akanealw/Charon
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 16 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
7f4e5a475acf16220eaa7d95c2f20c12d06a836a
Charon/docs/reports/qa_report.md
GitHub Actions 270597bb79 chore: Add E2E Security Enforcement Failures Spec and GORM Security Fix Documentation 
- Introduced a new document detailing the remediation plan for E2E security enforcement failures, including root cause analysis and proposed fixes for identified issues.
- Updated the implementation README to include the GORM Security Scanner documentation.
- Replaced the existing GitHub Actions E2E Trigger Investigation Plan with a comprehensive GORM ID Leak Security Vulnerability Fix plan, outlining the critical security bug, its impact, and a structured implementation plan for remediation.
- Revised the QA report to reflect the status of the GORM security fixes, highlighting the critical vulnerabilities found during the Docker image scan and the necessary actions to address them.
2026-01-28 10:30:03 +00:00

12 KiB
Raw Blame History

QA Security Audit Report - GORM Security Fixes

Date: 2026-01-28 Auditor: QA Security Auditor Status: ❌ FAILED - BLOCKING ISSUES FOUND

Executive Summary

The GORM security fixes QA audit has FAILED due to 7 HIGH severity vulnerabilities discovered in the Docker image scan. While all other quality gates passed successfully (backend tests, pre-commit hooks, CodeQL scans, and linting), the presence of HIGH severity vulnerabilities in system libraries is a CRITICAL BLOCKER that must be resolved before deployment.

Overall Status: ❌ FAIL

Check Status Details
Backend Coverage Tests ✅ PASS 85.2% coverage (meets 85% minimum)
Pre-commit Hooks ✅ PASS All hooks passing
Trivy Filesystem Scan ✅ PASS 0 vulnerabilities, 0 secrets
Docker Image Scan ❌ FAIL 7 HIGH, 20 MEDIUM vulnerabilities
CodeQL Security Scan ✅ PASS 0 errors, 0 warnings
Go Vet ✅ PASS No issues
Staticcheck ✅ PASS 0 issues

1. Backend Coverage Tests ✅

Status: PASSED Task: `Test: Backend with Coverage` Command: `.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh test-backend-coverage`

Results:

  • Total Coverage: 85.2% (statements)
  • Minimum Required: 85%
  • Status: ✅ Coverage requirement met
  • Test Result: All tests PASSED

Coverage Breakdown:

``` total: (statements) 85.2% ```

Test Execution:

  • All test suites passed successfully
  • No test failures detected
  • Coverage filtering completed successfully

Verdict: ✅ PASS - Meets minimum coverage threshold

2. Pre-commit Hooks ✅

Status: PASSED Command: `pre-commit run --all-files`

Results:

All hooks passed on final run:

  • ✅ fix end of files
  • ✅ trim trailing whitespace (auto-fixed)
  • ✅ check yaml
  • ✅ check for added large files
  • ✅ dockerfile validation (auto-fixed)
  • ✅ Go Vet
  • ✅ golangci-lint (Fast Linters - BLOCKING)
  • ✅ Check .version matches latest Git tag
  • ✅ Prevent large files that are not tracked by LFS
  • ✅ Prevent committing CodeQL DB artifacts
  • ✅ Prevent committing data/backups files
  • ✅ Frontend TypeScript Check
  • ✅ Frontend Lint (Fix)

Issues Resolved:

  1. Trailing whitespace in `docs/plans/current_spec.md` - Auto-fixed
  2. Dockerfile validation - Auto-fixed

Verdict: ✅ PASS - All hooks passing after auto-fixes

3. Security Scans

3.1 Trivy Filesystem Scan ✅

Status: PASSED Task: `Security: Trivy Scan` Command: `.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh security-scan-trivy`

Results:

``` ┌────────────────────────────┬───────┬─────────────────┬─────────┐ │ Target │ Type │ Vulnerabilities │ Secrets │ ├────────────────────────────┼───────┼─────────────────┼─────────┤ │ backend/go.mod │ gomod │ 0 │ - │ │ frontend/package-lock.json │ npm │ 0 │ - │ │ package-lock.json │ npm │ 0 │ - │ │ playwright/.auth/user.json │ text │ - │ 0 │ └────────────────────────────┴───────┴─────────────────┴─────────┘ ```

  • Vulnerabilities: 0
  • Secrets: 0
  • Scanners: vuln, secret
  • Severity: CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM

Verdict: ✅ PASS - No vulnerabilities or secrets found

3.2 Docker Image Scan ❌ CRITICAL FAILURE

Status: FAILED Command: `.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh security-scan-docker-image`

Critical Findings:

Summary:

``` 🔴 Critical: 0 🟠 High: 7 🟡 Medium: 20 🟢 Low: 2 ⚪ Negligible: 380 📊 Total: 409 ```

HIGH Severity Vulnerabilities (BLOCKING):

  1. CVE-2026-0915 in `libc-bin@2.41-12+deb13u1`

    • Description: Calling getnetbyaddr or getnetbyaddr_r with a configured nsswitch.conf
    • Fixed: No fix available
    • CVSS: N/A

  2. CVE-2026-0861 in `libc-bin@2.41-12+deb13u1`

    • Description: Passing too large an alignment to the memalign suite of functions
    • Fixed: No fix available
    • CVSS: N/A

  3. CVE-2025-15281 in `libc-bin@2.41-12+deb13u1`

    • Description: Calling wordexp with WRDE_REUSE in conjunction with WRDE_APPEND
    • Fixed: No fix available
    • CVSS: N/A

  4. CVE-2026-0915 in `libc6@2.41-12+deb13u1`

    • Description: Calling getnetbyaddr or getnetbyaddr_r with a configured nsswitch.conf
    • Fixed: No fix available
    • CVSS: N/A

  5. CVE-2026-0861 in `libc6@2.41-12+deb13u1`

    • Description: Passing too large an alignment to the memalign suite of functions
    • Fixed: No fix available
    • CVSS: N/A

  6. CVE-2025-15281 in `libc6@2.41-12+deb13u1`

    • Description: Calling wordexp with WRDE_REUSE in conjunction with WRDE_APPEND
    • Fixed: No fix available
    • CVSS: N/A

  7. CVE-2025-13151 in `libtasn1-6@4.20.0-2`

    • Description: Stack-based buffer overflow in libtasn1 version: v4.20.0
    • Fixed: No fix available
    • CVSS: N/A

Artifacts Generated:

  • `sbom.cyclonedx.json` - SBOM with 830 packages
  • `grype-results.json` - Detailed vulnerability report
  • `grype-results.sarif` - GitHub Security format

Verdict: ❌ CRITICAL FAILURE - 7 HIGH severity vulnerabilities MUST be resolved

3.3 CodeQL Security Scan ✅

Status: PASSED Command: `.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh security-scan-codeql`

Results:

Go Language:

  • Errors: 0
  • Warnings: 0
  • Notes: 0
  • SARIF Output: `codeql-results-go.sarif`

JavaScript/TypeScript:

  • Errors: 0
  • Warnings: 0
  • Notes: 0
  • Files Scanned: 318 out of 318
  • SARIF Output: `codeql-results-javascript.sarif`

Verdict: ✅ PASS - No security issues detected

4. Linting ✅

4.1 Go Vet ✅

Status: PASSED Task: `Lint: Go Vet` Command: `cd backend && go vet ./...`

Results:

  • No issues reported
  • All packages analyzed successfully

Verdict: ✅ PASS

4.2 Staticcheck (Fast) ✅

Status: PASSED Task: `Lint: Staticcheck (Fast)` Command: `cd backend && golangci-lint run --config .golangci-fast.yml ./...`

Results:

``` 0 issues. ```

Verdict: ✅ PASS

Critical Issues Requiring Remediation

🔴 BLOCKER: Docker Image Vulnerabilities

Issue: 7 HIGH severity vulnerabilities in system libraries

Affected Packages:

  1. `libc-bin@2.41-12+deb13u1` (3 CVEs)
  2. `libc6@2.41-12+deb13u1` (3 CVEs)
  3. `libtasn1-6@4.20.0-2` (1 CVE)

Root Cause: These are Debian base image vulnerabilities with no upstream fixes available yet.

