chore: git cache cleanup
This commit is contained in:
GitHub Actions
616
docs/plans/archive/PHASE_4_UAT_INTEGRATION_PLAN.md
Normal file
616
docs/plans/archive/PHASE_4_UAT_INTEGRATION_PLAN.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,616 @@
|
||||
# Phase 4: UAT & Integration Testing Plan
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** February 10, 2026
|
||||
**Status:** READY FOR EXECUTION ✅
|
||||
**Confidence Level:** 85% (based on Phase 2-3 baseline + test creation complete)
|
||||
**Estimated Duration:** 2-3 hours (execution only; test writing completed)
|
||||
**Test Coverage:** 110 comprehensive test cases (70 UAT + 40 integration)
|
||||
**Test Files Status:** ✅ All test suites created and ready in `/tests/phase4-*/`
|
||||
**Note:** Regression tests (CVE/upstream dependency tracking) handled by CI security jobs, not Phase 4 UAT
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 4 is the final validation milestone before production beta release. This plan provides:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **User Acceptance Testing (UAT)** - 70 real-world workflow tests validating that end-users can perform all major operations
|
||||
2. **Integration Testing** - 40 multi-component tests ensuring system components work together correctly
|
||||
3. **Production Readiness** - Final checklists and go/no-go gates before beta launch
|
||||
|
||||
**Note on Security Regression Testing:** CVE tracking and upstream dependency regression testing is handled by dedicated CI jobs (Trivy scans, security integration tests run with modules enabled). Phase 4 UAT focuses on feature validation with security modules disabled for isolated testing.
|
||||
|
||||
### Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ All 70 UAT tests passing (core workflows functional)
|
||||
- ✅ All 40 integration tests passing (components working together)
|
||||
- ✅ Zero CRITICAL/HIGH security vulnerabilities (Trivy scan)
|
||||
- ✅ Production readiness checklist 100% complete
|
||||
- ✅ Performance metrics within acceptable ranges
|
||||
- ✅ Documentation updated and complete
|
||||
|
||||
### Go/No-Go Decision
|
||||
|
||||
| Outcome | Criteria | Action |
|
||||
|---------|----------|--------|
|
||||
| **GO** | All tests passing, zero CRITICAL/HIGH vulns, checklist complete | Proceed to beta release |
|
||||
| **CONDITIONAL** | Minor issues found (non-blocking tests), easy remediation | Fix issues, retest, then GO |
|
||||
| **NO-GO** | Critical security issues, major test failures, architectural problems | Stop, remediate, restart Phase 4 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Assessment & Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
### TOP 3 IDENTIFIED RISKS
|
||||
|
||||
#### Risk #1: Test Implementation Delay → **RESOLVED ✅**
|
||||
- **Status:** All 110 test files created and ready (70 UAT + 40 integration)
|
||||
- **Previous Impact:** Could extend Phase 4 from 3-5 hours → 18-25 hours
|
||||
- **Mitigation Applied:** Pre-write all test suites before Phase 4 execution
|
||||
- **Current Impact:** ZERO - Tests ready to run
|
||||
|
||||
#### Risk #2: Security Module Regression (Handled by CI)
|
||||
- **Status:** MITIGATED - Delegated to CI security jobs
|
||||
- **Impact:** Phase 3 security modules could be broken by future changes
|
||||
- **Mitigation:**
|
||||
1. Dedicated CI jobs test security with modules **enabled**: `cerberus-integration.yml`, `waf-integration.yml`, `rate-limit-integration.yml`, `crowdsec-integration.yml`
|
||||
2. CVE tracking and upstream dependency changes monitored by Trivy + security scanning
|
||||
3. Phase 4 UAT runs with security modules **disabled** for isolated feature testing
|
||||
4. Security regression detection: Automated by CI pipeline, not Phase 4 responsibility
|
||||
- **Monitoring:** CI security jobs run on each commit; Phase 4 focuses on feature validation
|
||||
|
||||
#### Risk #3: Concurrency Issues Missed by Low Test Concurrency
|
||||
- **Status:** MITIGATED - Increased concurrency levels
|
||||
- **Impact:** Production race conditions not caught in testing
|
||||
- **Mitigation Applied:** Updated INT-407, INT-306 to use 20+ and 50+ concurrent operations respectively
|
||||
- **Current Status:** Updated in integration test files (INT-407: 2→20, INT-306: 5→50)
|
||||
|
||||
### STOP-AND-INVESTIGATE TRIGGERS
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
IF UAT tests <80% passing THEN
|
||||
PAUSE and categorize failures:
|
||||
- CRITICAL (auth, login, core ops): Fix immediately, re-test
|
||||
- IMPORTANT (features): Documented as known issue, proceed
|
||||
- MINOR (UI, formatting): Noted for Phase 5, proceed
|
||||
END IF
|
||||
|
||||
IF Integration tests have race condition failures THEN
|
||||
Increase concurrency further, re-run
|
||||
May indicate data consistency issue
|
||||
END IF
|
||||
|
||||
IF ANY CRITICAL or HIGH security vulnerability discovered THEN
|
||||
STOP Phase 4
|
||||
Remediate vulnerability
|
||||
Re-run security scan
|
||||
Do NOT proceed until 0 CRITICAL/HIGH
|
||||
END IF
|
||||
|
||||
IF Response time >2× baseline (e.g., Login >300ms vs <150ms baseline) THEN
|
||||
INVESTIGATE:
|
||||
- Database performance issue
|
||||
- Memory leak during test
|
||||
- Authentication bottleneck
|
||||
Optimize and re-test
|
||||
END IF
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Performance Baselines
|
||||
|
||||
### Target Response Times (Critical Paths)
|
||||
|
||||
| Endpoint | Operation | Target (P99) | Measurement Method | Alert Threshold |
|
||||
|----------|-----------|--------------|-------------------|------------------|
|
||||
| `/api/v1/auth/login` | Authentication | <150ms | Measure request → response | >250ms (fail) |
|
||||
| `/api/v1/users` | List users | <250ms | GET with pagination | >400ms (investigate) |
|
||||
| `/api/v1/proxy-hosts` | List proxies | <250ms | GET with pagination | >400ms (investigate) |
|
||||
| `/api/v1/users/invite` | Create user invite | <200ms | Was 5-30s; verify async | >300ms (regressed) |
|
||||
| `/api/v1/domains` | List domains | <300ms | GET full list | >500ms (investigate) |
|
||||
| `/api/v1/auth/refresh` | Token refresh | <50ms | POST to refresh endpoint | >150ms (investigate) |
|
||||
| Backup Operation | Create full backup | <5min | Time from start → complete | >8min (investigate) |
|
||||
| Restore Operation | Restore from backup | <10min | Time from restore → operational | >15min (investigate) |
|
||||
|
||||
### Resource Usage Baselines
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | Target | Max Alert | Measurement |
|
||||
|--------|--------|-----------|-------------|
|
||||
| Memory Usage | <500MB steady | >750MB | `docker stats charon-e2e` during tests |
|
||||
| CPU Usage (peak) | <70% | >90% | `docker stats` or `top` in container |
|
||||
| Database Size | <1GB | >2GB | `du -sh /var/lib/postgresql` |
|
||||
| Disk I/O | Normal patterns | >80% I/O wait | `iostat` during test |
|
||||
|
||||
### Measurement Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// In each test, measure response time:
|
||||
const start = performance.now();
|
||||
const response = await page.request.get('/api/v1/users');
|
||||
const duration = performance.now() - start;
|
||||
console.log(`API Response time: ${duration.toFixed(2)}ms`);
|
||||
|
||||
// Expected: ~100-250ms
|
||||
// Alert if: >400ms
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Regression Detection
|
||||
|
||||
**If any metric exceeds baseline by 2×:**
|
||||
1. Run again to rule out transient slowdown
|
||||
2. Check system load (other containers running?)
|
||||
3. Profile: Database query slowness? API endpoint issue? Network latency?
|
||||
4. If confirmed regression: Stop Phase 4, optimize, re-test
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Browser Testing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Scope & Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 4 Browser Coverage: Firefox ONLY (Primary QA Browser)**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Browser Testing Strategy:
|
||||
├── Regression Tests (Phase 2.3 + 3)
|
||||
│ └── Firefox only (API-focused, not browser-specific)
|
||||
│ └── Rationale: Security/performance tests, browser variant not critical
|
||||
│
|
||||
├── UAT Tests (User workflows)
|
||||
│ └── Firefox only (primary user flow validation)
|
||||
│ └── Rationale: Test coverage in hours; multi-browser testing deferred to Phase 5
|
||||
│ └── Exception: Top 5 critical UAT tests (login, user create, proxy create, backup, security)
|
||||
│ may spot-check on Chrome if time permits
|
||||
│
|
||||
├── Integration Tests (Component interactions)
|
||||
│ └── Firefox only (API-focused, data consistency tests)
|
||||
│ └── Rationale: Not visual/rendering tests; browser independence assumed
|
||||
│
|
||||
└── NOT in Phase 4 scope (defer to Phase 5):
|
||||
├── Chrome (Chromium-based compliance)
|
||||
├── Safari/WebKit (edge cases, rendering)
|
||||
├── Mobile browser testing
|
||||
└── Low-bandwidth scenarios
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Execution Command
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 4 Test Execution (Firefox only):**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
cd /projects/Charon
|
||||
echo "Step 1: Rebuild E2E environment"
|
||||
.github/skills/scripts/skill-runner.sh docker-rebuild-e2e
|
||||
|
||||
echo "Step 2: Run regression tests"
|
||||
npx playwright test tests/phase4-regression/ --project=firefox
|
||||
|
||||
echo "Step 3: Run UAT tests"
|
||||
npx playwright test tests/phase4-uat/ --project=firefox
|
||||
|
||||
echo "Step 4: Run integration tests (serial for concurrency tests)"
|
||||
npx playwright test tests/phase4-integration/ --project=firefox --workers=1
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Why NOT Multi-Browser in Phase 4?
|
||||
|
||||
| Reason | Justification | Timeline Impact |
|
||||
|--------|---------------|------------------|
|
||||
| **Time constraint** | 145 tests × 3 browsers = 435 test runs (would extend 3-5 hr to 9-15 hrs) | Would exceed Phase 4 window |
|
||||
| **Test focus** | UAT/Integration are functional, not rendering-specific | Browser variance minimal for these tests |
|
||||
| **CI/CD already validates** | `.github/workflows/` runs multi-browser tests post-Phase4 | Redundant in Phase 4 |
|
||||
| **MVP scope** | Phase 4 is feature validation, Phase 5 is cross-browser hardening | Proper sequencing |
|
||||
| **Production**: Phase 5 will include| Chrome/Safari spot-checks + full multi-browser CI | Comprehensive coverage post-Phase 4 |
|
||||
|
||||
### If Additional Browsers Needed:
|
||||
|
||||
**Chrome spot-check (5 critical tests only):**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# ONLY if Phase 4 ahead of schedule:
|
||||
npx playwright test tests/phase4-uat/02-user-management.spec.ts --project=chromium
|
||||
npx playwright test tests/phase4-uat/03-proxy-host-management.spec.ts --project=chromium
|
||||
npx playwright test tests/phase4-uat/07-backup-recovery.spec.ts --project=chromium
|
||||
npx playwright test tests/phase4-integration/01-admin-user-e2e-workflow.spec.ts --project=chromium
|
||||
npx playwright test tests/phase4-regression/phase-3-security-gates.spec.ts --project=chromium
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**WebKit (NOT recommended for Phase 4):** Deferred to Phase 5
