Files
Charon/docs/reports/qa_report.md
GitHub Actions 745b9e3e97 fix(security): complete SSRF remediation with defense-in-depth (CWE-918)
Implement three-layer SSRF protection:
- Layer 1: URL pre-validation (existing)
- Layer 2: network.NewSafeHTTPClient() with connection-time IP validation
- Layer 3: Redirect target validation

New package: internal/network/safeclient.go
- IsPrivateIP(): Blocks RFC 1918, loopback, link-local (169.254.x.x),
  reserved ranges, IPv6 private
- safeDialer(): DNS resolve → validate all IPs → dial validated IP
  (prevents DNS rebinding/TOCTOU)
- NewSafeHTTPClient(): Functional options (WithTimeout, WithAllowLocalhost,
  WithAllowedDomains, WithMaxRedirects)

Updated services:
- notification_service.go
- security_notification_service.go
- update_service.go
- crowdsec/registration.go (WithAllowLocalhost for LAPI)
- crowdsec/hub_sync.go (WithAllowedDomains for CrowdSec domains)

Consolidated duplicate isPrivateIP implementations to use network package.

Test coverage: 90.9% for network package
CodeQL: 0 SSRF findings (CWE-918 mitigated)

Closes #450
2025-12-24 17:34:56 +00:00

223 lines
7.1 KiB
Markdown

# QA Security Report: SSRF Mitigation Implementation
**Date:** December 24, 2025
**QA Agent:** QA_Security
**Component:** SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) Mitigation
---
## Executive Summary
| Metric | Status | Target | Actual |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| **Overall Test Pass Rate** | ✅ PASS | 100% | 100% |
| **Total Coverage** | ✅ PASS | ≥85% | 86.2% |
| **Network Package Coverage** | ✅ PASS | ≥85% | 90.9% |
| **Security Package Coverage** | ✅ PASS | ≥85% | 90.7% |
| **CodeQL SSRF (CWE-918)** | ✅ PASS | 0 | 0 (2 false positives) |
| **Go Vulnerabilities** | ✅ PASS | 0 | 0 |
| **HIGH/CRITICAL in Project** | ✅ PASS | 0 | 0 |
**Overall Status: ✅ PASS**
---
## Phase 1: Coverage Improvement
### Added Test Cases
The following test cases were added to `backend/internal/network/safeclient_test.go`:
1. **`TestValidateRedirectTarget_DNSFailure`** - Tests DNS resolution failure handling for redirect targets
2. **`TestValidateRedirectTarget_PrivateIPInRedirect`** - Verifies redirects to private IPs are blocked
3. **`TestSafeDialer_AllIPsPrivate`** - Tests blocking when all resolved IPs are private
4. **`TestNewSafeHTTPClient_RedirectToPrivateIP`** - Integration test for redirect blocking
5. **`TestSafeDialer_DNSResolutionFailure`** - DNS lookup failure in dialer
6. **`TestSafeDialer_NoIPsReturned`** - Edge case when DNS returns no IPs
7. **`TestNewSafeHTTPClient_TooManyRedirects`** - Redirect limit enforcement
8. **`TestValidateRedirectTarget_AllowedLocalhost`** - Localhost allowlist behavior
9. **`TestNewSafeHTTPClient_MetadataEndpoint`** - Cloud metadata endpoint blocking (169.254.169.254)
10. **`TestSafeDialer_IPv4MappedIPv6`** - IPv4-mapped IPv6 address handling
11. **`TestClientOptions_AllFunctionalOptions`** - Full options configuration
12. **`TestSafeDialer_ContextCancelled`** - Context cancellation handling
13. **`TestNewSafeHTTPClient_RedirectValidation`** - Valid redirect following
### Coverage Before/After
| Package | Before | After | Change |
|---------|--------|-------|--------|
| `internal/network` | 78.4% | **90.9%** | +12.5% |
| `internal/security` | 90.7% | **90.7%** | +0% |
| **Total** | ~85% | **86.2%** | +1.2% |
---
## Phase 2: Test Suite Results
### Backend Tests
```
✅ All 23 packages tested
✅ All tests passed (0 failures)
✅ Total coverage: 86.2%
```
### Package Coverage Details
| Package | Coverage | Status |
|---------|----------|--------|
| `internal/network` | 90.9% | ✅ |
| `internal/security` | 90.7% | ✅ |
| `internal/api/handlers` | 85.6% | ✅ |
| `internal/api/middleware` | 99.1% | ✅ |
| `internal/caddy` | 98.9% | ✅ |
| `internal/cerberus` | 100.0% | ✅ |
| `internal/config` | 100.0% | ✅ |
| `internal/crowdsec` | 84.0% | ⚠️ Below target |
| `internal/database` | 91.3% | ✅ |
| `internal/models` | 98.1% | ✅ |
| `internal/services` | 85.3% | ✅ |
| `internal/util` | 100.0% | ✅ |
| `internal/utils` | 91.0% | ✅ |
### Linting Results
**Go Vet:** ✅ PASS (no issues)
**GolangCI-Lint:** 29 issues found (all non-blocking)
- `bodyclose`: 3 (existing code)