Recommended Actions:

  1. Immediate Options:

    • Wait for Debian security updates for these packages
    • Consider switching to alternative base image (e.g., Alpine, Distroless)
    • Document risk acceptance if vulnerabilities are not exploitable in Charon's context
    • Add vulnerability exceptions with justification in security policy

  2. Risk Assessment Required:

    • Analyze if these libc CVEs are exploitable in Charon's deployment context
    • Check if the application uses the vulnerable functions (getnetbyaddr, memalign, wordexp)
    • Verify libtasn1-6 exposure (ASN.1 parsing)

  3. Mitigation Options:

    • Use runtime security controls (AppArmor, Seccomp) to prevent exploitation
    • Implement network segmentation to reduce attack surface
    • Add monitoring for exploitation attempts

  4. Long-term Strategy:

    • Establish vulnerability exception process
    • Define acceptable risk thresholds
    • Implement automated vulnerability tracking
    • Plan for base image updates/migrations

Test Coverage Analysis

Backend Test Results:

  • Total Coverage: 85.2%
  • Threshold: 85% (minimum)
  • Status: ✅ Meeting minimum requirement by 0.2 percentage points

Recommendations:

  • Consider increasing coverage to create buffer above minimum threshold
  • Target 90% coverage to allow for fluctuations
  • Focus on critical paths and security-sensitive code

Summary of Findings

Passed Checks (6/7):

✅ Backend coverage tests (85.2%) ✅ Pre-commit hooks (all passing) ✅ Trivy filesystem scan (0 vulnerabilities) ✅ CodeQL security scans (0 issues) ✅ Go Vet (no issues) ✅ Staticcheck (0 issues)

Failed Checks (1/7):

❌ Docker image scan (7 HIGH vulnerabilities)

Critical Metrics:

  • Test Coverage: 85.2% ✅
  • Code Quality: No linting issues ✅
  • Source Code Security: No vulnerabilities ✅
  • Image Security: 7 HIGH + 20 MEDIUM vulnerabilities ❌

Approval Status

❌ NOT APPROVED FOR DEPLOYMENT

Reason: The presence of 7 HIGH severity vulnerabilities in the Docker image violates the mandatory security requirements stated in the Definition of Done:

"Zero Critical/High severity vulnerabilities (MANDATORY)"

Next Steps:

  1. REQUIRED: Remediate or risk-accept HIGH severity vulnerabilities
  2. Address MEDIUM severity vulnerabilities where feasible
  3. Document risk acceptance decisions
  4. Re-run security scans after remediation
  5. Obtain security team approval for any exceptions

Artifacts and Evidence

Generated Files:

  • `sbom.cyclonedx.json` - Software Bill of Materials (830 packages)
  • `grype-results.json` - Detailed vulnerability report
  • `grype-results.sarif` - GitHub Security format
  • `codeql-results-go.sarif` - Go security analysis
  • `codeql-results-javascript.sarif` - JavaScript/TypeScript security analysis
  • `backend/coverage.txt` - Backend test coverage report

Scan Logs:

  • All scan outputs captured in task terminals
  • Full Grype scan results available in `grype-results.json`

Recommendations for Next QA Cycle

  1. Security:

    • Establish vulnerability exception process
    • Define risk acceptance criteria
    • Implement automated security scanning in PR checks
    • Consider migrating to more secure base images

  2. Testing:

    • Increase backend coverage threshold to 90%
    • Add integration tests for GORM security fixes
    • Implement E2E security testing

  3. Process:

    • Make Docker image scanning a PR requirement
    • Add security sign-off step to deployment pipeline
    • Create vulnerability remediation SLA policy

Sign-off

QA Security Auditor: GitHub Copilot Date: 2026-01-28 Status: ❌ REJECTED Reason: 7 HIGH severity vulnerabilities in Docker image

Approval Required From:

  • Security Team (vulnerability risk assessment)
  • Engineering Lead (remediation plan approval)
  • Release Manager (deployment decision)

Audit Trail

Timestamp Action Result
2026-01-28 09:49:00 Backend Coverage Tests ✅ PASS (85.2%)
2026-01-28 09:48:00 Pre-commit Hooks ✅ PASS (after auto-fixes)
2026-01-28 09:49:38 Trivy Filesystem Scan ✅ PASS (0 vulnerabilities)
2026-01-28 09:50:00 Docker Image Scan ❌ FAIL (7 HIGH, 20 MEDIUM)
2026-01-28 09:51:00 CodeQL Go Scan ✅ PASS (0 issues)
2026-01-28 09:51:00 CodeQL JS Scan ✅ PASS (0 issues)
2026-01-28 09:51:30 Go Vet ✅ PASS
2026-01-28 09:51:30 Staticcheck ✅ PASS (0 issues)
2026-01-28 09:52:00 QA Report Generated ❌ AUDIT FAILED

End of QA Security Audit Report

Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink