run docs:test-examples # Test code examples
+    npm run docs:lint         # Check for issues
+    ```
+
+## Documentation Quality Standards `apply-doc-quality-standard`
+
+If `apply-doc-quality-standard == true`, then apply the following configurable instruction section.
+
+### Writing Guidelines
+
+- Use clear, concise language
+- Include working code examples
+- Provide both basic and advanced examples
+- Use consistent terminology
+- Include error handling examples
+- Document edge cases and limitations
+
+### Code Example Format
+
+    ```markdown
+    ### Example: [Clear description of what example demonstrates]
+
+    \`\`\`language
+    // Include necessary imports/setup
+    import { function } from 'package';
+
+    // Complete, runnable example
+    const result = function(parameter);
+    console.log(result);
+    \`\`\`
+
+    **Output:**
+    \`\`\`
+    expected output
+    \`\`\`
+    ```
+
+### API Documentation Format
+
+    ```markdown
+    ### `functionName(param1, param2)`
+
+    Brief description of what the function does.
+
+    **Parameters:**
+    - `param1` (type): Description of parameter
+    - `param2` (type, optional): Description with default value
+
+    **Returns:**
+    - `type`: Description of return value
+
+    **Example:**
+    \`\`\`language
+    const result = functionName('value', 42);
+    \`\`\`
+
+    **Throws:**
+    - `ErrorType`: When and why error is thrown
+    ```
+
+## Automation and Tooling `apply-automation-tooling`
+
+If `apply-automation-tooling == true`, then apply the following configurable instruction section.
+
+### Documentation Generation
+
+**Use automated tools when available:**
+
+#### Automated Tool Examples
+
+- JSDoc/TSDoc for JavaScript/TypeScript
+- Sphinx/pdoc for Python
+- Javadoc for Java
+- xmldoc for C#
+- godoc for Go
+- rustdoc for Rust
+
+### Documentation Linting
+
+**Validate documentation with:**
+
+- Markdown linters (markdownlint)
+- Link checkers (markdown-link-check)
+- Spell checkers (cspell)
+- Code example validators
+
+### Pre-update Hooks
+
+**Add pre-commit checks for:**
+
+- Documentation build succeeds
+- No broken links
+- Code examples are valid
+- Changelog entry exists for changes
+
+## Common Documentation Patterns `apply-doc-patterns`
+
+If `apply-doc-patterns == true`, then apply the following configurable instruction section.
+
+### Feature Documentation Template
+
+    ```markdown
+    ## Feature Name
+
+    Brief description of the feature.
+
+    ### Usage
+
+    Basic usage example with code snippet.
+
+    ### Configuration
+
+    Configuration options with examples.
+
+    ### Advanced Usage
+
+    Complex scenarios and edge cases.
+
+    ### Troubleshooting
+
+    Common issues and solutions.
+    ```
+
+### API Endpoint Documentation Template
+
+    ```markdown
+    ### `HTTP_METHOD /api/endpoint`
+
+    Description of what the endpoint does.
+
+    **Request:**
+    \`\`\`json
+    {
+      "param": "value"
+    }
+    \`\`\`
+
+    **Response:**
+    \`\`\`json
+    {
+      "result": "value"
+    }
+    \`\`\`
+
+    **Status Codes:**
+    - 200: Success
+    - 400: Bad request
+    - 401: Unauthorized
+    ```
+
+## Best Practices `apply-best-practices`
+
+If `apply-best-practices == true`, then apply the following configurable instruction section.
+
+### Do's
+
+- ✅ Update documentation in the same commit as code changes
+- ✅ Include before/after examples for changes to be reviewed before applying
+- ✅ Test code examples before committing
+- ✅ Use consistent formatting and terminology
+- ✅ Document limitations and edge cases
+- ✅ Provide migration paths for breaking changes
+- ✅ Keep documentation DRY (link instead of duplicating)
+
+### Don'ts
+
+- ❌ Commit code changes without updating documentation
+- ❌ Leave outdated examples in documentation
+- ❌ Document features that don't exist yet
+- ❌ Use vague or ambiguous language
+- ❌ Forget to update changelog
+- ❌ Ignore broken links or failing examples
+- ❌ Document implementation details users don't need
+
+## Validation Example Commands `apply-validation-commands`
+
+If `apply-validation-commands == true`, then apply the following configurable instruction section.
+
+Example scripts to apply to your project for documentation validation:
+
+```json
+{
+  "scripts": {
+    "docs:build": "Build documentation",
+    "docs:test": "Test code examples in docs",
+    "docs:lint": "Lint documentation files",
+    "docs:links": "Check for broken links",
+    "docs:spell": "Spell check documentation",
+    "docs:validate": "Run all documentation checks"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Maintenance Schedule `apply-maintenance-schedule`
+
+If `apply-maintenance-schedule == true`, then apply the following configurable instruction section.
+
+### Regular Reviews
+
+- **Monthly**: Review documentation for accuracy
+- **Per release**: Update version numbers and examples
+- **Quarterly**: Check for outdated patterns or deprecated features
+- **Annually**: Comprehensive documentation audit
+
+### Deprecation Process
+
+When deprecating features:
+
+1. Add deprecation notice to documentation
+2. Update examples to use recommended alternatives
+3. Create migration guide
+4. Update changelog with deprecation notice
+5. Set timeline for removal
+6. In next major version, remove deprecated feature and docs
+
+## Git Integration `apply-git-integration`
+
+If `apply-git-integration == true`, then apply the following configurable instruction section.
+
+### Pull Request Requirements
+
+**Documentation must be updated in the same PR as code changes:**
+
+- Document new features in the feature PR
+- Update examples when code changes
+- Add changelog entries with code changes
+- Update API docs when interfaces change
+
+### Documentation Review
+
+**During code review, verify:**
+
+- Documentation accurately describes the changes
+- Examples are clear and complete
+- No undocumented breaking changes
+- Changelog entry is appropriate
+- Migration guides are provided if needed
+
+## Review Checklist
+
+Before considering documentation complete, and concluding on the **final procedure**:
+
+- [ ] **Compiled instructions** are based on the sum of **constant instruction sections** and
+**configurable instruction sections**
+- [ ] README.md reflects current project state
+- [ ] All new features are documented
+- [ ] Code examples are tested and work
+- [ ] API documentation is complete and accurate
+- [ ] Configuration examples are up to date
+- [ ] Breaking changes are documented with migration guide
+- [ ] CHANGELOG.md is updated
+- [ ] Links are valid and not broken
+- [ ] Installation instructions are current
+- [ ] Environment variables are documented
+
+## Updating Documentation on Code Change GOAL
+
+- Keep documentation close to code when possible
+- Use documentation generators for API reference
+- Maintain living documentation that evolves with code
+- Consider documentation as part of feature completeness
+- Review documentation in code reviews
+- Make documentation easy to find and navigate

.github/prompts/ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+---
+description: "Comprehensive AI prompt engineering safety review and improvement prompt. Analyzes prompts for safety, bias, security vulnerabilities, and effectiveness while providing detailed improvement recommendations with extensive frameworks, testing methodologies, and educational content."
+mode: 'agent'
+---
+
+# AI Prompt Engineering Safety Review & Improvement
+
+You are an expert AI prompt engineer and safety specialist with deep expertise in responsible AI development, bias detection, security analysis, and prompt optimization. Your task is to conduct comprehensive analysis, review, and improvement of prompts for safety, bias, security, and effectiveness. Follow the comprehensive best practices outlined in the AI Prompt Engineering & Safety Best Practices instruction.
+
+## Your Mission
+
+Analyze the provided prompt using systematic evaluation frameworks and provide detailed recommendations for improvement. Focus on safety, bias mitigation, security, and responsible AI usage while maintaining effectiveness. Provide educational insights and actionable guidance for prompt engineering best practices.
+
+## Analysis Framework
+
+### 1. Safety Assessment
+- **Harmful Content Risk:** Could this prompt generate harmful, dangerous, or inappropriate content?
+- **Violence & Hate Speech:** Could the output promote violence, hate speech, or discrimination?
+- **Misinformation Risk:** Could the output spread false or misleading information?
+- **Illegal Activities:** Could the output promote illegal activities or cause personal harm?
+
+### 2. Bias Detection & Mitigation
+- **Gender Bias:** Does the prompt assume or reinforce gender stereotypes?
+- **Racial Bias:** Does the prompt assume or reinforce racial stereotypes?
+- **Cultural Bias:** Does the prompt assume or reinforce cultural stereotypes?
+- **Socioeconomic Bias:** Does the prompt assume or reinforce socioeconomic stereotypes?
+- **Ability Bias:** Does the prompt assume or reinforce ability-based stereotypes?
+
+### 3. Security & Privacy Assessment
+- **Data Exposure:** Could the prompt expose sensitive or personal data?
+- **Prompt Injection:** Is the prompt vulnerable to injection attacks?
+- **Information Leakage:** Could the prompt leak system or model information?
+- **Access Control:** Does the prompt respect appropriate access controls?
+
+### 4. Effectiveness Evaluation
+- **Clarity:** Is the task clearly stated and unambiguous?
+- **Context:** Is sufficient background information provided?
+- **Constraints:** Are output requirements and limitations defined?
+- **Format:** Is the expected output format specified?
+- **Specificity:** Is the prompt specific enough for consistent results?
+
+### 5. Best Practices Compliance
+- **Industry Standards:** Does the prompt follow established best practices?
+- **Ethical Considerations:** Does the prompt align with responsible AI principles?
+- **Documentation Quality:** Is the prompt self-documenting and maintainable?
+
+### 6. Advanced Pattern Analysis
+- **Prompt Pattern:** Identify the pattern used (zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought, role-based, hybrid)
+- **Pattern Effectiveness:** Evaluate if the chosen pattern is optimal for the task
+- **Pattern Optimization:** Suggest alternative patterns that might improve results
+- **Context Utilization:** Assess how effectively context is leveraged
+- **Constraint Implementation:** Evaluate the clarity and enforceability of constraints
+
+### 7. Technical Robustness
+- **Input Validation:** Does the prompt handle edge cases and invalid inputs?
+- **Error Handling:** Are potential failure modes considered?
+- **Scalability:** Will the prompt work across different scales and contexts?
+- **Maintainability:** Is the prompt structured for easy updates and modifications?
+- **Versioning:** Are changes trackable and reversible?
+
+### 8. Performance Optimization
+- **Token Efficiency:** Is the prompt optimized for token usage?
+- **Response Quality:** Does the prompt consistently produce high-quality outputs?
+- **Response Time:** Are there optimizations that could improve response speed?
+- **Consistency:** Does the prompt produce consistent results across multiple runs?
+- **Reliability:** How dependable is the prompt in various scenarios?
+
+## Output Format
+
+Provide your analysis in the following structured format:
+
+### 🔍 **Prompt Analysis Report**
+
+**Original Prompt:**
+[User's prompt here]
+
+**Task Classification:**
+- **Primary Task:** [Code generation, documentation, analysis, etc.]
+- **Complexity Level:** [Simple, Moderate, Complex]
+- **Domain:** [Technical, Creative, Analytical, etc.]
+
+**Safety Assessment:**
+- **Harmful Content Risk:** [Low/Medium/High] - [Specific concerns]
+- **Bias Detection:** [None/Minor/Major] - [Specific bias types]
+- **Privacy Risk:** [Low/Medium/High] - [Specific concerns]
+- **Security Vulnerabilities:** [None/Minor/Major] - [Specific vulnerabilities]
+
+**Effectiveness Evaluation:**
+- **Clarity:** [Score 1-5] - [Detailed assessment]
+- **Context Adequacy:** [Score 1-5] - [Detailed assessment]
+- **Constraint Definition:** [Score 1-5] - [Detailed assessment]
+- **Format Specification:** [Score 1-5] - [Detailed assessment]
+- **Specificity:** [Score 1-5] - [Detailed assessment]
+- **Completeness:** [Score 1-5] - [Detailed assessment]
+
+**Advanced Pattern Analysis:**
+- **Pattern Type:** [Zero-shot/Few-shot/Chain-of-thought/Role-based/Hybrid]
+- **Pattern Effectiveness:** [Score 1-5] - [Detailed assessment]
+- **Alternative Patterns:** [Suggestions for improvement]
+- **Context Utilization:** [Score 1-5] - [Detailed assessment]
+
+**Technical Robustness:**
+- **Input Validation:** [Score 1-5] - [Detailed assessment]
+- **Error Handling:** [Score 1-5] - [Detailed assessment]
+- **Scalability:** [Score 1-5] - [Detailed assessment]
+- **Maintainability:** [Score 1-5] - [Detailed assessment]
+
+**Performance Metrics:**
+- **Token Efficiency:** [Score 1-5] - [Detailed assessment]
+- **Response Quality:** [Score 1-5] - [Detailed assessment]
+- **Consistency:** [Score 1-5] - [Detailed assessment]
+- **Reliability:** [Score 1-5] - [Detailed assessment]
+
+**Critical Issues Identified:**
+1. [Issue 1 with severity and impact]
+2. [Issue 2 with severity and impact]
+3. [Issue 3 with severity and impact]
+
+**Strengths Identified:**
+1. [Strength 1 with explanation]
+2. [Strength 2 with explanation]
+3. [Strength 3 with explanation]
+
+### 🛡️ **Improved Prompt**
+
+**Enhanced Version:**
+[Complete improved prompt with all enhancements]
+
+**Key Improvements Made:**
+1. **Safety Strengthening:** [Specific safety improvement]
+2. **Bias Mitigation:** [Specific bias reduction]
+3. **Security Hardening:** [Specific security improvement]
+4. **Clarity Enhancement:** [Specific clarity improvement]
+5. **Best Practice Implementation:** [Specific best practice application]
+
+**Safety Measures Added:**
+- [Safety measure 1 with explanation]
+- [Safety measure 2 with explanation]
+- [Safety measure 3 with explanation]
+- [Safety measure 4 with explanation]
+- [Safety measure 5 with explanation]
+
+**Bias Mitigation Strategies:**
+- [Bias mitigation 1 with explanation]
+- [Bias mitigation 2 with explanation]
+- [Bias mitigation 3 with explanation]
+
+**Security Enhancements:**
+- [Security enhancement 1 with explanation]
+- [Security enhancement 2 with explanation]
+- [Security enhancement 3 with explanation]
+
+**Technical Improvements:**
+- [Technical improvement 1 with explanation]
+- [Technical improvement 2 with explanation]
+- [Technical improvement 3 with explanation]
+
+### 📋 **Testing Recommendations**
+
+**Test Cases:**
+- [Test case 1 with expected outcome]
+- [Test case 2 with expected outcome]
+- [Test case 3 with expected outcome]
+- [Test case 4 with expected outcome]
+- [Test case 5 with expected outcome]
+
+**Edge Case Testing:**
+- [Edge case 1 with expected outcome]
+- [Edge case 2 with expected outcome]
+- [Edge case 3 with expected outcome]
+
+**Safety Testing:**
+- [Safety test 1 with expected outcome]
+- [Safety test 2 with expected outcome]
+- [Safety test 3 with expected outcome]
+
+**Bias Testing:**
+- [Bias test 1 with expected outcome]
+- [Bias test 2 with expected outcome]
+- [Bias test 3 with expected outcome]
+
+**Usage Guidelines:**
+- **Best For:** [Specific use cases]
+- **Avoid When:** [Situations to avoid]
+- **Considerations:** [Important factors to keep in mind]
+- **Limitations:** [Known limitations and constraints]
+- **Dependencies:** [Required context or prerequisites]
+
+### 🎓 **Educational Insights**
+
+**Prompt Engineering Principles Applied:**
+1. **Principle:** [Specific principle]
+   - **Application:** [How it was applied]
+   - **Benefit:** [Why it improves the prompt]
+
+2. **Principle:** [Specific principle]
+   - **Application:** [How it was applied]
+   - **Benefit:** [Why it improves the prompt]
+
+**Common Pitfalls Avoided:**
+1. **Pitfall:** [Common mistake]
+   - **Why It's Problematic:** [Explanation]
+   - **How We Avoided It:** [Specific avoidance strategy]
+
+## Instructions
+
+1. **Analyze the provided prompt** using all assessment criteria above
+2. **Provide detailed explanations** for each evaluation metric
+3. **Generate an improved version** that addresses all identified issues
+4. **Include specific safety measures** and bias mitigation strategies
+5. **Offer testing recommendations** to validate the improvements
+6. **Explain the principles applied** and educational insights gained
+
+## Safety Guidelines
+
+- **Always prioritize safety** over functionality
+- **Flag any potential risks** with specific mitigation strategies
+- **Consider edge cases** and potential misuse scenarios
+- **Recommend appropriate constraints** and guardrails
+- **Ensure compliance** with responsible AI principles
+
+## Quality Standards
+
+- **Be thorough and systematic** in your analysis
+- **Provide actionable recommendations** with clear explanations
+- **Consider the broader impact** of prompt improvements
+- **Maintain educational value** in your explanations
+- **Follow industry best practices** from Microsoft, OpenAI, and Google AI
+
+Remember: Your goal is to help create prompts that are not only effective but also safe, unbiased, secure, and responsible. Every improvement should enhance both functionality and safety.

.github/prompts/breakdown-feature-implementation.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+---
+mode: 'agent'
+description: 'Prompt for creating detailed feature implementation plans, following Epoch monorepo structure.'
+---
+
+# Feature Implementation Plan Prompt
+
+## Goal
+
+Act as an industry-veteran software engineer responsible for crafting high-touch features for large-scale SaaS companies. Excel at creating detailed technical implementation plans for features based on a Feature PRD.
+Review the provided context and output a thorough, comprehensive implementation plan.
+**Note:** Do NOT write code in output unless it's pseudocode for technical situations.
+
+## Output Format
+
+The output should be a complete implementation plan in Markdown format, saved to `/docs/ways-of-work/plan/{epic-name}/{feature-name}/implementation-plan.md`.
+
+### File System
+
+Folder and file structure for both front-end and back-end repositories following Epoch's monorepo structure:
+
+```
+apps/
+  [app-name]/
+services/
+  [service-name]/
+packages/
+  [package-name]/
+```
+
+### Implementation Plan
+
+For each feature:
+
+#### Goal
+
+Feature goal described (3-5 sentences)
+
+#### Requirements
+
+- Detailed feature requirements (bulleted list)
+- Implementation plan specifics
+
+#### Technical Considerations
+
+##### System Architecture Overview
+
+Create a comprehensive system architecture diagram using Mermaid that shows how this feature integrates into the overall system. The diagram should include:
+
+- **Frontend Layer**: User interface components, state management, and client-side logic
+- **API Layer**: tRPC endpoints, authentication middleware, input validation, and request routing
+- **Business Logic Layer**: Service classes, business rules, workflow orchestration, and event handling
+- **Data Layer**: Database interactions, caching mechanisms, and external API integrations
+- **Infrastructure Layer**: Docker containers, background services, and deployment components
+
+Use subgraphs to organize these layers clearly. Show the data flow between layers with labeled arrows indicating request/response patterns, data transformations, and event flows. Include any feature-specific components, services, or data structures that are unique to this implementation.
+
+- **Technology Stack Selection**: Document choice rationale for each layer
+```
+
+- **Technology Stack Selection**: Document choice rationale for each layer
+- **Integration Points**: Define clear boundaries and communication protocols
+- **Deployment Architecture**: Docker containerization strategy
+- **Scalability Considerations**: Horizontal and vertical scaling approaches
+
+##### Database Schema Design
+
+Create an entity-relationship diagram using Mermaid showing the feature's data model:
+
+- **Table Specifications**: Detailed field definitions with types and constraints
+- **Indexing Strategy**: Performance-critical indexes and their rationale
+- **Foreign Key Relationships**: Data integrity and referential constraints
+- **Database Migration Strategy**: Version control and deployment approach
+
+##### API Design
+
+- Endpoints with full specifications
+- Request/response formats with TypeScript types
+- Authentication and authorization with Stack Auth
+- Error handling strategies and status codes
+- Rate limiting and caching strategies
+
+##### Frontend Architecture
+
+###### Component Hierarchy Documentation
+
+The component structure will leverage the `shadcn/ui` library for a consistent and accessible foundation.
+
+**Layout Structure:**
+
+```
+Recipe Library Page
+├── Header Section (shadcn: Card)
+│   ├── Title (shadcn: Typography `h1`)
+│   ├── Add Recipe Button (shadcn: Button with DropdownMenu)
+│   │   ├── Manual Entry (DropdownMenuItem)
+│   │   ├── Import from URL (DropdownMenuItem)
+│   │   └── Import from PDF (DropdownMenuItem)
+│   └── Search Input (shadcn: Input with icon)
+├── Main Content Area (flex container)
+│   ├── Filter Sidebar (aside)
+│   │   ├── Filter Title (shadcn: Typography `h4`)
+│   │   ├── Category Filters (shadcn: Checkbox group)
+│   │   ├── Cuisine Filters (shadcn: Checkbox group)
+│   │   └── Difficulty Filters (shadcn: RadioGroup)
+│   └── Recipe Grid (main)
+│       └── Recipe Card (shadcn: Card)
+│           ├── Recipe Image (img)
+│           ├── Recipe Title (shadcn: Typography `h3`)
+│           ├── Recipe Tags (shadcn: Badge)
+│           └── Quick Actions (shadcn: Button - View, Edit)
+```
+
+- **State Flow Diagram**: Component state management using Mermaid
+- Reusable component library specifications
+- State management patterns with Zustand/React Query
+- TypeScript interfaces and types
+
+##### Security Performance
+
+- Authentication/authorization requirements
+- Data validation and sanitization
+- Performance optimization strategies
+- Caching mechanisms
+
+## Context Template
+
+- **Feature PRD:** [The content of the Feature PRD markdown file]

.github/prompts/codecov-patch-coverage-fix.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+---
+mode: 'agent'
+description: 'Generate targeted tests to achieve 100% Codecov patch coverage when CI reports uncovered lines'
+tools: ['changes', 'search/codebase', 'edit/editFiles', 'fetch', 'findTestFiles', 'problems', 'runCommands', 'runTasks', 'runTests', 'search', 'search/searchResults', 'runCommands/terminalLastCommand', 'runCommands/terminalSelection', 'testFailure', 'usages']
+---
+
+# Codecov Patch Coverage Fix
+
+You are a senior test engineer with deep expertise in test-driven development, code coverage analysis, and writing effective unit and integration tests. You have extensive experience with:
+
+- Interpreting Codecov reports and understanding patch vs project coverage
+- Writing targeted tests that exercise specific code paths and edge cases
+- Go testing patterns (`testing` package, table-driven tests, mocks, test helpers)
+- JavaScript/TypeScript testing with Vitest, Jest, and React Testing Library
+- Achieving 100% patch coverage without writing redundant or brittle tests
+
+## Primary Objective
+
+Analyze the provided Codecov comment or report and generate the minimum set of high-quality tests required to achieve **100% patch coverage** on all modified lines. Tests must be meaningful, maintainable, and follow project conventions.
+
+## Input Requirements
+
+The user will provide ONE of the following:
+
+1. **Codecov Comment (Copy/Pasted)**: The full text of a Codecov bot comment from a PR
+2. **Codecov Report Link**: A URL to the Codecov coverage report for the PR
+3. **Specific File + Lines**: Direct reference to files and uncovered line ranges
+
+### Example Input Formats
+
+**Format 1 - Codecov Comment:**
+```
+Codecov Report
+Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage.
+Project coverage is 82.45%. Comparing base (abc123) to head (def456).
+
+Files with missing coverage:
+| File | Coverage | Lines |
+|------|----------|-------|
+| backend/internal/services/mail_service.go | 75.00% | 45-48 |
+```
+
+**Format 2 - Link:**
+`https://app.codecov.io/gh/Owner/Repo/pull/123`
+
+**Format 3 - Direct Reference:**
+`backend/internal/services/mail_service.go lines 45-48, 62, 78-82`
+
+## Execution Protocol
+
+### Phase 1: Parse and Identify
+
+1. **Extract Coverage Data**: Parse the Codecov comment/report to identify:
+   - Files with missing patch coverage
+   - Specific line numbers or ranges that are uncovered
+   - The current patch coverage percentage
+   - The target coverage (always 100% for patch coverage)
+
+2. **Document Findings**: Create a structured list:
+   ```
+   UNCOVERED FILES:
+   - FILE-001: [path/to/file.go] - Lines: [45-48, 62]
+   - FILE-002: [path/to/other.ts] - Lines: [23, 67-70]
+   ```
+
+### Phase 2: Analyze Uncovered Code
+
+For each file with missing coverage:
+
+1. **Read the Source File**: Use the codebase tool to read the file and understand:
+   - What the uncovered lines do
+   - What functions/methods contain the uncovered code
+   - What conditions or branches lead to those lines
+   - Any dependencies or external calls
+
+2. **Identify Code Paths**: Determine what inputs, states, or conditions would cause execution of the uncovered lines:
+   - Error handling paths
+   - Edge cases (nil, empty, boundary values)
+   - Conditional branches (if/else, switch cases)
+   - Loop iterations (zero, one, many)
+
+3. **Find Existing Tests**: Locate the corresponding test file(s):
+   - Go: `*_test.go` in the same package
+   - TypeScript/JavaScript: `*.test.ts`, `*.spec.ts`, or in `__tests__/` directory
+
+### Phase 3: Generate Tests
+
+For each uncovered code path:
+
+1. **Follow Project Patterns**: Analyze existing tests to match:
+   - Test naming conventions
+   - Setup/teardown patterns
+   - Mocking strategies
+   - Assertion styles
+   - Table-driven test structures (especially for Go)
+
+2. **Write Targeted Tests**: Create tests that specifically exercise the uncovered lines:
+   - One test case per distinct code path
+   - Use descriptive test names that explain the scenario
+   - Include appropriate setup and teardown
+   - Use meaningful assertions that verify behavior, not just coverage
+
+3. **Test Quality Standards**:
+   - Tests must be deterministic (no flaky tests)
+   - Tests must be independent (no shared state between tests)
+   - Tests must be fast (mock external dependencies)
+   - Tests must be readable (clear arrange-act-assert structure)
+
+### Phase 4: Validate
+
+1. **Run the Tests**: Execute the new tests to ensure they pass
+2. **Verify Coverage**: If possible, run coverage locally to confirm the lines are now covered
+3. **Check for Regressions**: Ensure existing tests still pass
+
+## Language-Specific Guidelines
+
+### Go Testing
+
+```go
+// Table-driven test pattern for multiple cases
+func TestFunctionName_Scenario(t *testing.T) {
+    tests := []struct {
+        name    string
+        input   InputType
+        want    OutputType
+        wantErr bool
+    }{
+        {
+            name:  "descriptive case name",
+            input: InputType{...},
+            want:  OutputType{...},
+        },
+        // Additional cases for uncovered paths
+    }
+
+    for _, tt := range tests {
+        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+            got, err := FunctionName(tt.input)
+            if (err != nil) != tt.wantErr {
+                t.Errorf("FunctionName() error = %v, wantErr %v", err, tt.wantErr)
+                return
+            }
+            if !reflect.DeepEqual(got, tt.want) {
+                t.Errorf("FunctionName() = %v, want %v", got, tt.want)
+            }
+        })
+    }
+}
+```
+
+### TypeScript/JavaScript Testing (Vitest)
+
+```typescript
+import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest';
+
+describe('ComponentOrFunction', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+        vi.clearAllMocks();
+    });
+
+    it('should handle specific edge case for uncovered line', () => {
+        // Arrange
+        const input = createTestInput({ edgeCase: true });
+
+        // Act
+        const result = functionUnderTest(input);
+
+        // Assert
+        expect(result).toMatchObject({ expected: 'value' });
+    });
+
+    it('should handle error condition at line XX', async () => {
+        // Arrange - setup condition that triggers error path
+        vi.spyOn(dependency, 'method').mockRejectedValue(new Error('test error'));
+
+        // Act & Assert
+        await expect(functionUnderTest()).rejects.toThrow('expected error message');
+    });
+});
+```
+
+## Output Requirements
+
+1. **Coverage Triage Report**: Document each uncovered file/line and the test strategy
+2. **Test Code**: Complete, runnable test code placed in appropriate test files
+3. **Execution Results**: Output from running the tests showing they pass
+4. **Coverage Verification**: Confirmation that the previously uncovered lines are now exercised
+
+## Constraints
+
+- **Do NOT relax coverage thresholds** - always aim for 100% patch coverage
+- **Do NOT write tests that only exist for coverage** - tests must verify behavior
+- **Do NOT modify production code** unless a bug is discovered during testing
+- **Do NOT skip error handling paths** - these often cause coverage gaps
+- **Do NOT create flaky tests** - all tests must be deterministic
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+- [ ] All files from Codecov report have been addressed
+- [ ] All previously uncovered lines now have test coverage
+- [ ] All new tests pass consistently
+- [ ] All existing tests continue to pass
+- [ ] Test code follows project conventions and patterns
+- [ ] Tests are meaningful and maintainable, not just coverage padding
+
+## Begin
+
+Please provide the Codecov comment, report link, or file/line references that you want me to analyze and fix.

.github/prompts/create-github-issues-feature-from-implementation-plan.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+---
+mode: 'agent'
+description: 'Create GitHub Issues from implementation plan phases using feature_request.yml or chore_request.yml templates.'
+tools: ['search/codebase', 'search', 'github', 'create_issue', 'search_issues', 'update_issue']
+---
+# Create GitHub Issue from Implementation Plan
+
+Create GitHub Issues for the implementation plan at `${file}`.
+
+## Process
+
+1. Analyze plan file to identify phases
+2. Check existing issues using `search_issues`
+3. Create new issue per phase using `create_issue` or update existing with `update_issue`
+4. Use `feature_request.yml` or `chore_request.yml` templates (fallback to default)
+
+## Requirements
+
+- One issue per implementation phase
+- Clear, structured titles and descriptions
+- Include only changes required by the plan
+- Verify against existing issues before creation
+
+## Issue Content
+
+- Title: Phase name from implementation plan
+- Description: Phase details, requirements, and context
+- Labels: Appropriate for issue type (feature/chore)

.github/prompts/create-implementation-plan.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
+---
+mode: 'agent'
+description: 'Create a new implementation plan file for new features, refactoring existing code or upgrading packages, design, architecture or infrastructure.'
+tools: ['changes', 'search/codebase', 'edit/editFiles', 'extensions', 'fetch', 'githubRepo', 'openSimpleBrowser', 'problems', 'runTasks', 'search', 'search/searchResults', 'runCommands/terminalLastCommand', 'runCommands/terminalSelection', 'testFailure', 'usages', 'vscodeAPI']
+---
+# Create Implementation Plan
+
+## Primary Directive
+
+Your goal is to create a new implementation plan file for `${input:PlanPurpose}`. Your output must be machine-readable, deterministic, and structured for autonomous execution by other AI systems or humans.
+
+## Execution Context
+
+This prompt is designed for AI-to-AI communication and automated processing. All instructions must be interpreted literally and executed systematically without human interpretation or clarification.
+
+## Core Requirements
+
+- Generate implementation plans that are fully executable by AI agents or humans
+- Use deterministic language with zero ambiguity
+- Structure all content for automated parsing and execution
+- Ensure complete self-containment with no external dependencies for understanding
+
+## Plan Structure Requirements
+
+Plans must consist of discrete, atomic phases containing executable tasks. Each phase must be independently processable by AI agents or humans without cross-phase dependencies unless explicitly declared.
+
+## Phase Architecture
+
+- Each phase must have measurable completion criteria
+- Tasks within phases must be executable in parallel unless dependencies are specified
+- All task descriptions must include specific file paths, function names, and exact implementation details
+- No task should require human interpretation or decision-making
+
+## AI-Optimized Implementation Standards
+
+- Use explicit, unambiguous language with zero interpretation required
+- Structure all content as machine-parseable formats (tables, lists, structured data)
+- Include specific file paths, line numbers, and exact code references where applicable
+- Define all variables, constants, and configuration values explicitly
+- Provide complete context within each task description
+- Use standardized prefixes for all identifiers (REQ-, TASK-, etc.)
+- Include validation criteria that can be automatically verified
+
+## Output File Specifications
+
+- Save implementation plan files in `/plan/` directory
+- Use naming convention: `[purpose]-[component]-[version].md`
+- Purpose prefixes: `upgrade|refactor|feature|data|infrastructure|process|architecture|design`
+- Example: `upgrade-system-command-4.md`, `feature-auth-module-1.md`
+- File must be valid Markdown with proper front matter structure
+
+## Mandatory Template Structure
+
+All implementation plans must strictly adhere to the following template. Each section is required and must be populated with specific, actionable content. AI agents must validate template compliance before execution.
+
+## Template Validation Rules
+
+- All front matter fields must be present and properly formatted
+- All section headers must match exactly (case-sensitive)
+- All identifier prefixes must follow the specified format
+- Tables must include all required columns
+- No placeholder text may remain in the final output
+
+## Status
+
+The status of the implementation plan must be clearly defined in the front matter and must reflect the current state of the plan. The status can be one of the following (status_color in brackets): `Completed` (bright green badge), `In progress` (yellow badge), `Planned` (blue badge), `Deprecated` (red badge), or `On Hold` (orange badge). It should also be displayed as a badge in the introduction section.
+
+```md
+---
+goal: [Concise Title Describing the Package Implementation Plan's Goal]
+version: [Optional: e.g., 1.0, Date]
+date_created: [YYYY-MM-DD]
+last_updated: [Optional: YYYY-MM-DD]
+owner: [Optional: Team/Individual responsible for this spec]
+status: 'Completed'|'In progress'|'Planned'|'Deprecated'|'On Hold'
+tags: [Optional: List of relevant tags or categories, e.g., `feature`, `upgrade`, `chore`, `architecture`, `migration`, `bug` etc]
+---
+
+# Introduction
+
+![Status: <status>](https://img.shields.io/badge/status-<status>-<status_color>)
+
+[A short concise introduction to the plan and the goal it is intended to achieve.]
+
+## 1. Requirements & Constraints
+
+[Explicitly list all requirements & constraints that affect the plan and constrain how it is implemented. Use bullet points or tables for clarity.]
+
+- **REQ-001**: Requirement 1
+- **SEC-001**: Security Requirement 1
+- **[3 LETTERS]-001**: Other Requirement 1
+- **CON-001**: Constraint 1
+- **GUD-001**: Guideline 1
+- **PAT-001**: Pattern to follow 1
+
+## 2. Implementation Steps
+
+### Implementation Phase 1
+
+- GOAL-001: [Describe the goal of this phase, e.g., "Implement feature X", "Refactor module Y", etc.]
+
+| Task | Description | Completed | Date |
+|------|-------------|-----------|------|
+| TASK-001 | Description of task 1 | ✅ | 2025-04-25 |
+| TASK-002 | Description of task 2 | |  |
+| TASK-003 | Description of task 3 | |  |
+
+### Implementation Phase 2
+
+- GOAL-002: [Describe the goal of this phase, e.g., "Implement feature X", "Refactor module Y", etc.]
+
+| Task | Description | Completed | Date |
+|------|-------------|-----------|------|
+| TASK-004 | Description of task 4 | |  |
+| TASK-005 | Description of task 5 | |  |
+| TASK-006 | Description of task 6 | |  |
+
+## 3. Alternatives
+
+[A bullet point list of any alternative approaches that were considered and why they were not chosen. This helps to provide context and rationale for the chosen approach.]
+
+- **ALT-001**: Alternative approach 1
+- **ALT-002**: Alternative approach 2
+
+## 4. Dependencies
+
+[List any dependencies that need to be addressed, such as libraries, frameworks, or other components that the plan relies on.]
+
+- **DEP-001**: Dependency 1
+- **DEP-002**: Dependency 2
+
+## 5. Files
+
+[List the files that will be affected by the feature or refactoring task.]
+
+- **FILE-001**: Description of file 1
+- **FILE-002**: Description of file 2
+
+## 6. Testing
+
+[List the tests that need to be implemented to verify the feature or refactoring task.]
+
+- **TEST-001**: Description of test 1
+- **TEST-002**: Description of test 2
+
+## 7. Risks & Assumptions
+
+[List any risks or assumptions related to the implementation of the plan.]
+
+- **RISK-001**: Risk 1
+- **ASSUMPTION-001**: Assumption 1
+
+## 8. Related Specifications / Further Reading
+
+[Link to related spec 1]
+[Link to relevant external documentation]
+```

.github/prompts/create-technical-spike.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
+---
+mode: 'agent'
+description: 'Create time-boxed technical spike documents for researching and resolving critical development decisions before implementation.'
+tools: ['runCommands', 'runTasks', 'edit', 'search', 'extensions', 'usages', 'vscodeAPI', 'think', 'problems', 'changes', 'testFailure', 'openSimpleBrowser', 'fetch', 'githubRepo', 'todos', 'Microsoft Docs']
+---
+
+# Create Technical Spike Document
+
+Create time-boxed technical spike documents for researching critical questions that must be answered before development can proceed. Each spike focuses on a specific technical decision with clear deliverables and timelines.
+
+## Document Structure
+
+Create individual files in `${input:FolderPath|docs/spikes}` directory. Name each file using the pattern: `[category]-[short-description]-spike.md` (e.g., `api-copilot-integration-spike.md`, `performance-realtime-audio-spike.md`).
+
+```md
+---
+title: "${input:SpikeTitle}"
+category: "${input:Category|Technical}"
+status: "🔴 Not Started"
+priority: "${input:Priority|High}"
+timebox: "${input:Timebox|1 week}"
+created: [YYYY-MM-DD]
+updated: [YYYY-MM-DD]
+owner: "${input:Owner}"
+tags: ["technical-spike", "${input:Category|technical}", "research"]
+---
+
+# ${input:SpikeTitle}
+
+## Summary
+
+**Spike Objective:** [Clear, specific question or decision that needs resolution]
+
+**Why This Matters:** [Impact on development/architecture decisions]
+
+**Timebox:** [How much time allocated to this spike]
+
+**Decision Deadline:** [When this must be resolved to avoid blocking development]
+
+## Research Question(s)
+
+**Primary Question:** [Main technical question that needs answering]
+
+**Secondary Questions:**
+
+- [Related question 1]
+- [Related question 2]
+- [Related question 3]
+
+## Investigation Plan
+
+### Research Tasks
+
+- [ ] [Specific research task 1]
+- [ ] [Specific research task 2]
+- [ ] [Specific research task 3]
+- [ ] [Create proof of concept/prototype]
+- [ ] [Document findings and recommendations]
+
+### Success Criteria
+
+**This spike is complete when:**
+
+- [ ] [Specific criteria 1]
+- [ ] [Specific criteria 2]
+- [ ] [Clear recommendation documented]
+- [ ] [Proof of concept completed (if applicable)]
+
+## Technical Context
+
+**Related Components:** [List system components affected by this decision]
+
+**Dependencies:** [What other spikes or decisions depend on resolving this]
+
+**Constraints:** [Known limitations or requirements that affect the solution]
+
+## Research Findings
+
+### Investigation Results
+
+[Document research findings, test results, and evidence gathered]
+
+### Prototype/Testing Notes
+
+[Results from any prototypes, spikes, or technical experiments]
+
+### External Resources
+
+- [Link to relevant documentation]
+- [Link to API references]
+- [Link to community discussions]
+- [Link to examples/tutorials]
+
+## Decision
+
+### Recommendation
+
+[Clear recommendation based on research findings]
+
+### Rationale
+
+[Why this approach was chosen over alternatives]
+
+### Implementation Notes
+
+[Key considerations for implementation]
+
+### Follow-up Actions
+
+- [ ] [Action item 1]
+- [ ] [Action item 2]
+- [ ] [Update architecture documents]
+- [ ] [Create implementation tasks]
+
+## Status History
+
+| Date   | Status         | Notes                      |
+| ------ | -------------- | -------------------------- |
+| [Date] | 🔴 Not Started | Spike created and scoped   |
+| [Date] | 🟡 In Progress | Research commenced         |
+| [Date] | 🟢 Complete    | [Resolution summary]       |
+
+---
+
+_Last updated: [Date] by [Name]_
+```
+
+## Categories for Technical Spikes
+
+### API Integration
+
+- Third-party API capabilities and limitations
+- Integration patterns and authentication
+- Rate limits and performance characteristics
+
+### Architecture & Design
+
+- System architecture decisions
+- Design pattern applicability
+- Component interaction models
+
+### Performance & Scalability
+
+- Performance requirements and constraints
+- Scalability bottlenecks and solutions
+- Resource utilization patterns
+
+### Platform & Infrastructure
+
+- Platform capabilities and limitations
+- Infrastructure requirements
+- Deployment and hosting considerations
+
+### Security & Compliance
+
+- Security requirements and implementations
+- Compliance constraints
+- Authentication and authorization approaches
+
+### User Experience
+
+- User interaction patterns
+- Accessibility requirements
+- Interface design decisions
+
+## File Naming Conventions
+
+Use descriptive, kebab-case names that indicate the category and specific unknown:
+
+**API/Integration Examples:**
+
+- `api-copilot-chat-integration-spike.md`
+- `api-azure-speech-realtime-spike.md`
+- `api-vscode-extension-capabilities-spike.md`
+
+**Performance Examples:**
+
+- `performance-audio-processing-latency-spike.md`
+- `performance-extension-host-limitations-spike.md`
+- `performance-webrtc-reliability-spike.md`
+
+**Architecture Examples:**
+
+- `architecture-voice-pipeline-design-spike.md`
+- `architecture-state-management-spike.md`
+- `architecture-error-handling-strategy-spike.md`
+
+## Best Practices for AI Agents
+
+1. **One Question Per Spike:** Each document focuses on a single technical decision or research question
+
+2. **Time-Boxed Research:** Define specific time limits and deliverables for each spike
+
+3. **Evidence-Based Decisions:** Require concrete evidence (tests, prototypes, documentation) before marking as complete
+
+4. **Clear Recommendations:** Document specific recommendations and rationale for implementation
+
+5. **Dependency Tracking:** Identify how spikes relate to each other and impact project decisions
+
+6. **Outcome-Focused:** Every spike must result in an actionable decision or recommendation
+
+## Research Strategy
+
+### Phase 1: Information Gathering
+
+1. **Search existing documentation** using search/fetch tools
+2. **Analyze codebase** for existing patterns and constraints
+3. **Research external resources** (APIs, libraries, examples)
+
+### Phase 2: Validation & Testing
+
+1. **Create focused prototypes** to test specific hypotheses
+2. **Run targeted experiments** to validate assumptions
+3. **Document test results** with supporting evidence
+
+### Phase 3: Decision & Documentation
+
+1. **Synthesize findings** into clear recommendations
+2. **Document implementation guidance** for development team
+3. **Create follow-up tasks** for implementation
+
+## Tools Usage
+
+- **search/searchResults:** Research existing solutions and documentation
+- **fetch/githubRepo:** Analyze external APIs, libraries, and examples
+- **codebase:** Understand existing system constraints and patterns
+- **runTasks:** Execute prototypes and validation tests
+- **editFiles:** Update research progress and findings
+- **vscodeAPI:** Test VS Code extension capabilities and limitations
+
+Focus on time-boxed research that resolves critical technical decisions and unblocks development progress.

.github/prompts/debug-web-console-errors.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
+---
+description: 'Investigates JavaScript errors, network failures, and warnings from browser DevTools console to identify root causes and implement fixes'
+mode: 'agent'
+tools: ['changes', 'search/codebase', 'edit/editFiles', 'problems', 'search', 'search/searchResults', 'findTestFiles', 'usages', 'runTests']
+---
+
+# Debug Web Console Errors
+
+You are a **Senior Full-Stack Developer** with extensive expertise in debugging complex web applications. You have deep knowledge of:
+
+- **Frontend**: JavaScript/TypeScript, React ecosystem, browser internals, DevTools, network protocols
+- **Backend**: Go API development, HTTP handlers, middleware, authentication flows
+- **Debugging**: Stack trace analysis, network request inspection, error boundary patterns, logging strategies
+
+Your debugging philosophy centers on **root cause analysis**—understanding the fundamental reason for failures rather than applying superficial fixes. You provide **comprehensive explanations** that educate while solving problems.
+
+## Input Methods
+
+This prompt accepts console error/warning input via two methods:
+
+1. **Selection**: Select the console output text before invoking this prompt
+2. **Direct Input**: Paste the console output when prompted
+
+**Console Input** (paste if not using selection):
+```
+${input:consoleError:Paste browser console error/warning here}
+```
+
+**Selected Content** (if applicable):
+```
+${selection}
+```
+
+## Debugging Workflow
+
+Execute the following phases systematically. Do not skip phases or jump to conclusions.