- `errcheck`: 1 (existing code)
- `gocritic`: 19 (style suggestions)
- `gosec`: 1 (existing subprocess warning)
- `staticcheck`: 3 (deprecation warning)
- `unused`: 2 (unused test fields)
*Note: Issues found are in existing code, not in new SSRF implementation.*
---
## Phase 3: Security Scans
### CodeQL Analysis (CWE-918 SSRF)
**Result: ✅ NO SSRF VULNERABILITIES**
| Finding Type | Count | Severity |
|--------------|-------|----------|
| Request Forgery (CWE-918) | 2 | False Positive |
| Log Injection (CWE-117) | 73 | Informational |
| Email Injection | 3 | Low |
**CWE-918 Finding Analysis:**
Both `go/request-forgery` findings are **false positives**:
1. **`notification_service.go:311`** - URL validated by `security.ValidateExternalURL()` with SSRF protection
2. **`url_testing.go:176`** - URL validated by `security.ValidateExternalURL()` with SSRF protection
Both files contain inline comments explaining the mitigation:
```go
// codeql[go/request-forgery] Safe: URL validated by security.ValidateExternalURL() which:
// 1. Validates URL format and scheme (HTTPS required in production)
// 2. Resolves DNS and blocks private/reserved IPs (RFC 1918, loopback, link-local)
// 3. Uses ssrfSafeDialer for connection-time IP revalidation (TOCTOU protection)
// 4. No redirect following allowed
```
### Trivy Scan
**Result: ✅ NO PROJECT VULNERABILITIES**
| Finding Location | Type | Severity | Relevance |
|------------------|------|----------|-----------|
| Go module cache (dependencies) | Dockerfile best practices | HIGH | Third-party, not project code |
| Go module cache (Docker SDK) | Test fixture keys | HIGH | Third-party test files |
*All HIGH findings are in third-party Go module cache files, NOT in project source code.*
### Go Vulnerability Check (govulncheck)
**Result: ✅ NO VULNERABILITIES FOUND**
```
No vulnerabilities found.
```
---
## Phase 4: Pre-commit Hooks
**Status: ⚠️ NOT INSTALLED**
The `pre-commit` tool is not installed in the environment. Alternative linting was performed via GolangCI-Lint.
---
## Phase 5: Definition of Done Assessment
| Criteria | Status | Evidence |
|----------|--------|----------|
| Network package coverage ≥85% | ✅ PASS | 90.9% |
| Security package coverage ≥85% | ✅ PASS | 90.7% |
| Overall coverage ≥85% | ✅ PASS | 86.2% |
| All tests pass | ✅ PASS | 0 failures |
| No CWE-918 SSRF findings | ✅ PASS | 0 real findings (2 FP) |
| No HIGH/CRITICAL vulnerabilities | ✅ PASS | 0 in project code |
| Go vet passes | ✅ PASS | No issues |
| Code properly documented | ✅ PASS | Comments explain mitigations |
---
## SSRF Protection Summary
The implementation provides comprehensive SSRF protection through:
1. **IP Range Blocking:**
- RFC 1918 private networks (10.x, 172.16-31.x, 192.168.x)
- Loopback addresses (127.x.x.x, ::1)
- Link-local addresses (169.254.x.x, fe80::)
- Cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254)
- Reserved ranges (0.x, 240.x, broadcast)
- IPv6 unique local (fc00::/7)
2. **DNS Rebinding Protection:**
- Connection-time IP validation (defeats TOCTOU attacks)
- All resolved IPs validated (prevents mixed private/public DNS responses)
3. **Redirect Protection:**
- Default: no redirects allowed
- When enabled: each redirect target validated
4. **Functional Options API:**
- `WithAllowLocalhost()` - For known-safe local services
- `WithAllowedDomains()` - Domain allowlist
- `WithMaxRedirects()` - Controlled redirect following
- `WithTimeout()` / `WithDialTimeout()` - DoS protection
---
## Blocking Issues
**None identified.**
---
## Recommendations
1. **Install pre-commit hooks** for comprehensive automated checks
2. **Address GolangCI-Lint warnings** in existing code for cleaner codebase
3. **Consider suppressing CodeQL false positives** with inline annotations for cleaner reports
---
## Conclusion
The SSRF mitigation implementation passes all QA requirements:
- ✅ Coverage targets met (86.2% overall, 90.9% network package)
- ✅ All tests pass
- ✅ No real SSRF vulnerabilities detected
- ✅ No known Go vulnerabilities
- ✅ No HIGH/CRITICAL issues in project code
**Final Status: ✅ APPROVED FOR MERGE**