---
post_title: "Definition of Done QA Report"
author1: "Charon Team"
post_slug: "definition-of-done-qa-report-2026-02-10"
microsoft_alias: "charon-team"
featured_image: "https://wikid82.github.io/charon/assets/images/featured/charon.png"
categories: ["testing", "security", "ci"]
tags: ["coverage", "lint", "codeql", "trivy", "grype"]
ai_note: "true"
summary: "Definition of Done validation results, including coverage, security scans, linting, and pre-commit checks."
post_date: "2026-02-10"
---

## Validation Checklist

- Phase 1 - E2E Tests: PASS (provided: notification tests now pass)
- Phase 2 - Backend Coverage: PASS (92.0% statements)
- Phase 2 - Frontend Coverage: FAIL (lines 86.91%, statements 86.4%, functions 82.71%, branches 78.78%; min 88%)
- Phase 3 - Type Safety (Frontend): INCONCLUSIVE (task output did not confirm completion)
- Phase 4 - Pre-commit Hooks: INCONCLUSIVE (output truncated after shellcheck)
- Phase 5 - Trivy Filesystem Scan: INCONCLUSIVE (no vulnerabilities listed in artifacts)
- Phase 5 - Docker Image Scan: ACCEPTED RISK (1 High severity vulnerability; see [docs/security/SECURITY-EXCEPTION-nebula-v1.9.7.md](../security/SECURITY-EXCEPTION-nebula-v1.9.7.md))
- Phase 5 - CodeQL Go Scan: PASS (results array empty)
- Phase 5 - CodeQL JS Scan: PASS (results array empty)
- Phase 6 - Linters: FAIL (markdownlint and hadolint failures)

## Coverage Results

- Backend coverage: 92.0% statements (meets >=85%)
- Frontend coverage: lines 86.91%, statements 86.4%, functions 82.71%, branches 78.78% (below 88% gate)
- Evidence: [frontend/coverage.log](frontend/coverage.log)

## Type Safety (Frontend)

- Task: Lint: TypeScript Check
- Status: INCONCLUSIVE (output did not show completion or errors)

## Pre-commit Hooks (Fast)

- Task: Lint: Pre-commit (All Files)
- Status: INCONCLUSIVE (output ended at shellcheck without final summary)

## Security Scans

- Trivy filesystem scan: INCONCLUSIVE (no vulnerabilities section observed in [frontend/trivy-fs-scan.json](frontend/trivy-fs-scan.json))
- Docker image scan (Grype): ACCEPTED RISK
	- High: 1 (GHSA-69x3-g4r3-p962 in github.com/slackhq/nebula@v1.9.7; fixed in 1.10.3)
	- Evidence: [grype-results.json](grype-results.json), [grype-results.sarif](grype-results.sarif)
	- Exception: [docs/security/SECURITY-EXCEPTION-nebula-v1.9.7.md](../security/SECURITY-EXCEPTION-nebula-v1.9.7.md)
- CodeQL Go scan: PASS (results array empty in [codeql-results-go.sarif](codeql-results-go.sarif))
- CodeQL JS scan: PASS (results array empty in [codeql-results-js.sarif](codeql-results-js.sarif))

## Security Scan Comparison (Trivy vs Docker Image)

- Trivy filesystem artifacts do not list vulnerabilities.
- Docker image scan found 1 High severity vulnerability (accepted risk; see [docs/security/SECURITY-EXCEPTION-nebula-v1.9.7.md](../security/SECURITY-EXCEPTION-nebula-v1.9.7.md)).
- Result: MISMATCH - Docker image scan reveals issues not surfaced by Trivy filesystem artifacts.

## Linting

- Staticcheck (Fast): PASS
- Frontend ESLint: PASS (no errors reported in task output)
- Markdownlint: FAIL (table column spacing in [tests/README.md](tests/README.md#L428-L430))
- Hadolint: FAIL (DL3059 and SC2012 info-level findings; exit code 1)

## Blocking Issues and Remediation

- Frontend coverage below 88% gate. Increase coverage for lines/functions/branches; re-run frontend coverage task.
- Docker image vulnerability GHSA-69x3-g4r3-p962 in github.com/slackhq/nebula@v1.9.7 is an accepted risk; track upstream fixes per [docs/security/SECURITY-EXCEPTION-nebula-v1.9.7.md](../security/SECURITY-EXCEPTION-nebula-v1.9.7.md).
- Markdownlint failures in [tests/README.md](tests/README.md#L428-L430). Fix table spacing and re-run markdownlint.
- Hadolint failures (DL3059, SC2012). Consolidate consecutive RUN instructions and replace ls usage; re-run hadolint.
- TypeScript check and pre-commit status not confirmed. Re-run and capture final pass output.
- Trivy filesystem scan status inconclusive. Re-run and capture a vulnerability summary.

## Verdict

CONDITIONAL

## Validation Notes

- This report is generated with accessibility in mind, but accessibility issues may still exist. Please review and test with tools such as Accessibility Insights.