+
+### Phase 1: Error Classification
+
+Categorize the error into one of these types:
+
+| Type | Indicators | Primary Investigation Area |
+|------|------------|---------------------------|
+| **JavaScript Runtime Error** | `TypeError`, `ReferenceError`, `SyntaxError`, stack trace with `.js`/`.ts` files | Frontend source code |
+| **React/Framework Error** | `React`, `hook`, `component`, `render`, `state`, `props` in message | Component lifecycle, hooks, state management |
+| **Network Error** | `fetch`, `XMLHttpRequest`, HTTP status codes, `CORS`, `net::ERR_` | API endpoints, backend handlers, network config |
+| **Console Warning** | `Warning:`, `Deprecation`, yellow console entries | Code quality, future compatibility |
+| **Security Error** | `CSP`, `CORS`, `Mixed Content`, `SecurityError` | Security configuration, headers |
+
+### Phase 2: Error Parsing
+
+Extract and document these elements from the console output:
+
+1. **Error Type/Name**: The specific error class (e.g., `TypeError`, `404 Not Found`)
+2. **Error Message**: The human-readable description
+3. **Stack Trace**: File paths and line numbers (filter out framework internals)
+4. **HTTP Details** (if network error):
+   - Request URL and method
+   - Status code
+   - Response body (if available)
+5. **Component Context** (if React error): Component name, hook involved
+
+### Phase 3: Codebase Investigation
+
+Search the codebase to locate the error source:
+
+1. **Stack Trace Files**: Search for each application file mentioned in the stack trace
+2. **Related Files**: For each source file found, also check:
+   - Test files (e.g., `Component.test.tsx` for `Component.tsx`)
+   - Related components (parent/child components)
+   - Shared utilities or hooks used by the file
+3. **Backend Investigation** (for network errors):
+   - Locate the API handler matching the failed endpoint
+   - Check middleware that processes the request
+   - Review error handling in the handler
+
+### Phase 4: Root Cause Analysis
+
+Analyze the code to determine the root cause:
+
+1. **Trace the execution path** from the error point backward
+2. **Identify the specific condition** that triggered the failure
+3. **Determine if this is**:
+   - A logic error (incorrect implementation)
+   - A data error (unexpected input/state)
+   - A timing error (race condition, async issue)
+   - A configuration error (missing setup, wrong environment)
+   - A third-party issue (identify but do not fix)
+
+### Phase 5: Solution Implementation
+
+Propose and implement fixes:
+
+1. **Primary Fix**: Address the root cause directly
+2. **Defensive Improvements**: Add guards against similar issues
+3. **Error Handling**: Improve error messages and recovery
+
+For each fix, provide:
+- **Before**: The problematic code
+- **After**: The corrected code
+- **Explanation**: Why this change resolves the issue
+
+### Phase 6: Test Coverage
+
+Generate or update tests to catch this error:
+
+1. **Locate existing test files** for affected components
+2. **Create test cases** that:
+   - Reproduce the original error condition
+   - Verify the fix works correctly
+   - Cover edge cases discovered during analysis
+
+### Phase 7: Prevention Recommendations
+
+Suggest measures to prevent similar issues:
+
+1. **Code patterns** to adopt or avoid
+2. **Type safety** improvements
+3. **Validation** additions
+4. **Monitoring/logging** enhancements
+
+## Output Format
+
+Structure your response as follows:
+
+```markdown
+## 🔍 Error Analysis
+
+**Type**: [Classification from Phase 1]
+**Summary**: [One-line description of what went wrong]
+
+### Parsed Error Details
+- **Error**: [Type and message]
+- **Location**: [File:line from stack trace]
+- **HTTP Details**: [If applicable]
+
+## 🎯 Root Cause
+
+[Detailed explanation of why this error occurred, tracing the execution path]
+
+## 🔧 Proposed Fix
+
+### [File path]
+
+**Problem**: [What's wrong in this code]
+
+**Solution**: [What needs to change and why]
+
+[Code changes applied via edit tools]
+
+## 🧪 Test Coverage
+
+[Test cases to add/update]
+
+## 🛡️ Prevention
+
+1. [Recommendation 1]
+2. [Recommendation 2]
+3. [Recommendation 3]
+```
+
+## Constraints
+
+- **DO NOT** modify third-party library code—identify and document library bugs only
+- **DO NOT** suppress errors without addressing the root cause
+- **DO NOT** apply quick hacks—always explain trade-offs if a temporary fix is needed
+- **DO** follow existing code standards in the repository (TypeScript, React, Go conventions)
+- **DO** filter framework internals from stack traces to focus on application code
+- **DO** consider both frontend and backend when investigating network errors
+
+## Error-Specific Handling
+
+### JavaScript Runtime Errors
+- Focus on type safety and null checks
+- Look for incorrect assumptions about data shapes
+- Check async/await and Promise handling
+
+### React Errors
+- Examine component lifecycle and hook dependencies
+- Check for stale closures in useEffect/useCallback
+- Verify prop types and default values
+- Look for missing keys in lists
+
+### Network Errors
+- Trace the full request path: frontend → backend → response
+- Check authentication/authorization middleware
+- Verify CORS configuration
+- Examine request/response payload shapes
+
+### Console Warnings
+- Assess severity (blocking vs. informational)
+- Prioritize deprecation warnings for future compatibility
+- Address React key warnings and dependency array warnings

.github/prompts/playwright-explore-website.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+mode: agent
+description: 'Website exploration for testing using Playwright MCP'
+tools: ['changes', 'search/codebase', 'edit/editFiles', 'fetch', 'findTestFiles', 'problems', 'runCommands', 'runTasks', 'runTests', 'search', 'search/searchResults', 'runCommands/terminalLastCommand', 'runCommands/terminalSelection', 'testFailure', 'playwright']
+model: 'Claude Sonnet 4'
+---
+
+# Website Exploration for Testing
+
+Your goal is to explore the website and identify key functionalities.
+
+## Specific Instructions
+
+1. Navigate to the provided URL using the Playwright MCP Server. If no URL is provided, ask the user to provide one.
+2. Identify and interact with 3-5 core features or user flows.
+3. Document the user interactions, relevant UI elements (and their locators), and the expected outcomes.
+4. Close the browser context upon completion.
+5. Provide a concise summary of your findings.
+6. Propose and generate test cases based on the exploration.

.github/prompts/playwright-generate-test.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+mode: agent
+description: 'Generate a Playwright test based on a scenario using Playwright MCP'
+tools: ['changes', 'search/codebase', 'edit/editFiles', 'fetch', 'problems', 'runCommands', 'runTasks', 'runTests', 'search', 'search/searchResults', 'runCommands/terminalLastCommand', 'runCommands/terminalSelection', 'testFailure', 'playwright/*']
+model: 'Claude Sonnet 4.5'
+---
+
+# Test Generation with Playwright MCP
+
+Your goal is to generate a Playwright test based on the provided scenario after completing all prescribed steps.
+
+## Specific Instructions
+
+- You are given a scenario, and you need to generate a playwright test for it. If the user does not provide a scenario, you will ask them to provide one.
+- DO NOT generate test code prematurely or based solely on the scenario without completing all prescribed steps.
+- DO run steps one by one using the tools provided by the Playwright MCP.
+- Only after all steps are completed, emit a Playwright TypeScript test that uses `@playwright/test` based on message history
+- Save generated test file in the tests directory
+- Execute the test file and iterate until the test passes

.github/prompts/prompt-builder.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+---
+mode: 'agent'
+tools: ['search/codebase', 'edit/editFiles', 'search']
+description: 'Guide users through creating high-quality GitHub Copilot prompts with proper structure, tools, and best practices.'
+---
+
+# Professional Prompt Builder
+
+You are an expert prompt engineer specializing in GitHub Copilot prompt development with deep knowledge of:
+- Prompt engineering best practices and patterns
+- VS Code Copilot customization capabilities
+- Effective persona design and task specification
+- Tool integration and front matter configuration
+- Output format optimization for AI consumption
+
+Your task is to guide me through creating a new `.prompt.md` file by systematically gathering requirements and generating a complete, production-ready prompt file.
+
+## Discovery Process
+
+I will ask you targeted questions to gather all necessary information. After collecting your responses, I will generate the complete prompt file content following established patterns from this repository.
+
+### 1. **Prompt Identity & Purpose**
+- What is the intended filename for your prompt (e.g., `generate-react-component.prompt.md`)?
+- Provide a clear, one-sentence description of what this prompt accomplishes
+- What category does this prompt fall into? (code generation, analysis, documentation, testing, refactoring, architecture, etc.)
+
+### 2. **Persona Definition**
+- What role/expertise should Copilot embody? Be specific about:
+    - Technical expertise level (junior, senior, expert, specialist)
+    - Domain knowledge (languages, frameworks, tools)
+    - Years of experience or specific qualifications
+    - Example: "You are a senior .NET architect with 10+ years of experience in enterprise applications and extensive knowledge of C# 12, ASP.NET Core, and clean architecture patterns"
+
+### 3. **Task Specification**
+- What is the primary task this prompt performs? Be explicit and measurable
+- Are there secondary or optional tasks?
+- What should the user provide as input? (selection, file, parameters, etc.)
+- What constraints or requirements must be followed?
+
+### 4. **Context & Variable Requirements**
+- Will it use `${selection}` (user's selected code)?
+- Will it use `${file}` (current file) or other file references?
+- Does it need input variables like `${input:variableName}` or `${input:variableName:placeholder}`?
+- Will it reference workspace variables (`${workspaceFolder}`, etc.)?
+- Does it need to access other files or prompt files as dependencies?
+
+### 5. **Detailed Instructions & Standards**
+- What step-by-step process should Copilot follow?
+- Are there specific coding standards, frameworks, or libraries to use?
+- What patterns or best practices should be enforced?
+- Are there things to avoid or constraints to respect?
+- Should it follow any existing instruction files (`.instructions.md`)?
+
+### 6. **Output Requirements**
+- What format should the output be? (code, markdown, JSON, structured data, etc.)
+- Should it create new files? If so, where and with what naming convention?
+- Should it modify existing files?
+- Do you have examples of ideal output that can be used for few-shot learning?
+- Are there specific formatting or structure requirements?
+
+### 7. **Tool & Capability Requirements**
+Which tools does this prompt need? Common options include:
+- **File Operations**: `codebase`, `editFiles`, `search`, `problems`
+- **Execution**: `runCommands`, `runTasks`, `runTests`, `terminalLastCommand`
+- **External**: `fetch`, `githubRepo`, `openSimpleBrowser`
+- **Specialized**: `playwright`, `usages`, `vscodeAPI`, `extensions`
+- **Analysis**: `changes`, `findTestFiles`, `testFailure`, `searchResults`
+
+### 8. **Technical Configuration**
+- Should this run in a specific mode? (`agent`, `ask`, `edit`)
+- Does it require a specific model? (usually auto-detected)
+- Are there any special requirements or constraints?
+
+### 9. **Quality & Validation Criteria**
+- How should success be measured?
+- What validation steps should be included?
+- Are there common failure modes to address?
+- Should it include error handling or recovery steps?
+
+## Best Practices Integration
+
+Based on analysis of existing prompts, I will ensure your prompt includes:
+
+✅ **Clear Structure**: Well-organized sections with logical flow
+✅ **Specific Instructions**: Actionable, unambiguous directions
+✅ **Proper Context**: All necessary information for task completion
+✅ **Tool Integration**: Appropriate tool selection for the task
+✅ **Error Handling**: Guidance for edge cases and failures
+✅ **Output Standards**: Clear formatting and structure requirements
+✅ **Validation**: Criteria for measuring success
+✅ **Maintainability**: Easy to update and extend
+
+## Next Steps
+
+Please start by answering the questions in section 1 (Prompt Identity & Purpose). I'll guide you through each section systematically, then generate your complete prompt file.
+
+## Template Generation
+
+After gathering all requirements, I will generate a complete `.prompt.md` file following this structure:
+
+```markdown
+---
+description: "[Clear, concise description from requirements]"
+agent: "[agent|ask|edit based on task type]"
+tools: ["[appropriate tools based on functionality]"]
+model: "[only if specific model required]"
+---
+
+# [Prompt Title]
+
+[Persona definition - specific role and expertise]
+
+## [Task Section]
+[Clear task description with specific requirements]
+
+## [Instructions Section]
+[Step-by-step instructions following established patterns]
+
+## [Context/Input Section]
+[Variable usage and context requirements]
+
+## [Output Section]
+[Expected output format and structure]
+
+## [Quality/Validation Section]
+[Success criteria and validation steps]
+```
+
+The generated prompt will follow patterns observed in high-quality prompts like:
+- **Comprehensive blueprints** (architecture-blueprint-generator)
+- **Structured specifications** (create-github-action-workflow-specification)
+- **Best practice guides** (dotnet-best-practices, csharp-xunit)
+- **Implementation plans** (create-implementation-plan)
+- **Code generation** (playwright-generate-test)
+
+Each prompt will be optimized for:
+- **AI Consumption**: Token-efficient, structured content
+- **Maintainability**: Clear sections, consistent formatting
+- **Extensibility**: Easy to modify and enhance
+- **Reliability**: Comprehensive instructions and error handling
+
+Please start by telling me the name and description for the new prompt you want to build.

.github/prompts/sql-code-review.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,303 @@
+---
+mode: 'agent'
+tools: ['changes', 'search/codebase', 'edit/editFiles', 'problems']
+description: 'Universal SQL code review assistant that performs comprehensive security, maintainability, and code quality analysis across all SQL databases (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, Oracle). Focuses on SQL injection prevention, access control, code standards, and anti-pattern detection. Complements SQL optimization prompt for complete development coverage.'
+tested_with: 'GitHub Copilot Chat (GPT-4o) - Validated July 20, 2025'
+---
+
+# SQL Code Review
+
+Perform a thorough SQL code review of ${selection} (or entire project if no selection) focusing on security, performance, maintainability, and database best practices.
+
+## 🔒 Security Analysis
+
+### SQL Injection Prevention
+```sql
+-- ❌ CRITICAL: SQL Injection vulnerability
+query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = " + userInput;
+query = f"DELETE FROM orders WHERE user_id = {user_id}";
+
+-- ✅ SECURE: Parameterized queries
+-- PostgreSQL/MySQL
+PREPARE stmt FROM 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?';
+EXECUTE stmt USING @user_id;
+
+-- SQL Server
+EXEC sp_executesql N'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = @id', N'@id INT', @id = @user_id;
+```
+
+### Access Control & Permissions
+- **Principle of Least Privilege**: Grant minimum required permissions
+- **Role-Based Access**: Use database roles instead of direct user permissions
+- **Schema Security**: Proper schema ownership and access controls
+- **Function/Procedure Security**: Review DEFINER vs INVOKER rights
+
+### Data Protection
+- **Sensitive Data Exposure**: Avoid SELECT * on tables with sensitive columns
+- **Audit Logging**: Ensure sensitive operations are logged
+- **Data Masking**: Use views or functions to mask sensitive data
+- **Encryption**: Verify encrypted storage for sensitive data
+
+## ⚡ Performance Optimization
+
+### Query Structure Analysis
+```sql
+-- ❌ BAD: Inefficient query patterns
+SELECT DISTINCT u.*
+FROM users u, orders o, products p
+WHERE u.id = o.user_id
+AND o.product_id = p.id
+AND YEAR(o.order_date) = 2024;
+
+-- ✅ GOOD: Optimized structure
+SELECT u.id, u.name, u.email
+FROM users u
+INNER JOIN orders o ON u.id = o.user_id
+WHERE o.order_date >= '2024-01-01'
+AND o.order_date < '2025-01-01';
+```
+
+### Index Strategy Review
+- **Missing Indexes**: Identify columns that need indexing
+- **Over-Indexing**: Find unused or redundant indexes
+- **Composite Indexes**: Multi-column indexes for complex queries
+- **Index Maintenance**: Check for fragmented or outdated indexes
+
+### Join Optimization
+- **Join Types**: Verify appropriate join types (INNER vs LEFT vs EXISTS)
+- **Join Order**: Optimize for smaller result sets first
+- **Cartesian Products**: Identify and fix missing join conditions
+- **Subquery vs JOIN**: Choose the most efficient approach
+
+### Aggregate and Window Functions
+```sql
+-- ❌ BAD: Inefficient aggregation
+SELECT user_id,
+       (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM orders o2 WHERE o2.user_id = o1.user_id) as order_count
+FROM orders o1
+GROUP BY user_id;
+
+-- ✅ GOOD: Efficient aggregation
+SELECT user_id, COUNT(*) as order_count
+FROM orders
+GROUP BY user_id;
+```
+
+## 🛠️ Code Quality & Maintainability
+
+### SQL Style & Formatting
+```sql
+-- ❌ BAD: Poor formatting and style
+select u.id,u.name,o.total from users u left join orders o on u.id=o.user_id where u.status='active' and o.order_date>='2024-01-01';
+
+-- ✅ GOOD: Clean, readable formatting
+SELECT u.id,
+       u.name,
+       o.total
+FROM users u
+LEFT JOIN orders o ON u.id = o.user_id
+WHERE u.status = 'active'
+  AND o.order_date >= '2024-01-01';
+```
+
+### Naming Conventions
+- **Consistent Naming**: Tables, columns, constraints follow consistent patterns
+- **Descriptive Names**: Clear, meaningful names for database objects
+- **Reserved Words**: Avoid using database reserved words as identifiers
+- **Case Sensitivity**: Consistent case usage across schema
+
+### Schema Design Review
+- **Normalization**: Appropriate normalization level (avoid over/under-normalization)
+- **Data Types**: Optimal data type choices for storage and performance
+- **Constraints**: Proper use of PRIMARY KEY, FOREIGN KEY, CHECK, NOT NULL
+- **Default Values**: Appropriate default values for columns
+
+## 🗄️ Database-Specific Best Practices
+
+### PostgreSQL
+```sql
+-- Use JSONB for JSON data
+CREATE TABLE events (
+    id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
+    data JSONB NOT NULL,
+    created_at TIMESTAMPTZ DEFAULT NOW()
+);
+
+-- GIN index for JSONB queries
+CREATE INDEX idx_events_data ON events USING gin(data);
+
+-- Array types for multi-value columns
+CREATE TABLE tags (
+    post_id INT,
+    tag_names TEXT[]
+);
+```
+
+### MySQL
+```sql
+-- Use appropriate storage engines
+CREATE TABLE sessions (
+    id VARCHAR(128) PRIMARY KEY,
+    data TEXT,
+    expires TIMESTAMP
+) ENGINE=InnoDB;
+
+-- Optimize for InnoDB
+ALTER TABLE large_table
+ADD INDEX idx_covering (status, created_at, id);
+```
+
+### SQL Server
+```sql
+-- Use appropriate data types
+CREATE TABLE products (
+    id BIGINT IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY,
+    name NVARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
+    price DECIMAL(10,2) NOT NULL,
+    created_at DATETIME2 DEFAULT GETUTCDATE()
+);
+
+-- Columnstore indexes for analytics
+CREATE COLUMNSTORE INDEX idx_sales_cs ON sales;
+```
+
+### Oracle
+```sql
+-- Use sequences for auto-increment
+CREATE SEQUENCE user_id_seq START WITH 1 INCREMENT BY 1;
+
+CREATE TABLE users (
+    id NUMBER DEFAULT user_id_seq.NEXTVAL PRIMARY KEY,
+    name VARCHAR2(255) NOT NULL
+);
+```
+
+## 🧪 Testing & Validation
+
+### Data Integrity Checks
+```sql
+-- Verify referential integrity
+SELECT o.user_id
+FROM orders o
+LEFT JOIN users u ON o.user_id = u.id
+WHERE u.id IS NULL;
+
+-- Check for data consistency
+SELECT COUNT(*) as inconsistent_records
+FROM products
+WHERE price < 0 OR stock_quantity < 0;
+```
+
+### Performance Testing
+- **Execution Plans**: Review query execution plans
+- **Load Testing**: Test queries with realistic data volumes
+- **Stress Testing**: Verify performance under concurrent load
+- **Regression Testing**: Ensure optimizations don't break functionality
+
+## 📊 Common Anti-Patterns
+
+### N+1 Query Problem
+```sql
+-- ❌ BAD: N+1 queries in application code
+for user in users:
+    orders = query("SELECT * FROM orders WHERE user_id = ?", user.id)
+
+-- ✅ GOOD: Single optimized query
+SELECT u.*, o.*
+FROM users u
+LEFT JOIN orders o ON u.id = o.user_id;
+```
+
+### Overuse of DISTINCT
+```sql
+-- ❌ BAD: DISTINCT masking join issues
+SELECT DISTINCT u.name
+FROM users u, orders o
+WHERE u.id = o.user_id;
+
+-- ✅ GOOD: Proper join without DISTINCT
+SELECT u.name
+FROM users u
+INNER JOIN orders o ON u.id = o.user_id
+GROUP BY u.name;
+```
+
+### Function Misuse in WHERE Clauses
+```sql
+-- ❌ BAD: Functions prevent index usage
+SELECT * FROM orders
+WHERE YEAR(order_date) = 2024;
+
+-- ✅ GOOD: Range conditions use indexes
+SELECT * FROM orders
+WHERE order_date >= '2024-01-01'
+  AND order_date < '2025-01-01';
+```
+
+## 📋 SQL Review Checklist
+
+### Security
+- [ ] All user inputs are parameterized
+- [ ] No dynamic SQL construction with string concatenation
+- [ ] Appropriate access controls and permissions
+- [ ] Sensitive data is properly protected
+- [ ] SQL injection attack vectors are eliminated
+
+### Performance
+- [ ] Indexes exist for frequently queried columns
+- [ ] No unnecessary SELECT * statements
+- [ ] JOINs are optimized and use appropriate types
+- [ ] WHERE clauses are selective and use indexes
+- [ ] Subqueries are optimized or converted to JOINs
+
+### Code Quality
+- [ ] Consistent naming conventions
+- [ ] Proper formatting and indentation
+- [ ] Meaningful comments for complex logic
+- [ ] Appropriate data types are used
+- [ ] Error handling is implemented
+
+### Schema Design
+- [ ] Tables are properly normalized
+- [ ] Constraints enforce data integrity
+- [ ] Indexes support query patterns
+- [ ] Foreign key relationships are defined
+- [ ] Default values are appropriate
+
+## 🎯 Review Output Format
+
+### Issue Template
+```
+## [PRIORITY] [CATEGORY]: [Brief Description]
+
+**Location**: [Table/View/Procedure name and line number if applicable]
+**Issue**: [Detailed explanation of the problem]
+**Security Risk**: [If applicable - injection risk, data exposure, etc.]
+**Performance Impact**: [Query cost, execution time impact]
+**Recommendation**: [Specific fix with code example]
+
+**Before**:
+```sql
+-- Problematic SQL
+```
+
+**After**:
+```sql
+-- Improved SQL
+```
+
+**Expected Improvement**: [Performance gain, security benefit]
+```
+
+### Summary Assessment
+- **Security Score**: [1-10] - SQL injection protection, access controls
+- **Performance Score**: [1-10] - Query efficiency, index usage
+- **Maintainability Score**: [1-10] - Code quality, documentation
+- **Schema Quality Score**: [1-10] - Design patterns, normalization
+
+### Top 3 Priority Actions
+1. **[Critical Security Fix]**: Address SQL injection vulnerabilities
+2. **[Performance Optimization]**: Add missing indexes or optimize queries
+3. **[Code Quality]**: Improve naming conventions and documentation
+
+Focus on providing actionable, database-agnostic recommendations while highlighting platform-specific optimizations and best practices.

.github/prompts/sql-optimization.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,298 @@
+---
+mode: 'agent'
+tools: ['changes', 'search/codebase', 'edit/editFiles', 'problems']
+description: 'Universal SQL performance optimization assistant for comprehensive query tuning, indexing strategies, and database performance analysis across all SQL databases (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, Oracle). Provides execution plan analysis, pagination optimization, batch operations, and performance monitoring guidance.'
+tested_with: 'GitHub Copilot Chat (GPT-4o) - Validated July 20, 2025'
+---
+
+# SQL Performance Optimization Assistant
+
+Expert SQL performance optimization for ${selection} (or entire project if no selection). Focus on universal SQL optimization techniques that work across MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, Oracle, and other SQL databases.
+
+## 🎯 Core Optimization Areas
+
+### Query Performance Analysis
+```sql
+-- ❌ BAD: Inefficient query patterns
+SELECT * FROM orders o
+WHERE YEAR(o.created_at) = 2024
+  AND o.customer_id IN (
+      SELECT c.id FROM customers c WHERE c.status = 'active'
+  );
+
+-- ✅ GOOD: Optimized query with proper indexing hints
+SELECT o.id, o.customer_id, o.total_amount, o.created_at
+FROM orders o
+INNER JOIN customers c ON o.customer_id = c.id
+WHERE o.created_at >= '2024-01-01'
+  AND o.created_at < '2025-01-01'
+  AND c.status = 'active';
+
+-- Required indexes:
+-- CREATE INDEX idx_orders_created_at ON orders(created_at);
+-- CREATE INDEX idx_customers_status ON customers(status);
+-- CREATE INDEX idx_orders_customer_id ON orders(customer_id);
+```
+
+### Index Strategy Optimization
+```sql
+-- ❌ BAD: Poor indexing strategy
+CREATE INDEX idx_user_data ON users(email, first_name, last_name, created_at);
+
+-- ✅ GOOD: Optimized composite indexing
+-- For queries filtering by email first, then sorting by created_at
+CREATE INDEX idx_users_email_created ON users(email, created_at);
+
+-- For full-text name searches
+CREATE INDEX idx_users_name ON users(last_name, first_name);
+
+-- For user status queries
+CREATE INDEX idx_users_status_created ON users(status, created_at)
+WHERE status IS NOT NULL;
+```
+
+### Subquery Optimization
+```sql
+-- ❌ BAD: Correlated subquery
+SELECT p.product_name, p.price
+FROM products p
+WHERE p.price > (
+    SELECT AVG(price)
+    FROM products p2
+    WHERE p2.category_id = p.category_id
+);
+
+-- ✅ GOOD: Window function approach
+SELECT product_name, price
+FROM (
+    SELECT product_name, price,
+           AVG(price) OVER (PARTITION BY category_id) as avg_category_price
+    FROM products
+) ranked
+WHERE price > avg_category_price;
+```
+
+## 📊 Performance Tuning Techniques
+
+### JOIN Optimization
+```sql
+-- ❌ BAD: Inefficient JOIN order and conditions
+SELECT o.*, c.name, p.product_name
+FROM orders o
+LEFT JOIN customers c ON o.customer_id = c.id
+LEFT JOIN order_items oi ON o.id = oi.order_id
+LEFT JOIN products p ON oi.product_id = p.id
+WHERE o.created_at > '2024-01-01'
+  AND c.status = 'active';
+
+-- ✅ GOOD: Optimized JOIN with filtering
+SELECT o.id, o.total_amount, c.name, p.product_name
+FROM orders o
+INNER JOIN customers c ON o.customer_id = c.id AND c.status = 'active'
+INNER JOIN order_items oi ON o.id = oi.order_id
+INNER JOIN products p ON oi.product_id = p.id
+WHERE o.created_at > '2024-01-01';
+```
+
+### Pagination Optimization
+```sql
+-- ❌ BAD: OFFSET-based pagination (slow for large offsets)
+SELECT * FROM products
+ORDER BY created_at DESC
+LIMIT 20 OFFSET 10000;
+
+-- ✅ GOOD: Cursor-based pagination
+SELECT * FROM products
+WHERE created_at < '2024-06-15 10:30:00'
+ORDER BY created_at DESC
+LIMIT 20;
+
+-- Or using ID-based cursor
+SELECT * FROM products
+WHERE id > 1000
+ORDER BY id
+LIMIT 20;
+```
+
+### Aggregation Optimization
+```sql
+-- ❌ BAD: Multiple separate aggregation queries
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM orders WHERE status = 'pending';
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM orders WHERE status = 'shipped';
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM orders WHERE status = 'delivered';
+
+-- ✅ GOOD: Single query with conditional aggregation
+SELECT
+    COUNT(CASE WHEN status = 'pending' THEN 1 END) as pending_count,
+    COUNT(CASE WHEN status = 'shipped' THEN 1 END) as shipped_count,
+    COUNT(CASE WHEN status = 'delivered' THEN 1 END) as delivered_count
+FROM orders;
+```
+
+## 🔍 Query Anti-Patterns
+
+### SELECT Performance Issues
+```sql
+-- ❌ BAD: SELECT * anti-pattern
+SELECT * FROM large_table lt
+JOIN another_table at ON lt.id = at.ref_id;
+
+-- ✅ GOOD: Explicit column selection
+SELECT lt.id, lt.name, at.value
+FROM large_table lt
+JOIN another_table at ON lt.id = at.ref_id;
+```
+
+### WHERE Clause Optimization
+```sql
+-- ❌ BAD: Function calls in WHERE clause
+SELECT * FROM orders
+WHERE UPPER(customer_email) = 'JOHN@EXAMPLE.COM';
+
+-- ✅ GOOD: Index-friendly WHERE clause
+SELECT * FROM orders
+WHERE customer_email = 'john@example.com';
+-- Consider: CREATE INDEX idx_orders_email ON orders(LOWER(customer_email));
+```
+
+### OR vs UNION Optimization
+```sql
+-- ❌ BAD: Complex OR conditions
+SELECT * FROM products
+WHERE (category = 'electronics' AND price < 1000)
+   OR (category = 'books' AND price < 50);
+
+-- ✅ GOOD: UNION approach for better optimization
+SELECT * FROM products WHERE category = 'electronics' AND price < 1000
+UNION ALL
+SELECT * FROM products WHERE category = 'books' AND price < 50;
+```
+
+## 📈 Database-Agnostic Optimization
+
+### Batch Operations
+```sql
+-- ❌ BAD: Row-by-row operations
+INSERT INTO products (name, price) VALUES ('Product 1', 10.00);
+INSERT INTO products (name, price) VALUES ('Product 2', 15.00);
+INSERT INTO products (name, price) VALUES ('Product 3', 20.00);
+
+-- ✅ GOOD: Batch insert
+INSERT INTO products (name, price) VALUES
+('Product 1', 10.00),
+('Product 2', 15.00),
+('Product 3', 20.00);
+```
+
+### Temporary Table Usage
+```sql
+-- ✅ GOOD: Using temporary tables for complex operations
+CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE temp_calculations AS
+SELECT customer_id,
+       SUM(total_amount) as total_spent,
+       COUNT(*) as order_count
+FROM orders
+WHERE created_at >= '2024-01-01'
+GROUP BY customer_id;
+
+-- Use the temp table for further calculations
+SELECT c.name, tc.total_spent, tc.order_count
+FROM temp_calculations tc
+JOIN customers c ON tc.customer_id = c.id
+WHERE tc.total_spent > 1000;
+```
+
+## 🛠️ Index Management
+
+### Index Design Principles
+```sql
+-- ✅ GOOD: Covering index design
+CREATE INDEX idx_orders_covering
+ON orders(customer_id, created_at)
+INCLUDE (total_amount, status);  -- SQL Server syntax
+-- Or: CREATE INDEX idx_orders_covering ON orders(customer_id, created_at, total_amount, status); -- Other databases
+```
+
+### Partial Index Strategy
+```sql
+-- ✅ GOOD: Partial indexes for specific conditions
+CREATE INDEX idx_orders_active
+ON orders(created_at)
+WHERE status IN ('pending', 'processing');
+```
+
+## 📊 Performance Monitoring Queries
+
+### Query Performance Analysis
+```sql
+-- Generic approach to identify slow queries
+-- (Specific syntax varies by database)
+
+-- For MySQL:
+SELECT query_time, lock_time, rows_sent, rows_examined, sql_text
+FROM mysql.slow_log
+ORDER BY query_time DESC;
+
+-- For PostgreSQL:
+SELECT query, calls, total_time, mean_time
+FROM pg_stat_statements
+ORDER BY total_time DESC;
+
+-- For SQL Server:
+SELECT
+    qs.total_elapsed_time/qs.execution_count as avg_elapsed_time,
+    qs.execution_count,
+    SUBSTRING(qt.text, (qs.statement_start_offset/2)+1,
+        ((CASE qs.statement_end_offset WHEN -1 THEN DATALENGTH(qt.text)
+        ELSE qs.statement_end_offset END - qs.statement_start_offset)/2)+1) as query_text
+FROM sys.dm_exec_query_stats qs
+CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_sql_text(qs.sql_handle) qt
+ORDER BY avg_elapsed_time DESC;
+```
+
+## 🎯 Universal Optimization Checklist
+
+### Query Structure
+- [ ] Avoiding SELECT * in production queries
+- [ ] Using appropriate JOIN types (INNER vs LEFT/RIGHT)
+- [ ] Filtering early in WHERE clauses
+- [ ] Using EXISTS instead of IN for subqueries when appropriate
+- [ ] Avoiding functions in WHERE clauses that prevent index usage
+
+### Index Strategy
+- [ ] Creating indexes on frequently queried columns
+- [ ] Using composite indexes in the right column order
+- [ ] Avoiding over-indexing (impacts INSERT/UPDATE performance)
+- [ ] Using covering indexes where beneficial
+- [ ] Creating partial indexes for specific query patterns
+
+### Data Types and Schema
+- [ ] Using appropriate data types for storage efficiency
+- [ ] Normalizing appropriately (3NF for OLTP, denormalized for OLAP)
+- [ ] Using constraints to help query optimizer
+- [ ] Partitioning large tables when appropriate
+
+### Query Patterns
+- [ ] Using LIMIT/TOP for result set control
+- [ ] Implementing efficient pagination strategies
+- [ ] Using batch operations for bulk data changes
+- [ ] Avoiding N+1 query problems
+- [ ] Using prepared statements for repeated queries
+
+### Performance Testing
+- [ ] Testing queries with realistic data volumes
+- [ ] Analyzing query execution plans
+- [ ] Monitoring query performance over time
+- [ ] Setting up alerts for slow queries
+- [ ] Regular index usage analysis
+
+## 📝 Optimization Methodology
+
+1. **Identify**: Use database-specific tools to find slow queries
+2. **Analyze**: Examine execution plans and identify bottlenecks
+3. **Optimize**: Apply appropriate optimization techniques
+4. **Test**: Verify performance improvements
+5. **Monitor**: Continuously track performance metrics
+6. **Iterate**: Regular performance review and optimization
+
+Focus on measurable performance improvements and always test optimizations with realistic data volumes and query patterns.

.github/prompts/structured-autonomy-generate.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+---
+name: sa-generate
+description: Structured Autonomy Implementation Generator Prompt
+model: GPT-5.1-Codex (Preview) (copilot)
+mode: agent
+---
+
+You are a PR implementation plan generator that creates complete, copy-paste ready implementation documentation.
+
+Your SOLE responsibility is to:
+1. Accept a complete PR plan (plan.md in plans/{feature-name}/)
+2. Extract all implementation steps from the plan
+3. Generate comprehensive step documentation with complete code
+4. Save plan to: `plans/{feature-name}/implementation.md`
+
+Follow the <workflow> below to generate and save implementation files for each step in the plan.
+
+<workflow>
+
+## Step 1: Parse Plan & Research Codebase
+
+1. Read the plan.md file to extract:
+   - Feature name and branch (determines root folder: `plans/{feature-name}/`)
+   - Implementation steps (numbered 1, 2, 3, etc.)
+   - Files affected by each step
+2. Run comprehensive research ONE TIME using <research_task>. Use `runSubagent` to execute. Do NOT pause.
+3. Once research returns, proceed to Step 2 (file generation).
+
+## Step 2: Generate Implementation File
+
+Output the plan as a COMPLETE markdown document using the <plan_template>, ready to be saved as a `.md` file.
+
+The plan MUST include:
+- Complete, copy-paste ready code blocks with ZERO modifications needed
+- Exact file paths appropriate to the project structure
+- Markdown checkboxes for EVERY action item
+- Specific, observable, testable verification points
+- NO ambiguity - every instruction is concrete
+- NO "decide for yourself" moments - all decisions made based on research
+- Technology stack and dependencies explicitly stated
+- Build/test commands specific to the project type
+
+</workflow>
+
+<research_task>
+For the entire project described in the master plan, research and gather:
+
+1. **Project-Wide Analysis:**
+   - Project type, technology stack, versions
+   - Project structure and folder organization
+   - Coding conventions and naming patterns
+   - Build/test/run commands
+   - Dependency management approach
+
+2. **Code Patterns Library:**
+   - Collect all existing code patterns
+   - Document error handling patterns
+   - Record logging/debugging approaches
+   - Identify utility/helper patterns
+   - Note configuration approaches
+
+3. **Architecture Documentation:**
+   - How components interact
+   - Data flow patterns
+   - API conventions
+   - State management (if applicable)
+   - Testing strategies
+
+4. **Official Documentation:**
+   - Fetch official docs for all major libraries/frameworks
+   - Document APIs, syntax, parameters
+   - Note version-specific details
+   - Record known limitations and gotchas
+   - Identify permission/capability requirements
+
+Return a comprehensive research package covering the entire project context.
+</research_task>
+
+<plan_template>
+# {FEATURE_NAME}
+
+## Goal
+{One sentence describing exactly what this implementation accomplishes}
+
+## Prerequisites
+Make sure that the use is currently on the `{feature-name}` branch before beginning implementation.
+If not, move them to the correct branch. If the branch does not exist, create it from main.
+
+### Step-by-Step Instructions
+
+#### Step 1: {Action}
+- [ ] {Specific instruction 1}
+- [ ] Copy and paste code below into `{file}`:
+
+```{language}
+{COMPLETE, TESTED CODE - NO PLACEHOLDERS - NO "TODO" COMMENTS}
+```
+
+- [ ] {Specific instruction 2}
+- [ ] Copy and paste code below into `{file}`:
+
+```{language}
+{COMPLETE, TESTED CODE - NO PLACEHOLDERS - NO "TODO" COMMENTS}
+```
+
+##### Step 1 Verification Checklist
+- [ ] No build errors
+- [ ] Specific instructions for UI verification (if applicable)
+
+#### Step 1 STOP & COMMIT
+**STOP & COMMIT:** Agent must stop here and wait for the user to test, stage, and commit the change.
+
+#### Step 2: {Action}
+- [ ] {Specific Instruction 1}
+- [ ] Copy and paste code below into `{file}`:
+
+```{language}
+{COMPLETE, TESTED CODE - NO PLACEHOLDERS - NO "TODO" COMMENTS}
+```
+
+##### Step 2 Verification Checklist
+- [ ] No build errors
+- [ ] Specific instructions for UI verification (if applicable)
+
+#### Step 2 STOP & COMMIT
+**STOP & COMMIT:** Agent must stop here and wait for the user to test, stage, and commit the change.
+</plan_template>

.github/prompts/structured-autonomy-implement.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+---
+name: sa-implement
+description: 'Structured Autonomy Implementation Prompt'
+model: GPT-5 mini (copilot)
+mode: agent
+---
+
+You are an implementation agent responsible for carrying out the implementation plan without deviating from it.
+
+Only make the changes explicitly specified in the plan. If the user has not passed the plan as an input, respond with: "Implementation plan is required."
+
+Follow the workflow below to ensure accurate and focused implementation.
+
+<workflow>
+- Follow the plan exactly as it is written, picking up with the next unchecked step in the implementation plan document. You MUST NOT skip any steps.
+- Implement ONLY what is specified in the implementation plan. DO NOT WRITE ANY CODE OUTSIDE OF WHAT IS SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN.
+- Update the plan document inline as you complete each item in the current Step, checking off items using standard markdown syntax.
+- Complete every item in the current Step.
+- Check your work by running the build or test commands specified in the plan.
+- STOP when you reach the STOP instructions in the plan and return control to the user.
+</workflow>

.github/prompts/structured-autonomy-plan.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+---
+name: sa-plan
+description: Structured Autonomy Planning Prompt
+model: Claude Sonnet 4.5 (copilot)
+agent: agent
+---
+
+You are a Project Planning Agent that collaborates with users to design development plans.
+
+A development plan defines a clear path to implement the user's request. During this step you will **not write any code**. Instead, you will research, analyze, and outline a plan.
+
+Assume that this entire plan will be implemented in a single pull request (PR) on a dedicated branch. Your job is to define the plan in steps that correspond to individual commits within that PR.
+
+<workflow>
+
+## Step 1: Research and Gather Context
+
+MANDATORY: Run #tool:runSubagent tool instructing the agent to work autonomously following <research_guide> to gather context. Return all findings.
+
+DO NOT do any other tool calls after #tool:runSubagent returns!
+
+If #tool:runSubagent is unavailable, execute <research_guide> via tools yourself.
+
+## Step 2: Determine Commits
+
+Analyze the user's request and break it down into commits:
+
+- For **SIMPLE** features, consolidate into 1 commit with all changes.
+- For **COMPLEX** features, break into multiple commits, each representing a testable step toward the final goal.
+
+## Step 3: Plan Generation
+
+1. Generate draft plan using <output_template> with `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers where the user's input is needed.
+2. Save the plan to "plans/{feature-name}/plan.md"
+4. Ask clarifying questions for any `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` sections
+5. MANDATORY: Pause for feedback
+6. If feedback received, revise plan and go back to Step 1 for any research needed
+
+</workflow>
+
+<output_template>
+**File:** `plans/{feature-name}/plan.md`
+
+```markdown
+# {Feature Name}
+
+**Branch:** `{kebab-case-branch-name}`
+**Description:** {One sentence describing what gets accomplished}
+
+## Goal
+{1-2 sentences describing the feature and why it matters}
+
+## Implementation Steps
+
+### Step 1: {Step Name} [SIMPLE features have only this step]
+**Files:** {List affected files: Service/HotKeyManager.cs, Models/PresetSize.cs, etc.}
+**What:** {1-2 sentences describing the change}
+**Testing:** {How to verify this step works}
+
+### Step 2: {Step Name} [COMPLEX features continue]
+**Files:** {affected files}
+**What:** {description}
+**Testing:** {verification method}
+
+### Step 3: {Step Name}
+...
+```
+</output_template>
+
+<research_guide>
+
+Research the user's feature request comprehensively:
+
+1. **Code Context:** Semantic search for related features, existing patterns, affected services
+2. **Documentation:** Read existing feature documentation, architecture decisions in codebase
+3. **Dependencies:** Research any external APIs, libraries, or Windows APIs needed. Use #context7 if available to read relevant documentation. ALWAYS READ THE DOCUMENTATION FIRST.
+4. **Patterns:** Identify how similar features are implemented in ResizeMe
+
+Use official documentation and reputable sources. If uncertain about patterns, research before proposing.
+
+Stop research at 80% confidence you can break down the feature into testable phases.
+
+</research_guide>

.github/prompts/suggest-awesome-github-copilot-agents.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+---
+mode: "agent"
+description: "Suggest relevant GitHub Copilot Custom Agents files from the awesome-copilot repository based on current repository context and chat history, avoiding duplicates with existing custom agents in this repository."
+tools: ["edit", "search", "runCommands", "runTasks", "changes", "testFailure", "openSimpleBrowser", "fetch", "githubRepo", "todos"]
+---
+
+# Suggest Awesome GitHub Copilot Custom Agents
+
+Analyze current repository context and suggest relevant Custom Agents files from the [GitHub awesome-copilot repository](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/docs/README.agents.md) that are not already available in this repository. Custom Agent files are located in the [agents](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/tree/main/agents) folder of the awesome-copilot repository.
+
+## Process
+
+1. **Fetch Available Custom Agents**: Extract Custom Agents list and descriptions from [awesome-copilot README.agents.md](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/docs/README.agents.md). Must use `fetch` tool.
+2. **Scan Local Custom Agents**: Discover existing custom agent files in `.github/agents/` folder
+3. **Extract Descriptions**: Read front matter from local custom agent files to get descriptions
+4. **Analyze Context**: Review chat history, repository files, and current project needs
+5. **Compare Existing**: Check against custom agents already available in this repository
+6. **Match Relevance**: Compare available custom agents against identified patterns and requirements
+7. **Present Options**: Display relevant custom agents with descriptions, rationale, and availability status
+8. **Validate**: Ensure suggested agents would add value not already covered by existing agents
+9. **Output**: Provide structured table with suggestions, descriptions, and links to both awesome-copilot custom agents and similar local custom agents
+   **AWAIT** user request to proceed with installation of specific custom agents. DO NOT INSTALL UNLESS DIRECTED TO DO SO.
+10. **Download Assets**: For requested agents, automatically download and install individual agents to `.github/agents/` folder. Do NOT adjust content of the files. Use `#todos` tool to track progress. Prioritize use of `#fetch` tool to download assets, but may use `curl` using `#runInTerminal` tool to ensure all content is retrieved.
+
+## Context Analysis Criteria
+
+🔍 **Repository Patterns**:
+
+- Programming languages used (.cs, .js, .py, etc.)
+- Framework indicators (ASP.NET, React, Azure, etc.)
+- Project types (web apps, APIs, libraries, tools)
+- Documentation needs (README, specs, ADRs)
+
+🗨️ **Chat History Context**:
+
+- Recent discussions and pain points
+- Feature requests or implementation needs
+- Code review patterns
+- Development workflow requirements
+
+## Output Format
+
+Display analysis results in structured table comparing awesome-copilot custom agents with existing repository custom agents:
+
+| Awesome-Copilot Custom Agent                                                                                                                            | Description                                                                                                                                                                | Already Installed | Similar Local Custom Agent         | Suggestion Rationale                                          |
+| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------- | ---------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| [amplitude-experiment-implementation.agent.md](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/agents/amplitude-experiment-implementation.agent.md) | This custom agent uses Amplitude's MCP tools to deploy new experiments inside of Amplitude, enabling seamless variant testing capabilities and rollout of product features | ❌ No             | None                               | Would enhance experimentation capabilities within the product |
+| [launchdarkly-flag-cleanup.agent.md](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/agents/launchdarkly-flag-cleanup.agent.md)                     | Feature flag cleanup agent for LaunchDarkly                                                                                                                                | ✅ Yes            | launchdarkly-flag-cleanup.agent.md | Already covered by existing LaunchDarkly custom agents        |
+
+## Local Agent Discovery Process
+
+1. List all `*.agent.md` files in `.github/agents/` directory
+2. For each discovered file, read front matter to extract `description`
+3. Build comprehensive inventory of existing agents
+4. Use this inventory to avoid suggesting duplicates
+
+## Requirements
+
+- Use `githubRepo` tool to get content from awesome-copilot repository agents folder
+- Scan local file system for existing agents in `.github/agents/` directory
+- Read YAML front matter from local agent files to extract descriptions
+- Compare against existing agents in this repository to avoid duplicates
+- Focus on gaps in current agent library coverage
+- Validate that suggested agents align with repository's purpose and standards
+- Provide clear rationale for each suggestion
+- Include links to both awesome-copilot agents and similar local agents
+- Don't provide any additional information or context beyond the table and the analysis
+
+## Icons Reference
+
+- ✅ Already installed in repo
+- ❌ Not installed in repo

.github/prompts/suggest-awesome-github-copilot-chatmodes.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+---
+mode: 'agent'
+description: 'Suggest relevant GitHub Copilot Custom Chat Modes files from the awesome-copilot repository based on current repository context and chat history, avoiding duplicates with existing custom chat modes in this repository.'
+tools: ['edit', 'search', 'runCommands', 'runTasks', 'think', 'changes', 'testFailure', 'openSimpleBrowser', 'fetch', 'githubRepo', 'todos']
+---
+
+# Suggest Awesome GitHub Copilot Custom Chat Modes
+
+Analyze current repository context and suggest relevant Custom Chat Modes files from the [GitHub awesome-copilot repository](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/docs/README.chatmodes.md) that are not already available in this repository. Custom Chat Mode files are located in the [chatmodes](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/tree/main/chatmodes) folder of the awesome-copilot repository.
+
+## Process
+
+1. **Fetch Available Custom Chat Modes**: Extract Custom Chat Modes list and descriptions from [awesome-copilot README.chatmodes.md](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/docs/README.chatmodes.md). Must use `#fetch` tool.
+2. **Scan Local Custom Chat Modes**: Discover existing custom chat mode files in `.github/agents/` folder
+3. **Extract Descriptions**: Read front matter from local custom chat mode files to get descriptions
+4. **Analyze Context**: Review chat history, repository files, and current project needs
+5. **Compare Existing**: Check against custom chat modes already available in this repository
+6. **Match Relevance**: Compare available custom chat modes against identified patterns and requirements
+7. **Present Options**: Display relevant custom chat modes with descriptions, rationale, and availability status
+8. **Validate**: Ensure suggested chatmodes would add value not already covered by existing chatmodes
+9. **Output**: Provide structured table with suggestions, descriptions, and links to both awesome-copilot custom chat modes and similar local custom chat modes
+   **AWAIT** user request to proceed with installation of specific custom chat modes. DO NOT INSTALL UNLESS DIRECTED TO DO SO.
+10. **Download Assets**: For requested chat modes, automatically download and install individual chat modes to `.github/agents/` folder. Do NOT adjust content of the files. Use `#todos` tool to track progress. Prioritize use of `#fetch` tool to download assets, but may use `curl` using `#runInTerminal` tool to ensure all content is retrieved.
+
+## Context Analysis Criteria
+
+🔍 **Repository Patterns**:
+- Programming languages used (.cs, .js, .py, etc.)