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Updated Test File Locations
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Files Created & Ready ✅
|
||||
|
||||
**Location:** `/projects/Charon/tests/phase4-*/`
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
tests/
|
||||
├── phase4-uat/ (70 UAT tests, 8 feature areas)
|
||||
│ ├── 01-admin-onboarding.spec.ts (8 tests)
|
||||
│ ├── 02-user-management.spec.ts (10 tests)
|
||||
│ ├── 03-proxy-host-management.spec.ts (12 tests)
|
||||
│ ├── 04-security-configuration.spec.ts (10 tests)
|
||||
│ ├── 05-domain-dns-management.spec.ts (8 tests)
|
||||
│ ├── 06-monitoring-audit.spec.ts (8 tests)
|
||||
│ ├── 07-backup-recovery.spec.ts (9 tests)
|
||||
│ ├── 08-emergency-operations.spec.ts (5 tests)
|
||||
│ └── README.md
|
||||
│
|
||||
├── phase4-integration/ (40 integration tests, 7 scenarios)
|
||||
│ ├── 01-admin-user-e2e-workflow.spec.ts (7 tests)
|
||||
│ ├── 02-waf-ratelimit-interaction.spec.ts (5 tests)
|
||||
│ ├── 03-acl-waf-layering.spec.ts (4 tests)
|
||||
│ ├── 04-auth-middleware-cascade.spec.ts (6 tests)
|
||||
│ ├── 05-data-consistency.spec.ts (8 tests)
|
||||
│ ├── 06-long-running-operations.spec.ts (5 tests)
|
||||
│ ├── 07-multi-component-workflows.spec.ts (5 tests)
|
||||
│ └── README.md
|
||||
|
||||
TOTAL: 110 tests ready to execute
|
||||
NOTES:
|
||||
- Security/CVE regression testing (Phase 2.3 fixes, Phase 3 gates) handled by CI jobs
|
||||
- Trivy scans and security integration tests run on each commit with modules enabled
|
||||
- Phase 4 focuses on feature UAT and data consistency with security modules disabled
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Execution Order
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 4 tests should execute in this order to catch issues early:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **UAT Tests** (70 tests) - ~60-90 min
|
||||
- ✅ Admin Onboarding (8 tests) - ~10 min
|
||||
- ✅ User Management (10 tests) - ~15 min
|
||||
- ✅ Proxy Hosts (12 tests) - ~20 min
|
||||
- ✅ Security Configuration (10 tests) - ~15 min
|
||||
- ✅ Domain Management (8 tests) - ~15 min
|
||||
- ✅ Monitoring & Audit (8 tests) - ~10 min
|
||||
- ✅ Backup & Recovery (9 tests) - ~15 min
|
||||
- ✅ Emergency Operations (5 tests) - ~8 min
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Integration Tests** (40 tests) - ~45-60 min
|
||||
- Multi-component workflows
|
||||
- Data consistency verification
|
||||
- Long-running operations
|
||||
- Error handling across layers
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Production Readiness Checklist** - ~30 min
|
||||
- Manual verification of 45 checklist items
|
||||
- Documentation review
|
||||
- Security spot-checks
|
||||
|
||||
**Note:** Phase 2.3 fixes and Phase 3 security gates are validated by CI security jobs (run with security modules enabled), not Phase 4 UAT.
|
||||
|
||||
### Parallelization Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
To reduce total execution time, run independent suites in parallel where possible:
|
||||
|
||||
**Can Run Parallel:**
|
||||
- UAT suites are independent (no data dependencies)
|
||||
- Different user roles can test simultaneously
|
||||
- Integration tests can run after UAT
|
||||
- Regression tests must run first (sequential)
|
||||
|
||||
**Must Run Sequential:**
|
||||
- Phase 2.3 regression (validates state before other tests)
|
||||
- Phase 3 regression (validates state before UAT)
|
||||
- Auth/user tests before authorization tests
|
||||
- Setup operations before dependent tests
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended Parallelization:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Phase 2.3 Regression [████████████] 15 min (sequential)
|
||||
Phase 3 Regression [████████████] 10 min (sequential)
|
||||
UAT Suite A & B [████████████] 50 min (parallel, 2 workers)
|
||||
UAT Suite C & D [████████████] 50 min (parallel, 2 workers)
|
||||
Integration Tests [████████████] 60 min (4 parallel suites)
|
||||
─────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
Total Time: ~90 min (vs. 225 min if fully sequential)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Real-Time Monitoring
|
||||
|
||||
Monitor these metrics during Phase 4 execution:
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | Target | Action if Failed |
|
||||
|--------|--------|------------------|
|
||||
| Test Pass Rate | >95% | Stop, investigate failure |
|
||||
| API Response Time | <200ms p99 | Check performance, DB load |
|
||||
| Error Rate | <0.1% | Check logs for errors |
|
||||
| Security Events Blocked | >0 (if attacked) | Verify WAF/ACL working |
|
||||
| Audit Log Entries | >100 per hour | Check audit logging active |
|
||||
| Memory Usage | <500MB | Monitor for leaks |
|
||||
| Database Size | <1GB | Check for unexpected growth |
|
||||
|
||||
### Success/Fail Decision Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
**PASS (Proceed to Beta):**
|
||||
- ✅ All Phase 2.3 regression tests passing
|
||||
- ✅ All Phase 3 regression tests passing
|
||||
- ✅ ≥95% of UAT tests passing (≥48-76 of 50-80)
|
||||
- ✅ ≥90% of integration tests passing (≥27-45 of 30-50)
|
||||
- ✅ Trivy: 0 CRITICAL, 0 HIGH (in app code)
|
||||
- ✅ Production readiness checklist ≥90% complete
|
||||
- ✅ No data corruption or data loss incidents
|
||||
|
||||
**CONDITIONAL (Review & Remediate):**
|
||||
- ⚠️ 80-95% of tests passing, but non-blocking issues
|
||||
- ⚠️ 1-2 MEDIUM vulnerabilities (reviewable, documented)
|
||||
- ⚠️ Minor documentation gaps (non-essential for core operation)
|
||||
- **Action:** Fix issues, rerun affected tests, re-evaluate
|
||||
|
||||
**FAIL (Do Not Proceed):**
|
||||
- ❌ <80% of tests passing (indicates major issues)
|
||||
- ❌ CRITICAL or HIGH security vulnerabilities (in app code)
|
||||
- ❌ Data loss or corruption incidents
|
||||
- ❌ Auth/authorization not working
|
||||
- ❌ WAF/security modules not enforcing
|
||||
- **Action:** Stop Phase 4, remediate critical issues, restart from appropriate phase
|
||||
|
||||
### Escalation Procedure
|
||||
|
||||
If tests fail, escalate in this order:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Developer Review** (30 min)
|
||||
- Identify root cause in failure logs
|
||||
- Determine if fix is quick (code change) or structural
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Architecture Review** (if needed)
|
||||
- Complex failures affecting multiple components
|
||||
- Potential architectural issues
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Security Review** (if security-related)
|
||||
- WAF/ACL/rate limit failures
|
||||
- Authentication/authorization issues
|
||||
- Audit trail gaps
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Product Review** (if feature-related)
|
||||
- Workflow failures that affect user experience
|
||||
- Missing features or incorrect behavior
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline & Resource Estimate
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4 Timeline (2-3 hours)
|
||||
|
||||
| Phase | Task | Duration | Resources |
|
||||
|-------|------|----------|-----------|
|
||||
| 1 | Rebuild E2E environment (if needed) | 5-10 min | 1 QA engineer |
|
||||
| 2 | Run UAT test suite (70 tests) | 60-90 min | 2 QA engineers (parallel) |
|
||||
| 3 | Run integration tests (40 tests) | 45-60 min | 2 QA engineers (parallel) |
|
||||
| 4 | Production readiness review | 30 min | Tech lead + QA |
|
||||
| 5 | Documentation & final sign-off | 20 min | Tech lead |
|
||||
| **TOTAL** | **Phase 4 Complete** | **2-3 hours** | **2 QA + 1 Tech Lead** |
|
||||
|
||||
### Resource Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- **QA Engineers:** 2 (for parallel test execution)
|
||||
- **Tech Lead:** 1 (for review and go/no-go decisions)
|
||||
- **Infrastructure:** Docker environment, CI/CD system
|
||||
- **Tools:** Playwright, test reporters, monitoring tools
|
||||
|
||||
### Pre-Phase 4 Preparation (1 hour)
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Review Phase 2.3 fix details (crypto, async email, token refresh)
|
||||
- [ ] Review Phase 3 security test infrastructure
|
||||
- [ ] Prepare production readiness checklist
|
||||
- [ ] Set up test monitoring and alerting
|
||||
- [ ] Create test failure log templates
|
||||
- [ ] Brief team on Phase 4 plan
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Go/No-Go Decision Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision Authority
|
||||
|
||||
- **Phase 4 Authorization:** Technical Lead (sole authority)
|
||||
- **Escalation:** Product Manager (if contested)
|
||||
- **Final Approval:** Engineering Manager
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
#### Criteria 1: Test Pass Rates
|
||||
|
||||
| Test Category | Phase | Pass Rate | Decision |
|
||||
|---------------|-------|-----------|----------|
|
||||
| Regression | 2.3 | 100% | **GO** |
|
||||
| Regression | 3 | 100% | **GO** |
|
||||
| UAT | 4 | ≥95% | **GO** |
|
||||
| Integration | 4 | ≥90% | **GO** |
|
||||
| All Combined | - | ≥92% | **GO** |
|
||||
| All Combined | - | 80-92% | **CONDITIONAL** |
|
||||
| All Combined | - | <80% | **NO-GO** |
|
||||
|
||||
#### Criteria 2: Security Vulnerabilities
|
||||
|
||||
| Severity | App Code | Dependencies | Decision |
|
||||
|----------|----------|--------------|----------|
|
||||
| CRITICAL | 0 allowed | 0 allowed | **REQUIRED** |
|
||||
| HIGH | 0 allowed | Document & review | **REQUIRED** |
|
||||
| MEDIUM | Assess risk | Acceptable | **OK** |
|
||||
| LOW | Acceptable | Acceptable | **OK** |
|
||||
|
||||
#### Criteria 3: Production Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Items Complete | Status |
|
||||
|----------|-----------------|--------|
|
||||
| Deployment | ≥13/15 | **GO** |
|
||||
| Documentation | ≥10/12 | **GO** |
|
||||
| Security | 10/10 | **REQUIRED** |
|
||||
| Performance | ≥6/8 | **CONDITIONAL** |
|
||||
| Release | 10/10 | **REQUIRED** |
|
||||
|
||||
#### Criteria 4: Data Integrity
|
||||
|
||||
| Aspect | Status | Decision |
|
||||
|--------|--------|----------|
|
||||
| No data loss | ✅ Verified | **GO** |
|
||||
| No data corruption | ✅ Verified | **GO** |
|
||||
| Backups working | ✅ Verified | **GO** |
|
||||
| Restore successful | ✅ Verified | **GO** |
|
||||
| User isolation intact | ✅ Verified | **GO** |
|
||||
|
||||
### Sample Decision Scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
**Scenario 1: All Tests Pass, No Issues**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Phase 2.3 Regression: 20/20 ✅
|
||||
Phase 3 Regression: 15/15 ✅
|
||||
UAT: 75/80 (93%) ✅
|
||||
Integration: 48/50 (96%) ✅
|
||||
Security Scan: 0 CRITICAL, 0 HIGH ✅
|
||||
Checklist: 44/45 items ✅
|
||||
Data Integrity: All verified ✅
|
||||
───────────────────────────
|
||||
DECISION: ✅ GO FOR BETA RELEASE
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Scenario 2: Few UAT Failures, No Security Issues**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Phase 2.3 Regression: 20/20 ✅
|
||||
Phase 3 Regression: 15/15 ✅
|
||||
UAT: 68/80 (85%) ⚠️ (7 failures non-blocking)
|
||||
Integration: 45/50 (90%) ✅
|
||||
Security Scan: 0 CRITICAL, 0 HIGH ✅
|
||||
Checklist: 42/45 items ⚠️
|
||||
Data Integrity: All verified ✅
|
||||
───────────────────────────
|
||||
DECISION: 🟡 CONDITIONAL
|
||||
Action: Fix 7 failing UAT tests, verify no regressions, re-run
|
||||
Expected: 1-2 hours remediation, then GO
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Scenario 3: Security Module Failure**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Phase 2.3 Regression: 20/20 ✅
|
||||
Phase 3 Regression: 12/15 ❌ (ACL tests failing)
|
||||
UAT: 60/80 (75%) ❌
|
||||
Integration: 25/50 (50%) ❌
|
||||
Security Scan: 2 CRITICAL (crypto issue) ❌
|
||||
───────────────────────────
|
||||
DECISION: ❌ NO-GO
|
||||
Action: STOP Phase 4
|
||||
- Investigate crypto issue (Phase 2.3 regression)
|
||||
- Fix security module (Phase 3)
|
||||
- Re-run regression tests
|
||||
- Potentially restart Phase 4
|
||||
Timeline: +4-8 hours
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Appendix
|
||||
|
||||
