feat: add nightly branch workflow

2026-01-13 22:11:28 +00:00
parent d27c925ba5
commit 4adcd9eda1
187 changed files with 8897 additions and 1614 deletions
--- a/docs/reports/qa_codeql_ci_alignment.md
+++ b/docs/reports/qa_codeql_ci_alignment.md
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 **Status:** ✅ **APPROVED - ALL TESTS PASSED**

 The CodeQL CI alignment implementation has been **successfully verified** after upgrading CodeQL CLI to v2.23.8. All tests pass:
+
 - ✅ CodeQL scans execute successfully (Go: 79 findings, JS: 105 findings)
 - ✅ SARIF files generated correctly
 - ✅ Uses security-and-quality suite (not security-extended)
@@ -28,11 +29,13 @@ The CodeQL CI alignment implementation has been **successfully verified** after
 ### CodeQL CLI Upgrade

 **Initial State:**
+
 - CodeQL CLI: v2.16.0
 - Query Packs: codeql/go-queries@1.5.2, codeql/javascript-queries@2.2.3
 - **Problem:** Extensible predicate incompatibility

 **Resolution Steps:**
+
 ```bash
 # 1. Attempted upgrade via gh extension
 $ gh codeql set-version latest
@@ -48,6 +51,7 @@ CodeQL command-line toolchain release 2.23.8.
 ```

 **Result:**
+
 - ✅ CodeQL CLI: v2.23.8
 - ✅ Query packs compatible
 - ✅ All scans now functional
@@ -57,12 +61,14 @@ CodeQL command-line toolchain release 2.23.8.
 ## Pre-Testing Fixes

 ### Phase 1: Documentation Fix
+
 - [x] **VERIFIED:** All code blocks in [docs/security/codeql-scanning.md](../security/codeql-scanning.md) already have proper language identifiers
 - [x] Found 8 closing triple backticks (```) without language specifiers - **THIS IS NORMAL**
 - [x] All 8 opening code blocks have correct language identifiers (`bash`, `go`, `typescript`)
 - [x] **RESULT:** No fixes needed - documentation is already correct

 **Evidence:**
+
 ```bash
 # Opening blocks checked at lines: 22, 34, 58, 95, 114, 130, 173, 199
 All have proper language identifiers:
@@ -78,11 +84,13 @@ All have proper language identifiers:
 ### Phase 2: CodeQL Tasks Testing

 #### Test 1: CodeQL Go Scan (CI-Aligned)
+
 **Task:** `Security: CodeQL Go Scan (CI-Aligned) [~60s]`

 **Status:** ✅ **PASS**

 **Results:**
+
 - Database created: `/projects/Charon/codeql-db-go`
 - SARIF file: `codeql-results-go.sarif` (1.5 MB)
 - Query suite: `go-security-and-quality.qls`
@@ -91,6 +99,7 @@ All have proper language identifiers:
 - Execution time: ~60 seconds

 **Finding Categories:**
+
 - Email Injection (CWE-640): 3 instances
 - Server-Side Request Forgery (CWE-918): 2 instances
 - Log Injection (CWE-117): 10 instances
@@ -98,12 +107,14 @@ All have proper language identifiers:
 - Code quality issues: Redundant code, unreachable statements

 **Verification:**
+
 ```bash
 $ jq '.runs[].results | length' codeql-results-go.sarif
 79
 ```

 **Output Sample:**
+
 ```
 Running queries.
 [1/59] Loaded .../Security/CWE-022/ZipSlip.qlx.
@@ -114,17 +125,20 @@ Running queries.
 ```

 **Impact Verified:**
+
 - ✅ Uses `security-and-quality` suite (NOT `security-extended`)
 - ✅ 59 queries executed (matches CI)
 - ✅ SARIF compatible with GitHub Code Scanning
 - ✅ Human-readable summary provided

 #### Test 2: CodeQL JS Scan (CI-Aligned)
+
 **Task:** `Security: CodeQL JS Scan (CI-Aligned) [~90s]`

 **Status:** ✅ **PASS**

 **Results:**
+
 - Database created: `/projects/Charon/codeql-db-js`
 - SARIF file: `codeql-results-js.sarif` (786 KB)
 - Query suite: `javascript-security-and-quality.qls`
@@ -133,18 +147,21 @@ Running queries.
 - Execution time: ~90 seconds

 **Finding Categories:**
+
 - DOM-based XSS (CWE-079): 1 instance (coverage/sorter.js)
 - Incomplete hostname regexp (CWE-020): 4 instances in test files
 - Useless conditional: 19 instances (mostly in dist/ bundles)
 - Code quality issues in minified code

 **Verification:**
+
 ```bash
 $ jq '.runs[].results | length' codeql-results-js.sarif
 105
 ```

 **Output Sample:**
+
 ```
 Running queries.
 [1/202] Loaded .../Security/CWE-022/TaintedPath.qlx.
@@ -156,17 +173,20 @@ CodeQL scanned 267 out of 267 JavaScript/TypeScript files
 ```

 **Impact Verified:**
+
 - ✅ Uses `javascript-security-and-quality` suite
 - ✅ 202 queries executed (matches CI)
 - ✅ Full frontend coverage (267/267 files)
 - ✅ SARIF compatible with GitHub Code Scanning

 #### Test 3: CodeQL All Scan (Combined)
+
 **Task:** `Security: CodeQL All (CI-Aligned)`

 **Status:** ✅ **PASS** (Sequential execution verified)

 **Configuration:**
+
 ```json
 {
  "dependsOn": [
@@ -178,12 +198,14 @@ CodeQL scanned 267 out of 267 JavaScript/TypeScript files
 ```

 **Results:**
+
 - Both dependency tasks executed successfully
 - Total findings: 184 (79 Go + 105 JS)
 - Total execution time: ~150 seconds
 - Both SARIF files generated

 **Verification:**
+
 - ✅ Sequential execution (Go → JS)
 - ✅ No parallel interference
 - ✅ Both SARIF files intact
@@ -193,11 +215,13 @@ CodeQL scanned 267 out of 267 JavaScript/TypeScript files
 ### Phase 3: Pre-Commit Hooks Testing

 #### Test 4: Pre-Commit Fast Hooks
+
 **Command:** `pre-commit run --all-files` (excludes manual-stage hooks)

 **Status:** ✅ **PASS**

 **Results:**
+
 ```
 fix end of files.........................................................Passed
 trim trailing whitespace.................................................Passed
@@ -214,22 +238,26 @@ Frontend Lint (Fix)......................................................Passed
 ```

 **Verification:**
+
 - ✅ All 12 fast hooks passed
 - ✅ CodeQL hooks skipped (stage: manual) as expected
 - ✅ No files blocked
 - ✅ Pre-commit configuration intact

 #### Test 5: CodeQL Pre-Commit Hooks
+
 **Status:** ⏸️ **NOT TESTED** (manual-stage hooks require explicit invocation)

 **Reason:** CodeQL hooks configured with `stages: [manual]` in [.pre-commit-config.yaml](../../.pre-commit-config.yaml)

 **Hooks Available:**
+
 - `codeql-go-scan` - Script: `scripts/pre-commit-hooks/codeql-go-scan.sh`
 - `codeql-js-scan` - Script: `scripts/pre-commit-hooks/codeql-js-scan.sh`
 - `codeql-check-findings` - Script: `scripts/pre-commit-hooks/codeql-check-findings.sh`

 **Manual Invocation (not tested):**
+
 ```bash
 pre-commit run codeql-go-scan --all-files
 pre-commit run codeql-js-scan --all-files
@@ -237,6 +265,7 @@ pre-commit run codeql-check-findings --all-files
 ```

 **Expected Behavior:**
+
 - Would execute CodeQL scans (proven working via tasks)
 - Would validate SARIF files exist
 - Would check for high-severity findings
@@ -250,16 +279,19 @@ pre-commit run codeql-check-findings --all-files
 #### Coverage Tests

 ##### Backend Coverage
+
 **Task:** `Test: Backend with Coverage`

 **Status:** ✅ **PASS**

 **Results:**
+
 - **Total Coverage:** 85.35%
 - **Threshold:** 85%
 - **Result:** ✅ **MEETS REQUIREMENT**

 **Coverage Breakdown:**
+
 ```
 cmd/api:                0.0%    (main package - expected)
 cmd/seed:              62.5%    (seed utility)
@@ -272,21 +304,25 @@ internal/utils:        89.88%   (utilities)
 ```

 **Test Summary:**
+
 - All tests: PASS
 - Zero failures
 - Coverage report: `backend/coverage.txt`

 ##### Frontend Coverage
+
 **Task:** `Test: Frontend with Coverage`

 **Status:** ✅ **PASS**

 **Results:**
+
 - **Total Coverage:** 87.74%
 - **Threshold:** 85%
 - **Result:** ✅ **MEETS REQUIREMENT**

 **Coverage Breakdown:**
+
 ```
 src/api:              91.83%   (API clients)
 src/components:       80.74%   (UI components)
@@ -298,16 +334,19 @@ src/utils:            96.49%   (Utility functions)
 ```

 **Test Summary:**
+
 - All tests: PASS
 - Zero failures
 - Coverage report: `frontend/coverage/`

 #### Type Safety Check
+
 **Task:** `Lint: TypeScript Check`

 **Status:** ✅ **PASS**

 **Results:**
+
 ```bash
 $ cd frontend && npm run type-check
 > tsc --noEmit
@@ -316,6 +355,7 @@ $ cd frontend && npm run type-check
 ```

 **Verification:**
+
 - ✅ Zero TypeScript errors
 - ✅ All type definitions valid
 - ✅ No implicit any violations
@@ -324,6 +364,7 @@ $ cd frontend && npm run type-check
 #### Security Scans

 ##### Trivy Scan
+
 **Task:** `Security: Trivy Scan`

 **Status:** ✅ **PASS** (previously executed)
@@ -331,6 +372,7 @@ $ cd frontend && npm run type-check
 **Last Scan:** December 18, 2025

 **Results:**
+
 - Output: `trivy-scan-output.txt` (246 KB)
 - Image scan: `trivy-image-scan.txt` (12 KB)
 - Findings: Dependencies reviewed, no critical blockers
@@ -342,11 +384,13 @@ $ cd frontend && npm run type-check
 ### Phase 5: CI-Local Alignment Verification

 #### Test 7: Query Suite Comparison
+
 **Status:** ✅ **VERIFIED**

 **Configuration Analysis:**

 **Go Task:**
+
 ```bash
 --format=sarif-latest
 --sarif-category=go
@@ -355,6 +399,7 @@ codeql/go-queries:codeql-suites/go-security-and-quality.qls
 ```

 **JavaScript Task:**
+
 ```bash
 --format=sarif-latest
 --sarif-category=javascript
@@ -363,6 +408,7 @@ codeql/javascript-queries:codeql-suites/javascript-security-and-quality.qls
 ```

 **Verification:**
+
 - ✅ Both tasks use `security-and-quality` suite
 - ✅ NOT using `security-extended` suite
 - ✅ Matches CI workflow configuration
@@ -370,6 +416,7 @@ codeql/javascript-queries:codeql-suites/javascript-security-and-quality.qls
 - ✅ 202 JavaScript queries executed

 **CI Workflow Comparison:**
+
 ```yaml
 # .github/workflows/codeql.yml
 queries: +security-and-quality
@@ -378,9 +425,11 @@ queries: +security-and-quality
 **Result:** ✅ **ALIGNED** - Local and CI use identical query suites

 #### Test 8: SARIF Analysis
+
 **Status:** ✅ **VERIFIED**

 **Artifacts Generated:**
+
 ```bash
 $ ls -lh *.sarif
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.5M Dec 24 13:23 codeql-results-go.sarif
@@ -388,6 +437,7 @@ $ ls -lh *.sarif
 ```

 **SARIF Validation:**
+
 ```bash
 $ jq '.runs[].results | length' codeql-results-go.sarif codeql-results-js.sarif
 79
@@ -395,6 +445,7 @@ $ jq '.runs[].results | length' codeql-results-go.sarif codeql-results-js.sarif
 ```

 **SARIF Structure:**
+
 - ✅ Valid JSON format
 - ✅ SARIF v2.1.0 schema
 - ✅ Contains run metadata
@@ -405,14 +456,17 @@ $ jq '.runs[].results | length' codeql-results-go.sarif codeql-results-js.sarif
 **Finding Distribution:**

 **Go (79 findings):**
+
 - Security: 15 findings (CWE-640, CWE-918, CWE-117)
 - Quality: 64 findings (redundant code, missing checks)

 **JavaScript (105 findings):**
+
 - Security: 5 findings (XSS, incomplete validation)
 - Quality: 100 findings (useless conditionals, code quality)

 **Verification:**
+
 - ✅ SARIF files contain expected fields
 - ✅ Findings categorized by severity
 - ✅ Source locations included
@@ -429,16 +483,19 @@ $ jq '.runs[].results | length' codeql-results-go.sarif codeql-results-js.sarif
 **Resolution Method:** CodeQL CLI upgraded to v2.23.8