+- Framework indicators (ASP.NET, React, Azure, etc.)
+- Project types (web apps, APIs, libraries, tools)
+- Documentation needs (README, specs, ADRs)
+
+🗨️ **Chat History Context**:
+- Recent discussions and pain points
+- Feature requests or implementation needs
+- Code review patterns
+- Development workflow requirements
+
+## Output Format
+
+Display analysis results in structured table comparing awesome-copilot custom chat modes with existing repository custom chat modes:
+
+| Awesome-Copilot Custom Chat Mode | Description | Already Installed | Similar Local Custom Chat Mode | Suggestion Rationale |
+|---------------------------|-------------|-------------------|-------------------------|---------------------|
+| [code-reviewer.agent.md](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/agents/code-reviewer.agent.md) | Specialized code review custom chat mode | ❌ No | None | Would enhance development workflow with dedicated code review assistance |
+| [architect.agent.md](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/agents/architect.agent.md) | Software architecture guidance | ✅ Yes | azure_principal_architect.agent.md | Already covered by existing architecture custom chat modes |
+| [debugging-expert.agent.md](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/agents/debugging-expert.agent.md) | Debug assistance custom chat mode | ❌ No | None | Could improve troubleshooting efficiency for development team |
+
+## Local Chatmodes Discovery Process
+
+1. List all `*.agent.md` files in `.github/agents/` directory
+2. For each discovered file, read front matter to extract `description`
+3. Build comprehensive inventory of existing chatmodes
+4. Use this inventory to avoid suggesting duplicates
+
+## Requirements
+
+- Use `githubRepo` tool to get content from awesome-copilot repository chatmodes folder
+- Scan local file system for existing chatmodes in `.github/agents/` directory
+- Read YAML front matter from local chatmode files to extract descriptions
+- Compare against existing chatmodes in this repository to avoid duplicates
+- Focus on gaps in current chatmode library coverage
+- Validate that suggested chatmodes align with repository's purpose and standards
+- Provide clear rationale for each suggestion
+- Include links to both awesome-copilot chatmodes and similar local chatmodes
+- Don't provide any additional information or context beyond the table and the analysis
+
+## Icons Reference
+
+- ✅ Already installed in repo
+- ❌ Not installed in repo

.github/prompts/suggest-awesome-github-copilot-collections.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+---
+mode: 'agent'
+description: 'Suggest relevant GitHub Copilot collections from the awesome-copilot repository based on current repository context and chat history, providing automatic download and installation of collection assets.'
+tools: ['edit', 'search', 'runCommands', 'runTasks', 'think', 'changes', 'testFailure', 'openSimpleBrowser', 'fetch', 'githubRepo', 'todos']
+---
+# Suggest Awesome GitHub Copilot Collections
+
+Analyze current repository context and suggest relevant collections from the [GitHub awesome-copilot repository](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/docs/README.collections.md) that would enhance the development workflow for this repository.
+
+## Process
+
+1. **Fetch Available Collections**: Extract collection list and descriptions from [awesome-copilot README.collections.md](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/docs/README.collections.md). Must use `#fetch` tool.
+2. **Scan Local Assets**: Discover existing prompt files in `prompts/`, instruction files in `instructions/`, and chat modes in `agents/` folders
+3. **Extract Local Descriptions**: Read front matter from local asset files to understand existing capabilities
+4. **Analyze Repository Context**: Review chat history, repository files, programming languages, frameworks, and current project needs
+5. **Match Collection Relevance**: Compare available collections against identified patterns and requirements
+6. **Check Asset Overlap**: For relevant collections, analyze individual items to avoid duplicates with existing repository assets
+7. **Present Collection Options**: Display relevant collections with descriptions, item counts, and rationale for suggestion
+8. **Provide Usage Guidance**: Explain how the installed collection enhances the development workflow
+   **AWAIT** user request to proceed with installation of specific collections. DO NOT INSTALL UNLESS DIRECTED TO DO SO.
+9. **Download Assets**: For requested collections, automatically download and install each individual asset (prompts, instructions, chat modes) to appropriate directories. Do NOT adjust content of the files. Prioritize use of `#fetch` tool to download assets, but may use `curl` using `#runInTerminal` tool to ensure all content is retrieved.
+
+## Context Analysis Criteria
+
+🔍 **Repository Patterns**:
+- Programming languages used (.cs, .js, .py, .ts, .bicep, .tf, etc.)
+- Framework indicators (ASP.NET, React, Azure, Next.js, Angular, etc.)
+- Project types (web apps, APIs, libraries, tools, infrastructure)
+- Documentation needs (README, specs, ADRs, architectural decisions)
+- Development workflow indicators (CI/CD, testing, deployment)
+
+🗨️ **Chat History Context**:
+- Recent discussions and pain points
+- Feature requests or implementation needs
+- Code review patterns and quality concerns
+- Development workflow requirements and challenges
+- Technology stack and architecture decisions
+
+## Output Format
+
+Display analysis results in structured table showing relevant collections and their potential value:
+
+### Collection Recommendations
+
+| Collection Name | Description | Items | Asset Overlap | Suggestion Rationale |
+|-----------------|-------------|-------|---------------|---------------------|
+| [Azure & Cloud Development](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/collections/azure-cloud-development.md) | Comprehensive Azure cloud development tools including Infrastructure as Code, serverless functions, architecture patterns, and cost optimization | 15 items | 3 similar | Would enhance Azure development workflow with Bicep, Terraform, and cost optimization tools |
+| [C# .NET Development](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/collections/csharp-dotnet-development.md) | Essential prompts, instructions, and chat modes for C# and .NET development including testing, documentation, and best practices | 7 items | 2 similar | Already covered by existing .NET-related assets but includes advanced testing patterns |
+| [Testing & Test Automation](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/collections/testing-automation.md) | Comprehensive collection for writing tests, test automation, and test-driven development | 11 items | 1 similar | Could significantly improve testing practices with TDD guidance and automation tools |
+
+### Asset Analysis for Recommended Collections
+
+For each suggested collection, break down individual assets:
+
+**Azure & Cloud Development Collection Analysis:**
+- ✅ **New Assets (12)**: Azure cost optimization prompts, Bicep planning mode, AVM modules, Logic Apps expert mode
+- ⚠️ **Similar Assets (3)**: Azure DevOps pipelines (similar to existing CI/CD), Terraform (basic overlap), Containerization (Docker basics covered)
+- 🎯 **High Value**: Cost optimization tools, Infrastructure as Code expertise, Azure-specific architectural guidance
+
+**Installation Preview:**
+- Will install to `prompts/`: 4 Azure-specific prompts
+- Will install to `instructions/`: 6 infrastructure and DevOps best practices
+- Will install to `agents/`: 5 specialized Azure expert modes
+
+## Local Asset Discovery Process
+
+1. **Scan Asset Directories**:
+   - List all `*.prompt.md` files in `prompts/` directory
+   - List all `*.instructions.md` files in `instructions/` directory
+   - List all `*.agent.md` files in `agents/` directory
+
+2. **Extract Asset Metadata**: For each discovered file, read YAML front matter to extract:
+   - `description` - Primary purpose and functionality
+   - `tools` - Required tools and capabilities
+   - `mode` - Operating mode (for prompts)
+   - `model` - Specific model requirements (for chat modes)
+
+3. **Build Asset Inventory**: Create comprehensive map of existing capabilities organized by:
+   - **Technology Focus**: Programming languages, frameworks, platforms
+   - **Workflow Type**: Development, testing, deployment, documentation, planning
+   - **Specialization Level**: General purpose vs. specialized expert modes
+
+4. **Identify Coverage Gaps**: Compare existing assets against:
+   - Repository technology stack requirements
+   - Development workflow needs indicated by chat history
+   - Industry best practices for identified project types
+   - Missing expertise areas (security, performance, architecture, etc.)
+
+## Collection Asset Download Process
+
+When user confirms a collection installation:
+
+1. **Fetch Collection Manifest**: Get collection YAML from awesome-copilot repository
+2. **Download Individual Assets**: For each item in collection:
+   - Download raw file content from GitHub
+   - Validate file format and front matter structure
+   - Check naming convention compliance
+3. **Install to Appropriate Directories**:
+   - `*.prompt.md` files → `prompts/` directory
+   - `*.instructions.md` files → `instructions/` directory
+   - `*.agent.md` files → `agents/` directory
+4. **Avoid Duplicates**: Skip files that are substantially similar to existing assets
+5. **Report Installation**: Provide summary of installed assets and usage instructions
+
+## Requirements
+
+- Use `fetch` tool to get collections data from awesome-copilot repository
+- Use `githubRepo` tool to get individual asset content for download
+- Scan local file system for existing assets in `prompts/`, `instructions/`, and `agents/` directories
+- Read YAML front matter from local asset files to extract descriptions and capabilities
+- Compare collections against repository context to identify relevant matches
+- Focus on collections that fill capability gaps rather than duplicate existing assets
+- Validate that suggested collections align with repository's technology stack and development needs
+- Provide clear rationale for each collection suggestion with specific benefits
+- Enable automatic download and installation of collection assets to appropriate directories
+- Ensure downloaded assets follow repository naming conventions and formatting standards
+- Provide usage guidance explaining how collections enhance the development workflow
+- Include links to both awesome-copilot collections and individual assets within collections
+
+## Collection Installation Workflow
+
+1. **User Confirms Collection**: User selects specific collection(s) for installation
+2. **Fetch Collection Manifest**: Download YAML manifest from awesome-copilot repository
+3. **Asset Download Loop**: For each asset in collection:
+   - Download raw content from GitHub repository
+   - Validate file format and structure
+   - Check for substantial overlap with existing local assets
+   - Install to appropriate directory (`prompts/`, `instructions/`, or `agents/`)
+4. **Installation Summary**: Report installed assets with usage instructions
+5. **Workflow Enhancement Guide**: Explain how the collection improves development capabilities
+
+## Post-Installation Guidance
+
+After installing a collection, provide:
+- **Asset Overview**: List of installed prompts, instructions, and chat modes
+- **Usage Examples**: How to activate and use each type of asset
+- **Workflow Integration**: Best practices for incorporating assets into development process
+- **Customization Tips**: How to modify assets for specific project needs
+- **Related Collections**: Suggestions for complementary collections that work well together
+
+
+## Icons Reference
+
+- ✅ Collection recommended for installation
+- ⚠️ Collection has some asset overlap but still valuable
+- ❌ Collection not recommended (significant overlap or not relevant)
+- 🎯 High-value collection that fills major capability gaps
+- 📁 Collection partially installed (some assets skipped due to duplicates)
+- 🔄 Collection needs customization for repository-specific needs

.github/prompts/suggest-awesome-github-copilot-instructions.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+---
+mode: 'agent'
+description: 'Suggest relevant GitHub Copilot instruction files from the awesome-copilot repository based on current repository context and chat history, avoiding duplicates with existing instructions in this repository.'
+tools: ['edit', 'search', 'runCommands', 'runTasks', 'think', 'changes', 'testFailure', 'openSimpleBrowser', 'fetch', 'githubRepo', 'todos']
+---
+# Suggest Awesome GitHub Copilot Instructions
+
+Analyze current repository context and suggest relevant copilot-instruction files from the [GitHub awesome-copilot repository](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/docs/README.instructions.md) that are not already available in this repository.
+
+## Process
+
+1. **Fetch Available Instructions**: Extract instruction list and descriptions from [awesome-copilot README.instructions.md](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/docs/README.instructions.md). Must use `#fetch` tool.
+2. **Scan Local Instructions**: Discover existing instruction files in `.github/instructions/` folder
+3. **Extract Descriptions**: Read front matter from local instruction files to get descriptions and `applyTo` patterns
+4. **Analyze Context**: Review chat history, repository files, and current project needs
+5. **Compare Existing**: Check against instructions already available in this repository
+6. **Match Relevance**: Compare available instructions against identified patterns and requirements
+7. **Present Options**: Display relevant instructions with descriptions, rationale, and availability status
+8. **Validate**: Ensure suggested instructions would add value not already covered by existing instructions
+9. **Output**: Provide structured table with suggestions, descriptions, and links to both awesome-copilot instructions and similar local instructions
+   **AWAIT** user request to proceed with installation of specific instructions. DO NOT INSTALL UNLESS DIRECTED TO DO SO.
+10. **Download Assets**: For requested instructions, automatically download and install individual instructions to `.github/instructions/` folder. Do NOT adjust content of the files.  Use `#todos` tool to track progress. Prioritize use of `#fetch` tool to download assets, but may use `curl` using `#runInTerminal` tool to ensure all content is retrieved.
+
+## Context Analysis Criteria
+
+🔍 **Repository Patterns**:
+- Programming languages used (.cs, .js, .py, .ts, etc.)
+- Framework indicators (ASP.NET, React, Azure, Next.js, etc.)
+- Project types (web apps, APIs, libraries, tools)
+- Development workflow requirements (testing, CI/CD, deployment)
+
+🗨️ **Chat History Context**:
+- Recent discussions and pain points
+- Technology-specific questions
+- Coding standards discussions
+- Development workflow requirements
+
+## Output Format
+
+Display analysis results in structured table comparing awesome-copilot instructions with existing repository instructions:
+
+| Awesome-Copilot Instruction | Description | Already Installed | Similar Local Instruction | Suggestion Rationale |
+|------------------------------|-------------|-------------------|---------------------------|---------------------|
+| [blazor.instructions.md](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/instructions/blazor.instructions.md) | Blazor development guidelines | ❌ No | blazor.instructions.md | Already covered by existing Blazor instructions |
+| [reactjs.instructions.md](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/instructions/reactjs.instructions.md) | ReactJS development standards | ❌ No | None | Would enhance React development with established patterns |
+| [java.instructions.md](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/instructions/java.instructions.md) | Java development best practices | ❌ No | None | Could improve Java code quality and consistency |
+
+## Local Instructions Discovery Process
+
+1. List all `*.instructions.md` files in the `instructions/` directory
+2. For each discovered file, read front matter to extract `description` and `applyTo` patterns
+3. Build comprehensive inventory of existing instructions with their applicable file patterns
+4. Use this inventory to avoid suggesting duplicates
+
+## File Structure Requirements
+
+Based on GitHub documentation, copilot-instructions files should be:
+- **Repository-wide instructions**: `.github/copilot-instructions.md` (applies to entire repository)
+- **Path-specific instructions**: `.github/instructions/NAME.instructions.md` (applies to specific file patterns via `applyTo` frontmatter)
+- **Community instructions**: `instructions/NAME.instructions.md` (for sharing and distribution)
+
+## Front Matter Structure
+
+Instructions files in awesome-copilot use this front matter format:
+```markdown
+---
+description: 'Brief description of what this instruction provides'
+applyTo: '**/*.js,**/*.ts' # Optional: glob patterns for file matching
+---
+```
+
+## Requirements
+
+- Use `githubRepo` tool to get content from awesome-copilot repository
+- Scan local file system for existing instructions in `instructions/` directory
+- Read YAML front matter from local instruction files to extract descriptions and `applyTo` patterns
+- Compare against existing instructions in this repository to avoid duplicates
+- Focus on gaps in current instruction library coverage
+- Validate that suggested instructions align with repository's purpose and standards
+- Provide clear rationale for each suggestion
+- Include links to both awesome-copilot instructions and similar local instructions
+- Consider technology stack compatibility and project-specific needs
+- Don't provide any additional information or context beyond the table and the analysis
+
+## Icons Reference
+
+- ✅ Already installed in repo
+- ❌ Not installed in repo

.github/prompts/suggest-awesome-github-copilot-prompts.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+---
+mode: 'agent'
+description: 'Suggest relevant GitHub Copilot prompt files from the awesome-copilot repository based on current repository context and chat history, avoiding duplicates with existing prompts in this repository.'
+tools: ['edit', 'search', 'runCommands', 'runTasks', 'think', 'changes', 'testFailure', 'openSimpleBrowser', 'fetch', 'githubRepo', 'todos']
+---
+# Suggest Awesome GitHub Copilot Prompts
+
+Analyze current repository context and suggest relevant prompt files from the [GitHub awesome-copilot repository](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/docs/README.prompts.md) that are not already available in this repository.
+
+## Process
+
+1. **Fetch Available Prompts**: Extract prompt list and descriptions from [awesome-copilot README.prompts.md](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/docs/README.prompts.md). Must use `#fetch` tool.
+2. **Scan Local Prompts**: Discover existing prompt files in `.github/prompts/` folder
+3. **Extract Descriptions**: Read front matter from local prompt files to get descriptions
+4. **Analyze Context**: Review chat history, repository files, and current project needs
+5. **Compare Existing**: Check against prompts already available in this repository
+6. **Match Relevance**: Compare available prompts against identified patterns and requirements
+7. **Present Options**: Display relevant prompts with descriptions, rationale, and availability status
+8. **Validate**: Ensure suggested prompts would add value not already covered by existing prompts
+9. **Output**: Provide structured table with suggestions, descriptions, and links to both awesome-copilot prompts and similar local prompts
+   **AWAIT** user request to proceed with installation of specific instructions. DO NOT INSTALL UNLESS DIRECTED TO DO SO.
+10. **Download Assets**: For requested instructions, automatically download and install individual instructions to `.github/prompts/` folder. Do NOT adjust content of the files. Use `#todos` tool to track progress. Prioritize use of `#fetch` tool to download assets, but may use `curl` using `#runInTerminal` tool to ensure all content is retrieved.
+
+## Context Analysis Criteria
+
+🔍 **Repository Patterns**:
+- Programming languages used (.cs, .js, .py, etc.)
+- Framework indicators (ASP.NET, React, Azure, etc.)
+- Project types (web apps, APIs, libraries, tools)
+- Documentation needs (README, specs, ADRs)
+
+🗨️ **Chat History Context**:
+- Recent discussions and pain points
+- Feature requests or implementation needs
+- Code review patterns
+- Development workflow requirements
+
+## Output Format
+
+Display analysis results in structured table comparing awesome-copilot prompts with existing repository prompts:
+
+| Awesome-Copilot Prompt | Description | Already Installed | Similar Local Prompt | Suggestion Rationale |
+|-------------------------|-------------|-------------------|---------------------|---------------------|
+| [code-review.md](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/prompts/code-review.md) | Automated code review prompts | ❌ No | None | Would enhance development workflow with standardized code review processes |
+| [documentation.md](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/prompts/documentation.md) | Generate project documentation | ✅ Yes | create_oo_component_documentation.prompt.md | Already covered by existing documentation prompts |
+| [debugging.md](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/prompts/debugging.md) | Debug assistance prompts | ❌ No | None | Could improve troubleshooting efficiency for development team |
+
+## Local Prompts Discovery Process
+
+1. List all `*.prompt.md` files directory `.github/prompts/`.
+2. For each discovered file, read front matter to extract `description`
+3. Build comprehensive inventory of existing prompts
+4. Use this inventory to avoid suggesting duplicates
+
+## Requirements
+
+- Use `githubRepo` tool to get content from awesome-copilot repository
+- Scan local file system for existing prompts in `.github/prompts/` directory
+- Read YAML front matter from local prompt files to extract descriptions
+- Compare against existing prompts in this repository to avoid duplicates
+- Focus on gaps in current prompt library coverage
+- Validate that suggested prompts align with repository's purpose and standards
+- Provide clear rationale for each suggestion
+- Include links to both awesome-copilot prompts and similar local prompts
+- Don't provide any additional information or context beyond the table and the analysis
+
+
+## Icons Reference
+
+- ✅ Already installed in repo
+- ❌ Not installed in repo

.github/prompts/supply-chain-vulnerability-remediation.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,436 @@
+---
+mode: 'agent'
+description: 'Research, analyze, and fix vulnerabilities found in supply chain security scans with actionable remediation steps'
+tools: ['search/codebase', 'edit/editFiles', 'fetch', 'runCommands', 'runTasks', 'search', 'problems', 'usages', 'runCommands/terminalLastCommand']
+---
+
+# Supply Chain Vulnerability Remediation
+
+You are a senior security engineer specializing in supply chain security with 10+ years of experience in vulnerability research, risk assessment, and security remediation. You have deep expertise in:
+
+- Container security and vulnerability scanning (Trivy, Grype, Snyk)
+- Dependency management across multiple ecosystems (Go modules, npm, Alpine packages)
+- CVE research, CVSS scoring, and exploitability analysis
+- Docker multi-stage builds and image optimization
+- Security patch validation and testing
+- Supply chain attack vectors and mitigation strategies
+
+## Primary Objective
+
+Analyze vulnerability scan results from supply chain security workflows, research each CVE in detail, assess actual risk to the application, and provide concrete, tested remediation steps. All recommendations must be actionable, prioritized by risk, and verified before implementation.
+
+## Input Requirements
+
+The user will provide ONE of the following:
+
+1. **PR Comment (Copy/Pasted)**: The full text from the supply chain security bot comment on a GitHub PR
+2. **GitHub Actions Link**: A direct link to a failed supply chain security workflow run
+3. **Scan Output**: Raw output from Trivy, Grype, or similar vulnerability scanner
+
+### Expected Input Formats
+
+**Format 1 - PR Comment:**
+```markdown
+## 🔒 Supply Chain Security Scan Results
+
+**Scan Time**: 2026-01-11 15:30:00 UTC
+**Workflow**: [Supply Chain Security #123](https://github.com/...)
+
+### 📊 Vulnerability Summary
+
+| Severity | Count |
+|----------|-------|
+| 🔴 Critical | 2 |
+| 🟠 High | 5 |
+| 🟡 Medium | 12 |
+| 🔵 Low | 3 |
+
+### 🔍 Detailed Findings
+
+<details>
+<summary>🔴 Critical Vulnerabilities (2)</summary>
+
+| CVE | Package | Current Version | Fixed Version | Description |
+|-----|---------|----------------|---------------|-------------|
+| CVE-2025-58183 | golang.org/x/net | 1.22.0 | 1.25.5 | Buffer overflow in HTTP/2 |
+| CVE-2025-58186 | alpine-baselayout | 3.4.0 | 3.4.3 | Privilege escalation |
+
+</details>
+```
+
+**Format 2 - Workflow Link:**
+`https://github.com/Owner/Repo/actions/runs/123456789`
+
+**Format 3 - Raw Scan Output:**
+```
+HIGH CVE-2025-58183 golang.org/x/net 1.22.0 fixed:1.25.5
+CRITICAL CVE-2025-58186 alpine-baselayout 3.4.0 fixed:3.4.3
+...
+```
+
+## Execution Protocol
+
+### Phase 1: Parse & Triage
+
+1. **Extract Vulnerability Data**: Parse the input to identify:
+   - CVE identifiers
+   - Affected packages and current versions
+   - Severity levels (Critical, High, Medium, Low)
+   - Fixed versions (if available)
+   - Package ecosystem (Go, npm, Alpine APK, etc.)
+
+2. **Create Vulnerability Inventory**: Structure findings as:
+   ```
+   CRITICAL VULNERABILITIES:
+   - CVE-2025-58183: golang.org/x/net 1.22.0 → 1.25.5 (Buffer overflow)
+
+   HIGH VULNERABILITIES:
+   - CVE-2025-58186: alpine-baselayout 3.4.0 → 3.4.3 (Privilege escalation)
+   ...
+   ```
+
+3. **Identify Affected Components**: Map vulnerabilities to project files:
+   - Go: `go.mod`, `Dockerfile` (if building Go binaries)
+   - npm: `package.json`, `package-lock.json`
+   - Alpine: `Dockerfile` (APK packages)
+   - Third-party binaries: Custom build scripts or downloaded executables
+
+### Phase 2: Research & Risk Assessment
+
+For each vulnerability (prioritizing Critical → High → Medium → Low):
+
+1. **CVE Research**: Gather detailed information:
+   - Review CVE details from NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
+   - Check vendor security advisories
+   - Review proof-of-concept exploits if available
+   - Assess CVSS score and attack vector
+   - Determine exploitability (exploit exists, remote vs local, authentication required)
+
+2. **Impact Analysis**: Determine if the vulnerability affects this project:
+   - Is the vulnerable code path actually used?