### A. Test Execution Commands
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Run all tests (sequential)
|
||||
cd /projects/Charon
|
||||
npx playwright test tests/phase3/ --project=firefox
|
||||
|
||||
# Run specific test category
|
||||
npx playwright test tests/phase3/security-enforcement.spec.ts --project=firefox
|
||||
|
||||
# Run with debug output
|
||||
npx playwright test --debug
|
||||
|
||||
# Generate HTML report
|
||||
npx playwright show-report
|
||||
|
||||
# Run with specific browser
|
||||
npx playwright test --project=chromium
|
||||
npx playwright test --project=webkit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### B. Key Test Files Locations
|
||||
|
||||
- **Phase 2.3 Regression:** `/projects/Charon/tests/phase3/security-enforcement.spec.ts`
|
||||
- **Phase 3 Regression:** `/projects/Charon/tests/phase3/*.spec.ts`
|
||||
- **UAT Tests:** `/projects/Charon/tests/phase4-uat/` (to be created)
|
||||
- **Integration Tests:** `/projects/Charon/tests/phase4-integration/` (to be created)
|
||||
- **Test Utilities:** `/projects/Charon/tests/utils/`
|
||||
- **Fixtures:** `/projects/Charon/tests/fixtures/`
|
||||
|
||||
### C. Infrastructure Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**Docker Container:**
|
||||
- Image: `charon:local` (built before Phase 4)
|
||||
- Ports: 8080 (app), 2019 (Caddy admin), 2020 (emergency)
|
||||
- Environment: `.env` with required variables
|
||||
|
||||
**CI/CD System:**
|
||||
- GitHub Actions or equivalent
|
||||
- Docker support
|
||||
- Test result publishing
|
||||
- Artifact storage
|
||||
|
||||
**Monitoring:**
|
||||
- Real-time test progress tracking
|
||||
- Error log aggregation
|
||||
- Performance metrics collection
|
||||
- Alert configuration
|
||||
|
||||
### D. Failure Investigation Template
|
||||
|
||||
When a test fails, use this template to document investigation:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Test ID: [e.g., UAT-001]
|
||||
Test Name: [e.g., "Login page loads"]
|
||||
Failure Time: [timestamp]
|
||||
Environment: [docker/local/ci]
|
||||
Browser: [firefox/chrome/webkit]
|
||||
|
||||
Expected Result: [e.g., "Login form displayed"]
|
||||
Actual Result: [e.g., "404 Not Found"]
|
||||
|
||||
Error logs: [relevant logs from playwright reporter]
|
||||
|
||||
Root Cause Analysis:
|
||||
- [ ] Code defect
|
||||
- [ ] Test environment issue
|
||||
- [ ] Test flakiness/race condition
|
||||
- [ ] Environment variable missing
|
||||
- [ ] Dependency issue (API down, DB locked, etc.)
|
||||
|
||||
Proposed Fix: [action to resolve]
|
||||
Risk Assessment: [impact of fix]
|
||||
Remediation Time: [estimate]
|
||||
|
||||
Sign-off: [investigator] at [time]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
- **Phase 2 Report:** [docs/reports/PHASE_2_FINAL_APPROVAL.md](docs/reports/PHASE_2_FINAL_APPROVAL.md)
|
||||
- **Phase 3 Report:** [docs/reports/PHASE_3_FINAL_VALIDATION_REPORT.md](docs/reports/PHASE_3_FINAL_VALIDATION_REPORT.md)
|
||||
- **Current Spec:** [docs/plans/current_spec.md](docs/plans/current_spec.md)
|
||||
- **Security Instructions:** [.github/instructions/security-and-owasp.instructions.md](.github/instructions/security-and-owasp.instructions.md)
|
||||
- **Testing Instructions:** [.github/instructions/testing.instructions.md](.github/instructions/testing.instructions.md)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Sign-Off
|
||||
|
||||
**Document Status:** READY FOR TEAM REVIEW & APPROVAL
|
||||
|
||||
| Role | Name | Date | Signature |
|
||||
|------|------|------|-----------|
|
||||
| Technical Lead | [TO BE ASSIGNED] | 2026-02-10 | ☐ |
|
||||
| QA Lead | [TO BE ASSIGNED] | 2026-02-10 | ☐ |
|
||||
| Product Manager | [TO BE ASSIGNED] | 2026-02-10 | ☐ |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Version:** 1.0
|
||||
**Last Updated:** February 10, 2026
|
||||
**Next Review:** Upon Phase 4 initiation or when significant changes occur
|
||||
**Document Location:** `/projects/Charon/docs/plans/PHASE_4_UAT_INTEGRATION_PLAN.md`
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user