chore: git cache cleanup
This commit is contained in:
237
docs/plans/archive/revert_ci_pipeline.md
Normal file
237
docs/plans/archive/revert_ci_pipeline.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,237 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Revert CI Pipeline Consolidation"
|
||||
status: "draft"
|
||||
scope: "ci/workflows, integration, e2e, security"
|
||||
notes: Restore per-workflow pull_request triggers, retire ci-pipeline.yml, and reestablish self-contained image builds.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
This plan dismantles the consolidated CI pipeline and restores individual
|
||||
pull_request triggers for component workflows. The goal is to return to a
|
||||
simple, independent workflow model where each integration or test workflow
|
||||
runs on PRs without relying on a central pipeline or shared image artifacts.
|
||||
|
||||
Objectives:
|
||||
|
||||
- Identify workflows that had pull_request triggers removed or were merged
|
||||
into ci-pipeline.yml.
|
||||
- Restore per-workflow pull_request triggers for integration, E2E, and
|
||||
build workflows.
|
||||
- Delete ci-pipeline.yml as the required path to retire the consolidated
|
||||
pipeline.
|
||||
- Ensure each workflow is self-contained for image availability.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Research Findings
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.1 Current Consolidated Pipeline
|
||||
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/ci-pipeline.yml](.github/workflows/ci-pipeline.yml)
|
||||
runs on pull_request and bundles lint, image build, integration tests,
|
||||
E2E, coverage, CodeQL, Trivy, supply-chain scans, and gates.
|
||||
- The pipeline builds and uploads an image artifact for integration and
|
||||
uses e2e-tests-split.yml via workflow_call.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.2 Integration Workflows (Current State)
|
||||
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/cerberus-integration.yml](.github/workflows/cerberus-integration.yml): workflow_dispatch only.
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/crowdsec-integration.yml](.github/workflows/crowdsec-integration.yml): workflow_dispatch only.
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/waf-integration.yml](.github/workflows/waf-integration.yml): workflow_dispatch only.
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/rate-limit-integration.yml](.github/workflows/rate-limit-integration.yml): workflow_dispatch only.
|
||||
- Each workflow currently pulls a registry image and tags it as
|
||||
charon:local. There is no pull_request trigger and no local build step.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.3 E2E Workflows (Current State)
|
||||
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/e2e-tests-split.yml](.github/workflows/e2e-tests-split.yml): workflow_call +
|
||||
workflow_dispatch only. No pull_request trigger.
|
||||
- The build job can build an image locally when invoked directly, but
|
||||
the file is currently only invoked by ci-pipeline.yml.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.4 Build Workflow (Current State)
|
||||
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/docker-build.yml](.github/workflows/docker-build.yml): workflow_dispatch only.
|
||||
- This workflow is designed to be the main build pipeline but is not
|
||||
currently triggered by pull_request.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.5 Security Workflows (Current State)
|
||||
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/security-pr.yml](.github/workflows/security-pr.yml): workflow_dispatch only.
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/supply-chain-pr.yml](.github/workflows/supply-chain-pr.yml): workflow_dispatch only.
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/codeql.yml](.github/workflows/codeql.yml): schedule + workflow_dispatch only.
|
||||
- These workflows include logic for push and pull_request contexts but
|
||||
their triggers do not include pull_request.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.6 Historical Reference
|
||||
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml.backup](.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml.backup) and
|
||||
[.github/workflows/e2e-tests-split.yml.backup](.github/workflows/e2e-tests-split.yml.backup) show prior pull_request
|
||||
trigger patterns and path filters that can be restored.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Technical Specifications
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.1 Workflow Inventory and Trigger Restoration
|
||||
|
||||
Target workflows to restore pull_request triggers:
|
||||
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/docker-build.yml](.github/workflows/docker-build.yml)
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/cerberus-integration.yml](.github/workflows/cerberus-integration.yml)
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/crowdsec-integration.yml](.github/workflows/crowdsec-integration.yml)
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/waf-integration.yml](.github/workflows/waf-integration.yml)
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/rate-limit-integration.yml](.github/workflows/rate-limit-integration.yml)
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/e2e-tests-split.yml](.github/workflows/e2e-tests-split.yml)
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/security-pr.yml](.github/workflows/security-pr.yml)
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/supply-chain-pr.yml](.github/workflows/supply-chain-pr.yml)
|
||||
- [.github/workflows/codeql.yml](.github/workflows/codeql.yml) (decision point)
|
||||
|
||||
Notes:
|
||||
|
||||
- e2e-tests-split.yml should run directly on pull_request with the
|
||||
internal build job enabled, not only via workflow_call.
|
||||
- security-pr.yml and supply-chain-pr.yml must include pull_request
|
||||
triggers so security coverage is not lost.
|
||||
- codeql.yml needs a decision: re-enable pull_request in codeql.yml or
|
||||
leave CodeQL in a separate PR workflow. The consolidated pipeline is
|
||||
currently the only PR CodeQL path.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.2 ci-pipeline.yml Decommission Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Decision:
|
||||
|
||||
- Option A (required): delete ci-pipeline.yml to fully end the
|
||||
consolidated pipeline and avoid duplicate PR checks.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.3 Image Availability Strategy (Critical Challenge)
|
||||
|
||||
Independent PR workflows cannot rely on a shared image from another
|
||||
workflow unless using artifacts or a registry. The user wants to avoid
|
||||
pipeline complexity.
|
||||
|
||||
Required behavior for each integration workflow:
|
||||
|
||||
- Restore the "Build Docker image (Local)" step in each integration
|
||||
workflow, reverting any artifact handover dependency.
|
||||
- Build a local Docker image within the workflow before tests run.
|
||||
- Tag the image as charon:local for consistency with existing scripts.
|
||||
- Avoid external registry dependency for PR builds.
|
||||
|
||||
Impacted workflows:
|
||||
|
||||
- cerberus-integration.yml
|
||||
- crowdsec-integration.yml
|
||||
- waf-integration.yml
|
||||
- rate-limit-integration.yml
|
||||
|
||||
E2E workflows:
|
||||
|
||||
- e2e-tests-split.yml already supports building an image locally when
|
||||
invoked directly. Ensure pull_request triggers route through this path
|
||||
(not workflow_call).