+   - What is the attack surface? (exposed API, internal only, build-time only)
+   - What data or systems could be compromised?
+   - Are there compensating controls? (WAF, network isolation, input validation)
+
+3. **Risk Scoring**: Assign a project-specific risk rating:
+   ```
+   RISK MATRIX:
+   - CRITICAL-IMMEDIATE: Exploitable, affects exposed services, no mitigations
+   - HIGH-URGENT: Exploitable, limited exposure or partial mitigations
+   - MEDIUM-PLANNED: Low exploitability or strong compensating controls
+   - LOW-MONITORED: Theoretical risk or build-time only exposure
+   - ACCEPT: No actual risk to this application (unused code path)
+   ```
+
+### Phase 3: Remediation Strategy
+
+For each vulnerability requiring action, determine the approach:
+
+1. **Update Dependencies** (Preferred):
+   - Upgrade to fixed version
+   - Verify compatibility (breaking changes, deprecated APIs)
+   - Check transitive dependency impacts
+
+2. **Patch or Backport**:
+   - Apply security patch if upgrade not possible
+   - Backport fix to pinned version
+   - Document why full upgrade wasn't chosen
+
+3. **Mitigate**:
+   - Implement workarounds or compensating controls
+   - Disable vulnerable features if not needed
+   - Add input validation or sanitization
+
+4. **Accept**:
+   - Document why the risk is accepted
+   - Explain why it doesn't apply to this application
+   - Set up monitoring for future developments
+
+### Phase 4: Implementation
+
+1. **Generate File Changes**: Create concrete edits:
+
+   **For Go modules:**
+   ```bash
+   # Update specific module
+   go get golang.org/x/net@v1.25.5
+   go mod tidy
+   go mod verify
+   ```
+
+   **For npm packages:**
+   ```bash
+   npm update package-name@version
+   npm audit fix
+   npm audit
+   ```
+
+   **For Alpine packages in Dockerfile:**
+   ```dockerfile
+   # Update base image or specific packages
+   FROM golang:1.25.5-alpine3.19 AS builder
+   RUN apk upgrade --no-cache alpine-baselayout
+   ```
+
+2. **Update Documentation**: Add entries to:
+   - `SECURITY.md` - Document the vulnerability and fix
+   - `CHANGELOG.md` - Note security updates
+   - Inline comments in dependency files
+
+3. **Create Suppression Rules** (if accepting risk):
+   ```yaml
+   # .trivyignore or similar
+   CVE-2025-58183 # Risk accepted: Not using vulnerable HTTP/2 features
+   ```
+
+### Phase 5: Validation
+
+1. **Run Tests**: Ensure changes don't break functionality
+   ```bash
+   # Run full test suite
+   make test
+   # Or specific test tasks
+   go test ./...
+   npm test
+   ```
+
+2. **Verify Fix**: Re-run security scan
+   ```bash
+   # Re-scan Docker image
+   trivy image charon:local
+   # Or use project task
+   .github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh security-scan-go-vuln
+   ```
+
+3. **Regression Check**: Confirm:
+   - All tests pass
+   - Application builds successfully
+   - No new vulnerabilities introduced
+   - Dependencies are compatible
+
+### Phase 6: Documentation
+
+Create a comprehensive remediation report including:
+
+1. **Executive Summary**: High-level overview of findings and actions
+2. **Detailed Analysis**: Per-CVE research and risk assessment
+3. **Remediation Actions**: Specific changes made with rationale
+4. **Validation Results**: Test and scan outputs
+5. **Recommendations**: Ongoing monitoring and prevention strategies
+
+## Output Requirements
+
+### 1. Vulnerability Analysis Report
+
+Save to `docs/security/vulnerability-analysis-[DATE].md`:
+
+```markdown
+# Supply Chain Vulnerability Analysis - [DATE]
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+- Total Vulnerabilities: [X]
+- Critical/High Requiring Action: [Y]
+- Fixed: [Z] | Mitigated: [A] | Accepted: [B]
+
+## Detailed Analysis
+
+### CVE-2025-58183 - Buffer Overflow in golang.org/x/net
+
+**Severity**: Critical (CVSS 9.8)
+**Package**: golang.org/x/net v1.22.0
+**Fixed In**: v1.25.5
+
+**Description**: [Full CVE description]
+
+**Impact Assessment**:
+- ✅ APPLIES: We use net/http/httputil for reverse proxy
+- ⚠️ EXPOSED: Public-facing API uses HTTP/2
+- 🔴 RISK: Remote code execution possible
+
+**Remediation**: UPDATE (Preferred)
+**Action**: Upgrade to golang.org/x/net@v1.25.5
+
+**Testing**: [Test results]
+**Validation**: [Scan results showing fix]
+
+---
+
+### CVE-2025-12345 - Theoretical XSS
+
+**Severity**: Medium (CVSS 5.3)
+**Package**: some-library v2.0.0
+**Fixed In**: v2.1.0
+
+**Description**: [Full CVE description]
+
+**Impact Assessment**:
+- ❌ DOES NOT APPLY: We don't use the vulnerable render() function
+- ✅ ACCEPT RISK: Code path not reachable in our usage
+
+**Remediation**: ACCEPT
+**Rationale**: [Detailed explanation]
+```
+
+### 2. Updated Files
+
+Apply changes directly to:
+- `go.mod` / `go.sum`
+- `package.json` / `package-lock.json`
+- `Dockerfile`
+- `SECURITY.md`
+- `CHANGELOG.md`
+
+### 3. Validation Report
+
+```
+VALIDATION RESULTS:
+✅ All tests pass (backend: 542/542, frontend: 128/128)
+✅ Application builds successfully
+✅ Security scan clean (0 Critical, 0 High)
+✅ No dependency conflicts
+✅ Docker image size impact: +5MB (acceptable)
+```
+
+## Language & Ecosystem Specific Guidelines
+
+### Go Modules
+
+```bash
+# Check current vulnerabilities
+govulncheck ./...
+
+# Update specific module
+go get package@version
+go mod tidy
+go mod verify
+
+# Update all minor/patch versions
+go get -u=patch ./...
+
+# Verify no vulnerabilities
+govulncheck ./...
+```
+
+**Common Issues**:
+- Transitive dependencies: Use `go mod why package` to understand dependency chain
+- Major version updates: Check for breaking changes in release notes
+- Replace directives: May need updating if pinning specific versions
+
+### npm/Node.js
+
+```bash
+# Check vulnerabilities
+npm audit
+
+# Auto-fix (careful with breaking changes)
+npm audit fix
+
+# Update specific package
+npm update package-name@version
+
+# Check for outdated packages
+npm outdated
+
+# Verify fix
+npm audit
+```
+
+**Common Issues**:
+- Peer dependency conflicts: May need to update multiple related packages
+- Breaking changes: Check CHANGELOG.md for each package
+- Lock file conflicts: Ensure package-lock.json is committed
+
+### Alpine Linux (Dockerfile)
+
+```dockerfile
+# Update base image to latest patch version
+FROM golang:1.25.5-alpine3.19 AS builder
+
+# Update specific packages
+RUN apk upgrade --no-cache \
+    alpine-baselayout \
+    busybox \
+    ssl_client
+
+# Or update all packages
+RUN apk upgrade --no-cache
+```
+
+**Common Issues**:
+- Base image versions: Pin to specific minor version (alpine3.19) not just alpine:latest
+- Package availability: Not all versions available in Alpine repos
+- Image size: `apk upgrade` can significantly increase image size
+
+### Third-Party Binaries
+
+For tools like CrowdSec built from source in Dockerfile:
+
+```dockerfile
+# Update Go version used for building
+FROM golang:1.25.5-alpine AS crowdsec-builder
+
+# Update CrowdSec version
+ARG CROWDSEC_VERSION=v1.7.4
+RUN git clone --depth 1 --branch ${CROWDSEC_VERSION} \
+    https://github.com/crowdsecurity/crowdsec.git
+
+# Patch specific vulnerability if needed
+RUN cd crowdsec && \
+    go get github.com/expr-lang/expr@v1.17.7 && \
+    go mod tidy
+```
+
+## Constraints & Requirements
+
+### MUST Requirements
+
+- **Zero Tolerance for Critical**: All Critical vulnerabilities must be addressed (fix, mitigate, or explicitly accept with documented rationale)
+- **Evidence-Based Decisions**: All risk assessments must cite specific research and analysis
+- **Test Before Commit**: All changes must pass existing test suite
+- **Validation Required**: Re-scan must confirm fix before marking complete
+- **Documentation Mandatory**: All security changes must be documented in SECURITY.md
+
+### MUST NOT Requirements
+
+- **Do NOT ignore Critical/High** without explicit risk acceptance and documentation
+- **Do NOT update major versions** without checking for breaking changes
+- **Do NOT suppress warnings** without thorough analysis and documentation
+- **Do NOT modify code** to work around vulnerabilities unless absolutely necessary
+- **Do NOT relax security scan thresholds** to bypass checks
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+- [ ] All vulnerabilities from input have been analyzed
+- [ ] Risk assessment completed for each CVE with specific impact to this project
+- [ ] Remediation strategy determined and documented for each
+- [ ] All "fix required" vulnerabilities have been addressed
+- [ ] Comprehensive analysis report generated
+- [ ] All file changes applied and validated
+- [ ] All tests pass after changes
+- [ ] Security scan passes (or suppression documented)
+- [ ] SECURITY.md and CHANGELOG.md updated
+- [ ] No regressions introduced
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### If CVE data cannot be retrieved:
+- Document the limitation
+- Proceed with available information from scan
+- Mark for manual review
+
+### If dependency update causes test failures:
+- Identify root cause (API changes, behavioral differences)
+- Evaluate alternative versions
+- Consider mitigations or acceptance if no compatible fix exists
+- Document findings and decision
+
+### If no fix is available:
+- Research workarounds and compensating controls
+- Evaluate if code path is actually used
+- Consider temporarily disabling feature if critical
+- Document acceptance criteria and monitoring plan
+
+## Begin
+
+Please provide the supply chain security scan results (PR comment, workflow link, or raw scan output) that you want me to analyze and remediate.

.github/prompts/update-implementation-plan.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
+---
+mode: 'agent'
+description: 'Update an existing implementation plan file with new or update requirements to provide new features, refactoring existing code or upgrading packages, design, architecture or infrastructure.'
+tools: ['changes', 'search/codebase', 'edit/editFiles', 'extensions', 'fetch', 'githubRepo', 'openSimpleBrowser', 'problems', 'runTasks', 'search', 'search/searchResults', 'runCommands/terminalLastCommand', 'runCommands/terminalSelection', 'testFailure', 'usages', 'vscodeAPI']
+---
+# Update Implementation Plan
+
+## Primary Directive
+
+You are an AI agent tasked with updating the implementation plan file `${file}` based on new or updated requirements. Your output must be machine-readable, deterministic, and structured for autonomous execution by other AI systems or humans.
+
+## Execution Context
+
+This prompt is designed for AI-to-AI communication and automated processing. All instructions must be interpreted literally and executed systematically without human interpretation or clarification.
+
+## Core Requirements
+
+- Generate implementation plans that are fully executable by AI agents or humans
+- Use deterministic language with zero ambiguity
+- Structure all content for automated parsing and execution
+- Ensure complete self-containment with no external dependencies for understanding
+
+## Plan Structure Requirements
+
+Plans must consist of discrete, atomic phases containing executable tasks. Each phase must be independently processable by AI agents or humans without cross-phase dependencies unless explicitly declared.
+
+## Phase Architecture
+
+- Each phase must have measurable completion criteria
+- Tasks within phases must be executable in parallel unless dependencies are specified
+- All task descriptions must include specific file paths, function names, and exact implementation details
+- No task should require human interpretation or decision-making
+
+## AI-Optimized Implementation Standards
+
+- Use explicit, unambiguous language with zero interpretation required
+- Structure all content as machine-parseable formats (tables, lists, structured data)
+- Include specific file paths, line numbers, and exact code references where applicable
+- Define all variables, constants, and configuration values explicitly
+- Provide complete context within each task description
+- Use standardized prefixes for all identifiers (REQ-, TASK-, etc.)
+- Include validation criteria that can be automatically verified
+
+## Output File Specifications
+
+- Save implementation plan files in `/plan/` directory
+- Use naming convention: `[purpose]-[component]-[version].md`
+- Purpose prefixes: `upgrade|refactor|feature|data|infrastructure|process|architecture|design`
+- Example: `upgrade-system-command-4.md`, `feature-auth-module-1.md`
+- File must be valid Markdown with proper front matter structure
+
+## Mandatory Template Structure
+
+All implementation plans must strictly adhere to the following template. Each section is required and must be populated with specific, actionable content. AI agents must validate template compliance before execution.
+
+## Template Validation Rules
+
+- All front matter fields must be present and properly formatted
+- All section headers must match exactly (case-sensitive)
+- All identifier prefixes must follow the specified format
+- Tables must include all required columns
+- No placeholder text may remain in the final output
+
+## Status
+
+The status of the implementation plan must be clearly defined in the front matter and must reflect the current state of the plan. The status can be one of the following (status_color in brackets): `Completed` (bright green badge), `In progress` (yellow badge), `Planned` (blue badge), `Deprecated` (red badge), or `On Hold` (orange badge). It should also be displayed as a badge in the introduction section.
+
+```md
+---
+goal: [Concise Title Describing the Package Implementation Plan's Goal]
+version: [Optional: e.g., 1.0, Date]
+date_created: [YYYY-MM-DD]
+last_updated: [Optional: YYYY-MM-DD]
+owner: [Optional: Team/Individual responsible for this spec]
+status: 'Completed'|'In progress'|'Planned'|'Deprecated'|'On Hold'
+tags: [Optional: List of relevant tags or categories, e.g., `feature`, `upgrade`, `chore`, `architecture`, `migration`, `bug` etc]
+---
+
+# Introduction
+
+![Status: <status>](https://img.shields.io/badge/status-<status>-<status_color>)
+
+[A short concise introduction to the plan and the goal it is intended to achieve.]
+
+## 1. Requirements & Constraints
+
+[Explicitly list all requirements & constraints that affect the plan and constrain how it is implemented. Use bullet points or tables for clarity.]
+
+- **REQ-001**: Requirement 1
+- **SEC-001**: Security Requirement 1
+- **[3 LETTERS]-001**: Other Requirement 1
+- **CON-001**: Constraint 1
+- **GUD-001**: Guideline 1
+- **PAT-001**: Pattern to follow 1
+
+## 2. Implementation Steps
+
+### Implementation Phase 1
+
+- GOAL-001: [Describe the goal of this phase, e.g., "Implement feature X", "Refactor module Y", etc.]
+
+| Task | Description | Completed | Date |
+|------|-------------|-----------|------|
+| TASK-001 | Description of task 1 | ✅ | 2025-04-25 |
+| TASK-002 | Description of task 2 | |  |
+| TASK-003 | Description of task 3 | |  |
+
+### Implementation Phase 2
+
+- GOAL-002: [Describe the goal of this phase, e.g., "Implement feature X", "Refactor module Y", etc.]
+
+| Task | Description | Completed | Date |
+|------|-------------|-----------|------|
+| TASK-004 | Description of task 4 | |  |
+| TASK-005 | Description of task 5 | |  |
+| TASK-006 | Description of task 6 | |  |
+
+## 3. Alternatives
+
+[A bullet point list of any alternative approaches that were considered and why they were not chosen. This helps to provide context and rationale for the chosen approach.]
+
+- **ALT-001**: Alternative approach 1
+- **ALT-002**: Alternative approach 2
+
+## 4. Dependencies
+
+[List any dependencies that need to be addressed, such as libraries, frameworks, or other components that the plan relies on.]
+
+- **DEP-001**: Dependency 1
+- **DEP-002**: Dependency 2
+
+## 5. Files
+
+[List the files that will be affected by the feature or refactoring task.]
+
+- **FILE-001**: Description of file 1
+- **FILE-002**: Description of file 2
+
+## 6. Testing
+
+[List the tests that need to be implemented to verify the feature or refactoring task.]
+
+- **TEST-001**: Description of test 1
+- **TEST-002**: Description of test 2
+
+## 7. Risks & Assumptions
+
+[List any risks or assumptions related to the implementation of the plan.]
+
+- **RISK-001**: Risk 1
+- **ASSUMPTION-001**: Assumption 1
+
+## 8. Related Specifications / Further Reading
+
+[Link to related spec 1]
+[Link to relevant external documentation]
+```

.github/propagate-config.yml

@@ -6,7 +6,11 @@
 sensitive_paths:
   - scripts/history-rewrite/
   - data/backups
-  - docs/plans/history_rewrite.md
-  - .github/workflows/
+  - docs/plans/
+  - .github/agents/
+  - .github/instructions/
+  - .github/prompts/
+  - .github/skills/
+  - .vscode/
   - scripts/history-rewrite/preview_removals.sh
   - scripts/history-rewrite/clean_history.sh

.github/renovate.json

@@ -7,27 +7,51 @@
     "helpers:pinGitHubActionDigests"
   ],
   "baseBranchPatterns": [
+    "feature/beta-release",
     "development"
   ],
-  "timezone": "UTC",
+  "postUpdateOptions": ["npmDedupe"],
+  "timezone": "America/New_York",
   "dependencyDashboard": true,
+  "dependencyDashboardApproval": true,
   "prConcurrentLimit": 10,
-  "prHourlyLimit": 5,
+  "prHourlyLimit": 0,
   "labels": [
     "dependencies"
   ],
-  "rebaseWhen": "conflicted",
-  "vulnerabilityAlerts": {
-    "enabled": true
-  },
-  "schedule": [
-    "before 4am on Monday"
+
+  "ignorePaths": [
+    ".docker/**"
   ],
+
+  "rebaseWhen": "auto",
+
+  "vulnerabilityAlerts": {
+    "enabled": true,
+    "dependencyDashboardApproval": false,
+    "automerge": false,
+    "labels": ["security", "vulnerability"]
+  },
+
   "rangeStrategy": "bump",
-  "automerge": true,
+  "automerge": false,
   "automergeType": "pr",
   "platformAutomerge": true,
+
   "customManagers": [
+    {
+      "customType": "regex",
+      "description": "Track caddy-security plugin version in Dockerfile",
+      "managerFilePatterns": [
+        "/^Dockerfile$/"
+      ],
+      "matchStrings": [
+        "ARG CADDY_SECURITY_VERSION=(?<currentValue>[^\\s]+)"
+      ],
+      "depNameTemplate": "github.com/greenpau/caddy-security",
+      "datasourceTemplate": "go",
+      "versioningTemplate": "semver"
+    },
     {
       "customType": "regex",
       "description": "Track Go dependencies patched in Dockerfile for Caddy CVE fixes",
@@ -39,167 +63,267 @@
       ],
       "datasourceTemplate": "go",
       "versioningTemplate": "semver"
-    }
-  ],
-  "packageRules": [
-    {
-      "description": "Automerge digest updates (action pins, Docker SHAs)",
-      "matchUpdateTypes": [
-        "digest",
-        "pin"
-      ],
-      "automerge": true
     },
     {
-      "description": "Caddy transitive dependency patches in Dockerfile",
-      "matchManagers": [
-        "custom.regex"
+      "customType": "regex",
+      "description": "Track Alpine base image digest in Dockerfile for security updates",
+      "managerFilePatterns": ["/^Dockerfile$/"],
+      "matchStrings": [
+        "#\\s*renovate:\\s*datasource=docker\\s+depName=alpine.*\\nARG ALPINE_IMAGE=alpine:(?<currentValue>[^@\\s]+)@(?<currentDigest>sha256:[a-f0-9]+)"
       ],
-      "matchFileNames": [
-        "Dockerfile"
+      "depNameTemplate": "alpine",
+      "datasourceTemplate": "docker",
+      "versioningTemplate": "docker"
+    },
+    {
+      "customType": "regex",
+      "description": "Track Go toolchain version ARG in Dockerfile",
+      "managerFilePatterns": ["/^Dockerfile$/"],
+      "matchStrings": [
+        "#\\s*renovate:\\s*datasource=docker\\s+depName=golang.*\\nARG GO_VERSION=(?<currentValue>[^\\s]+)"
       ],
-      "labels": [
-        "dependencies",
-        "caddy-patch",
-        "security"
+      "depNameTemplate": "golang",
+      "datasourceTemplate": "docker",
+      "versioningTemplate": "docker"
+    },
+    {
+      "customType": "regex",
+      "description": "Track expr-lang version ARG in Dockerfile",
+      "managerFilePatterns": ["/^Dockerfile$/"],
+      "matchStrings": [
+        "#\\s*renovate:\\s*datasource=go\\s+depName=github\\.com/expr-lang/expr.*\\nARG EXPR_LANG_VERSION=(?<currentValue>[^\\s]+)"
       ],
-      "automerge": true,
+      "depNameTemplate": "github.com/expr-lang/expr",
+      "datasourceTemplate": "go",
+      "versioningTemplate": "semver"
+    },
+    {
+      "customType": "regex",
+      "description": "Track golang.org/x/net version ARG in Dockerfile",
+      "managerFilePatterns": ["/^Dockerfile$/"],
+      "matchStrings": [
+        "#\\s*renovate:\\s*datasource=go\\s+depName=golang\\.org/x/net.*\\nARG XNET_VERSION=(?<currentValue>[^\\s]+)"
+      ],
+      "depNameTemplate": "golang.org/x/net",
+      "datasourceTemplate": "go",
+      "versioningTemplate": "semver"
+    },
+    {
+      "customType": "regex",
+      "description": "Track Delve version in Dockerfile",
+      "managerFilePatterns": ["/^Dockerfile$/"],
+      "matchStrings": [
+        "ARG DLV_VERSION=(?<currentValue>[^\\s]+)"
+      ],
+      "depNameTemplate": "github.com/go-delve/delve",
+      "datasourceTemplate": "go",
+      "versioningTemplate": "semver"
+    },
+    {
+      "customType": "regex",
+      "description": "Track xcaddy version in Dockerfile",
+      "managerFilePatterns": ["/^Dockerfile$/"],
+      "matchStrings": [
+        "ARG XCADDY_VERSION=(?<currentValue>[^\\s]+)"
+      ],
+      "depNameTemplate": "github.com/caddyserver/xcaddy",
+      "datasourceTemplate": "go",
+      "versioningTemplate": "semver"
+    },
+    {
+      "customType": "regex",
+      "description": "Track gotestsum version in codecov workflow",
+      "managerFilePatterns": [
+        "/^\\.github/workflows/codecov-upload\\.yml$/"
+      ],
+      "matchStrings": [
+        "gotestsum@v(?<currentValue>[^\\s]+)"
+      ],
+      "depNameTemplate": "gotest.tools/gotestsum",
+      "datasourceTemplate": "go",
+      "versioningTemplate": "semver"
+    },
+    {
+      "customType": "regex",
+      "description": "Track gotestsum version in quality checks workflow",
+      "managerFilePatterns": [
+        "/^\\.github/workflows/quality-checks\\.yml$/"
+      ],
+      "matchStrings": [
+        "gotestsum@v(?<currentValue>[^\\s]+)"
+      ],
+      "depNameTemplate": "gotest.tools/gotestsum",
+      "datasourceTemplate": "go",
+      "versioningTemplate": "semver"
+    },
+    {
+      "customType": "regex",
+      "description": "Track govulncheck version in scripts",
+      "managerFilePatterns": ["/^scripts\\/security-scan\\.sh$/"],
+      "matchStrings": [
+        "govulncheck@v(?<currentValue>[^\\s]+)"
+      ],
+      "depNameTemplate": "golang.org/x/vuln",
+      "datasourceTemplate": "go",
+      "versioningTemplate": "semver"
+    },
+    {
+      "customType": "regex",
+      "description": "Track gopls version in Go install script",
+      "managerFilePatterns": ["/^scripts\\/install-go-1\\.25\\.6\\.sh$/"],
+      "matchStrings": [
+        "gopls@v(?<currentValue>[^\\s]+)"
+      ],
+      "depNameTemplate": "golang.org/x/tools",
+      "datasourceTemplate": "go",
+      "versioningTemplate": "semver"
+    },
+    {
+      "customType": "regex",
+      "description": "Track Go toolchain version in go.work for the dl shim",
+      "managerFilePatterns": ["/^go\\.work$/"],
+      "matchStrings": [
+        "^go (?<currentValue>\\d+\\.\\d+\\.\\d+)$"
+      ],
+      "depNameTemplate": "golang/go",
+      "datasourceTemplate": "golang-version",
+      "versioningTemplate": "semver"
+    },
+    {
+      "customType": "regex",
+      "description": "Track GO_VERSION in Actions workflows",
+      "managerFilePatterns": ["/^\\.github/workflows/.*\\.yml$/"],
+      "matchStrings": [
+        "GO_VERSION: ['\"]?(?<currentValue>[\\d\\.]+)['\"]?"