 **Original Problem:**
+
 - CodeQL CLI v2.16.0 incompatible with query packs v1.5.2
 - Extensible predicate errors blocking all scans

 **Solution Applied:**
+
 ```bash
 gh codeql set-version latest  # Downloaded v2.23.8
 sudo ln -sf /root/.local/share/gh/extensions/gh-codeql/dist/release/v2.23.8/codeql /usr/local/bin/codeql
 ```

 **Verification:**
+
 - ✅ CodeQL version: v2.23.8
 - ✅ Query packs compatible
 - ✅ All scans functional
@@ -454,10 +511,12 @@ sudo ln -sf /root/.local/share/gh/extensions/gh-codeql/dist/release/v2.23.8/code
 **Resolution Date:** December 24, 2025

 **Original Problem:**
+
 - Backend coverage test output interrupted by CodeQL errors
 - Unable to verify coverage threshold

 **Resolution:**
+
 - After CodeQL fix, backend coverage test completed successfully
 - **Result:** 85.35% coverage (threshold: 85%) ✅ **PASS**
 - Frontend coverage: 87.74% (threshold: 85%) ✅ **PASS**
@@ -474,11 +533,13 @@ sudo ln -sf /root/.local/share/gh/extensions/gh-codeql/dist/release/v2.23.8/code

 **Description:**
 Supervisor reported "8 code blocks missing language identifiers". Investigation revealed this is a **false positive**:
+
 - 8 instances of ``` found at lines 30, 46, 64, 104, 124, 136, 177, 202
 - ALL are **closing** triple backticks (normal Markdown syntax)
 - ALL **opening** blocks have correct language identifiers

 **Evidence:**
+
 ```bash
 $ awk '/^```$/ {print NR": closing at", NR}' docs/security/codeql-scanning.md
 30: closing
@@ -538,6 +599,7 @@ Based on plan review and file checks:
 ### Code Quality Assessment

 **Configuration Correctness:**
+
 - ✅ Tasks use `codeql/go-queries:codeql-suites/go-security-and-quality.qls`
 - ✅ Tasks use `codeql/javascript-queries:codeql-suites/javascript-security-and-quality.qls`
 - ✅ Correct pack reference format (not hardcoded paths)
@@ -546,6 +608,7 @@ Based on plan review and file checks:
 - ✅ Human-readable fallback with jq

 **Implementation Completeness:**
+
 - ✅ Phase 1: Task alignment - COMPLETE
 - ✅ Phase 2: Pre-commit integration - COMPLETE
 - ❓ Phase 3: CI/CD enhancements - NOT VERIFIED
@@ -577,34 +640,34 @@ Based on plan review and file checks:

 ### 📋 Follow-Up Actions (Recommended)

-4. **Document CodeQL Version Requirements**
+1. **Document CodeQL Version Requirements**
   - Add minimum version (v2.17.0+) to README or docs
   - Add version check to pre-commit hooks
   - Fail gracefully with helpful error message if version too old

-5. **CI Alignment Verification (Post-Merge)**
+2. **CI Alignment Verification (Post-Merge)**
   - Compare local SARIF with CI SARIF after next push
   - Verify query suite matches (59 Go, 202 JS queries)
   - Confirm findings are identical or explain differences

-6. **Performance Benchmarking**
+3. **Performance Benchmarking**
   - Go scan: ~60s (matches specification ✅)
   - JS scan: ~90s (matches specification ✅)
   - Combined scan: ~150s (sequential execution)

 ### 🚀 Future Improvements (Optional)

-7. **Enhanced CI Integration**
+1. **Enhanced CI Integration**
   - Verify codeql-issue-reporter workflow (if created)
   - Test automatic issue creation for new findings
   - Test PR blocking on high-severity findings

-8. **Developer Experience Enhancements**
+2. **Developer Experience Enhancements**
   - Create VS Code launch config for debugging CodeQL queries
   - Add CodeQL extension to IDE recommendations
   - Document SARIF Viewer extension setup in README

-9. **False Positive Management**
+3. **False Positive Management**
   - Document suppression syntax for known false positives
   - Create triage process for new findings
   - Maintain baseline of accepted findings
@@ -614,12 +677,14 @@ Based on plan review and file checks:
 ## Appendix A: Environment Details

 ### System Information
+
 - **OS:** Linux (srv599055)
 - **CodeQL CLI:** v2.23.8 ✅ (upgraded from v2.16.0)
 - **CodeQL Location:** `/root/.local/share/gh/extensions/gh-codeql/dist/release/v2.23.8`
 - **Query Packs Location:** `~/.codeql/packages/codeql/`

 ### Installed Packages (Post-Upgrade)
+
 ```
 codeql/go-queries@1.5.2 (compatible with v2.23.8)
 codeql/javascript-queries@2.2.3 (compatible with v2.23.8)
@@ -628,6 +693,7 @@ codeql/javascript-all
 ```

 ### Version Compatibility ✅
+
 - CLI: v2.23.8 (December 2024)
 - Query Packs: 1.5.2 / 2.2.3
 - **Status:** ✅ COMPATIBLE
@@ -638,6 +704,7 @@ codeql/javascript-all
 ## Appendix B: Test Execution Log

 ### Test 1 Output (Success - Go Scan)
+
 ```
 🔍 Creating CodeQL database for Go...
 Successfully created database at /projects/Charon/codeql-db-go.
@@ -662,6 +729,7 @@ CodeQL scanned 118 out of 295 Go files in this invocation.
 ```

 ### Test 2 Output (Success - JS Scan)
+
 ```
 🔍 Creating CodeQL database for JavaScript...
 Successfully created database at /projects/Charon/codeql-db-js.
@@ -684,6 +752,7 @@ CodeQL scanned 267 out of 267 JavaScript/TypeScript files.
 ```

 ### Files Generated ✅
+
 ```bash
 $ ls -lh *.sarif codeql-db-*/
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.5M Dec 24 13:23 codeql-results-go.sarif
@@ -703,6 +772,7 @@ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root  4.0K diagnostic/
 ```

 ### Coverage Test Results ✅
+
 ```
 Backend Coverage: 85.35% (threshold: 85%) ✅ PASS
 Frontend Coverage: 87.74% (threshold: 85%) ✅ PASS
@@ -720,28 +790,33 @@ Pre-Commit Hooks: ✅ PASS (12/12 fast hooks)
 The CodeQL CI alignment implementation is **complete, tested, and verified**. After resolving the initial CodeQL version incompatibility (v2.16.0 → v2.23.8), all tests pass successfully:

 **✅ Core Functionality:**
+
 - CodeQL Go scan: 79 findings, 59 queries, ~60s
 - CodeQL JS scan: 105 findings, 202 queries, ~90s
 - SARIF files: Valid, GitHub-compatible, 2.4 MB total
 - Query suite: `security-and-quality` (CI-aligned)

 **✅ Quality Gates:**
+
 - Backend coverage: 85.35% (≥85% required)
 - Frontend coverage: 87.74% (≥85% required)
 - TypeScript check: Zero errors
 - Pre-commit hooks: 12/12 fast hooks passing

 **✅ CI Alignment:**
+
 - Same query suites as CI workflows
 - Same SARIF format and structure
 - Same execution parameters

 **✅ Documentation:**
+
 - Comprehensive guide at [docs/security/codeql-scanning.md](../security/codeql-scanning.md)
 - All code blocks properly formatted
 - Usage examples for tasks and pre-commit hooks

 **Completion Criteria:**
+
 - [x] Fix CodeQL version incompatibility → v2.23.8 ✅
 - [x] Verify all CodeQL scans complete successfully → 79 + 105 findings ✅
 - [x] Verify SARIF files generated correctly → 2 files, valid JSON ✅
@@ -752,11 +827,13 @@ The CodeQL CI alignment implementation is **complete, tested, and verified**. Af
 - [x] Verify implementation aligns with CI → Confirmed ✅

 **Known Findings (Not Blockers):**
+
 - 79 Go findings: Mostly code quality issues, 15 security (email injection, SSRF, log injection)
 - 105 JS findings: Mostly code quality in minified bundles, 5 security (XSS, validation)
 - Findings are expected and triaged - not blocking production

 **Implementation Quality:** ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)
+
 - Excellent code structure following implementation plan
 - Correct CI alignment with security-and-quality suite
 - Comprehensive documentation with examples
@@ -768,6 +845,7 @@ The CodeQL CI alignment implementation is **complete, tested, and verified**. Af
 ---

 **Next Steps:**
+
 1. Merge implementation to main branch
 2. Monitor CI workflows for alignment validation
 3. Consider implementing recommended improvements (version checks, false positive management)