fix: make location rules integration test honest about what it tests
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -132,24 +132,23 @@ describe('proxy-hosts integration', () => {
|
||||
expect(meta.location_rules[1]).toMatchObject({ path: '/api/*', upstreams: ['api:3000'] });
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('sanitizes invalid location rules — drops entries missing path or upstreams', async () => {
|
||||
it('stores location rules with mixed valid and invalid entries in raw meta', async () => {
|
||||
const locationRules = [
|
||||
{ path: '/good/*', upstreams: ['backend:8080'] },
|
||||
{ path: '', upstreams: ['backend:8080'] },
|
||||
{ path: '/no-upstreams/*', upstreams: [] },
|
||||
];
|
||||
const host = await insertProxyHost({
|
||||
name: 'bad-rules',
|
||||
domains: JSON.stringify(['bad.example.com']),
|
||||
name: 'mixed-rules',
|
||||
domains: JSON.stringify(['mixed.example.com']),
|
||||
upstreams: JSON.stringify(['backend:80']),
|
||||
meta: JSON.stringify({
|
||||
location_rules: [
|
||||
{ path: '/good/*', upstreams: ['backend:8080'] },
|
||||
{ path: '', upstreams: ['backend:8080'] },
|
||||
{ path: '/no-upstreams/*', upstreams: [] },
|
||||
{ path: '/bad-upstream/*', upstreams: [''] },
|
||||
'not-an-object',
|
||||
],
|
||||
}),
|
||||
meta: JSON.stringify({ location_rules: locationRules }),
|
||||
});
|
||||
const row = await db.query.proxyHosts.findFirst({ where: (t, { eq }) => eq(t.id, host.id) });
|
||||
const meta = JSON.parse(row!.meta ?? '{}');
|
||||
expect(meta.location_rules).toHaveLength(5); // raw DB stores as-is
|
||||
// Raw DB stores all entries as-is; sanitization happens at model layer (parseMeta)
|
||||
expect(meta.location_rules).toHaveLength(3);
|
||||
expect(meta.location_rules[0].path).toBe('/good/*');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('filters out invalid redirect rules on parse', async () => {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user