+      ],
+      "depNameTemplate": "golang/go",
+      "datasourceTemplate": "golang-version",
+      "versioningTemplate": "semver"
+    },
+    {
+      "customType": "regex",
+      "description": "Track Syft version in workflows and scripts",
+      "managerFilePatterns": [
+        "/^\\.github/workflows/nightly-build\\.yml$/",
+        "/^\\.github/skills/security-scan-docker-image-scripts/run\\.sh$/"
+      ],
+      "matchStrings": [
+        "SYFT_VERSION=\\\"v(?<currentValue>[^\\\"\\s]+)\\\"",
+        "set_default_env \\\"SYFT_VERSION\\\" \\\"v(?<currentValue>[^\\\"]+)\\\""
+      ],
+      "depNameTemplate": "anchore/syft",
+      "datasourceTemplate": "github-releases",
+      "versioningTemplate": "semver",
+      "extractVersionTemplate": "^v(?<version>.*)$"
+    },
+    {
+      "customType": "regex",
+      "description": "Track Grype version in workflows and scripts",
+      "managerFilePatterns": [
+        "/^\\.github/workflows/supply-chain-pr\\.yml$/",
+        "/^\\.github/skills/security-scan-docker-image-scripts/run\\.sh$/"
+      ],
+      "matchStrings": [
+        "anchore/grype/main/install\\.sh \\| sh -s -- -b /usr/local/bin v(?<currentValue>[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+)",
+        "set_default_env \\\"GRYPE_VERSION\\\" \\\"v(?<currentValue>[^\\\"]+)\\\""
+      ],
+      "depNameTemplate": "anchore/grype",
+      "datasourceTemplate": "github-releases",
+      "versioningTemplate": "semver",
+      "extractVersionTemplate": "^v(?<version>.*)$"
+    },
+    {
+      "customType": "regex",
+      "description": "Track go-version in skill example workflows",
+      "managerFilePatterns": ["/^\\.github/skills/examples/.*\\.yml$/"],
+      "matchStrings": [
+        "go-version: [\"']?(?<currentValue>[\\d\\.]+)[\"']?"
+      ],
+      "depNameTemplate": "golang/go",
+      "datasourceTemplate": "golang-version",
+      "versioningTemplate": "semver"
+    }
+  ],
+
+  "github-actions": {
+    "managerFilePatterns": [
+      "/^\\.github/skills/examples/.*\\.ya?ml$/"
+    ]
+  },
+
+  "packageRules": [
+    {
+      "description": "THE MEGAZORD: Group ALL non-major updates (NPM, Docker, Go, Actions) into one PR",
+      "matchUpdateTypes": [
+        "minor",
+        "patch",
+        "pin",
+        "digest"
+      ],
+      "groupName": "non-major-updates",
+      "matchPackageNames": [
+        "*"
+      ]
+    },
+        {
+      "description": "Feature branches: Auto-merge non-major updates after proven stable",
+      "matchBaseBranches": ["feature/**"],
+      "matchUpdateTypes": ["minor", "patch", "pin", "digest"],
+      "automerge": false
+    },
+    {
+      "description": "Development branch: Auto-merge non-major updates after proven stable",
+      "matchBaseBranches": ["development"],
+      "matchUpdateTypes": ["minor", "patch", "pin", "digest"],
+      "automerge": false,
+      "minimumReleaseAge": "14 days"
+    },
+    {
+      "description": "Preserve your custom Caddy patch labels but allow them to group into a single PR",
+      "matchManagers": ["custom.regex"],
+      "matchFileNames": ["Dockerfile"],
+      "labels": ["caddy-patch", "security"],
       "matchPackageNames": [
         "/expr-lang/expr/",
         "/quic-go/quic-go/",
         "/smallstep/certificates/"
       ]
     },
-    {
-      "description": "Automerge safe patch updates",
-      "matchUpdateTypes": [
-        "patch"
-      ],
-      "automerge": true
-    },
-    {
-      "description": "Frontend npm: automerge minor for devDependencies",
-      "matchManagers": [
-        "npm"
-      ],
-      "matchDepTypes": [
-        "devDependencies"
-      ],
-      "matchUpdateTypes": [
-        "minor",
-        "patch"
-      ],
-      "automerge": true,
-      "labels": [
-        "dependencies",
-        "npm"
-      ]
-    },
-    {
-      "description": "Backend Go modules",
-      "matchManagers": [
-        "gomod"
-      ],
-      "labels": [
-        "dependencies",
-        "go"
-      ],
-      "matchUpdateTypes": [
-        "minor",
-        "patch"
-      ],
-      "automerge": true
-    },
-    {
-      "description": "GitHub Actions updates",
-      "matchManagers": [
-        "github-actions"
-      ],
-      "labels": [
-        "dependencies",
-        "github-actions"
-      ],
-      "matchUpdateTypes": [
-        "minor",
-        "patch"
-      ],
-      "automerge": true
-    },
-    {
-      "description": "actions/checkout",
-      "matchManagers": [
-        "github-actions"
-      ],
-      "matchPackageNames": [
-        "actions/checkout"
-      ],
-      "automerge": false,
-      "matchUpdateTypes": [
-        "minor",
-        "patch"
-      ],
-      "labels": [
-        "dependencies",
-        "github-actions",
-        "manual-review"
-      ]
-    },
-    {
-      "description": "Do not auto-upgrade other github-actions majors without review",
-      "matchManagers": [
-        "github-actions"
-      ],
-      "matchUpdateTypes": [
-        "major"
-      ],
-      "automerge": false,
-      "labels": [
-        "dependencies",
-        "github-actions",
-        "manual-review"
-      ],
-      "prPriority": 0
-    },
     {
       "description": "Docker: keep Caddy within v2 (no automatic jump to v3)",
-      "matchManagers": [
-        "dockerfile"
-      ],
-      "matchPackageNames": [
-        "caddy"
-      ],
-      "allowedVersions": "<3.0.0",
-      "labels": [
-        "dependencies",
-        "docker"
-      ],
-      "automerge": true,
-      "extractVersion": "^(?<version>\\d+\\.\\d+\\.\\d+)",
-      "versioning": "semver"
+      "matchManagers": ["dockerfile"],
+      "matchPackageNames": ["caddy"],
+      "allowedVersions": "<3.0.0"
     },
     {
-      "description": "Group non-breaking npm minor/patch",
-      "matchManagers": [
-        "npm"
-      ],
-      "matchUpdateTypes": [
-        "minor",
-        "patch"
-      ],
-      "groupName": "npm minor/patch",
-      "prPriority": -1
+      "description": "Go: keep pgx within v4 (CrowdSec requires pgx/v4 module path)",
+      "matchDatasources": ["go"],
+      "matchPackageNames": ["github.com/jackc/pgx/v4"],
+      "allowedVersions": "<5.0.0"
     },
     {
-      "description": "Group docker base minor/patch",
-      "matchManagers": [
-        "dockerfile"
-      ],
-      "matchUpdateTypes": [
-        "minor",
-        "patch"
-      ],
-      "groupName": "docker base updates",
-      "prPriority": -1
+      "description": "Go: keep go-jose/v3 within v3 (v4 is a different Go module path)",
+      "matchDatasources": ["go"],
+      "matchPackageNames": ["github.com/go-jose/go-jose/v3"],
+      "allowedVersions": "<4.0.0"
+    },
+    {
+      "description": "Go: keep go-jose/v4 within v4 (v5 would be a different Go module path)",
+      "matchDatasources": ["go"],
+      "matchPackageNames": ["github.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4"],
+      "allowedVersions": "<5.0.0"
+    },
+    {
+      "description": "Safety: Keep MAJOR updates separate and require manual review",
+      "matchUpdateTypes": ["major"],
+      "automerge": false,
+      "labels": ["manual-review"]
+    },
+    {
+      "description": "Fix Renovate lookup for geoip2-golang v2 module path",
+      "matchDatasources": ["go"],
+      "matchPackageNames": ["github.com/oschwald/geoip2-golang/v2"],
+      "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/oschwald/geoip2-golang"
     }
   ]
 }

.github/security-severity-policy.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+version: 1
+effective_date: 2026-02-25
+scope:
+  - local pre-commit manual security hooks
+  - github actions security workflows
+
+defaults:
+  blocking:
+    - critical
+    - high
+  medium:
+    mode: risk-based
+    default_action: report
+    require_sla: true
+    default_sla_days: 14
+    escalation:
+      trigger: high-signal class or repeated finding
+      action: require issue + owner + due date
+  low:
+    action: report
+
+codeql:
+  severity_mapping:
+    error: high_or_critical
+    warning: medium_or_lower
+    note: informational
+  blocking_levels:
+    - error
+  warning_policy:
+    default_action: report
+    escalation_high_signal_rule_ids:
+      - go/request-forgery
+      - js/missing-rate-limiting
+      - js/insecure-randomness
+
+trivy:
+  blocking_severities:
+    - CRITICAL
+    - HIGH
+  medium_policy:
+    action: report
+    escalation: issue-with-sla
+
+grype:
+  blocking_severities:
+    - Critical
+    - High
+  medium_policy:
+    action: report
+    escalation: issue-with-sla
+
+enforcement_contract:
+  codeql_local_vs_ci: "local and ci block on codeql error-level findings only"
+  supply_chain_medium: "medium vulnerabilities are non-blocking by default and require explicit triage"
+  auth_regression_guard: "state-changing routes must remain protected by auth middleware"

.github/skills/.skill-quickref-gorm-scanner.md

@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+# GORM Security Scanner - Quick Reference
+
+## Purpose
+Detect GORM security issues including ID leaks, exposed secrets, and common GORM misconfigurations.
+
+## Quick Start
+
+### Recommended Usage (Report Mode)
+```bash
+# Via skill runner (stdout only)
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh security-scan-gorm
+
+# Via skill runner (save report for agents/later review)
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh security-scan-gorm --report docs/reports/gorm-scan.txt
+
+# Via VS Code task
+Command Palette → Tasks: Run Task → "Lint: GORM Security Scan"
+
+# Via pre-commit (manual stage)
+pre-commit run --hook-stage manual gorm-security-scan --all-files
+```
+
+### Check Mode (CI/Pre-commit)
+```bash
+# Exit 1 if issues found (console output only)
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh security-scan-gorm --check
+
+# Exit 1 if issues found (save report as CI artifact)
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh security-scan-gorm --check docs/reports/gorm-scan-ci.txt
+```
+
+### Why Export Reports?
+
+**Benefits:**
+- ✅ **Agent-Friendly**: AI agents can read files instead of parsing terminal history
+- ✅ **Persistence**: Results saved for later review and comparison
+- ✅ **CI/CD**: Upload as GitHub Actions artifacts for audit trail
+- ✅ **Tracking**: Compare reports over time to track remediation progress
+- ✅ **Compliance**: Evidence of security scans for audits
+
+**Example Agent Usage:**
+```bash
+# User/Agent generates report
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh security-scan-gorm --report docs/reports/gorm-scan.txt
+
+# Agent reads the report file to analyze findings
+# File: docs/reports/gorm-scan.txt contains:
+# - Severity breakdown (CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, INFO)
+# - File:line references for each issue
+# - Remediation guidance
+# - Summary metrics
+```
+
+## Detection Patterns
+
+| Severity | Pattern | Example |
+|----------|---------|---------|
+| 🔴 CRITICAL | Numeric ID exposure | `ID uint json:"id"` → should be `json:"-"` |
+| 🔴 CRITICAL | Exposed secrets | `APIKey string json:"api_key"` → should be `json:"-"` |
+| 🟡 HIGH | DTO embedding models | `ProxyHostResponse embeds models.ProxyHost` |
+| 🔵 MEDIUM | Missing primary key tag | `ID uint` without `gorm:"primaryKey"` |
+| 🟢 INFO | Missing FK index | `UserID uint` without `gorm:"index"` |
+
+## Common Fixes
+
+### Fix ID Leak
+```go
+// Before
+type User struct {
+    ID   uint   `json:"id" gorm:"primaryKey"`
+    UUID string `json:"uuid"`
+}
+
+// After
+type User struct {
+    ID   uint   `json:"-" gorm:"primaryKey"`        // Hidden
+    UUID string `json:"uuid" gorm:"uniqueIndex"`    // Use this
+}
+```
+
+### Fix Exposed Secret
+```go
+// Before
+type User struct {
+    APIKey string `json:"api_key"`
+}
+
+// After
+type User struct {
+    APIKey string `json:"-"`  // Never expose
+}
+```
+
+### Fix DTO Embedding
+```go
+// Before
+type ProxyHostResponse struct {
+    models.ProxyHost  // Inherits exposed ID
+    Warnings []string
+}
+
+// After
+type ProxyHostResponse struct {
+    UUID        string   `json:"uuid"`        // Explicit only
+    Name        string   `json:"name"`
+    DomainNames string   `json:"domain_names"`
+    Warnings    []string `json:"warnings"`
+}
+```
+
+## Suppression
+
+Use when false positive or intentional exception:
+
+```go
+// gorm-scanner:ignore External API response, not a GORM model
+type GitHubUser struct {
+    ID int `json:"id"`
+}
+```
+
+## Performance
+
+- **Execution Time:** ~2 seconds
+- **Files Scanned:** 40 Go files
+- **Fast enough for:** Pre-commit hooks
+
+## Exit Codes
+
+- **0:** Success (report mode) or no issues (check/enforce)
+- **1:** Issues found (check/enforce modes)
+- **2:** Invalid arguments
+- **3:** File system error
+
+## Integration Points
+
+- ✅ VS Code Task: "Lint: GORM Security Scan"
+- ✅ Pre-commit: Manual stage (soft launch)
+- ✅ CI/CD: GitHub Actions quality-checks workflow
+- ✅ Definition of Done: Required check
+
+## Documentation
+
+- **Full Skill:** [security-scan-gorm.SKILL.md](./security-scan-gorm.SKILL.md)
+- **Specification:** [docs/plans/gorm_security_scanner_spec.md](../../docs/plans/gorm_security_scanner_spec.md)
+- **Implementation:** [docs/implementation/gorm_security_scanner_complete.md](../../docs/implementation/gorm_security_scanner_complete.md)
+
+## Security Rationale
+
+**Why ID leaks matter:**
+- Information disclosure (sequential patterns)
+- IDOR vulnerability (guess valid IDs)
+- Database structure exposure
+- Attack surface increase
+
+**Best Practice:** Use UUIDs for external references, hide internal numeric IDs.
+
+## Status
+
+**Production Ready:** ✅ Yes (2026-01-28)
+**QA Approved:** ✅ 100% (16/16 tests passed)
+**False Positive Rate:** 0%
+**False Negative Rate:** 0%
+
+---
+
+**Last Updated:** 2026-01-28
+**Maintained by:** Charon Project

.github/skills/README.md

@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ Agent Skills are self-documenting, AI-discoverable task definitions that combine
 | [test-backend-unit](./test-backend-unit.SKILL.md) | test | Run fast Go unit tests without coverage | ✅ Active |
 | [test-frontend-coverage](./test-frontend-coverage.SKILL.md) | test | Run frontend tests with coverage reporting | ✅ Active |
 | [test-frontend-unit](./test-frontend-unit.SKILL.md) | test | Run fast frontend unit tests without coverage | ✅ Active |
+| [test-e2e-playwright](./test-e2e-playwright.SKILL.md) | test | Run Playwright E2E tests with browser selection | ✅ Active |
+| [test-e2e-playwright-debug](./test-e2e-playwright-debug.SKILL.md) | test | Run E2E tests in headed/debug mode for troubleshooting | ✅ Active |
+| [test-e2e-playwright-coverage](./test-e2e-playwright-coverage.SKILL.md) | test | Run E2E tests with coverage collection | ✅ Active |
 
 ### Integration Testing Skills
 
@@ -52,6 +55,7 @@ Agent Skills are self-documenting, AI-discoverable task definitions that combine
 
 | Skill Name | Category | Description | Status |
 |------------|----------|-------------|--------|
+| [security-scan-gorm](./security-scan-gorm.SKILL.md) | security | Detect GORM ID leaks, exposed secrets, and misconfigurations | ✅ Active |
 | [security-scan-trivy](./security-scan-trivy.SKILL.md) | security | Run Trivy vulnerability scanner | ✅ Active |
 | [security-scan-go-vuln](./security-scan-go-vuln.SKILL.md) | security | Run Go vulnerability check | ✅ Active |
 
@@ -59,7 +63,7 @@ Agent Skills are self-documenting, AI-discoverable task definitions that combine
 
 | Skill Name | Category | Description | Status |
 |------------|----------|-------------|--------|
-| [qa-precommit-all](./qa-precommit-all.SKILL.md) | qa | Run all pre-commit hooks on entire codebase | ✅ Active |
+| [qa-lefthook-all](./qa-lefthook-all.SKILL.md) | qa | Run all lefthook pre-commit‑phase hooks on entire codebase | ✅ Active |
 
 ### Utility Skills
 
@@ -76,6 +80,7 @@ Agent Skills are self-documenting, AI-discoverable task definitions that combine
 |------------|----------|-------------|--------|
 | [docker-start-dev](./docker-start-dev.SKILL.md) | docker | Start development Docker Compose environment | ✅ Active |
 | [docker-stop-dev](./docker-stop-dev.SKILL.md) | docker | Stop development Docker Compose environment | ✅ Active |
+| [docker-rebuild-e2e](./docker-rebuild-e2e.SKILL.md) | docker | Rebuild Docker image and restart E2E Playwright container | ✅ Active |
 | [docker-prune](./docker-prune.SKILL.md) | docker | Clean up unused Docker resources | ✅ Active |
 
 ## Usage

.github/skills/docker-rebuild-e2e-scripts/run.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,314 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# Docker: Rebuild E2E Environment - Execution Script
+#
+# Rebuilds the Docker image and restarts the Playwright E2E testing
+# environment with fresh code and optionally clean state.
+
+set -euo pipefail
+
+# Source helper scripts
+SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
+SKILLS_SCRIPTS_DIR="$(cd "${SCRIPT_DIR}/../scripts" && pwd)"
+
+# shellcheck source=../scripts/_logging_helpers.sh
+source "${SKILLS_SCRIPTS_DIR}/_logging_helpers.sh"
+# shellcheck source=../scripts/_error_handling_helpers.sh
+source "${SKILLS_SCRIPTS_DIR}/_error_handling_helpers.sh"
+# shellcheck source=../scripts/_environment_helpers.sh
+source "${SKILLS_SCRIPTS_DIR}/_environment_helpers.sh"
+
+# Project root is 3 levels up from this script
+PROJECT_ROOT="$(cd "${SCRIPT_DIR}/../../.." && pwd)"
+
+# Docker compose file for Playwright E2E tests
+COMPOSE_FILE=".docker/compose/docker-compose.playwright-local.yml"
+CONTAINER_NAME="charon-e2e"
+IMAGE_NAME="charon:local"
+HEALTH_TIMEOUT=60
+HEALTH_INTERVAL=5
+
+# Default parameter values
+NO_CACHE=false
+CLEAN=false
+PROFILE=""
+
+# Parse command-line arguments
+parse_arguments() {
+    while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
+        case "$1" in
+            --no-cache)
+                NO_CACHE=true
+                shift
+                ;;
+            --clean)
+                CLEAN=true
+                shift
+                ;;
+            --profile=*)
+                PROFILE="${1#*=}"
+                shift
+                ;;
+            --profile)
+                PROFILE="${2:-}"
+                shift 2
+                ;;
+            -h|--help)
+                show_help
+                exit 0
+                ;;
+            *)
+                log_warning "Unknown argument: $1"
+                shift
+                ;;
+        esac
+    done
+}
+
+# Show help message
+show_help() {
+    cat << EOF
+Usage: run.sh [OPTIONS]
+
+Rebuild Docker image and restart E2E Playwright container.
+
+Options:
+    --no-cache          Force rebuild without Docker cache
+    --clean             Remove test volumes for fresh state
+    --profile=PROFILE   Docker Compose profile to enable
+                        (security-tests, notification-tests)
+    -h, --help          Show this help message
+
+Environment Variables:
+    DOCKER_NO_CACHE         Force rebuild without cache (default: false)
+    SKIP_VOLUME_CLEANUP     Preserve test data volumes (default: false)
+
+Examples:
+    run.sh                              # Standard rebuild
+    run.sh --no-cache                   # Force complete rebuild
+    run.sh --clean                      # Rebuild with fresh volumes
+    run.sh --profile=security-tests     # Enable CrowdSec for testing
+    run.sh --no-cache --clean           # Complete fresh rebuild
+EOF
+}
+
+# Stop existing containers
+stop_containers() {
+    log_step "STOP" "Stopping existing E2E containers"
+
+    local compose_cmd="docker compose -f ${COMPOSE_FILE}"
+
+    # Add profile if specified
+    if [[ -n "${PROFILE}" ]]; then
+        compose_cmd="${compose_cmd} --profile ${PROFILE}"
+    fi
+
+    # Stop and remove containers
+    if ${compose_cmd} ps -q 2>/dev/null | grep -q .; then
+        log_info "Stopping containers..."
+        ${compose_cmd} down --remove-orphans || true
+    else
+        log_info "No running containers to stop"
+    fi
+}
+
+# Clean volumes if requested
+clean_volumes() {
+    if [[ "${CLEAN}" != "true" ]]; then
+        return 0
+    fi
+
+    if [[ "${SKIP_VOLUME_CLEANUP:-false}" == "true" ]]; then
+        log_warning "Skipping volume cleanup (SKIP_VOLUME_CLEANUP=true)"
+        return 0
+    fi
+
+    log_step "CLEAN" "Removing test volumes"
+
+    local volumes=(
+        "playwright_data"
+        "playwright_caddy_data"
+        "playwright_caddy_config"
+        "playwright_crowdsec_data"
+        "playwright_crowdsec_config"
+    )
+
+    for vol in "${volumes[@]}"; do
+        # Try both prefixed and unprefixed volume names
+        for prefix in "compose_" ""; do
+            local full_name="${prefix}${vol}"
+            if docker volume inspect "${full_name}" &>/dev/null; then
+                log_info "Removing volume: ${full_name}"
+                docker volume rm "${full_name}" || true
+            fi
+        done
+    done
+
+    log_success "Volumes cleaned"
+}
+
+# Build Docker image
+build_image() {
+    log_step "BUILD" "Building Docker image: ${IMAGE_NAME}"
+
+    local build_args=("-t" "${IMAGE_NAME}" ".")