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.4 Pull Request Trigger Scope and Path Filters
|
||||
|
||||
- Use branch filters consistent with prior backups and docker-build.yml
|
||||
usage: main, development, feature/**, hotfix/**.
|
||||
- Apply path filters for E2E to avoid unnecessary runs:
|
||||
frontend/**, backend/**, tests/**, playwright.config.js,
|
||||
.github/workflows/e2e-tests-split.yml.
|
||||
- Integration workflows typically run on any backend/frontend changes.
|
||||
Consider adding path filters if desired, but default to full PR runs
|
||||
for parity with previous behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.5 Dependency and Concurrency Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Remove workflow_run coupling to docker-build.yml for integration and
|
||||
E2E workflows. Each workflow should be independently triggered by
|
||||
pull_request.
|
||||
- Keep job-level concurrency where it prevents duplicate runs on the
|
||||
same PR, but avoid cross-workflow dependencies.
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Implementation Plan
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Baseline Verification (Tests)
|
||||
|
||||
- Confirm current CI behavior for PRs: identify which checks are now
|
||||
only running via ci-pipeline.yml.
|
||||
- Capture baseline PR check set from GitHub Actions UI for comparison
|
||||
after restoration.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Restore PR Triggers (Core Workflows)
|
||||
|
||||
- Add pull_request triggers to docker-build.yml with branches including
|
||||
main and development.
|
||||
- Add pull_request triggers to cerberus-integration.yml,
|
||||
crowdsec-integration.yml, waf-integration.yml, and
|
||||
rate-limit-integration.yml.
|
||||
- Add pull_request triggers to e2e-tests-split.yml, using the backup
|
||||
trigger block as the source of truth.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Make Integration Workflows Self-Contained
|
||||
|
||||
- Restore the "Build Docker image (Local)" step in each integration
|
||||
workflow and remove dependency on ci-pipeline.yml artifacts.
|
||||
- Remove registry pull steps or make them optional for manual runs.
|
||||
- Ensure test scripts continue to reference charon:local.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Security Workflow Triggers
|
||||
|
||||
- Add pull_request triggers to security-pr.yml and supply-chain-pr.yml
|
||||
as a mandatory requirement to preserve PR security coverage.
|
||||
- Decide on CodeQL: either add pull_request to codeql.yml or create a
|
||||
dedicated PR CodeQL workflow. If the pipeline is deleted, CodeQL must
|
||||
have an alternative PR trigger.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 5: Decommission ci-pipeline.yml
|
||||
|
||||
- Delete ci-pipeline.yml.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 6: Validation and Audit
|
||||
|
||||
- Verify that PRs show the restored individual checks instead of a
|
||||
single pipeline job.
|
||||
- Confirm each integration workflow completes without relying on
|
||||
registry or artifact inputs and includes the restored local build step.
|
||||
- Validate E2E workflow runs directly on pull_request with build job
|
||||
executed locally.
|
||||
- Confirm security workflows run on pull_request.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Acceptance Criteria (EARS)
|
||||
|
||||
- WHEN a pull_request is opened or updated, THE SYSTEM SHALL trigger
|
||||
docker-build.yml directly on pull_request for main and development.
|
||||
- WHEN a pull_request is opened or updated, THE SYSTEM SHALL trigger
|
||||
cerberus-integration.yml, crowdsec-integration.yml, waf-integration.yml,
|
||||
and rate-limit-integration.yml on pull_request.
|
||||
- WHEN an integration workflow runs on pull_request, THE SYSTEM SHALL
|
||||
restore and run the "Build Docker image (Local)" step, build a local
|
||||
Docker image, and tag it as charon:local before tests.
|
||||
- WHEN a pull_request is opened or updated, THE SYSTEM SHALL trigger
|
||||
e2e-tests-split.yml directly on pull_request without relying on
|
||||
ci-pipeline.yml.
|
||||
- WHEN the consolidated pipeline is retired, THE SYSTEM SHALL NOT run
|
||||
ci-pipeline.yml on pull_request.
|
||||
- WHEN a pull_request is opened or updated, THE SYSTEM SHALL run
|
||||
security-pr.yml and supply-chain-pr.yml on pull_request.
|
||||
- WHEN CodeQL is required for pull_request, THE SYSTEM SHALL run a
|
||||
CodeQL workflow on pull_request independent of ci-pipeline.yml.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Risks and Mitigations
|
||||
|
||||
- Risk: PR checks increase in parallel count and runtime.
|
||||
Mitigation: use path filters for E2E and consider optional filters
|
||||
for integration workflows.
|
||||
- Risk: Image build duplication increases CI cost.
|
||||
Mitigation: keep builds scoped to workflows that need the image, and
|
||||
avoid registry pushes for PR builds.
|
||||
- Risk: Security scans or CodeQL no longer run on PR if triggers are
|
||||
not restored.
|
||||
Mitigation: explicitly re-enable PR triggers in security workflows
|
||||
or add a dedicated PR security workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Confidence Score
|
||||
|
||||
Confidence: 82 percent
|
||||
|
||||
Rationale: The workflow inventory and trigger gaps are clear. The main
|
||||
uncertainty is selecting the final CodeQL and security trigger model
|
||||
once ci-pipeline.yml is removed.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user