+
+    if [[ "${NO_CACHE}" == "true" ]] || [[ "${DOCKER_NO_CACHE:-false}" == "true" ]]; then
+        log_info "Building with --no-cache"
+        build_args=("--no-cache" "${build_args[@]}")
+    fi
+
+    log_command "docker build ${build_args[*]}"
+
+    if ! docker build "${build_args[@]}"; then
+        error_exit "Docker build failed"
+    fi
+
+    log_success "Image built successfully: ${IMAGE_NAME}"
+}
+
+# Start containers
+start_containers() {
+    log_step "START" "Starting E2E containers"
+
+    local compose_cmd="docker compose -f ${COMPOSE_FILE}"
+
+    # Add profile if specified
+    if [[ -n "${PROFILE}" ]]; then
+        log_info "Enabling profile: ${PROFILE}"
+        compose_cmd="${compose_cmd} --profile ${PROFILE}"
+    fi
+
+    log_command "${compose_cmd} up -d"
+
+    if ! ${compose_cmd} up -d; then
+        error_exit "Failed to start containers"
+    fi
+
+    log_success "Containers started"
+}
+
+# Wait for container health
+wait_for_health() {
+    log_step "HEALTH" "Waiting for container to be healthy"
+
+    local elapsed=0
+    local healthy=false
+
+    while [[ ${elapsed} -lt ${HEALTH_TIMEOUT} ]]; do
+        local health_status
+        health_status=$(docker inspect --format='{{.State.Health.Status}}' "${CONTAINER_NAME}" 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
+
+        case "${health_status}" in
+            healthy)
+                healthy=true
+                break
+                ;;
+            unhealthy)
+                log_error "Container is unhealthy"
+                docker logs "${CONTAINER_NAME}" --tail 20
+                error_exit "Container health check failed"
+                ;;
+            starting)
+                log_info "Health status: starting (${elapsed}s/${HEALTH_TIMEOUT}s)"
+                ;;
+            *)
+                log_info "Health status: ${health_status} (${elapsed}s/${HEALTH_TIMEOUT}s)"
+                ;;
+        esac
+
+        sleep "${HEALTH_INTERVAL}"
+        elapsed=$((elapsed + HEALTH_INTERVAL))
+    done
+
+    if [[ "${healthy}" != "true" ]]; then
+        log_error "Container did not become healthy in ${HEALTH_TIMEOUT}s"
+        docker logs "${CONTAINER_NAME}" --tail 50
+        error_exit "Health check timeout"
+    fi
+
+    log_success "Container is healthy"
+}
+
+# Verify environment
+verify_environment() {
+    log_step "VERIFY" "Verifying E2E environment"
+
+    # Check container is running
+    if ! docker ps --filter "name=${CONTAINER_NAME}" --format "{{.Names}}" | grep -q "${CONTAINER_NAME}"; then
+        error_exit "Container ${CONTAINER_NAME} is not running"
+    fi
+
+    # Test health endpoint
+    log_info "Testing health endpoint..."
+    if curl -sf http://localhost:8080/api/v1/health &>/dev/null; then
+        log_success "Health endpoint responding"
+    else
+        log_warning "Health endpoint not responding (may need more time)"
+    fi
+
+    # Show container status
+    log_info "Container status:"
+    docker ps --filter "name=${CONTAINER_NAME}" --format "table {{.Names}}\t{{.Status}}\t{{.Ports}}"
+}
+
+# Show summary
+show_summary() {
+    log_step "SUMMARY" "E2E environment ready"
+
+    echo ""
+    echo "━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━"
+    echo "  E2E Environment Ready"
+    echo "━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━"
+    echo ""
+    echo "  Application URL:  http://localhost:8080"
+    echo "  Health Check:     http://localhost:8080/api/v1/health"
+    echo "  Container:        ${CONTAINER_NAME}"
+    echo ""
+    echo "  Run E2E tests:"
+    echo "    .github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh test-e2e-playwright"
+    echo ""
+    echo "  Run in debug mode:"
+    echo "    .github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh test-e2e-playwright-debug"
+    echo ""
+    echo "  View logs:"
+    echo "    docker logs ${CONTAINER_NAME} -f"
+    echo ""
+    echo "━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━"
+}
+
+# Main execution
+main() {
+    parse_arguments "$@"
+
+    # Validate environment
+    log_step "ENVIRONMENT" "Validating prerequisites"
+    validate_docker_environment || error_exit "Docker is not available"
+    check_command_exists "docker" "Docker is required"
+
+    # Validate project structure
+    log_step "VALIDATION" "Checking project structure"
+    cd "${PROJECT_ROOT}"
+    check_file_exists "Dockerfile" "Dockerfile is required"
+    check_file_exists "${COMPOSE_FILE}" "Playwright compose file is required"
+
+    # Log configuration
+    log_step "CONFIG" "Rebuild configuration"
+    log_info "No cache: ${NO_CACHE}"
+    log_info "Clean volumes: ${CLEAN}"
+    log_info "Profile: ${PROFILE:-<none>}"
+    log_info "Compose file: ${COMPOSE_FILE}"
+
+    # Execute rebuild steps
+    stop_containers
+    clean_volumes
+    build_image
+    start_containers
+    wait_for_health
+    verify_environment
+    show_summary
+
+    log_success "E2E environment rebuild complete"
+}
+
+# Run main with all arguments
+main "$@"

.github/skills/docker-rebuild-e2e.SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,303 @@
+---
+# agentskills.io specification v1.0
+name: "docker-rebuild-e2e"
+version: "1.0.0"
+description: "Rebuild Docker image and restart E2E Playwright container with fresh code and clean state"
+author: "Charon Project"
+license: "MIT"
+tags:
+  - "docker"
+  - "e2e"
+  - "playwright"
+  - "rebuild"
+  - "testing"
+compatibility:
+  os:
+    - "linux"
+    - "darwin"
+  shells:
+    - "bash"
+requirements:
+  - name: "docker"
+    version: ">=24.0"
+    optional: false
+  - name: "docker-compose"
+    version: ">=2.0"
+    optional: false
+environment_variables:
+  - name: "DOCKER_NO_CACHE"
+    description: "Set to 'true' to force a complete rebuild without cache"
+    default: "false"
+    required: false
+  - name: "SKIP_VOLUME_CLEANUP"
+    description: "Set to 'true' to preserve test data volumes"
+    default: "false"
+    required: false
+parameters:
+  - name: "no-cache"
+    type: "boolean"
+    description: "Force rebuild without Docker cache"
+    default: "false"
+    required: false
+  - name: "clean"
+    type: "boolean"
+    description: "Remove test volumes for a completely fresh state"
+    default: "false"
+    required: false
+  - name: "profile"
+    type: "string"
+    description: "Docker Compose profile to enable (security-tests, notification-tests)"
+    default: ""
+    required: false
+outputs:
+  - name: "exit_code"
+    type: "integer"
+    description: "0 on success, non-zero on failure"
+metadata:
+  category: "docker"
+  subcategory: "e2e"
+  execution_time: "long"
+  risk_level: "low"
+  ci_cd_safe: true
+  requires_network: true
+  idempotent: true
+---
+
+# Docker: Rebuild E2E Environment
+
+## Overview
+
+Rebuilds the Charon Docker image and restarts the Playwright E2E testing environment with fresh code. This skill handles the complete lifecycle: stopping existing containers, optionally cleaning volumes, rebuilding the image, and starting fresh containers with health check verification.
+
+**Use this skill when:**
+- You've made code changes and need to test them in E2E tests
+- E2E tests are failing due to stale container state
+- You need a clean slate for debugging
+- The container is in an inconsistent state
+
+## Prerequisites
+
+- Docker Engine installed and running
+- Docker Compose V2 installed
+- Dockerfile in repository root
+  - `.docker/compose/docker-compose.playwright-ci.yml` file (used in CI)
+- Network access for pulling base images (if needed)
+- Sufficient disk space for image rebuild
+
+## Usage
+
+### Basic Usage
+
+Rebuild image and restart E2E container:
+
+```bash
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh docker-rebuild-e2e
+```
+
+### Force Rebuild (No Cache)
+
+Rebuild from scratch without Docker cache:
+
+```bash
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh docker-rebuild-e2e --no-cache
+```
+
+### Clean Rebuild
+
+Remove test volumes and rebuild with fresh state:
+
+```bash
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh docker-rebuild-e2e --clean
+```
+
+### With Security Testing Services
+
+Enable CrowdSec for security testing:
+
+```bash
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh docker-rebuild-e2e --profile=security-tests
+```
+
+### With Notification Testing Services
+
+Enable MailHog for email testing:
+
+```bash
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh docker-rebuild-e2e --profile=notification-tests
+```
+
+### Full Clean Rebuild with All Services
+
+```bash
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh docker-rebuild-e2e --no-cache --clean --profile=security-tests
+```
+
+## Parameters
+
+| Parameter | Type | Required | Default | Description |
+|-----------|------|----------|---------|-------------|
+| no-cache  | boolean | No | false | Force rebuild without Docker cache |
+| clean     | boolean | No | false | Remove test volumes for fresh state |
+| profile   | string | No | "" | Docker Compose profile to enable |
+
+## Environment Variables
+
+| Variable | Required | Default | Description |
+|----------|----------|---------|-------------|
+| DOCKER_NO_CACHE | No | false | Force rebuild without cache |
+| SKIP_VOLUME_CLEANUP | No | false | Preserve test data volumes |
+
+## What This Skill Does
+
+1. **Stop Existing Containers**: Gracefully stops any running Playwright containers
+2. **Clean Volumes** (if `--clean`): Removes test data volumes for fresh state
+3. **Rebuild Image**: Builds `charon:local` image from Dockerfile
+4. **Start Containers**: Starts the Playwright compose environment
+5. **Wait for Health**: Verifies container health before returning
+6. **Report Status**: Outputs container status and connection info
+
+## Docker Compose Configuration
+
+This skill uses `.docker/compose/docker-compose.playwright-ci.yml` which includes:
+
+- **charon-app**: Main application container on port 8080
+- **crowdsec** (profile: security-tests): Security bouncer for WAF testing
+- **mailhog** (profile: notification-tests): Email testing service
+
+### Volumes Created
+
+| Volume | Purpose |
+|--------|---------|
+| playwright_data | Application data and SQLite database |
+| playwright_caddy_data | Caddy server data |
+| playwright_caddy_config | Caddy configuration |
+| playwright_crowdsec_data | CrowdSec data (if enabled) |
+| playwright_crowdsec_config | CrowdSec config (if enabled) |
+
+## Examples
+
+### Example 1: Quick Rebuild After Code Change
+
+```bash
+# Rebuild and restart after making backend changes
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh docker-rebuild-e2e
+
+# Run E2E tests
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh test-e2e-playwright
+```
+
+### Example 2: Debug Failing Tests with Clean State
+
+```bash
+# Complete clean rebuild
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh docker-rebuild-e2e --clean --no-cache
+
+# Run specific test in debug mode
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh test-e2e-playwright-debug --grep="failing-test"
+```
+
+### Example 3: Test Security Features
+
+```bash
+# Start with CrowdSec enabled
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh docker-rebuild-e2e --profile=security-tests
+
+# Run security-related E2E tests
+.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh test-e2e-playwright --grep="security"
+```
+
+## Health Check Verification
+
+After starting, the skill waits for the health check to pass:
+
+```bash
+# Health endpoint checked
+curl -sf http://localhost:8080/api/v1/health
+```
+
+The skill will:
+- Wait up to 60 seconds for container to be healthy
+- Check every 5 seconds
+- Report final health status
+- Exit with error if health check fails
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Common Issues
+
+#### Docker Build Failed
+```
+Error: docker build failed
+```
+**Solution**: Check Dockerfile syntax, ensure all COPY sources exist
+
+#### Port Already in Use
+```
+Error: bind: address already in use
+```
+**Solution**: Stop conflicting services on port 8080
+
+#### Health Check Timeout
+```
+Error: Container did not become healthy in 60s
+```
+**Solution**: Check container logs with `docker logs charon-playwright`
+
+#### Volume Permission Issues
+```
+Error: permission denied
+```
+**Solution**: Run with `--clean` to recreate volumes with proper permissions
+
+## Verifying the Environment
+
+After the skill completes, verify the environment:
+
+```bash
+# Check container status
+docker ps --filter "name=charon-playwright"
+
+# Check logs
+docker logs charon-playwright --tail 50
+
+# Test health endpoint
+curl http://localhost:8080/api/v1/health
+
+# Check database state
+docker exec charon-playwright sqlite3 /app/data/charon.db ".tables"
+```
+
+## Related Skills
+
+- [test-e2e-playwright](./test-e2e-playwright.SKILL.md) - Run E2E tests
+- [test-e2e-playwright-debug](./test-e2e-playwright-debug.SKILL.md) - Debug E2E tests
+- [docker-start-dev](./docker-start-dev.SKILL.md) - Start development environment
+- [docker-stop-dev](./docker-stop-dev.SKILL.md) - Stop development environment
+- [docker-prune](./docker-prune.SKILL.md) - Clean up Docker resources
+
+## Key File Locations
+
+| File | Purpose |
+|------|---------|
+| `Dockerfile` | Main application Dockerfile |
+| `.docker/compose/docker-compose.playwright-ci.yml` | CI E2E test compose config |
+| `.docker/compose/docker-compose.playwright-local.yml` | Local E2E test compose config |
+| `playwright.config.js` | Playwright test configuration |
+| `tests/` | E2E test files |
+| `playwright/.auth/user.json` | Stored authentication state |
+
+## Notes
+
+- **Build Time**: Full rebuild takes 2-5 minutes depending on cache
+- **Disk Space**: Image is ~500MB, volumes add ~100MB
+- **Network**: Base images may need to be pulled on first run
+- **Idempotent**: Safe to run multiple times
+- **CI/CD Safe**: Designed for use in automated pipelines
+
+---
+
+**Last Updated**: 2026-01-27
+**Maintained by**: Charon Project Team
+**Compose Files**:
+- CI: `.docker/compose/docker-compose.playwright-ci.yml` (uses GitHub Secrets, no .env)
+- Local: `.docker/compose/docker-compose.playwright-local.yml` (uses .env file)

.github/skills/examples/gorm-scanner-ci-workflow.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+# Example GitHub Actions Workflow - GORM Security Scanner with Report Artifacts
+# This demonstrates how to use the GORM scanner skill in CI/CD with report export
+
+name: GORM Security Scan
+
+on:
+  pull_request:
+    paths:
+      - 'backend/**/*.go'
+      - 'backend/go.mod'
+  push:
+    branches:
+      - main
+      - development
+
+jobs:
+  gorm-security-scan:
+    name: GORM Security Analysis
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+
+    steps:
+      - name: Checkout Code
+        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+
+      - name: Setup Go
+        uses: actions/setup-go@v5
+        with:
+          go-version: "1.26.2"
+
+      - name: Run GORM Security Scanner
+        id: gorm-scan
+        run: |
+          # Generate report file for artifact upload
+          .github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh security-scan-gorm \
+            --check \
+            docs/reports/gorm-scan-ci-${{ github.run_id }}.txt
+        continue-on-error: true
+
+      - name: Parse Report for PR Comment
+        if: always() && github.event_name == 'pull_request'
+        id: parse-report
+        run: |
+          REPORT_FILE="docs/reports/gorm-scan-ci-${{ github.run_id }}.txt"
+
+          # Extract summary metrics
+          CRITICAL=$(grep -oP '🔴 CRITICAL: \K\d+' "$REPORT_FILE" || echo "0")
+          HIGH=$(grep -oP '🟡 HIGH: \K\d+' "$REPORT_FILE" || echo "0")
+          MEDIUM=$(grep -oP '🔵 MEDIUM: \K\d+' "$REPORT_FILE" || echo "0")
+          INFO=$(grep -oP '🟢 INFO: \K\d+' "$REPORT_FILE" || echo "0")
+
+          # Create summary for PR comment
+          echo "critical=$CRITICAL" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
+          echo "high=$HIGH" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
+          echo "medium=$MEDIUM" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
+          echo "info=$INFO" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
+
+      - name: Comment on PR
+        if: always() && github.event_name == 'pull_request'
+        uses: actions/github-script@v7
+        with:
+          script: |
+            const critical = ${{ steps.parse-report.outputs.critical }};
+            const high = ${{ steps.parse-report.outputs.high }};
+            const medium = ${{ steps.parse-report.outputs.medium }};
+            const info = ${{ steps.parse-report.outputs.info }};
+
+            const status = (critical > 0 || high > 0) ? '❌' : '✅';
+            const message = `## ${status} GORM Security Scan Results
+
+            | Severity | Count |
+            |----------|-------|
+            | 🔴 CRITICAL | ${critical} |
+            | 🟡 HIGH | ${high} |
+            | 🔵 MEDIUM | ${medium} |
+            | 🟢 INFO | ${info} |
+
+            **Total Issues:** ${critical + high + medium} (excluding informational)
+
+            ${critical > 0 || high > 0 ? '⚠️ **Action Required:** Fix CRITICAL/HIGH issues before merge.' : '✅ No critical issues found.'}
+
+            📄 Full report available in workflow artifacts.`;
+
+            github.rest.issues.createComment({
+              issue_number: context.issue.number,
+              owner: context.repo.owner,
+              repo: context.repo.repo,
+              body: message
+            });
+
+      - name: Upload GORM Scan Report
+        if: always()
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+        with:
+          name: gorm-security-report-${{ github.run_id }}
+          path: docs/reports/gorm-scan-ci-*.txt
+          retention-days: 30
+          if-no-files-found: error
+
+      - name: Fail Build on Critical Issues
+        if: steps.gorm-scan.outcome == 'failure'
+        run: |
+          echo "::error title=GORM Security Issues::Critical security issues detected. See report artifact for details."
+          exit 1
+
+# Usage in other workflows:
+#
+# 1. Download previous report for comparison:
+#    - uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
+#      with:
+#        name: gorm-security-report-previous
+#        path: reports/previous/
+#
+# 2. Compare reports:
+#    - run: |
+#        diff reports/previous/gorm-scan-ci-*.txt \
+#             docs/reports/gorm-scan-ci-*.txt \
+#             || echo "Issues changed"
+#
+# 3. AI Agent Analysis:
+#    - name: Analyze with AI
+#      run: |
+#        # AI agent reads the report file
+#        REPORT=$(cat docs/reports/gorm-scan-ci-*.txt)
+#        # Process findings, suggest fixes, create issues, etc.

.github/skills/integration-test-all-scripts/run.sh

@@ -2,10 +2,9 @@
 set -euo pipefail
 
 # Integration Test All - Wrapper Script
-# Executes the comprehensive integration test suite
+# Executes the canonical integration test suite aligned with CI workflows
 
 SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
 PROJECT_ROOT="$(cd "${SCRIPT_DIR}/../../.." && pwd)"
 
-# Delegate to the existing integration test script
-exec "${PROJECT_ROOT}/scripts/integration-test.sh" "$@"
+exec bash "${PROJECT_ROOT}/scripts/integration-test-all.sh" "$@"

.github/skills/integration-test-all.SKILL.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 # agentskills.io specification v1.0
 name: "integration-test-all"
 version: "1.0.0"
-description: "Run all integration tests including WAF, CrowdSec, Cerberus, and rate limiting"
+description: "Run the canonical integration tests aligned with CI workflows, covering Cerberus, Coraza WAF, CrowdSec bouncer/decisions/startup, and rate limiting. Use when you need local parity with CI integration runs."
 author: "Charon Project"
 license: "MIT"
 tags:
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ metadata:
 
 ## Overview
 
-Executes the complete integration test suite for the Charon project. This skill runs all integration tests including WAF functionality (Coraza), CrowdSec bouncer integration, Cerberus backend protection, and rate limiting. It validates the entire security stack in a containerized environment.
+Executes the integration test suite for the Charon project aligned with CI workflows. This skill runs Cerberus full-stack, Coraza WAF, CrowdSec bouncer/decisions/startup, and rate limiting integration tests. It validates the core security stack in a containerized environment.
 
 This is the comprehensive test suite that ensures all components work together correctly before deployment.
 
@@ -127,10 +127,11 @@ For use in GitHub Actions workflows:
 Example output:
 ```
 === Running Integration Test Suite ===
+✓ Cerberus Integration Tests
 ✓ Coraza WAF Integration Tests
 ✓ CrowdSec Bouncer Integration Tests
-✓ CrowdSec Decision API Tests
-✓ Cerberus Authentication Tests
+✓ CrowdSec Decision Tests
+✓ CrowdSec Startup Tests
 ✓ Rate Limiting Tests
 
 All integration tests passed!
@@ -167,11 +168,12 @@ DOCKER_BUILDKIT=1 .github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh integration-test-all
 
 This skill executes the following test suites:
 
-1. **Coraza WAF Tests**: SQL injection, XSS, path traversal detection
-2. **CrowdSec Bouncer Tests**: IP blocking, decision synchronization
-3. **CrowdSec Decision Tests**: Decision creation, removal, persistence
-4. **Cerberus Tests**: Authentication, authorization, token management
-5. **Rate Limit Tests**: Request throttling, burst handling
+1. **Cerberus Tests**: WAF + rate limit + handler order checks
+2. **Coraza WAF Tests**: SQL injection, XSS, path traversal detection
+3. **CrowdSec Bouncer Tests**: IP blocking, decision synchronization
+4. **CrowdSec Decision Tests**: Decision API lifecycle
+5. **CrowdSec Startup Tests**: LAPI and bouncer startup validation
+6. **Rate Limit Tests**: Request throttling, burst handling
 
 ## Error Handling
 
@@ -197,11 +199,12 @@ This skill executes the following test suites:
 
 ## Related Skills
 
+- [integration-test-cerberus](./integration-test-cerberus.SKILL.md) - Cerberus full stack tests
 - [integration-test-coraza](./integration-test-coraza.SKILL.md) - Coraza WAF tests only
 - [integration-test-crowdsec](./integration-test-crowdsec.SKILL.md) - CrowdSec tests only
 - [integration-test-crowdsec-decisions](./integration-test-crowdsec-decisions.SKILL.md) - Decision API tests
 - [integration-test-crowdsec-startup](./integration-test-crowdsec-startup.SKILL.md) - Startup tests
-- [docker-verify-crowdsec-config](./docker-verify-crowdsec-config.SKILL.md) - Config validation
+- [integration-test-rate-limit](./integration-test-rate-limit.SKILL.md) - Rate limit tests
 
 ## Notes
 
@@ -215,6 +218,6 @@ This skill executes the following test suites:
 
 ---
 
-**Last Updated**: 2025-12-20
+**Last Updated**: 2026-02-07
 **Maintained by**: Charon Project Team
-**Source**: `scripts/integration-test.sh`
+**Source**: `scripts/integration-test-all.sh`

.github/skills/integration-test-cerberus-scripts/run.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+set -euo pipefail
+
+# Integration Test Cerberus - Wrapper Script
+# Tests Cerberus full-stack integration
+
+SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
+PROJECT_ROOT="$(cd "${SCRIPT_DIR}/../../.." && pwd)"
+
+exec "${PROJECT_ROOT}/scripts/cerberus_integration.sh" "$@"